Gravity-wave parametrization in weather forecast and climate models
Submitting Institution
University of CambridgeUnit of Assessment
Mathematical SciencesSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Mathematical Sciences: Pure Mathematics
Earth Sciences: Oceanography
Engineering: Maritime Engineering
Summary of the impact
    The Warner-McIntyre parametrization scheme for non-topographic
      atmospheric gravity waves,
      developed at the Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics
      (DAMTP),
      University of Cambridge, during the period from 1993 to 2004, has since
      2010 been used by the
      UK Met Office in their operational models for seasonal forecasting and
      climate prediction .The
      parametrization is regarded by the Met Office as a vital part of improved
      representation of the
      stratosphere in those models, which in turn has been shown to lead to
      significant operational
      benefits.
    Underpinning research
    Numerical models used for weather forecasting and climate prediction
      cannot explicitly represent
      several processes that have small spatial scale but which have systematic
      effects on the larger
      scale. Instead these processes must be represented by parametrization,
      i.e. by extra terms
      included in the model equations. One such process is momentum transport by
      gravity waves, in
      particular by waves that are not associated with topography. (Gravity
      waves are small-scale waves
      that result from internal density gradients in the atmosphere. An example
      is the topographic gravity
      waves generated by flow over mountains that are manifested in cloud
      patterns. Non-topographic
      gravity waves are generated by processes such as thunderstorms.) The
      potential role of non-topographic
      gravity waves in determining aspects of the large-scale atmospheric
      circulation,
      particularly in the stratosphere and mesosphere, and consequently the need
      to represent such
      waves in numerical models was recognised in the 1980s and 1990s. In 1993
      researchers at the
      University of Cambridge Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical
      Physics (DAMTP),
      C.D. Warner (DAMTP Research Associate from 1992, Senior Research Associate
      from 2003) and
      M.E. McIntyre (DAMTP Professor throughout the period), began work on the
      formulation of a
      parametrization scheme in which the propagation and dissipation of a field
      of waves made up of a
      broad spectrum of frequencies was calculated by following individual
      spectral elements [Ref 1].
      Compared to other schemes existing at that time, this scheme (the `full'
      scheme) gave the
      advantage of physical and mathematical clarity, but was too
      computationally expensive to be
      useable in numerical models of the large-scale atmosphere. In following
      work [Refs 2 and 4] an
      `ultra-simple' version of the scheme, that required only a small number of
      variables to characterize
      the gravity wave field as a function of height and time at each horizontal
      location, was developed
      and validated by Warner and McIntyre by testing against their full scheme.
      Alongside this work
      developing a robust and properly formulated gravity-wave scheme there was
      a collaborative
      programme of work with the UK Met Office to establish, as new versions of
      the gravity-wave
      scheme became available, the effect on the circulation as represented by a
      global-scale model.
      (The equations describing the parametrization were added to the large
      computer code defining the
      model.) The global model was a version, at that time used for research
      purposes only, of the Met
      Office Unified Model, `vertically extended' to include a detailed
      representation of the stratosphere.
      Results showing the effect of the gravity-wave scheme on the modelled
      circulation were reported in
      Refs 3, 5 and 6.
    References to the research
    
1. *Warner, CD; McIntyre, ME, 1996: On the propagation and dissipation of
      gravity wave
      spectra through a realistic middle atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci., 53,
      3213-3235. DOI:
      10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<3213:OTPADO>2.0.CO;2
     
2. Warner, CD; McIntyre, ME, 1999: Toward an ultra-simple spectral
      gravity wave
      parameterization for general circulation models. (Proceeding of
      International Symposium on
      Dynamics and Structure of the Mesopause Region, Kyoto Univ., Kyoto, Japan,
      March 16-21
      1998. Earth, Planets and Space, 51, 7-8. 475-484.
     
3. Scaife, AA, Butchart, N, Warner, CD, Stainforth, D., Norton, WA,
      Austin, J., 2000: Realistic
      quasi-biennial oscillations in a simulation of the global climate.
      Geophys. Res. Lett., 27,
      3481-3484. DOI: 10.1029/2000GL011625.
     
4. *Warner, CD, McIntyre, ME, 2001: An ultrasimple spectral
      parameterization for
      nonorographic gravity waves. J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 1837-1857. DOI:
      10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<1837:AUSPFN>2.0.CO;2
     
5. *Scaife AA, Butchart, N, Warner, CD, Swinbank, RC, 2002: Impact of a
      spectral gravity
      wave parameterization on the stratosphere in the met office unified model.
      J. Atmos. Sci.,
      59, 1473-1489. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<1473:IOASGW>2.0.CO;2
     
6. Warner, CD, Scaife, AA, Butchart, N, 2005: Filtering of parametrized
      nonorographic gravity
      waves in the Met Office Unified Model. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 1831-1848. doi:
      10.1175/JAS3450.1
     
* References which best reflect the quality of the underpinning research
    Details of the impact
    The effect of the Warner-McIntyre (hereafter WM) gravity wave scheme was
      carefully considered
      by the Met Office during the period in which the desirability of using
      `vertically extended' models,
      including a detailed representation of the stratosphere, for operational
      purposes was established
      and a robust, high-quality version of the extended model developed. Since
      2006 the UK Met Office
      has used such `vertically extended' models, including the WM gravity-wave
      scheme, for operational
      purposes, for numerical weather prediction (implemented in 2006), for
      seasonal forecasting
      (implemented in 2010, Fereday et al 2012) and for climate prediction
      simulations used for the 5th
      IPCC Assessment report (implemented in 2011, Hardiman et al 2012).
    Improvement of Short-Term Weather Prediction and Seasonal Forecasting
    On the short time scales of a few days accessible to conventional
      numerical weather prediction
      extending the model to include the stratosphere, including use of the WM
      scheme, provides
      significant advantages for data assimilation in the stratospheric levels
      of the model. On longer
      seasonal forecast time scales, e.g. months, the WM scheme gives skill in
      prediction of the
      evolution of the equatorial Quasi Biennial Oscillation (QBO) which has
      significant implications for
      the extratropical circulation, including the low-level circulation in the
      North Atlantic/European
      region. (Marshall and Scaife 2009).
    The advantages of using the extended model for seasonal forecasting are
      discussed in detail by
      Fereday et al (2012) who show that the severe 2009/10 winter was better
      predicted by an
      extended version of the Met Office Glosea 4 seasonal forecast system which
      included the WM
      scheme than by the standard version that was in operational use in that
      winter. Fereday et al
      (2012) argue that the better representation of the QBO in the extended
      model, for which the WM
      scheme is absolutely essential, together with improved representation of
      the stratospheric aspects
      of the communication of a tropical El Nino signal to the extratropics were
      important in giving the
      improved prediction. For the 2010/11 and 2011/12 winters the Met Office
      implemented the
      vertically extended version of the seasonal forecast system and their
      seasonal predictions for
      these winters were correct insofar that the correct phase of the North
      Atlantic Oscillation pattern
      (which has a major controlling effect over UK and European weather) was
      predicted.
    Seasonal forecasts are passed by the Met Office to UK government
      Departments such as the
      Cabinet Office, the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC),
      Department for Transport
      (DfT) and DEFRA where they are used for resilience planning purposes.
    Impact on Climate Modelling
    The Met Office Hadley Centre currently uses the HadGEM2 family of models
      for climate prediction
      (Met Office news item 2010). The vertically extended version of this model
      is one of the three
      models being used by the Hadley Centre in their contribution to the 5th
      Assessment Report of the
      Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC). This contribution is
      through the Coupled
      Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) which is an internationally
      coordinated activity to perform
      climate model simulations to a common set of specifications across all the
      world's major climate
      modelling centres. (Hardiman et al 2012, Met Office news item November
      2012).
    By comparing simulations with standard and extended versions of the
      climate model Hardiman et
      al (2012) show that the inclusion of a well-resolved stratosphere does
      improve the impact of
      atmospheric teleconnections on surface climate, in particular the response
      to El Nino-Southern
      Oscillation, the quasi-biennial oscillation, and midwinter stratospheric
      sudden warmings (i.e., zonal
      mean wind reversals in the middle stratosphere). Thus, including a
      well-represented stratosphere
      is expected to improve climate simulation on intraseasonal to interannual
      time scales.
    Scaife et al (2012) show by considering several models, including the Met
      Office model, that the
      inclusion of a well-resolved stratosphere changes predictions for Northern
      Hemisphere winter
      regional climate change. In the models with a well-resolved stratosphere
      there is a weakening and
      equatorward shift of the stratospheric polar vortex and a corresponding
      equatorward shift of the
      typical path of tropospheric weather systems. There are corresponding
      differences in the predicted
      changes in low-level circulation, storminess and rainfall, with these
      differences being particularly
      large in western Europe. Scaife et al (2012) conclude, for example, that
      the increase in frequency
      under CO2 increase of 1 in 50 daily heavy winter rainfall events in
      western Europe (10 W-20 E
      and 40-55 N) is predicted, by the extended Met Office model to be twice as
      great as predicted by
      the standard model. Detailed representation of the stratosphere and the
      associated implementation
      of the WM scheme has, therefore, had a first order impact on European
      climate projections.
    Participation in the IPCC as described above is the primary way in which
      the UK contributes to
      formulation of international policy on climate change and the WM scheme is
      an important
      component of the model used for these projections. The Met Office is also
      the primary source of
      climate information to UK government to advise on national policy
      formulation. For example, Met
      Office climate predictions are provided to the UK Climate Projections
      database.
    The WM scheme is regarded by the Met Office as an essential component of
      this extended model.
      The Head of Monthly to Decadal Prediction at the Met Office Hadley Centre
      states, "The Met Office
        regards the Warner-McIntyre gravity-wave parametrization as an essential
        part of the improved
        representation of the stratosphere in weather and climate prediction
        models which has given direct
        benefits for seasonal forecasting and climate prediction."
    Sources to corroborate the impact 
    Statement from the Head Monthly to Decadal Prediction at the Met Office
      Hadley Centre
    Fereday, DR, Maidens, A, Arribas, A, Scaife, AA, Knight, JR, 2012.
      Seasonal forecasts of northern
      hemisphere winter 2009/10. Environmental Research Letters, 7, 034031: DOI:
      10.1088/1748-
      9326/7/3/034031.
    Hardiman, SC. Butchart, N, Hinton, TJ, Osprey, SM, Gray, LJ. 2012: The
      effect of a well-resolved
      stratosphere on surface climate: differences in CMIP5 simulations with
      high and low top versions of
      the Met Office climate model. J. Climate, 25, 7083-7099. DOI:
      10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00579.1.
    Scaife, AA, Spangehl, T, Fereday, DR, Cubasch, U, Langematz, U, Akiyoshi,
      H, Bekki, S,
      Braesicke, P, Butchart, N, Chipperfield, MP, Gettelman, A, Hardiman, SC,
      Michou, M, Rozanov, E,
      Shepherd, TG, 2011: Climate change projections and
      stratosphere-troposphere interaction.
      Climate Dynamics, 38, 2089-2097. DOI 10.1007/s00382-011-1080-7
      Institute of Physics news item. http://www.iop.org/news/12/sep/page_57337.html
    Marshall, AG, Scaife, AA, 2009: Impact of the QBO on surface winter
      climate. J. Geophys. Res.,
      114, D18110, doi:10.1029/2009JD011737.
    Met Office news item 2010:
      http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/modelling-systems/unified-model/climate-models/hadgem2
    Met Office news item 14 September 2012:
      http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive/2012/improved-winter-guidance
    Met Office news item, 29 November 2012: Met Office delivers new climate
      simulations to
      international modelling activity. http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/news/cmip5