Investigative interviews with suspects of crime
Submitting Institution
University of DerbyUnit of Assessment
LawSummary Impact Type
LegalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Criminology
Summary of the impact
Both the introduction of legislation in England and Wales and the
mandatory recording of interviews with criminal suspects has led to an
increased examination and understanding of what happens in such
interviews. Such studies have led to a prescribed framework, which
following its implementation, has led to further study concerning its
efficacy in gathering a reliable account. This case study, demonstrates
how (through dissemination of the research and through working with
practitioners) particular research findings concerning approaches to the
investigative interviewing of suspects have influenced the practices of
those users of the research both in this country and overseas.
Underpinning research
Dr. David Walsh is currently Head of Research in the School of Law and
Criminology at the University of Derby, having been employed there to date
continuously since 2006 as either Lecturer/Senior Lecturer /Assistant
Subject Head of Criminology/Head of School Research, being the programme
leader at various times of the Fd/UG/PG programmes. The underpinning
research for the case study is through eight published peer reviewed
articles (most published in at least 2* rated journals) and one book
chapter.
Walsh conducted his initial study in 2006, being funded (£3,200) by the
Joint Working Initiative of the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP).
This involved examination of various inspections of local authorities
(LAs) in the UK conducted by governmental auditing authorities. This
analysis (Section 3, Item 6) found beneficial effects on performance had
been realized during 1999-2007, believed to be associated by such
inspections. Such reporting to various LA and DWP fora by Walsh in 2006
engaged their interest in an examination of DWP/LA benefit fraud
investigators. Walsh's subsequent analysis of their actual interviewing
performance conducted in 2007 found that most interviews were below
expected standards when using measurement scales designed to assess
interviewing skills. Such dissemination of this research to professional
LA fora in 2007/2008 generally led to concerns regarding the research
findings, since these (unsurprisingly) did not match their voiced
perceptions of their own skill levels. Regardless, several users of the
research (such as DWP investigation trainers, and LA managers) did feel
that the findings had some substance and they supported Walsh in providing
further field data in order for him to undertake further studies.
Subsequent studies (Section 3, items 1 and 4) displayed how, when a
framework was most skillfully used it was associated with the gathering of
comprehensive, accurate and reliable accounts. These findings were shared
at professional and academic conferences in this country and overseas
during 2008-2009. Upon publication of its findings, the paper (Section 3,
item 1) was adopted as an integral component within training packages for
police detectives in Norway in 2010 and, later, China in 2011, being
translated into those countries' languages. Item 1 remains a prerequisite
for detectives to have read this article during their training in these
countries so as to inform them of the benefits of using information
gathering approaches when interviewing suspects. More than 2,000
detectives are estimated to have used Walsh's study as part of their
training. Meanwhile, the researcher engaged with 114 UK professionals in
various fora, (also in 2008-2009) undertaking an attitudinal survey (see
item 3, Section 3), finding further areas of concern. Further
dissemination of studies to over 1400 academic and investigation
professionals (from various agencies and countries) occurred during
2009-2013 (Section 3, items 2, 5, 6), directly leading to further
engagement to undertake collaborative research and consultancy.
The research is unique since despite over 150,000 interviews being
conducted each year by benefit fraud investigators, no other research has
been undertaken to this depth concerning their interview practices
(research has focused in the past examined police investigations, and thus
until this research we remained unaware of the performance of other
agencies). Further, the findings from these studies have informed service
users overseas who possess unfamiliarity with this model of interviewing
criminal suspects.
References to the research
1. Walsh, D. and Bull, R. (2010a). The interviewing of suspects by
non-police agencies: What's effective? What is effective! Legal and
Criminological Psychology, 15, 305-321 (3*)
2. Walsh, D. and Bull, R. (2010b). Know your rights? A study
comparing fraud investigators approaches to informing suspects of their
rights and ensuring they are understood and observed. Cambrian Law
Review, 41, 24-39.(3*)
3. Walsh, D. and Bull, R. (2011). Benefit fraud investigative
interviewing: A self-report study of investigation professionals' beliefs
concerning practice. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender
Profiling, 8, 131-148. (3*)
4. Walsh, D. and Bull, R. (2012a) How do interviewers attempt to
overcome suspects' denials? Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 19,
151-168.(3*) (TIR grant UoD, 2008 — £2500)
5. Walsh, D. and Bull, R. (2012b). Examining rapport in
investigative interviews with suspects: Does its building and maintenance
work? Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 27, 73-84.(3*)
6. Walsh, D., and Bull, R. (2013a). The investigation and
investigative interviewing of benefit fraud suspects in the UK: Historical
and contemporary perspectives. In B. Cooper, D. Griesel, and M. Ternes
(Eds.) Applied issues in investigative interviewing, eyewitness
memory, and credibility assessment. (pp33-58). New York: SpringerSpringer.(3*)
Details of the impact
The underpinning research and its key findings have been influential in
both the UK and overseas. Firstly, LA benefit fraud investigators have
engaged with the researcher to review their practices in light of the
researcher's findings, leading to a review of training needs and
identification of skills deficits, as well as requests to deliver findings
in other professional settings, alongside an engagement of the researcher
in strategic planning of the LA investigators' national forum. Thus far
the researcher has presented research findings to over 750 LA
investigation personnel in around 12 separate presentations (about 20% of
the total investigation personnel in the UK, and representing over 60% of
the 440 LAs.). Specific in-depth consultation has occurred in five of
these organisations, whilst other agencies and constituencies (such as the
police, Business,Information & Skills' investigators, Gangmasters'
Licensing Authority, the East of England Fraud Forum, and the Welsh Fraud
Forum) have engaged with the researcher and asked him to present his
findings in various training/ `masterclass' contexts, that has included
around 200 detectives undergoing initial training in Derbyshire and
Lincolnshire Constabularies. Evaluations of these sessions learned that
Walsh had positively influenced officers' thinking about interviewing
strategies. The GLA have recently engaged Walsh on a consultancy basis to
advise how to further boost investigative performance.
Other impacts include the provision of the research as an essential
component of the training of police officers overseas, where it is
estimated that over 2000 officers in the last three years have read the
researcher's study (Section 3, item 1) as prescribed in their training. As
part of a package of reading it is clearly difficult to make claims as to
its own discrete impact. However, this article is unique in that it shows
the association between skilful deployment of an interviewing framework
(that is steadily being embraced around the world) and optimum interview
outcomes (that is; a comprehensive reliable account). Anecdotal evidence
from trainers in Norway indicates that this article clearly overcomes
officers' concerns that the interviewing model better identifies the
guilty, while avoiding false confessions from the innocent. Professional
social media sites such as Linkedin have recently cited the researcher's
work as the only study of investigations outside the police (this was an
Australian view).
As a consequence of presenting research to Belgian Police, Walsh was
asked by (i) senior Belgian police officers to contribute to a handbook
for all Belgian Police officers' that advises how to disclose evidence in
light of recent ECtHR rulings that concern legal representation
requirements when criminal suspects are questioned about possible
offences; and (ii) by consultants to the Dutch government to provide
evidence for their report how the ECtHR rulings will likely affect police
investigations in the Netherlands.
Alongside this activity Walsh reported his findings from his first study
in 2007 at an international seminar that was attended by both academics
and practitioners interested in the study of the investigative
interviewing of victims, suspects, and witnesses. This led to Walsh (with
Dr Gavin Oxburgh, of Newcastle University, and Dr Trond Myklebust of the
Norwegian Police Training College) to create an organisation that was to
be the host for both practitioners and academics with an professional
interest in this area, with the aims of encouraging collaborative research
between the two groups and to enable a forum where best practices are
identified and spread world-wide. In the first five years since its
inception it has achieved both these aims. The organisation (the
International Investigative Interviewing Research Group — iIIRG) under the
stewardship of the three original founder members, has grown to over 300
members. Among its other successes are an annual international conference
(in each of the last five years) and masterclass (that regularly attracts
150 delegates from all over the world) and a biannual peer reviewed
journal; Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice (of which Walsh
is its Editor-in chief) with contributions from both practitioners and
academics. The international reputation and credibility of Walsh's status
in this organisation is directly related to his studies in pioneering
research in hitherto untouched territories. For example, in New Zealand
and Australia three training companies use the researcher's material as
important components for their own training that has been delivered to
over 250 trainees in the past two to three years to underline the efficacy
of the interviewing framework.
Finally, Walsh provided consultancy advice during 2007-2012 to welfare
rights' groups in their authoring of various editions of a national
guidance document, designed for those who attend fraud interviews as
suspects without legal representation, informing them of their rights.
Feedback from both the organisations and the public who have used the
document has been highly positive towards its usefulness.
Sources to corroborate the impact
Testimonies supportive of the material in this case study can be obtained
from the following:
The Housing benefits fraud manager at South Cambridgeshire District
Council and
The National Chair of Local Authority Investigating Officers' Group
(LAIOG)
( in regard to work Walsh has conducted with Local Authority
investigators)
Senior managers with the Gangmasters' Licensing Authority in regard to
the work Walsh has conducted with that agency
Police crime trainers in Lincolnshire Police in regard to the work Walsh
has presented to new detectives
The (now retired) Assistant Chief Constable and Derbyshire Crime Trainers
of Derbyshire police in regard to the work Walsh as undertaken with that
Constabulary
A Senior crime trainer (Ivar Fahsing) in the Norwegian Police Training
College in relation to the pre-requisite of Walsh's material for new
Norwegian police detectives
Professor Vanderhallen of Maastricht, and Antwerp Universities who can
provide testimony in regard to the Chinese and Belgian police and to the
advice provided by Walsh that assisted in a report to the Dutch'
government.
Advice now website
http://www.advicenow.org.uk/advicenow-guides/problems-with-benefits/how-to-handle-an-interview-under-caution/
which shows the document that Walsh helped co-author for that national
organisation's clients
iIIRG website (www.iiirg.org) — Dr
Gavin Oxburgh at Newcastle University and Dr Trond Myklebust of the
Norwegian Police Training College in regard to evidence required regarding
Walsh's contribution to iIIRG.