Recasting and Demythifying Chekhov
Submitting Institution
Queen Mary, University of LondonUnit of Assessment
Modern Languages and LinguisticsSummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Language, Communication and Culture: Cultural Studies, Literary Studies
History and Archaeology: Historical Studies
Summary of the impact
Donald Rayfield's biography of Chekhov, Anton Chekhov: A life has
transformed Russia's understanding of its cultural icon, as attested by
the fact that the Russian government has bought 200 copies of it to
disseminate among higher education institutions. The biography has
achieved this: 1. by challenging myths about the great humanity of the
playwright and stimulating public debate around this — both in Russia and
further afield — in light of the facts it unearthed about Chekhov's
tumultuous private life, which had been excised from Soviet editions of
his works and correspondence; and 2. by inspiring filmmakers, theatre
directors and actors to create new works that disseminate new
interpretations of Chekhov's personality and of the relationship between
his writings and his life.
Underpinning research
The basic research for the biography of Chekhov was carried out in the
Chekhov archive (much of it previously unexamined except by archivists and
most of it not divulged) in the Manuscript Department of the Russian State
Library in Moscow. Substantial further research came from archival
holdings in the Russian State Archives for Literature and Art in Moscow,
the Pushkin House in St Petersburg, and Chekhov museums and archives in
Taganrog, Yalta, etc. Consultation was made by travelling through Russia
and the Ukraine from Sumy to Ufa, visiting Chekhov's summer houses, etc,
in car journeys between 1992 and 1997.
The novelty of the research rests on an examination of some 10,000
letters to Chekhov (which are often more revealing of his inner and
everyday life than his own letters), in addition to the correspondence and
(unpublished) diaries of his family, friends, and contemporaries. Research
reveals the way in which Chekhov's prose and drama uses material (letters,
remarks, characters, events) from the lives of others around him.
The main findings were 1. that Chekhov was, for much of his life, a
ruthless womaniser, even a sexual tourist; 2. that there were sporadic
actions in which, contrary to his established reputation, he treated
people (especially those close to him) and even pet animals with what can
only be called cruelty; 3. that many incidents, characters, even phrases
in his work are taken from letters written to him, so that a number of
short stories and at least two of the plays ('The Wood Demon' and 'The
Seagull') can now be read as bombshells designed to explode in the theatre
and affect a small number of persons in the audience (who see themselves
caricatured) — thus creating a drama which is simultaneously enacted on
stage and in the stalls and boxes of the theatre, and which has a
cathartic effect on his own life; 4. that Chekhov read rather more widely
than has been assumed, and that such works as a biography of the Brontës,
profoundly influenced his own; 5. that he had a relish for pornographic
light verse and, on occasions in his letters, for unprintable verbal
abuse; 6. that he nurtured, rather than suppressed or treated his own
illness.
The biography and related publications thus resulted in a complete
recasting of the received understanding of Chekhov's personality and in a
thorough debunking of the nearly hagiographic account presented in Soviet
publications. A number of discoveries and assertions in the biography have
been subsequently developed by others in the field.
The research was undertaken by Prof. Donald Rayfield, then Chair of the
Russian Department at Queen Mary, between 1993 and 1997. The biography was
published in 1997 (London), 1998 (New York), and again in 2009 (London).
The Russian version, published first in 2004 and now in its sixth edition
(2011), was updated and translated by Olga Makarova, then Research
Assistant at Queen Mary, and revised by Rayfield.
References to the research
Donald Rayfield, Anton Chekhov: A Life (London: HarperCollins,
1997), 674 pp; (N.Y.: Henry Holt, 1998), 674 pp; (Evanston: Northwestern
University Press, 2000), 674pp. (London: Faber Finds, 2009), 704 pp.
Donald Rayfield, Zhizn' Antona Chekhova, transl. by Ol'ga
Makarova (Moscow: Nezavisimaia gazeta, 2005, 2006; Moscow: B.S.G.-Press,
2007, 2008, 2010, 2011), 781 pp.
The English version of the biography was included in the RAE2001
submission and contributed to the unit's 5 rating.
Details of the impact
When it initially came out in Russia, Rayfield's Chekhov biography
generated much agitation and criticism. Reviews published in newspapers
and in major `thick journals' (addressed to the broad reading public),
almost unanimously objected to the emphasis on Chekhov's private life and
especially to the inclusion of numerous allegedly `unnecessary' details.
This applies equally to major literary critics such as Andrei Nemzer and
to prominent writers like Viktor Erofeev. Reviews came out in Zvezda,
in the Moscow cultural events magazine Afisha, as well as in
numerous academic journals. Radio Liberty staged a polemic between
Rayfield and Erofeev (03/07/2005).
However, by 2010, when Russia celebrated the 150 anniversary of Chekhov's
birth, public opinion began to recognise the intrinsic value of Rayfield's
biography. The famous actor Oleg Tabakov was quoted stating that the
biography should be sent free to all Russian schools (http://goo.gl/YxhmPj).
The MKHAT theatre, where Chekhov's plays where first staged, placed an
extended discussion of the biography on its website. In it, Anatoli
Smelianski, then the Director of Moscow Arts Theatre School, states that
'I don't remember any monograph by a Western scholar on a Russian author
having such success ... Nikita Mikhalkov said that before this book came
out we didn't know Chekhov' (www.rg.ru/2010/04/05/chehov.html).
The public debate inspired by the biography prompted several interviews
with Rayfield on radio, TV, and in newspapers. The biography became the
object of a radio programme (1). The Russian TV channel Kul'tura
broadcast an interview with Rayfield (2). Major, broad-circulation
newspapers such as Novaia gazeta (7), weeklies (8, 9), and
internet magazines (12) likewise published interviews. Reviews appeared in
mainstream literary newspapers (10), magazines (11) and internet journals
(13). Blogs and reader reviews also demonstrate a lively engagement (14).
The biography was discussed at a roundtable at the Institute of Russian
Literature of the Academy of Sciences in 2010 (http://lit.lib.ru/k/karalis_d_n/text_0990.shtml).
Filmmaker Andrey Mikhalkov-Konchalovsky recommended it in his blog (www.konchalovsky.ru/recommendations/)
and praised it on Russian Pervyi Kanal TV as recently as New Year 2013 (http://goo.gl/4gG09g)
The biography was then used by documentary and feature filmmakers to
produce movies that explore Chekhov's private life and recast the received
understanding of his personality. Evgenii Tsymbal (Bafta award, 1989) and
Sergei Golovetskii produced the documentary film The Mystery of
Chekhov (2010), released on DVD, which explores the international
resonance of Chekhov (3). It features an interview with Rayfield, along
with Peter Stein, Falk Richter, and Alexander Sokurov. Swiss television
(SF1 and 3sat) produced a movie about Chekhov's relationship with women
based largely on Rayfield's biography, Tschechow Lieben: Work und
Leben von Anton Tschekhow, dir. by Marina Rumjanzewa (4). It again
includes an interview with Rayfield. The compound audience rating of its
various runs is above 105,000 viewers. The Russian TV network Rossiia
broadcast a programme that similarly presents a more differentiated view
of Chekhov's personality. Produced by Aleksandr Avilov, Chekhov in the
21C: Doctor Chekhov; A Recipe for Immortality (2010) was broadcast
on Russian TV Rossiia on 25/01/2010. The synopsis of the film acknowledges
the use of Rayfield's biography (5). Much the same applies to the
documentary film broadcast on Russia's other major TV network Pervyi
kanal, Chekhov; Unpublished life (2010), dir. by Sergei
Kozhevnikov, in which Rayfield is interviewed as the main authority on
Chekhov's life (6). It was broadcast on 30/01/2010 and online.
The biography also informed the production of recent feature films about
Chekhov's life. The movie Poklonnitsa (The Worshipping Lady)
(Lenfilm, 2011), dir. by Vitalii Mel'nikov, which depicts the illicit love
affair between Chekhov and writer Lidia Avilova, rests significantly on
Rayfield's biography (www.afisha.ru/movie/210231/).
In an interview published in Rossiiskaia gazeta (02/04/2009), the
director acknowledged the impact of Rayfield's `remarkable' book, which
`removes all the veils, destroys all the stereotypes about the writer' (www.rg.ru/2009/04/02/kino.html).
His film, produced by one of the two major Russian film studios, features
famous actors such as Oleg Tabakov and Svetlana Kriuchkova and won two
prizes. In a discussion of the movie, Tabakov praises Rayfield's biography
as one of the books that shaped his understanding of Chekhov (Rossiiskaia
gazeta, 05.04.2010) (www.rg.ru/2010/04/05/chehov.html).
The biography also inspired a theatrical production. The `documentalist'
playwright Elena Gremina turned Rayfield's biography into a play entitled
Brat'ia Ch. (The Brothers Ch.), staged in the Moscow Stanislavsky
Theatre in 2010. The critic Marina Davydov called the play `a dramaturgic
(and extremely terse) paraphrase of Rayfield's book' (http://goo.gl/jQ3CoR).
In the US, writer, director, and producer of theatre and film Laura
Strausfeld wrote a screenplay on the relations between Chekhov and Suvorin
partly based on Rayfield's biography, which is currently in
pre-production. Much of the theatre and film work she has done in the past
10 years was likewise inspired by Rayfield's biography.
Meanwhile in England Rayfield's biography has set a model of scrupulous
fact-based biographical writing. Michael Frayn called it `without question
the definitive biography of Chekhov'. Arthur Miller wrote a laudatory
review in Sunday Times, and so did William Boyd in The
Guardian. Although these reviews predate 2008, Rayfield's biography
remains a reference. In an article published in The Observer on 2
October 2011, William Boyd praises Claire Tomalin's biography of Dickens
as `worthy to stand beside Richard Ellmann on Joyce, Donald Rayfield on
Chekhov and Jean-Yves Tadie on Proust' (http://goo.gl/aSOHOO).
Indicators (2008-2013)
Radio programmes
(1) Radio Svoboda. 02/02/2010.Discussion of merits of Rayfield's
biography.
www.svobodanews.ru/content/transcript/1946763.html
TV programmes and documentary films
(2) Channel Kultura, 28/11/09. Rayfield interview. www.tvkultura.ru/news.html?id=397092
Available on Newstube: www.newstube.ru/media/kniga-zhizn%27-antona-chexova-donal%27da-rejfilda.
(3) Zagadka Chekhova (2010): www.ozon.ru/context/detail/id/5425957/?item=5425311
(4) Tschechow Lieben: Work und Leben von Anton Tschekhow (2010):
www.sendungen.sf.tv/sternstunden/Nachrichten/Archiv/2011/03/10/sternstundeneinzel/Filme-der-Sternstunde-Kunst-2010)
Audience figures:
Swiss Public Television SF 1: 12/12/10, (TV-Premiere), 43700;
14/12/10, 6500; 18/12/10, 17100; 24/07/11, 26700; 25/07/11, 4500;
30/07/2011, 8200.
3sat, Television for german speaking territories: 25.10.2012, 5000
The movie was also available on www.sternstunden.sf.tv
(5) Chekhov XXI veka. (Doktor Chekhov. Retsept bessmertiia (2010)
http://rutracker.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2698573
Available online: http://kinolis.ru/news/chekhov_xxi_veka_2010/2011-11-03-114
(6) Chekhov. Neopublikovannaia zhizn' (2010):
www.1tvrus.com/channel1/announce/7417
Available online: http://video.mail.ru/mail/lyudmila-1946/klassik/822.html)
Print interviews of Rayfield and other references to Chekhov biography
(7) Novaia gazeta. 03/02/10. Interview with Rayfield.
www.novayagazeta.ru/data/2010/008/21.html
(8) Stanislavskii/Nezavisimaia gazeta. 20/01/10. Interview with
Rayfield
http://stanislavsky.ng.ru/tochki/2010-01-01/90_rayfield.html
(9) Komersant Vlast'. 25/01/10. Interview with Rayfield
http://kommersant.ru/doc/1303723
(10) Andrei Turkov, Literaturnaia gazeta, 30/07/08. Review of
biography
http://www.lgz.ru/article/5278/
(11) Anatolii Shenderovich, Znamia, vol. 3, 2008. Comments about
biography
http://magazines.russ.ru/znamia/2008/3/sh17.html
Internet magazines and news portals
(12) Infox.ru. 72/09/2009. Interview with Rayfield
http://infox.ru/afisha/book/2009/11/26/rayfield_print.phtml
(13) Litprom.ru. 06/04/2012. Review of Rayfield's biography
http://litprom.ru/print46123.html
(14) Blogs and Reader reviews (samples)
http://uborshizzza.livejournal.com/601751.html
18/07/2009,
www.liveinternet.ru/users/1150469/post64407522
21/01/2008
www.liveinternet.ru/users/apriori-next/post106894583/
29/07/2009
http://chto-chitat.livejournal.com/7398688.html
02/09/2010,
www.ljpoisk.ru/archive/9385032.html
04/2011
www.livelib.ru/book/1000107373
(13 reviews)
www.ozon.ru/context/detail/id/3655568/
(8 reviews)
www.labirint.ru/reviews/goods/81601/
(6 reviews)
Sources to corroborate the impact
Websites listed above.
The following four individuals can corroborate claims about the ways
Rayfield's biography has changed Russia's understanding of Chekhov and has
underpinned new artistic production.
- Director, MkhAT (Moscow Art Theater)
- President, Mkhat School, Deputy Artistic Director, Mkhat
- Independent film director
- Director Chekhov Centre
This person can corroborate the impact of Rayfield's biography on her own
theatre and film work:
- Writer, director and producer of film and theatre