The Impact of MMU Research on Technical Climate Policy in the Aviation and Maritime Sectors.
Submitting Institution
Manchester Metropolitan UniversityUnit of Assessment
Earth Systems and Environmental SciencesSummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Economics: Applied Economics, Econometrics
Summary of the impact
This case study describes the impacts of the work undertaken at
Manchester Metropolitan University's (MMU) Centre for Aviation, Transport,
and the Environment (CATE), on international and national policy and
legislation for reducing CO2 emissions from aviation and
shipping. The research has provided a robust technical basis for emissions
reductions of CO2 from aviation and the maritime sectors. It
has influenced international and national policy development of the
International Civil Aviation Organization through their Committee on
Aviation Environmental Protection (ICAO-CAEP), the International Maritime
Organization (IMO), the European Commission (EC), and the UK Committee on
Climate Change (UKCCC). Greenhouse gas emission reductions have been
pledged under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change's
(UNFCCC) Conference of Parties (COP) as a result of the United Nations
Environment Program's (UNEP) influential report "Bridging the Emissions
Gap", in which a chapter on aviation and shipping was led by CATE staff ([1],
sec.3, numerical references to the research).
Underpinning research
The context: Reductions of greenhouse gas emissions, and
principally those of CO2, represent one of the greatest
environmental challenges to society today because of the nature, scale and
longevity of impacts. According to the Fourth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC), transport emissions of
CO2 were 23% of energy-related CO2 emissions in 2004
([A], sec.5, alphabetical sources to corroborate the impact).
However, the aviation and maritime sub-sectors of transport (~21% of
transport CO2 emissions) have less potential for dramatic
reductions in CO2 emission intensity. This is because of their
dependence on liquid fossil fuels and slow fleet turnover. Moreover, both
sectors are predicted to continue to grow at rates greater than that of
the GDP. Thus, aviation and maritime sectors are likely to represent
increasing proportions of both total transport and global fossil fuel
related CO2 emissions. CATE, at MMU, has been researching the
environmental impacts of aviation (noise, air quality and climate) since
1993. Since 2003, CATE has focussed upon the impact of the aviation and
maritime sectors on climate. CATE's key REF staff, (Prof. David Lee and Dr
Sarah Raper, supported at any one time by a team of ~10 RFs, RAs and
PhDs), have developed research that has earned a global reputation for its
policy-relevance on emissions, atmospheric impacts and the impact of
future alternative fuel (biofuel). This is evidenced by continuous support
by the Department for Transport (DFT) since 2003 (sec.3) and key widely
cited research on the quantification of the impact of aviation on climate
([1], sec.3).
Research on international aviation emissions (2010-2013): This
research has focused upon i) the design of a whole aircraft
performance-based emission metric for international regulation, ii) the
design of emission scenarios and assessment of future trends, and iii)
developing summaries of the science of aviation and climate. This has led
to three internationally authored ICAO `White Papers' for policy makers.
Key outputs at ICAO-CAEP 9th meeting, Feb. 2013 ([B],
sec.5).
Research on international maritime emissions (2007-2010):
Historical, current-day and potential future maritime emissions and
climate impacts comprise the core of this research ([2], [3],
sec.3), which is of particular importance to the IMO. Key outputs of
benchmark emissions and mitigation options were given in an IMO report ([3],
sec.3), and development of understanding of trade-offs in CO2
and non-CO2 emissions in 2009, 2010 journal articles ([2],
[4], sec.3) supported by EC grants, Quantify, ATTICA, sec.3).
Designing aviation policy options in the European Union and the UK
(2005-2012): This has involved i) design of the scope and coverage
of the European Aviation Emissions Trading Scheme, resulting in key
outputs published in 2005 ([5], sec.3), 2008, that led to legal
implementation of the scheme in 2012, ii) assessment of the size and scope
of UK international aviation emissions at baseline and future years for
the Committee on Climate Change; key output a 2009 CCC report forming the
basis of UK policy on international aviation emissions of CO2 ([C],
sec.5).
Informing climate negotiations for emissions reductions pledges
(2010-2011): Primarily research into the mitigation potential from
aviation and maritime CO2 emissions by 2020. One key
peer-reviewed output was the UNEP report ([6], sec.3), presented to
the 2011 COP meeting in Durban.
Work for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1997-2013):
This has encompassed assessment of aviation emissions and impacts for the
IPCC Special Report 1999, an emissions calculation methodology for IPCC
Greenhouse Gas Guidebook in 2006 (both of which have enduring impacts and
continued usage into the REF period); the assessment of transport-related
mitigation potential in the IPCC Fourth Assessment report (2007) ([A],
sec.5); and contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report between 2010
and 2013 (published, Sept. 2013).
References to the research
[1] Lee D. S., Fahey D., Forster, P., Newton P. J., Wit, R. C. N.,
Lim L. L., Owen B., and Sausen R. (2009) Aviation and global climate
change in the 21st century. Atmospheric Environment 43,
3520-3537, DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.024, (154
citations)
[2] Fuglestvedt J. S., Berntsen T., Eyring V., Isaksen I., Lee D.
S., Sausen R. (2009) Shipping emissions: from cooling to warming of
climate — and reducing impacts on health. Environmental Science and
Technology 43, 9057-9062. DOI: 10.1021/es901944r (19
citations)
[3] Buhaug O., Corbett J. J., Endresen O., Eyring V., Faber J.,
Hanayama S., Lee D. S., Lee D., Lindstad H., Markowska A. Z., Mjelde A.,
Nelissen D., Nilsen J., Palsson C., Winebrake J. J., Wu W., Yoshida K.
(2009) Second IMO GHG Study, 2009. International Maritime Organization,
London.
[4] Fuglestvedt J. S., Shine K. P., Cook J., Berntsen T., Lee D.
S., Stenke A., Skeie R. B., Velders G. J. M. and Waitz I. A. (2010)
Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Metrics. Atmospheric
Environment, 44, 4648-4677. DOI:
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.044, (92 citations)
[5] Wit R. C. N., Boon B. H., van Velzen A., Cames M., Deuber O.
and Lee D. S. (2005) Giving wings to emission trading. Inclusion of
aviation under the European emission trading system (ETS): design and
impacts. CE-Delft, No. ENC.C.2/ETU/2004/0074r, the Netherlands.
[6] Lee D. S., Hare, W., Endresen Ø., Eyring V., Faber J., Lockley
P., Maurice L., Schaeffer M., Wilson C. (2011) International emissions. In
`Bridging the Emissions Gap. A UNEP Synthesis Report'. United
Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
Research Grants
In the time covered by this impact case study MMU has attracted ~ £10
million of direct income from research grants and contracts related to
this impact study. This includes funding from the EPSRC (£1.5M), UK
Government (DFT, DEFRA, DECC; £4.5M), and the European Union (Quantify,
ATTICA, ECATS, AERONET, AERO2K, REACT4C, ITAKA; £2M). From 2007 - 2009
CATE led the £5M HEIF-funded OMEGA project (£1.5M direct funding). OMEGA
is a network of UK based research centres (Cambridge, Cranfield, Leeds,
Loughborough, MMU, Oxford, Reading, Sheffield and Southampton) focussed on
providing scientific data for sustainable growth in the aviation industry.
Details of the impact
The principle impacts are those upon public policy and the environment
through scientific work to support international/national policy and
regulation. These have resulted in real-world impacts, which ultimately
result in tangible reductions in global CO2 and other
atmospheric emissions.
Research on International Aviation Emissions: CATE, at MMU, has
been working within a technical body of the UN ICAO Agency, to design the
first CO2 emissions standard for aircraft (see `Research on
international aviation emissions', sec.2). MMU input has been crucial for
the relevant UK and European regulatory authorities ([D], sec.5).
The ICAO formally adopted the metric in February 2013 ([B], sec.5),
but the standard has not yet been set. MMU is active in both establishing
the principles for standard-setting and quantifying the impact of
standards on future CO2 emission reduction. CATE leads one of
the 6 technical ICAO Working Groups (Impacts and Science Group) and
supports 3 others. According to the Executive Director of the Federal
Aviation Administration of the US: "CATE's efforts to quantify
aviation's emissions inventories have informed critical decisions on new
air quality and noise engine and aircraft standards in 2010 and 2013 at
ICAO/CAEP. Such policy decisions have tremendous costs and offer
substantial environmental benefits. They must be made carefully and be
informed by the best available science. CATE has been at the forefront
of informing policy makers and ensuring their decisions are
science-based" ([D], sec.5).
Research on International Maritime Emissions: The IMO is the UN
Agency responsible for international emissions of CO2 from the
maritime sector, under Article 2.2. of the Kyoto Protocol. The IMO
commissioned a `game changing' emissions and impacts assessment, published
in 2009, to which David Lee contributed. This report has made a major
impact on the maritime sector and has set benchmarks for historical,
present, and future potential emissions through the development of
scenarios. "The involvement of Professor Lee, amongst other
world-leading experts has reduced the uncertainty for governments in
their decision making process and is one of the main reasons for IMO's
successful adoption of the first binding and global CO2
regime for an industry sector." (Technical Director, IMO, [E],
sec.5) In addition to the emissions assessment, the section on the climate
impact of maritime emissions was co-led by David Lee. Through the IMO
report ([3], sec.3) and follow-on publications ([2], [6],
sec.3), this shifted the perspective of the maritime and shipping industry
to accept that the sector's emissions of CO2 lead to global
warming in the long-term, despite short-term cooling from sulphur
emissions. Thus SO2 emissions regulations proceeded (entered
into force 1 July 2010), with the consequential protection of local and
regional air quality, simultaneously combined with a separate focus on CO2
emissions reductions. This resulted in adoption of a CO2
emissions standard/energy efficiency design index in July 2011.
Designing aviation policy options in the European Union and the UK:
In January 2012, the European Union introduced aviation into its Emissions
Trading Scheme (ETS). The original scope of the scheme, in terms of
pollutants and policy/geographical scope, was commissioned by the European
Commission in 2005 ([5], sec.3). The 2005 report set out the basic
design of the ETS. Crucially, the European Parliament wanted to include
non-CO2 emissions from aviation, and David Lee, concluded in
this ([5], sec.3) and a later (2008) report to the Commission that
they should not be included in the ETS as the science was not sufficiently
developed. As a result of the EU-ETS, significant CO2 emissions
savings will result (currently under some negotiation at the international
level, to which MMU is contributing data). "From the early stages of
policy formulation through to on-going international negotiations over
the future global policy and rules on aviation emissions, timely MMU
research and input have enabled EU policies and positions to be
formulated and defended on the basis of solid and state-of-the art
knowledge, the most prominent example hereof being aviation's inclusion
in the EU's Emissions Trading System" (Personal assistant to
Member of Cabinet of Connie Hedegaard, European Commissioner for Climate
Action [F], sec.5) The UK Committee on Climate Change (CCC)
was established by Parliamentary Act to examine UK CO2
emissions each year and ensure that the UK is on course to meet targets.
The CCC assessed whether aviation emissions should form part of these
targets, and examined impacts and mitigation options. David Lee was
appointed to the CCC as special advisor on aviation, and contributed
towards the writing of the CCC's 2009 Aviation Report, as recorded in the
report's acknowledgements. As a result, the CCC noted that CO2
emissions from international aviation should be considered in the UK legal
targets for CO2. Moreover, the CCC adopted and re-published the
main chart from [1], sec.3, and recommended that non-CO2
impacts should be revisited in the future "David Lee was an expert
advisor for our review of aviation emissions (CCC, 2009), where he
provided advice on non-CO2 effects, aircraft and fleet
technologies and future scenarios. This report was, and continues to be,
very influential in debates around the future of UK aviation" (Climate
Science Advisor, Committee on Climate Change Secretariat [G],
sec.5).
Informing Climate Negotiations for Emissions Reductions Pledges:
As a result of extensive technical and scientific experience in the
aviation and shipping sectors, David Lee was invited by UNEP to lead a
chapter of a UNEP Synthesis Report ([6], sec.3) on whether pledges
of emissions reductions will be sufficient to meet the `2 degree target'
for global warming. The UNEP report `Bridging the Emissions Gap' was
launched at the Royal Society in 2011, and presented to the Conference of
Parties to the Climate Convention at Durban in 2011. As a result, various
`Parties to the Convention' re-pledged emissions reductions and for the
report to be taken into account in climate negotiations. "The UNEP
series reports on the 'emissions gap' of where we need to be on a 2
degree trajectory, and where we are according to current pledges and
projections, has been of vital importance to policy makers in the UNFCCC
negotiations. The analysis from the gap report has been extensively used
by negotiators to support their work and is often quoted during the
climate talks and negotiation sessions." (Deputy Director,
Division of Technology, Industry & Economics, United Nations
Environment Program [H], sec.5).
Work for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: The work
of the IPCC was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007. Four of MMU's staff
from CATE (Lee, Raper S, Raper D and Dimitriu) are Lead Authors. Lee as
REF researcher has contributed to the 1999 Aviation Report ([I],
sec.5), the 2006 Greenhouse Guidebook ([J], sec.5) and the 2007
Fourth Assessment WG3 Report ([A], sec.5), and the writing of the
Fifth Assessment Report from 2011 to 2013. CATE has made significant
contributions to IPCC reports that have been critical in informing
international climate policy and have enduring impact in the current REF
impact period. The IPCC Greenhouse Guidebook (2006) for example ([J],
sec.5) is still the de facto standard for estimating and reporting
aviation and shipping emissions internationally and still in use to 2013.
Sources to corroborate the impact
[A] Kahn-Ribeiro S., Kobayashi S, Beuthe M., Gasca J., Greene D.,
Lee D. S., Muromachi Y., Newton P. J., Plotkin S., Wit R. C. N. and
Zhou P. J. (2007) Transportation and its infrastructure. Chapter
5, IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Working Group 3.
[B] Report of the Ninth meeting of the International Civil
Aviation Organization Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection,
Montreal, February 4th to 15th, 2013.
[C] Meeting the UK aviation target — options for reducing
emissions to 2050. Committee on Climate Change, London.
[D] Quote from Executive Director/Chief Scientist
(Environment/Energy), US Federal Aviation Administration corroborating
impacts on establishing the principles for standard-setting on
international aviation emissions and on quantifying the impact on future
CO2 reduction.
[E] Quote from: Technical Adviser to the Secretary-General, Office
of the Secretary-General, International Maritime Organization corroborating
impacts on setting benchmarks for international CO2 emissions from the
maritime sector.
[F] Quote from: Personal assistant to Member of Cabinet of Connie
Hedegaard, European Commissioner for Climate Action corroborating
impacts on EU policy and position in relation to CO2 emissions from
aviation.
[G] Quote from: Climate Science Advisor, Committee on Climate
Change Secretariat corroborating impacts on UK aviation and shipping
emissions policy.
[H] Quote from: Deputy Director, Division of Technology, Industry
& Economics, United Nations Environment Program corroborating
impacts on international aviation / maritime policy and potential CO2
reductions.
[I] Henderson S. C., Wickrama U. K., Baughcum S. L., Begin J. L.,
Franco F., Greene D. L., Lee D. S., Mclaren M. L., Mortlock A. K.,
Newton P. J., Schmitt A., Sutkus D. J., Vedantham A. and Wuebbles D. J.
(1999) Aircraft emissions: current inventories and future scenarios.
Chapter 9 of `Aviation and the Global Atmosphere'. Special Report
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge.
[J] Maurice L. Q., Hockstad L., Hoehne N., Hupe J., Lee D. S.
and Rypdal K. (2006) Mobile combustion: aviation. In `2006 IPCC
Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories' Chapter 3,
Section 6, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Japan.