Submitting Institution
University of CambridgeUnit of Assessment
Politics and International StudiesSummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Political Science
Law and Legal Studies: Law
Summary of the impact
This project, which commenced in 2000 and continues to this day, has
addressed the settlement of conflicts within states. The project has
yielded important findings in the areas of complex power-sharing, autonomy
and self-governance, political participation mechanisms for non-dominant
groups, peace-making and transitional arrangements in peace agreements.
These findings have flowed into the policies and practices of major
international actors (United Nations, Council of Europe, Organization for
Security and Cooperation in Europe), and have been implemented in a number
of sensitive contexts. The project findings were also applied directly in
a significant number of international negotiations and settlements. This
includes the independence of Kosovo and South Sudan, the peace
negotiations on Darfur, UN planning for the transition in Libya, the
United Nations-led negotiations on a settlement for the conflict in Syria,
and the peace agreement and transitional arrangements addressing the deep
crisis in Yemen.
Underpinning research
This research was carried out by Professor Marc Weller of the Department
of Politics and International Studies (POLIS). Professor Weller joined the
University of Cambridge in 1990 and became Professor of International Law
and International Constitutional Studies in 2010. The project has been
developed by him over the past decade. He devised the concept, and raised
in excess of USD 1.5 million from major Foundations. Professor Weller
established and led an international research team and authored the major
elements of the outputs of the project.
The first phase of the work addressed the issue of secession and
secessionist conflicts. It studied this phenomenon in depth, reviewing a
significant number of internationalized peace agreements of the 1990s, and
then identified different types of accommodation that have occurred in
practice. The project noted a new trend in recent settlement practice and
engaged in a detailed collective study of the phenomenon of complex
power-sharing agreements as a means of settling ethnic and
self-determination conflicts. Through this work, it advanced the
understanding of peaceful remedies to address on-going conflict, and of
the architecture of complex power sharing, combining consociationalist
tools with integrative techniques of state construction and with
international involvement in post-settlement implementation.
In a further phase the project focused on asymmetric autonomy as a means
of addressing self-determination conflicts. This work considered the
concerning trend of simply assigning a broad range of powers to
secessionist units without paying sufficient attention to the addition of
integrationalist elements of state design, and offered guidance on how to
overcome the weaknesses in such a simplistic approach.
After having considered macro-solutions in terms of state design, the
project then addressed softer options of accommodating non-dominant groups
within states. This concerned mechanisms for political participation of
minorities in the overall state. The project offered original insights
into the emerging principle of political participation as a legal
entitlement, along with the different sets of tools for facilitating its
implementation.
Having dealt with autonomy, complex power-sharing and political
participation mechanisms, attention turned to the issue of facilitated
secession. The research then identified and analysed entirely new patterns
of addressing the self-determination dimension outright, ranging from
deferred secession options to the balancing of claims and the issue of
conditional statehood.
In its present phase, the project has broadened out, addressing internal
peace settlements, and the peace processes leading to them, more
generally. In this way, the understanding of conflict management tools
derived from the context of self-determination conflicts can, where
appropriate, also be put to use in other contexts.
References to the research
1. Marc Weller, ed., (Katherine Nobbs, Assistant Editor), A
Commentary on the Right to Political Participation of Minorities,
Oxford University Press, 2010, 855 pages.
2. Marc Weller and Katherine Nobbs, eds., Asymmetrical State Design
as a Tool of Ethnopolitical Conflict Settlement, Pennsylvania
University Press, 2010, 320 pages.
3. Marc Weller, Contested Statehood: Kosovo's Struggle for
Independence, Oxford University Press, 2009, 328 pages, also
published in translation as Shtetesia e kuntestuar, Koha
Publishing House, 2009.
4. Marc Weller, Escaping the Self-determination Trap, Martinus
Nijhoff Publishers, 2008, 224 pages.
5. Marc Weller, Denika Blacklock and Katherine Nobbs, eds, The
Protection of Minorities in the Wider Europe, Palgrave, Macmillan,
2008, 296 pages.
6. Marc Weller and Barbara Metzger, eds., Settling Self-determination
Conflicts, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008, 768 pages.
This project has been supported by a series of research grants awarded
to Professor Weller. Including those given by the Carnegie Corporation
of New York, from 2000 to 2013, totalling around USD 1.5 million. During
the REF Period, these were Carnegie Corporation of New York Grants:
B 7736.R01 — $356,000 Duration: 10/1/07-9/30/09, Asymmetric Autonomy
B 7736.R02 — $378,000 Duration: 10/1/09-9/30/13, Completion Grant
The follow-on work has attracted support from the Newton Trust in the
order of £52,000 for 2012-1013, and $106,000 from the Humanity United
Foundation for the same period (`Legal Tools of Peace-making'). A further
application for ESRC at the level of £900,000 is under way.
Details of the impact
There have been five types of immediate impact deriving from this work:
- Developments of international and domestic standards and best
practices;
- General dissemination of project results through capacity building;
- Dissemination of project results at points of decision;
- Direct involvement in peace negotiations;
- Establishing a framework for a national transition process.
The first type of impact concerns the development of standards.
The work performed in the area of community rights has been influential in
the progressive interpretation and development of international
instruments. This effect is most visible in relation to the Council of
Europe, the guardian of the most advanced binding international instrument
in this area, and the OSCE High Commissioner for National Minorities, as
is attested in the Forewords contributed by both institutions to the Legal
Commentary on Political Participation (OUP 2008), edited by Weller [Ref
1, above]. The impact of this work on actual standards can be
illustrated by reference to the case of Kosovo. Weller provided
significant impact into the Ahtisaari peace plan which was endorsed and
adopted by Kosovo's declaration of independence in 2008. He then
contributed to the drafting of the human and minority rights sections of
the constitution of Kosovo, which are based on this document. Moreover, he
drafted the Law on the Promotion and Protection of Communities
(minorities) which implements these provisions [Source 1, below].
The Statute of the Kosovo Community Consultative Council is directly based
on Weller's earlier work in writing the Council of Europe Handbook on
Minority Consultative Mechanisms (Council of Europe Document
DH-MIN(2006)-012, 20 October 2006) [Source 2].
Weller has had a significant role in disseminating the outcomes of his
work through capacity-building events, with a particular emphasis
on policy-makers and those involved in the implementation of policy. His
contribution to policy planning is evidenced, for instance, by his
presentations to the United Nations Senior Management team on
power-sharing in peace settlement, and by a two-day training seminar held
for the Staff of the Organization on the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons
at The Hague in 2012 on the challenges of political transitions in the
Middle East [Source 3]. Moreover, he has been invited to offer
advice at `challenge sessions' conducted by the FCO to develop its policy,
and given subsequent advice, for instance on UK policy relating to the
recognition of states, in particular Somaliland in 2012 [Source 4].
He acted as a key speaker at a seminar in the House of Commons in 2010
concerning legal controls over military action [Source 5]. He has
been a lecturer in the Senior Officers' Course of the Royal College of
Defence Studies (2008 to present), which every year exposes around 100
senior military officers from around the world to academic advances in the
area of international law and politics.
The third type of impact has been obtained through direct dissemination
of project results to decision-makers at the very point of decision.
This has included consultations and workshops just before or during
negotiations for one or both of the sides in on-going peace settlement
attempts. Examples are workshops with high-level officials, or
delegations, from Georgia (29.4.2009), Kosovo (24.7.2010), Sudan
(8-9.12.2009, 18.7.2010, 17.10.2010), Syria (6.3.2013), (south) Yemen
(March 2013) and Burma (May 2013). The workshops were very much focused on
allowing the participants to draw upon and operationalize the findings
flowing from this project activity, providing settlement options to the
participants at critical points in important negotiations. One may also
include in this set of activities formal advisory memoranda provided to
the United Nations Secretariat, for instance on the legal authority of
United Nations Security Council Resolutions and on the legality of the use
of unmanned drones (2012/13).
The fourth type of impact relates to direct involvement in peace
settlement negotiations themselves. This has included the provision
of legal and policy advice to delegations in peace settlement
negotiations, to the African Union and League of Arab States when acting
as mediator, and to the United Nations Department of Political Affairs, or
individual Special Representatives of the United Nations Secretary-General
[Source 6].
In relation to advice to the African Union, the most pronounced case
concerns South Sudan. Weller was engaged by the African Union to support
the pre-referendum negotiations between North and South [Source 7].
Moreover, in 2011 he served as advisor to the Joint Special Envoy of the
African Union and the United Nations Secretary General for a Settlement in
Darfur, assisting the delegation of the Justice and Equality Movement and
the Mediation Team. He participated in the critical phases of the Doha
negotiations on Darfur, resulting in the settlement (2011) that is at
present being implemented [Source 8].
Weller also implemented the project findings in his role as advisor to
the League of Arab States and United Nations Joint Special Envoy on Syria,
HE Kofi Annan. He drafted the Guidelines and Principles for a Syrian-led
Transition adopted in the Geneva Action Group Communiqué in July 2012.
This was adopted on 27 September 2013 by the UN Security Council as the
basis for a possible peace settlement [Source 9]. In 2013 he has
led the preparations for the projected Geneva International Peace
Conference for Syria chaired by HE Lakhdar Brahimi, the
Secretary-General's Special Envoy [Source 10].
Weller has also given advice on power-sharing issues to the Special Envoy
of the United Nations Secretary-General on Libya, Jordanian Foreign
Minister al-Khatib (2011) [Source 11]. He also served as legal and
political advisor for the United Nations Special Advisor on Yemen, and
drafted the Yemen peace settlement of November 2011 [Source 12].
The fifth element concerns planning for UN sponsored-or supported
transitions and their implementation. He gave advice to the UN
Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs on the emerging transitions
in Egypt and the post-election crisis in Côte d'Ivoire, and authored a
general guidance manual on transitions for the UN Department of Political
Affairs [Source 13]. In 2011, Professor Weller served as a member
of the UN inter-agency task force for pre-planning for Libya, and
contributed elements to the strategic planning document that emerged [Source
14]. That year, he also participated in the planning for the final
transitional phase in Somalia. In 2012 he devised and drafted the
transition plan for the Maldives after the contested change in government
there. As noted, he also had a significant role in designing the
transitional process for Yemen during 2012 and 2013, meaning planning and
preparation for the National Dialogue process, including its rules of
procedure, and drafting its final report [Source 15].
Sources to corroborate the impact
Source 1: Kosovo Law No. 03/LO-47, Law on the Protection and
Promotion of the Rights of Communities and their Members in Kosovo, at
http://www.assembly-kosova.org/common/docs/ligjet/2008_03-L047_en.pdf.
Source2: http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/minorities/6_Resources/PDF_DH-MIN_Handbook_MinConMecanisms_en.pdf
Presidential Decree on the Establishment of the Kosovo Community
Consultative Council, 15 September 2008, http://www.kryeministri-ks.net/zck/?page=2,77.
Source 3: Letter of Thanks from person 1, Principal Legal Advisor,
Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, 24 December 2012.
Source 4: Exchange of correspondence with person 2 (Deputy Head
and Political Team Leader, UK Somalia Unit; Foreign and Commonwealth
Office) and others at the FCO on a Challenge Session relating to
Somaliland, held on 28 May 2012 and subsequent request for advice.
Source 5: Invitation and Agenda for a Presentation Event held at
the House of Commons, at the invitation of Julian Huppert, MP, on Enhancing
the Role of Legal Advice in Decisions on Peace and War in Government and
Parliament, 28 October 2010.
Source 6: Letter of Appointment as United Nations Senior Mediation
Expert (2011-2012) for the Department of Political Affairs from person 3
(Director, Policy and Mediation Division, Department of Political Affairs,
United Nations), dated 23 March 2011.
Source 7: Request from person 4 (Head of the African Union Liaison
Office in the Sudan) on behalf of the African Union to act in support of
the Sudan-South Sudan peace process, September 2010, AU Ref
AULOS-k/33/14/09/2010.
Source 8: Terms of Reference for Service to the Doha Peace Process
provided to the Joint African Union and United Nations Mediation for the
Darfur Peace Negotiations (JMIST), 9 March 2011,
Source 9: Communiqué of the Action Group on Syria, Geneva 30 June
2012, endorsed and adopted by the UN Security Council as Resolution 2118
(2013), Annex II, containing the `Guidelines and Principles for a
Transitions in Syria' drafted by Professor Weller.
Source 10: Workbook and Agenda for the Preparatory Meeting to
arrange for the Geneva Peace Conference, and the annotated agenda for the
Trilateral meeting between the US and Russian Federation Government and
the United Nations, held at Geneva in June 2013.
Source 11: Package of Briefing Materials for HE Minister
al-Khatib, UN Special Envoy for Libya, and text of power-point
presentation delivered to him, July 2011.
Source 12: Yemen Peace Settlement, 22 November 2011, and
associated drafts provided by Professor Weller.
Source 13: Guidance on Transitions, Prepared for the UN
Department of Political Affairs, Mediation Support Unit, updated
March 2013).
Source 14: Draft inputs to the Inter-agency Task Force on
Pre-Planning for Libya. The summary of the resulting report, which has
remained confidential, has been leaked at http://www.innercitypress.com/un2replibya082611.html,
26 August 2011, including elements of input provided by Professor Weller
on the constitutional dimension for post-conflict planning.
Source 15: Draft of the rules of procedure of the Yemen
National Dialogue Process and the resulting Presidential Decree (2013).