A new joining process for deep sea pipelines
Submitting Institution
Cranfield UniversityUnit of Assessment
Aeronautical, Mechanical, Chemical and Manufacturing EngineeringSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Engineering: Chemical Engineering, Manufacturing Engineering, Interdisciplinary Engineering
Summary of the impact
Automated dry hyperbaric (high pressure) gas metal-arc welding (GMAW) is
used in deep-sea pipelines for remote repair and "hot-tap" connections to
operating pipelines. Cranfield's process can be used for depths of up to
2,500 metres. The process has been applied in production with a new joint
being made at a depth of 265 metres on a live gas pipeline. As part of the
Åsgard Subsea Compression project, it will improve the recovery from the
Mikkel and Midgard reservoirs by around 280 million barrels of oil
equivalents, worth more than 28 billion dollars at today's prices.
Underpinning research
Cranfield identified that fully automated dry hyperbaric welding for
deep-water applications was going to be a major requirement for the
sustainability of UK and world fossil fuels. Deep-water hydrocarbon
recovery had grown steadily since 1990 to become a significant fraction of
offshore oil and gas production by this time. This production is likely to
grow significantly over the coming decade due to depletion of reserves in
shallow waters. Cranfield established a facility, unique in the world then
and now, to enable the study and development of arc welding, in all
positions, up to a gas pressure of 250 bar, equivalent to 2,500 metres
water depth (P1 & G1). Following the establishment of this facility,
Cranfield conducted extensive research into gas metal arc and plasma
welding at high pressures (P2-5, G2, 3).
Cranfield's initial work focussed on the behaviour of welding arcs and
metallurgy at elevated pressures in the downhand position, i.e. the
electrode located above the job (P2, 3, 5, G2). As expected, we found
significant departures from conventional welding. At high pressures,
operating parameters are constrained by stability considerations, leaving
limited scope for weld pool and weld property modification. Despite this,
robust and tolerant GMAW and plasma operating parameters were found for
positional welding that were largely insensitive to orientation.
The problems we encountered included arc instability and poor metal
transfer characteristics due to high gas pressures, high susceptibility to
hydrogen cracking and other defects due to the high cooling rate in a
moist environment. We arrived at solutions to these problems by systematic
study of the arc characteristics, determination of thermal cycles and an
investigation of welding consumables with varying alloy compositions (P5,
G3). The result of these studies was a new power source control strategy
with high capability power source configurations, optimised electrical
transients and waveforms, combined with optimised filler materials (P5,
P6, G3).
Key Researchers |
Post details and dates |
Research |
Dr I M
Richardson |
Lecturer (May 1991 – Sept 1996)
Senior lecturer (Oct 1996 – June 2001) |
Arc physics and
hyperbaric welding |
Professor J
Billingham |
Professor of Marine Technology (May1984 – Aug
1998),
Head of School of Industrial Science and
Engineering (Sept 1998 – Sept 2004) |
Offshore engineering,
hyperbaric welding |
J H Nixon |
Principal researcher (Oct 1985 – Sept 2007) |
Welding processes |
References to the research
Evidence of quality — Peer reviewed journal papers
P1 * Nixon, J.H. and Richardson, I.M., `Deepwater Welding and
Intervention Technology', Underwater Technology, 21(3), pp. 3-7,
1995.
doi: 10.3723/175605495783326432
P2 Ducharme, Ra., Kapadia, Pa.; Dowden, Jb.;
Richardson, I.M. and Thornton, M. `A Mathematical Model of TIG Electric
Arcs Operating in the Hyperbaric Range' J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys, 29(10),
pp. 2650-2658, 1996.
doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/29/10/016)
P3 * Ducharme, Ra., Kapadia, Pa., Dowden, Jb.,
Thornton, M. and Richardson, I.M., `A Mathematical Model of the Arc in
Electric Arc Welding, Including Shielding Gas Flow and Cathode Spot
Location' J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys, 28(9), pp. 1840-1850, 1995.
doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/28/9/012
P4 * Ogunbiyi, B., Nixon, J., Richardson, I. and Blackman, S.,
`Monitoring indices for assessing pulsed gas metal arc welding process'
Science and Technology of Welding & Joining, 4(4) pp. 209-213,
1999.
doi:10.1179/136217199101537798
P5 Hart P., Richardson I. M. and Nixon J. H. `The Effects of Pressure on
Electrical Performance and Weld Bead Geometry in High Pressure GMA
Welding', Welding in the World, 45, No. 11/12, pp25-33, 2001.
Key to Papers
a) Physics Dept. University of Essex; b) Mathematics Dept. University of
Essex
Evidence of quality — underpinning research grants
G1 EPSRC (GR/J93153/01), PI: J. Billingham, CIs: I Richardson and J.
Nixon, `Design, construction and commissioning of a 250 bar hyperbaric
welding research facility'. 1994 -1996 £500,000.
G2 EPSRC (GR/K70656/01), PI: I Richardson, CIs: J. Billingham and J.
Nixon, `Arc welding processes for deepwater hyperbaric welding', 1996 -
1998, £210,319.
G3 EPSRC (GR/M32689/01), PI: I Richardson, CIs: J. Billingham and J.
Nixon, `Deepwater hyperbaric welding — the influence of welding position
on arc stability and weld pool control', 1999 -2000, £272,373.
Details of the impact
Cranfield's research into gas metal-arc welding has led to new ways of
connecting and repairing subsea pipelines that are changing the nature of
off-shore hydrocarbon operations. The technology allows pipeline
operations in increasingly deeper waters, making it possible for the
development of previously inaccessible hydrocarbon reserves.
The continuous increase in demand for oil and natural gas resulted in
sustained growth of off-shore oil and gas production. Offshore crude oil
production can be broadly classified in three categories based on the
depth of water; shallow water (< 400 m), deep water (400 to 1500 m) and
ultra-deep water (> 1500 m). Since the mid-1960s, the rate of offshore
production of oil and natural gas growth was on a rise till about middle
of 1990s, when offshore production reached a plateau. This could be
attributed to the depletion of fossil fuel in the shallow water region as
deep-sea exploration showed a significant growth during that period.
Concurrently deep-water recovery has dramatically increased and now
comprises more than 20% of total offshore production. This figure is
likely to rise significantly over the coming decades as shallow reserves
are further depleted.
Critical to all offshore oil and gas recovery are pipelines for
connecting well heads and for transporting hydrocarbons to vessels or
onshore. A process known as a hot tapping is required when an operator
wants to expand the coverage of an oilfield. In this process a
T-connection is welded to an existing pipeline while oil or gas continues
to flow [C3]. In addition, subsea pipelines can require maintenance, often
requiring repair if they are suffering from, e.g. cracking due to
environmental degradation or occasional accidental damage. For larger pipe
diameters, beyond depths where divers can operate, this may be achieved by
the sleeve repair method. In this operation, the pipeline is cut, a sleeve
pre-welded onto a spool piece is slid over the subsea pipe end and this is
welded, subsea, using dry hyperbaric welding. The only viable welding
method for these operations beyond diver depths is remote dry hyperbaric
GMAW [C4]. The operation involves lowering a specially designed subsea
habitat around the pipe to be welded and filling the habitat with inert
gas to displace the water. Remotely operated tools are then used to align
the pipes, prepare the pipe surfaces before performing the welding
operation.
Following the detailed research programme and process development, subsea
remote welding equipment and welding procedures were specified by Statoil.
Offshore field trials took place in 2011 in a Norwegian Fjord at world
record depths of 350msw for the remote hot tap and 970msw for sleeve
repair. This involved further extensive detailed studies of process
sensitivity, repeatability (in all positions) and further optimisation for
both remote hot tap and sleeve repair applications at various water depths
with different consumables. In 2012, further fully integrated offshore
trials with the remote hot tap equipment, validated the welding process
for production application [C5].
Formal specifications for hyperbaric weld procedures, arising from
Cranfield's research, have now been approved by Det Norske Veritas (DNV)
for different applications as a part of a standard [C6].
The first production application was a remote hot tap installation
carried out in connection with the preparations for the Åsgard Subsea Gas
Compression project in the Norwegian Sea. The remote Tee was welded on to
the Åsgard B production flowline at a water depth of 265 metres.
Sophisticated remotely operated subsea tools and a subsea welding tool
installed the Tee on a live gas pipeline [C1, 2]. Completion of the Åsgard
Subsea Compression project will take place in 2015, as the first of its
kind in the world. Compressors will be installed on the seabed, instead of
on a platform. This will improve recovery from the Mikkel and Midgard
reservoirs by around 280 million barrels of oil equivalents, worth more
than 28 billion dollars at today's prices.
There are many beneficiaries of the research, both economic and
environmental. Economic benefits arise through significant additional oil
recovery. This benefits governments through taxes (including the UK), oil
& gas companies through profits and society in general through lower
energy prices. Other beneficiaries include the pipeline operators who lay
and maintain pipelines and companies who manufacture and maintain the
equipment associated with the processes. Environmental benefits arise
through the ability to repair subsea structures at great depths. As
illustrated by the recent Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of
Mexico, it is difficult to deal with catastrophes of this nature at these
depths. The new repair processes developed at Cranfield provide ways to
avoid future events and to deal with them should they occur.
Sources to corroborate the impact
C1 Subsea gas compression to boost Åsgard volumes
http://www.statoil.com/en/NewsAndMedia/News/2011/Pages/16Aug_SubseaGasCompression.aspx —
access date 16th September 2013
C2 Remote-controlled world record at Åsgard
http://www.statoil.com/en/NewsAndMedia/News/2012/Pages/13Sep_hottap.aspx
— access date 30th September 2013
C3 Woodward N., Apeland K. E., Berge J.O., Verley R. and Armstrong M.,
`Subsea pipelines: the remotely welded retrofit tee for hot tap
applications', Proceedings of the ASME 2013 32nd International Conference
on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2013, June 9-14, 2013,
Nantes, France, OMAE2013-10765
C4 Contact: Welding Specialist, Isotek Oil & Gas Ltd, Leeds, England
C5 Contact: Department Manager, Statoil ASA N-4045 Stavanger, Norway
C6 Det Norske Veritas, 2012, DNV-OS-F101 Submarine Pipeline Systems
(Offshore Standard)