Improving the Protection of Cultural Property During Armed Conflict
Submitting Institution
Newcastle UniversityUnit of Assessment
Communication, Cultural and Media Studies, Library and Information Management Summary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Built Environment and Design: Architecture
Studies In Human Society: Sociology
Law and Legal Studies: Law
Summary of the impact
Since 2005 Professor Peter Stone's research has explored what we tolerate
as acceptable, and crucially, what we view as unacceptable, practice
during armed conflict in relation to the protection of cultural property.
It has investigated, within the context of jus in bello [the
morality of what is done during war], the way in which we wage war
and, by implication, the very nature of war itself. This research has
impacted on: NGOs; national policy makers (including the HM Government);
and the international military:
-
NGOs and civil society: Prioritising the agenda of NGOs and
civil society organisations. Measurable through: non-academic
publications; media activity; organisational prize; and moves towards
the adoption of this research as policy.
-
National Policy makers: Influencing UK and international
policy, and HM Government parliamentary business. Measurable through:
work with Select Committee; written questions; meetings with and action
by government ministers; and contributions to the Iraq Inquiry.
-
UK, NATO and international armed forces: Modifying the doctrine
of UK and international armed forces. Measurable in: invitations to
workshops; development of training modules.
Underpinning research
This impact case study begins with Stone's 2008 co-edited book The
Destruction of Cultural Heritage in Iraq (1). Destruction
comprised 28 chapters mainly written by those Americans, Europeans and
Iraqis heavily involved in the protection of cultural property in Iraq
before, during, and after the 2003 invasion. These included Stone's (2005)
article `The identification and protection of cultural heritage during the
Iraq conflict: a peculiarly English tale' (2) which outlined his
work as archaeological advisor to the UK Ministry of Defence and
identified a series of 18 points for future action. Destruction
was part diary of events, part identification and analysis of issues, and
part draft strategy for future cooperation between cultural heritage
experts and the military. The research provided a baseline of knowledge
about what went wrong in Iraq, and about what the relationship between
cultural heritage experts and the military (in particular) could be. It
highlighted as a major issue the failure of the UK to ratify the `1954
Hague Convention on the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of
Armed Conflict and its two Protocols of 1954 and 1999' (Hague Convention).
One issue raised in Destruction was the belief that by working
with the military cultural heritage experts `provided academic and
cultural legitimacy to the invasion' and were part of a wider `ethical
crisis' in archaeology (Hamilakis, Y. 2003, Public Archaeology, 2:
107). This issue was addressed, and contextualised, in Stone's 2011 edited
book Cultural Heritage, Ethics and the Military (3). The 18
contributions to this book included: an historical overview; chapters
focusing on religious, medical, and indigenous relations with the
military; and chapters revolving around how any relationship might
develop. Taken together they underscored the complexity of the
relationship whilst emphasising its importance if cultural property is to
be better protected in future conflicts.
Stone's research has broadened to investigate the wider relationship
between cultural property protection and human rights (4) and on
the development of a four-tier approach to cultural property protection
and co-operation: long term; immediate pre-deployment; during conflict;
post conflict (5). This framework is intended to influence military
doctrine and practice and the development of a proactive and effective
response from the cultural heritage community. Future research is planned
to comprise an historic overview of cultural property protection and
iconoclasm and then focus on the interconnected areas of international
humanitarian law, trade in illicit antiquities, and the development of
good practice within the military and related organisations and agencies.
Stone is currently working with UK Blue Shield Committee to develop an
AHRC Research Networking Scheme to support this work.
Professor Peter Stone was appointed to the University in 1997, as
Director of the International Centre for Cultural and Heritage Studies
(ICCHS) in 2000, and as Head of the School of Arts and Cultures in 2006.
References to the research
1) Stone, P., Bajjaly, J.F. (eds.) (2008) The Destruction of Cultural
Heritage in Iraq, Boydell Press, Woodbridge. Paperback 2009. (224
pp). REF2 output: 138293. Book sales (UK and US): 820 copies
2) Stone, P. (2005) `The Identification and Protection of Cultural
Heritage during the Iraq Conflict: A Peculiarly English Tale'. Antiquity,
79:306: 933-943. (Prefaced by the journal editor as: `This is history,
heritage, regulation and perhaps even legislation in the making'.)
3) Stone, P. (ed.) (2011) Cultural Heritage, Ethics and the Military,
Boydell Press, Woodbridge. (230pp). REF2 output: 170431.
4) Stone. P. (2012) `Human Rights and Cultural Property Protection in
Times of Conflict' International Journal of Heritage Studies,
18:3: 271-284. REF2 output: 185013. DOI:10.1080/13527258.2012.651737
5) Stone, P. (2013) `A Four-Tier Approach to the Protection of Cultural
Property in the Event of Armed Conflict'. Antiquity, 87:335:
166-177. REF2 output: 185007. (Prefaced by the editor as a `vitally
important article... [and] important... that the author and his associates
continue their campaign and are supported by everyone who believes that
cultural property has a value that lies beyond sectional interests. Read
prior to publication by a retired commander of the British Field Army who
commented: `I think your basic 4-step approach is sound...What you propose
is very possible and the mechanisms are there to introduce it'. Article to
be reproduced in the 2013 (Winter Issue) of the professional army journal
British Army Review).
Details of the impact
While all of the research noted above has contributed to the impact, the
key text to-date is Stone's 2008 book (co-edited with J.F. Bajjaly) The
Destruction of Cultural Heritage in Iraq. This has impacted on three
specific groupings: NGOs; national policy makers (including HM
Government); and the international military.
NGOs and civil society
The UK National Commission for UNESCO (UKNC), an independent, civil
society organisation providing policy advice to government in the fields
of UNESCO's competence, requested a copy of the hardback edition of Destruction.
With the British Institute for the Study of Iraq, it part-funded the
paperback edition in order that it be available to the widest possible
audience. Destruction was awarded the Archaeological Institute of
America's (AIA) 2011 James R Wiseman book award. The citation for the
award includes the following statement about the value of Destruction:
`The authors....respond to popular perception of events that gained
international attention and challenge the reader to fully comprehend the
context of each episode. As a result, this book has the ability to open a
wider dialogue between specialists and the general public about cultural
heritage issues that resonate on a global scale' (IMP1).
Destruction was highlighted as `Book of the Week' in the Times
Higher Education (31 July 2008), where it was described as: `an
extraordinary achievement that will stand as the definitive account of the
desperate, avoidable cultural tragedy of Iraq for many years to come' (IMP2).
Destruction was the subject of a three-page article in the Big
Issue (May 2009) and material from the book was used by journalist
Robert Fisk in his front-page story in the Independent (5 August
2012).
In 2009 the UKNC also sponsored the travelling version of the exhibition
Catastrophe! The Looting and Destruction of Iraq's Past - produced
by Stone in conjunction with the Oriental Institute in Chicago as the
result of links made during the writing of Destruction. Catastrophe!
has been shown at eight UK and European venues including Newcastle upon
Tyne, Durham, London, Dublin, and The Hague. Visitor feedback (IMP3)
on Catastrophe! has been extremely positive, including:
"wonderfully informative"; "dreadful about the destruction: good to see
the issues are made public"; "both saddening and inspiring"; "An
excellent, shocking and truly important exhibition"; "Too grim for words;
but makes people think". The last showing, at the Great North Museum,
Newcastle (July-August 2012) was accompanied by a series of four public
lectures (one by Stone) each of which attracted 40+ members of the general
public, which is a high number for such events at this venue. Overall the
exhibition reached an estimated public and specialist audience of
c.10,000.
In addition to this publication and exhibition activity Stone has also
brought the issue of cultural protection to the attention of wider popular
audiences via his contribution to BBC Radio, including on Radio Newcastle
(15 May 2008), Radio 5's `Up all night' programme (10 June 2008), and on
Radio 4's `World this Weekend (1 April 2012).
National Policy makers, HM Government
A copy of the Destruction book was requested by the Parliamentary
Select Committee scrutinising the Draft Cultural Property (Armed Conflict)
Bill in 2008. The Committee noted the value of the book in providing an
informed context for their deliberations and referred specifically to
information in the book in paragraph 9 of the report (IMP4). In
2009 the UKNC asked the author to draft written evidence to be submitted
to the Iraq (Chilcot) Inquiry. This evidence was submitted, with a copy of
Destruction, under the signature of 13 cultural heritage
organisations to the Inquiry in February 2010. In a letter dated 19 April
2010 the Inquiry Chairman noted that Destruction was `...very
useful to the Inquiry..." and that he was "...very grateful to [the
author] for sharing his expertise...' (IMP5). In 2012 Stone wrote
a Policy Brief for UKNC on `The value to the UK of ratifying the 1954
Hague Convention on the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of
Armed Conflict and its two Protocols of 1954 and 1999'. In 2012 Stone
worked with his local MP to table a written question on the likely timing
of ratification of the Hague Convention. As a result of this research
Stone has met with the relevant ministers for the previous and current
governments. These meetings and the above pressure from the UKNC and
others, all led by Stone, led directly to the Secretary of State at the
Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) (unsuccessfully) requesting
formally Parliamentary time during the 2012/13 Session for passing
legislation to enable the UK to ratify the Hague Convention. DCMS staff
have confirmed they anticipate making a similar request for the next
Parliamentary session.
UK, NATO and international armed forces
The publication of Destruction has led to invitations to speak at
a number of military symposia dealing with cultural property protection
(CPP) including the Sustaining Military Readiness Conference, US
Department of Defence (2009); Cultural Property Protection in Times of
Conflict, Netherlands Ministry of Defence (2009); Cultural
Property Protection, Norwegian Ministries of Environment and Defence
(2011); Coping with Culture, German Bundeswehr (2011); Culture
in Conflict, UK Defence Academy (2012); Coping with Culture,
NATO Civilian/Military Centre of Excellence (CIMIC-COE), The Netherlands
(2012). Impact has been incremental as Stone has gained the trust of the
military. For example he was: asked to chair the whole 2009 Dutch
Symposium mentioned above and to submit a report and recommendations to
the Netherlands MoD as a result of meeting military personnel at earlier
meetings; invited to the 2011 Coping with Culture meeting by the
Bundeswehr as the result of contacts made at the 2009 Dutch meeting;
invited to the 2012 meeting at CIMIC-COE at which he was asked to return
to work on the development of a training module for middle-ranking
officers on cultural property protection for NATO, for which a draft
syllabus has now been developed. Commenting on Stone's work in this area,
a senior CIMIC-COE staff member stated that: `were it not for the past
work, expertise and dedication of Prof. Stone, the project would have
never moved farther along than the concept....His impact on both sides of
the civil-military equation, in the area of joint education and training,
has been significant' (IMP6). Through this relationship-building
with the current and previous Directors of CIMIC Stone's research has been
able to influence military activity at an operational level. Cultural
property protection lists provided by Stone were used by NATO forces to
protect key sites from air strikes during the 2011 Libya conflict. The
current Director of the CIMIC- COE noted that `when Professor Stone
submitted lists of cultural property to be protected in Libya and Mali the
Centre was confident of their quality and reliability and passed them on
to the relevant strategic and operational units in NATO. These lists were
then used to ensure cultural property was not damaged by air-strikes' (IMP7).
For example, six mobile radar units that had been placed very close to the
Roman fort at Ras Almargeb by troops loyal to the Gaddafi regime were
carefully targeted and destroyed without damaging the fort because the
fort was on the list supplied to NATO (IMP8). The Director also
noted that: `A recent NATO report on our work in Libya recommended that
NATO develop a cultural property protection doctrine and I hope to
continue the Centre's relationship with Professor Stone' (IMP7).
More recently (2013) Stone has also been asked to prepare cultural
property protection training sessions and materials for the Lebanese Army,
the Nigerian Army and the Economic Community Of West African States
(ECOWAS). The three-day workshop with the Lebanese Army (June 2013) was
attended by 30 high level officers from the Lebanese Army, the United
Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) and the international police
organisation INTERPOL. Commenting on this workshop, the Head of the
International Humanitarian Law (IHL) Office, Lebanese Army wrote: `IHL in
general and the protection of cultural property in particular are becoming
increasingly important aspects of modern conflict. Because of this....I
created a team within the Lebanese Army to help develop doctrine and
practical approaches for the Army to use. The seminar we held last week
which was under the auspices of UNESCO was a crucial part of the training
of this team and a beginning of this process. It was very helpful that
Professor Stone was able to participate to share his knowledge and
experience with my staff and to introduce the concept of his 4-Tier
Approach that I am sure will be very useful in our future work' (IMP9).
Agreement on this need for new training provision on cultural property
protection for peacekeeping forces was also indicated by the attending
representative from UNIFIL who wrote: `In light of recent conflicts in
countries rich in cultural heritage where UN peacekeeping operations are
being planned, deployed and conducted, I am discussing...ways to ensure
that this aspect is taken into consideration. Most immediately, I am
seeking approval for CPP sensitivity seminars for UN troops in southern
Lebanon, and will try to expand these to other peacekeeping operations...'
(IMP10).
Sources to corroborate the impact
(IMP1) Award citation: for the AIA 2011 James R. Wiseman book award.
Available on request.
(IMP2) Newspaper article: Robson, E. (2008) `Book of the week: The
Destruction of Cultural Heritage in Iraq', Times Higher Education,
31 July 2008. Available at:
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/books/book-of-the-week-the-destruction-of-
cultural-heritage-in-iraq/403039.article.
(IMP3) Visitor comments on exhibition of Catastrophe, Society of
Antiquities, London (15-26 June 2009). Available on request.
(IMP4) House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee (2008) Draft
Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill, Ninth Report of Session 2007-08.
London: TSO.
(IMP5) Letter from Chair, The Iraq Inquiry (19 April 2010).
(IMP6) Statement from Senior Program Manager, CIMIC-COE, on Stone's work
on joint CCP education and training (18 August 2013).
(IMP7) Statement from Director and Senior National Representative of The
Netherlands, CIMIC- COE on influence of Stone's work on NATO (22 July
2013).
(IMP8) Image of Mobile Radar Units and Roman Fort at Ras Almargeb.
Available at: http://research.ncl.ac.uk/sacs/macsicchs/people/staff/peter.stone.
(IMP9) Statement from Head of International Humanitarian Law Office,
Lebanese Army on impact of the UNESCO workshop (27 June 2013).
(IMP10) Statement: from Acting Senior Political Affairs Officer, UNIFIL
on influence of the UNESCO workshop in planning training for UN
peacekeeping forces.