Log in
Leeds researchers first proposed and tested the concept of a pharmacist-led clinical medication review and showed its effectiveness in care homes. This led to a collaborative study on medicines' safety in care homes which showed seven out of ten residents, on any one day, had at least one medication error. As a direct result, there was a ministerial-led summit, and the Department of Health (DH) issued a `Health Alert' requiring NHS trusts to take immediate action, citing the study findings. This was followed by several national initiatives to take forward the recommendations of the study, including a DH commissioned initiative involving Royal Colleges, the National Care Forum, the Health Foundation and Age UK. Prototype tools developed on the basis of our research and with Leeds input were reported in 2012 and are now being evaluated for national roll out.
Two major national studies, conducted by staff in the Unit and colleagues from a number of other institutions, provide the most comprehensive estimate to date of the prevalence of prescribing errors in general practice in England. These studies identified a number of strategies for reducing these prescribing errors that have been endorsed by the General Medical Council (GMC). Other impacts from these studies include increased public understanding and debate through media coverage, changes to GP education to be implemented by the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP), improvements to computerised prescribing decision support for general practitioners and increased awareness of the medication safety role of primary care pharmacists.
Our research has: i) increased public and professional knowledge and understanding of the prevalence, nature and causes of prescribing errors in general practices; ii) led the General Medical Council to recommend improvements to GP education and training; iii) led to the Royal College of General Practitioners to revise its curriculum to increase the emphasis on safe prescribing; iv) led one of the major GP computer system suppliers to make safety improvements; v) identified an IT-based intervention that is effective at reducing prescribing errors; vi) led to the roll-out of the intervention in over 800 general practices.
Our ground-breaking research has driven major changes in non-medical prescribing (NMP) legislation. As a result of our research, over 19,000 nurses and 2,000 pharmacists now independently prescribe medicines directly to patients across the most comprehensive range of medicines in the world. This amounts to four million prescriptions per year in England. NMP has improved the quality and efficiency of health care: patients can now access prescribed medicines faster and NMP has reduced the number of professionals required. Study results have also contributed significantly to a recent extension of independent prescribing powers to physiotherapists and podiatrists. Our research is widely cited in international NMP policy development, and our survey methods and evaluation measures are used to assess NMP quality and safety internationally.
Research undertaken on prescribing strategy by the Centre for Medicines Optimisation (School of Pharmacy) is embedded in NHS policy for medicines management. Keele's bespoke reports for the West Midlands Region provided the template for national performance management of primary care prescribing. Linked educational outreach studies established the use of community pharmacists as change agents. Both of these approaches are referenced in separate National Audit Office reports. In addition, Keele piloted risk sharing between pharmaceutical companies and the NHS, now adapted in DH Joint Working Guidelines and NICE policy. Their work on effective shared care is referenced in the 2013 GMC guidance on good practice in prescribing. These principles have been adapted for their WHO government level reports.
Patient safety research from Manchester Pharmacy School at the University of Manchester (UoM) has reduced prescription errors in primary and secondary care. Pharmacists using our indicators with patients' electronic health records (aimed at preventing drug-related morbidity in general practices) reduced the odds of prescribing and monitoring problems by at least 22%. These indicators are now incorporated into `medicines optimisation' software for general practice computer systems. The EQUIP study led changes in the recommended design of hospital prescription charts, an annual national assessment of prescribing competence of medical students and the employment of extra hospital pharmacists to prevent the 9% of prescriptions with errors from harming patients.