Risk Management of Physical Assets: Estimation and Optimisation of Performance of Maintenance Systems
Submitting Institution
University of EdinburghUnit of Assessment
Business and Management StudiesSummary Impact Type
EconomicResearch Subject Area(s)
Mathematical Sciences: Statistics
Economics: Applied Economics
Summary of the impact
Physical asset management is a major cost for many organisations and is
measured in £billions in the regulated industries within the UK. Methods
developed by researchers in the University of Edinburgh Business School
have enabled managers to estimate the effectiveness of maintenance
interventions, and to build optimal maintenance strategies for large and
complex assets, providing a scientific basis for major budgetary
allocations. Users have deployed these methods to: achieve optimal asset
management (Scottish Water); support regulatory assessments (Yorkshire
Water Services); assist Severn Trent Water Company with its regulatory
submissions (Cap Gemini); and inform procurement decisions across major
platforms in maritime and air environments (Ministry of Defence).
Underpinning research
The on-going research started in 1998 and initially involved Professor
L.C. Thomas (left Edinburgh 2000), Professor J.I. Ansell (1990-current),
Professor T.W. Archibald (1988-current) and Dr J. Dagpunar (1996-2000).
Subsequently Dr G. Andreeva (from 2007) joined the project team to
contribute to the development of Risk Management Training.
The initial work aimed to provide estimates of the rate of unplanned
maintenance actions for large and complex assets whose performance is
influenced by environmental and organisational factors. This stage of the
research benefited from access to data from Yorkshire Water Services which
was regarded at the time as an industry leader in data collection.
However, all water companies recognise that existing information on assets
is extremely limited in scope. One of the challenges for the research was
the relatively short time period during which useful data on maintenance
actions had been collected. Data was only available for a period of four
years while the typical lifecycle of an asset could be 40 years or more.
This required the development of robust methods of analysis capable of
producing important management insights from the existing incomplete
maintenance records. An innovative approach was developed that integrated
a number of advanced statistical modelling techniques. This assumed a
time-dependent base rate for unplanned maintenance that is common to all
assets of a given type. The base rate is adjusted by a factor that depends
on the characteristics of a particular asset. Methods were developed to
estimate the common base rate and the adjustment factor from the available
data [see 3.1].
The resulting model allowed the investigation and assessment of the
effect of various factors on the rate of unplanned maintenance. This
knowledge allows decision-makers to improve the performance of an asset.
Since the techniques employed were data driven, they provided insight into
the underlying process, through improved appreciation of the impact of
maintenance actions on the performance of assets, which led to further
work on assessing the impact of maintenance actions. This is an insight
that would not have been possible from alternative approaches which impose
an intuitive, but arbitrary, form on the rate of unplanned maintenance
(for example that it is increasing over time) to simplify analysis. This
research was published in Ansell et al (2003) [3.1].
The realisation that the data could be used to assess the impact of
maintenance on the rate of unplanned maintenance motivated follow-on work
to develop a general stochastic model to optimise the timing of planned
maintenance interventions on an asset. For the purposes of this model, the
state of the asset is assumed to consist of three components: (1) the
environmental and organisational factors that affect performance of the
asset, (2) the age (i.e. time since installation) of the asset, and (3)
the "virtual" age of the asset. The virtual age of an asset is an
alternative measure of age that allows for the "rejuvenation" effect of
maintenance. The extent of the rejuvenation is estimated from the insight
provided by the analysis above. The model can consider a range of
maintenance interventions, from minor refurbishment to complete
replacement, and is flexible enough to allow characteristics of
replacement equipment to differ from those of the original equipment, to
take account of technological advancement. The model is based on a
discrete-time, stochastic dynamic programming formulation of the problem.
Standard solution approaches exist to find optimal management strategies
for maintenance. In addition to the novel approach to estimating the
impact of maintenance, this research was distinctive because of the
concept of virtual age and the range of actions considered. The research
was published in Ansell et al (2004a) [3.2].
References to the research
3.1 Ansell J, Archibald, T, Dagpunar, J, Thomas, L, Abell, P and Duncalf,
D (2003), `Analysing maintenance data to gain insight into systems
performance'. Journal of the Operational Research Society
54(4):343-349 (DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601496).
3.2 Ansell J, Archibald, T and Thomas, L (2004a), `The elixir of life:
using a maintenance, repair and replacement model based on virtual and
operating age in the water industry'. IMA Journal of Management
Mathematics 15(2):151-160 (DOI: 10.1093/imaman/15.2.151).
3.3 Ansell J, Archibald, T and Thomas, L (2004b), `The stability of an
optimal maintenance strategy for repairable assets'. Journal of
Process Mechanical Engineering 218(E2):77-82, (DOI: 10.1243/095440804774134253).
3.5 Ansell J, Archibald, T, Denning, R and Bain, A (2011), `Investigating
deferment of maintenance actions', In: Prescott and Remenyte-Prescott
(Eds.) Proceedings of the 19th Advances in Risk and Reliability
Technology Symposium (AR2TS), Stratford, 289-296.
Details of the impact
The first stage of the research (to estimate the rate of unplanned
maintenance [5.1]) produced what became known within Yorkshire Water
Services as "Edinburgh curves" for different types of assets [5.2.1 &
5.2.2]. These curves gave a scientific underpinning to the deterioration
model which contributed to the assessment of the need for future
maintenance activity. This assessment was the basis for the evidence
Yorkshire Water Services submitted to the English water regulator (OFWAT)
to support the company's price review [5.2.1 & 5.2.2]. Thus within
Yorkshire Water Services, the research had an impact on the budget for
maintenance projects estimated to be in the order of £1.93bn 2010-2015
based on findings and the prices charged to customers [5.3]. The approach
was also taken up by Gap Gemini to underpin work carried out to assist
Severn Trent Water Company with its submission to the regulator [5.2.5].
A further consequence of the implementation of the research in Yorkshire
Water Services was the development of a Risk Management Training programme
[5.1]. The aim of the training was to make employees more aware of the
techniques available for the management of risk within the organisation.
Between 2008 and 2010, over 100 staff participated in the programme [5.3].
The training was organised at two levels: an awareness level and an
understanding level. The aim of the former was to give all technical and
managerial staff the ability to assess how their role had an impact upon
the efficiency and effectiveness of the organisation. The understanding
level allowed individuals to develop their skills in implementing
appropriate procedures within Yorkshire Water Services with a view to
achieving reductions in both risk and cost within their own work context.
The programme is attributed with "improvements in service performance ...
by reducing the risk of service interruptions to customers and improving
the prioritisation of investment needs" [5.3]. Through the programme, the
research has had impact on management practices throughout the
organisation by "opening the risk management practices up to all" in a way
that "embeds a risk management culture into Yorkshire Water" [5.3]. The
Programme was awarded two industry national awards including the People
Initiative of the Year at the Water Industry Achievement Awards 2008
[5.4].
The second stage of the research (optimising the timing of planned
maintenance) has been applied in two separate contexts: assessing the
impact of delay in maintenance actions on the overall cost of managing
assets; and developing optimal strategies for repair, refurbishment and
replacement of assets. The former work was carried out for the Ministry of
Defence Procurement Executive [5.1 & 5.2.3] and the latter for
Scottish Water [5.2.4].
Discussion of the research at a meeting of the Water User Statistics
Group (a specialist interest group of the Royal Statistical Society) led
to a Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP) to assist Scottish Water in
strategic asset planning (Sept 2010-Sept 2012) [5.1]. The aim of the KTP
was to build on the published research by developing models (based on
concepts from reliability and stochastic dynamic programming) to inform
asset management strategy. The resulting suite of mathematical models
allows Scottish Water to predict the optimal timing of asset maintenance
over a 25-year period. In this way, "the KTP has provided a clearer
understanding of data deficiencies and a much more robust application of
new and existing risk management techniques" [5.5 & 5.6], resulting in
efficiency savings of £67.5m over three years [Scottish Water estimates
5.6, p10]. Presentation of the modelling techniques to the Water Industry
Commission resulted in endorsement and acceptance of the outputs of the
models to a critical Scottish Water stakeholder [5.5]. The models have
been so successful that they have quickly become a crucial element of the
company's overarching strategic projections document (published November
2012 [5.7]) and near-term business plan (due to be published October 2013)
[5.5]. Within these documents, the models are providing a credible,
evidence based approach for over £1bn of capital investment need [5.5].
Both documents are key elements of the regulatory process and will help to
set customer charges and the funding the company requires from 2015
through to 2021. Training sessions on optimisation delivered by the
research team have ensured that the knowledge acquired during the project
was transferred to the whole of the Analytics Team in Scottish Water so
that the models can be developed and progressed now that the KTP has
officially finished [5.5].
Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1. Contracts totalling over £500k with: Yorkshire Water Services for
Development of Assessment Procedures; Yorkshire Water Services for Risk
Training; Scottish Water (KTP Award); Ministry of Defence (Demonstrates
the value that industry partners placed on the research — details
available from HEI.)
5.2. Individual users/beneficiaries who could be contacted by the REF
team to corroborate claims:
5.2.1. Risk Matters (Will corroborate the contribution to Yorkshire Water
in both analytic and training — contact details and statement available
from HEI.)
5.2.2. Yorkshire Water (Will corroborate the contribution to Yorkshire
Water in both analytic and training — contact details and statement
available from HEI.)
5.2.3. Principal Reliability Engineer, Ministry of Defence (Will
corroborate the contribution to MoD in modelling — statement available
from HEI.)
5.2.4. Analytics Team, Scottish Water (Will corroborate the contribution
made to Scottish Water in Optimal Maintenance and outcome of KTP — contact
details available from HEI.)
5.2.5. Cap Gemini (Will corroborate the impact of the modelling developed
at Edinburgh — contact details available from HEI.)
5.3. Yorkshire Water (2009), Final Business Plan 2010-15: Part B3
Sections 2 & 6. (www.yorkshirewater.com/about-us/our-investment-plans/final-business-plan.aspx
or http://tinyurl.com/nvtueod )
(Corroborates the scale of the investment in maintenance activities that
the research helped to guide in Yorkshire Water and the scale of the risk
management programme within Yorkshire Water.)
5.4. The Risk Training Programme within Yorkshire Water Services achieved
two industry national awards: Utility Industry Achievement Award for
Training 2007 and the People Initiative of the Year at the People
Initiative of the Year Awards 2008. (http://tinyurl.com/pbdkodq)
(Demonstrates the high regard in which the risk training programme was
held within Yorkshire Water and the utility industries.)
5.5. Scottish Water (2012), Knowledge Transfer Partnership, Final Report:
Results for the Company Partner (copy available from HEI). (Corroborates
the impact of the research on the planning of maintenance activities
within Scottish Water and the estimate of the financial savings resulting
from the new processes implemented.)
5.6. The KTP project was awarded the highest grade of "Outstanding" by
the KTP Grading Panel for its achievement in meeting KTP's Objectives. (http://forms.ktponline.org.uk/repository/cert/KTP007813-130227085126.pdf
or http://tinyurl.com/o5lcwyh )
(Provides an independent assessment of the impact of the research on
maintenance planning within Scottish Water.)
5.7. Scottish Water (2012), Draft Strategic Projections, pp.44-46. (http://www.scottishwater.co.uk/assets/about%20us/files/key%20publications/final_swdraftstrategicprojectionsnov12feb13.pdf
or http://tinyurl.com/p4wo3gs ).
(Provides evidence of the embedding of the processes developed within
Scottish Water as a result of the research within strategic planning.)