Antiepileptic Drug (AED) Safety in Pregnancy - epidemiological surveillance of congenital anomalies (birth defects)
Submitting Institution
University of UlsterUnit of Assessment
Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and PharmacySummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Summary of the impact
(1) Enhancing the awareness of (i) women of childbearing age suffering
from epilepsy and
prescribed new and/or older generation AEDs, and (ii) their healthcare
professionals. Empowering
both to make informed decisions through evidence-based practice that
will reduce/prevent the risk
of harm to unborn children potentially exposed to AEDs in early
pregnancy.
(2) A change in the process by which GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) practices
post-marketing
epidemiological surveillance of the new generation AED `lamotrigine' in
pregnancy.
(3) Benefit to the methodological practice of other researchers in
Europe involved with AEDs and
epidemiological surveillance
(4) Contribution to building European system for reproductive safety
evaluation
Underpinning research
The EU-funded European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies network
(EUROCAT), is
coordinated and led by Professor Dolk since 2000. Surveillance to
ensure early detection of new
teratogens (i.e. birth defect causing exposures) originated following the
thalidomide tragedy when
thousands of children were born with limb defects due to a medication used
in early pregnancy.
EUROCAT population-based registries (42 in 23 European countries covering
1.7M births
annually) annually transmit a dataset to a central database (Centre for
Maternal, Fetal and Infant
Research, Institute of Nursing and Health Research, University of Ulster)
where quality validation,
and epidemiologic surveillance and research are conducted relating to
causes and prevention. This
case study concentrates on AED safety in pregnancy. Maria Loane
leads EUROCAT Central
Database Management and Surveillance since 2002. Professor Lolkje de
Jong van den Berg, led
until recently the Medication Safety in Pregnancy Working Group, and
collaborates closely on
related research.
For newly licensed medications, safety information is limited to
pre-marketing animal studies (with
limited ability to predict harm in human pregnancy), since pregnant women
are excluded from
clinical trials. Post-marketing surveillance (pharmacovigilance) is
essential for early detection of
safety concerns, particularly difficult for birth defects due to the
rarity of cases. Very large study
populations are needed to provide sufficient statistical power. This
research is relevant to
regulatory decisions regarding medication safety and product safety
information, and to clinical
decision making regarding risk and benefit of treatment options.
The research output relates to case-control studies performed 2007-2009
using EUROCAT data to
address hypotheses (or evaluate signals) from the literature regarding
teratogenicity of AEDs (new
-lamotrigine[1] and old - valproic acid[2]/carbamazepine[3])).
An AED database was created for this
referring to 3.9M births (19 registries, 1995-2005) including 98,075
livebirths, stillbirths or
terminations with birth defects.
(i) The lamotrigine study[1] responded to a signal
indicating an over 10-fold raised risk of orofacial
clefts associated with lamotrigine, from the North American AED cohort.
The study did not support
the original signal, nor have subsequent updates[4].
(ii) Valproic acid was known to be teratogenic, but which birth
defects were specifically associated
was unknown as reports include chance associations. 7 of 14 birth defects
suggested in the
literature were confirmed as significantly associated with valproic acid
exposure, with up to 13-fold
risk. This is the first study to specifically identify types of birth
defect caused, with implications
beyond clinical practice to elucidating teratogenic mechanisms of action[2].
(iii) The carbamazepine study proceeded as for valproic acid, and
in contrast confirmed only one
significantly associated birth defect - spina bifida, with a much less
raised risk than for valproic
acid[3].
EUROCAT Guide 1.3: Instructions for the Registration of congenital
anomalies[5], a methodological
guide developed by a process of consultation and consensus for EUROCAT
research and
surveillance, includes standardised congenital anomaly inclusion/exclusion
criteria and
classification and coding, used in the AED studies and all other EUROCAT
studies, and available
to other researchers in this field. This Guide also introduced the
International Anatomic
Therapeutic Classification coding of medication exposure for EUROCAT data,
which, after a period
of training and data source validation, has enabled the subsequent AED
research.
Details of the Research Team
Professor Dolk (Professor of Epidemiology and Health Services Research)
since 2000.
Maria Loane, Public Health Lecturer since 2002.
Visiting Professor of Pharmacoepidemiology, Lolkje de Jong van den Berg
since 2010.
References to the research
Impact factors (IFs), citation reports, related funding, and google
analytics have been included as quality indicators of the underpinning
research.
1. Dolk H, Jentink J, Loane M, Morris J, de Jong-van den Berg LTW and on
behalf of the
EUROCAT AED Working Group (2008), Does lamotrigine use in pregnancy
increase orofacial cleft
risk relative to other malformations? Neurology,71, 714-722
Output: listed in REF2, IF: 8.312, Citations: 52 non-self citations in
Scopus.
2. Jentink J, Loane M, Dolk H, Barisic I, Garne E, Morris J, de Jong-van
den Berg L for the
EUROCAT Antepileptic Study Working Group (2010), Valproic Acid Monotherapy
in Pregnancy
and Major Congenital Malformations, The New England Journal of
Medicine, 362, 2185-2193
URL: http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa0907328,
IF: 53.298, Citations: 54 non-self
citations in Scopus
3. Jentink J, Dolk H, Loane M, Morris JK, Wellesley D, Garne E, de
Jong-van den Berg L for the
EUROCAT Antiepileptic Study Working Group (2010), Intrauterine Exposure to
Carbamazepine
and Specific Congenital Malformations: Systematic Review and Case-Control
Study, British
Medical Journal, 341, c6581
URL: http://www.bmj.com/content/341/bmj.c6581.pdf%2Bhtml,
IF: 14.093, Citations: 19 non-self
citations in Scopus
4. Wang H, Garne E, Loane M, Dolk H, Morris JK, de Jong-van den Berg L
(2012), Lamotrigine
Use in Pregnancy and Risk of Orofacial Cleft, an Update. Poster
presentation at The International
Society of Pharmacoepidemiology's 28th International Conference on
Pharmacoepidemiology and
Therapeutic Risk Management, August 2012, Barcelona, Spain URL:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pds.3324/pdf
abstract 691 (page 321)
Googleopen search: 103 results
Grant awarded to: Prof Helen Dolk, University of Ulster
Title: A case control study of isolated orofacial clefts and in
utero exposure to lamotrigine
Sponsor: GSK Research and Development Ltd Period: Jan
2007-June 2007 Value: £252,745.00
Grant awarded to: Prof Helen Dolk, co-ordinating centre University
of Ulster
Title: EUROCAT Sponsor: The EU Public Health Programme of
the European Commission
Period: September 2007 to August 2010 Value: €1,469,480
GSK asked for continuation of the studies through updates - indicator
of quality.
Grant awarded to: Prof Helen Dolk, University of Ulster
Title: A case control study of isolated orofacial clefts and in
utero exposure to lamotrigine
Sponsor: GSK Research and Development Ltd Period: April
2009 to Dec 2013 Value: £451,250
This grant was awarded on the strength of our surveillance activities,
including pharmacovigilance.
Grant awarded to: Prof Helen Dolk, co-ordinating centre University
of Ulster
Title: EUROCAT Joint Action Sponsor: The European
Commission's Public Health Programme
Period: Jan 2011 to Dec 2013 Value: €3,313,001 received by
the co-ordinating centre and then
distributed to be managed locally by associate partners (University of
Ulster component €538,238).
Awarded on the strength of the AED pilot studies made possible through
the above grants.
Who the grant was awarded to: Prof Helen Dolk, co-ordinating centre
University of Ulster
Title: EUROmediCAT: Safety of Medication use in Pregnancy in
Relation to Risk of Congenital
Malformations Sponsor: European Union's 7th Framework
Programme
Period: 1st March 2011 to 28th February 2015
Value: €2,996,100.00
Details of the impact
The WHO recognises "The Importance of Pharmacovigilance - Safety
Monitoring of Medicinal
Products" for impacting drug regulation, clinical practice and
international health
(http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js4893e/).
Pharmacovigilance imparts an impact by
empowerment and reassurance through knowledge. Negative results (results
not supporting a
signal regarding medication risk) are as important as positive results,
but the impacts are less
demonstrable, and do not attract media attention. In 2006, the European
Medicines Agency
adopted a guideline on "The exposure to medicinal products during
pregnancy: Need for post-
authorisation data". Within, EUROCAT is listed as a source of information
for human pregnancy
data collected post-authorisation (pg 9)
(http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Regulatory_and_procedural_guideline/2
009/11/WC500011303.pdf). Our research does not and should not stand
alone. It is a component
of the wider global pharmacovigilance agenda.
Evidence of impact described as:
1. Enhancing awareness of women of childbearing age suffering from
epilepsy and
prescribed AEDs, and their Healthcare Professionels (HCPs), empowering
both to make
informed decisions through evidence-based practice that will
reduce/prevent the risk of
teratogenic harm to unborn children potentially exposed to AEDs.
The valproic acid study[2] based on birth defect information
of nearly 4M births had visibility in a
high impact medical journal (NEJM) and in media (Source 1). The
reemphasis and further
clarification and quantification of the known teratogenicity, was an
important part of changing
awareness and practice. The lamotrigine study[1] which was
largely negative was also important in
helping women/HCPs make optimal medication choices based on updated
patient information
(Source 2).
Our research has been included in systematic reviews which inform
evidence-based practice
(Source 3) for women with epilepsy, but also with bipolar disorder, now
a more common indication
for use of some AEDs.
Contribution to Medscape, Motherisk and Patient.co.uk -
authoritative, trusted, accessible
online information for pregnant women/HCPs regarding the safety/risk to
the developing foetus
associated with maternal exposure to drugs. Rigorous literature
reviewing allows rapid integration
of new practice-changing evidence, such as our research on carbamazepine
and lamotrigine
(Source 4).
2. A change in the process by which GSK practices post-marketing
pharmacovigilance in
relation to lamotrigine
In 2006, based on a signal from emerging data of the North American AED
Pregnancy Registry,
GSK alerted HCPs to a possible association of lamotrigine exposure with
orofacial clefts. A US
Federal Drugs Agency (FDA) warning followed
(http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/u
cm126225.htm). GSK, FDA, UK Medicines and Health Regulatory Agency
(MHRA) and European
regulators (EMA) revised patient information, and agreed new research
was needed to
independently confirm this finding. GSK approached Prof. Dolk (2006) to
establish the possibility of
funding feasibility research by EUROCAT (Source 5). EUROCAT offered more
appropriate and
powerful observational research methods (Source 2, 6 and 7), than
heretofore possible using the
GSK run International Lamotrigine Pregnancy Registry (1992-2010) The
results of the EUROCAT
research that ensued were disseminated by confidential report to GSK
(Source 8) and scientific
paper[1]. GSK shared the results with regulators who endorsed
a revision to the core safety
information provided in the Pregnancy and Lactation section of GSKs
Global Data Sheet for
lamotrigine, by insertion of - "A case control study did not
demonstrate an increased risk of oral
clefts compared to other defects following exposure to lamotrigine"
(Source 2). Based on our data,
the regulators expressed an interest in monitoring a potential signal
for club foot and lamotrigine
(Source 2), a study now underway (http://www.eurocat-network.eu/content/Poster-Lamotrigine-
Mejnartowicz.pdf) within the GSK-funded research. Following
closure of GSK's Registry, Prof.
Harden, Director of Comprehensive Epilepsy Care Center, published a
commentary explaining its
replacement by further use of EUROCAT data (Source 9).
3. Benefit to the practice of other researchers in Europe.
EUROCAT guidelines[5] are utilised as the gold standard
methodology by others when conducting
research into birth defects and AEDs and are helping overcome
non-comparability between studies
(Source 10). Another important impact is strengthening the system of
signal generation and signal
evaluation in AED pharmacovigilance among research groups worldwide,
such that signals
generated by one research study are evaluated by one or more others, as
our methodology clearly
adheres to and has promoted this approach. An indirect impact of this
research is that, in order to
ensure scientific independence and transparency in industry-sponsored
research, Prof Dolk
chaired, for four years to 2012, the European Medicines Agency Working
Group which developed
a Code of Conduct for Scientific Independence and Transparency
(http://www.encepp.eu/documents/encepp_studies/ENCePP%20Code%20of%20Conduct_201005
07.pdf).
4. Sustainable Impact
These studies were the first to use EUROCAT data for investigation of
specific drugs. Since then
we have had many queries from pharmaceutical companies/researchers
requesting
data/information on other medications. A PhD student at the
University has analysed the
EUROCAT data in relation to antidepressant safety; an ongoing GSK funded
study continues to
study lamotrigine [4]. EUROmediCAT is looking further at
newer generation AEDs, insulin analogs,
antidepressants and antiasthmatic drugs, is testing new methodologies
and has a wider aim of
building a European system for reproductive safety evaluation.
Sources to corroborate the impact
Source 1a) - Text of the Valproic Acid Press Release. Available at
http://www.eurocat-
network.eu/content/Press-2010-Valproic.pdf
b) Details of 19 media articles
Source 2 - A statement from GSK (contact details listed in REF3b).
Source 3 A list of systematic reviews (of relevance to
AEDs/epilepsy/bipolar disorder) in peer-
reviewed journals that the listed research outputs have been included in.
Source 4 a) Articles on Medscape/Patient.co.uk that included the
carbamazepine paper:
Neurological Disease & Pregnancy, Seizure Disorders in Pregnancy,
Neural Tube Defects, Spina
Bifida b) Motherisk.org Is carbamazepine safe to take during
pregnancy? Perinatal exposure to
maternal lamotrigine - Clinical considerations for the mother and child
Source 5 - Copy of an Email
From: (Manager of Epidemiology at GlaxoSmithKline in 2006) Sent: 15 May
2006 10:08 To: Prof.
Helen Dolk Cc: Prof. Lolkje de Jong van den Berg Subject: Use of EUROCAT
for monitoring
lamotrigine and specific defects
Source 6 - GlaxoSmithKline International (2010). The Lamotrigine
Pregnancy Registry: Final
Report - 1 September 1992 through 31 March 2010 (see pgs 4, 36, 37, 43 and
45). Available at:
http://pregnancyregistry.gsk.com/documents/lam_spring_2010_final_report.pdf
Source 7 - Cunnington MC et al. (2011). Final results from 18
years of the International
Lamotrigine Pregnancy Registry, Neurology, 76, 1817-1823 (see pg 1821)
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821ccd18.
Source 8 - EUROCAT 4th Report for GSK (CONFIDENTIAL)
Source 9 - Harden CL (2011). Complete the Following Statement: Industry-Sponsored
Antiepileptic
Drug Pregnancy Registries Provide Information that is Beneficial to:
Patients, Doctors,
The Sponsor, All of the Above, None of the Above, Cannot Respond Due to
Risk of COI. Epilepsy
Currents, 11,181-183. Available at:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3220421/pdf/i1535-7511-11-6-181.pdf
Source 10 - Publications citing EUROCAT Guide 1.3 in their
methodology sections as basis for
defining and classifying major birth defects a) Molgaard-Nielsen D
and Hviid A (2011). Newer-
generation AEDs and the risk of major birth defects. JAMA, 305, 1996-2002;
b) Morrow J et al.
(2006). Malformation risks of antiepileptic drugs in pregnancy: a
prospective study from the UK
Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 77,
193-198.
c) list of other known publications recovered from Google search.