University of Portsmouth allergy research leads to change of Department of Health guidelines on maternal feeding during pregnancy and breastfeeding
Submitting Institution
University of PortsmouthUnit of Assessment
Public Health, Health Services and Primary CareSummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Immunology, Public Health and Health Services
Summary of the impact
Our research has led to a change in DoH guidelines on maternal
consumption of peanut during pregnancy/breastfeeding.
Guidelines until 2009 advocated the avoidance of peanut in allergic
families. However evidence base for this advice was poor and the advice
was adopted by families regardless of their allergy status leading to
significant constraints on their lifestyles. Our research revealed that
peanut allergy is not associated with maternal peanut consumption, and
that there was no need for pregnant women to avoid peanut during
pregnancy. On the basis of our research DoH concluded that previous
guidance was inappropriate and it was thus withdrawn.
Underpinning research
The underpinning research was carried out under the leadership of
Professor Taraneh Dean (Professor of Health Sciences, University of
Portsmouth; Honorary Deputy Director of Asthma and Allergy Research
Centre, Isle of Wight) during the period 2001-2010. The main
co-investigator for this research is Dr Carina Venter (University of
Portsmouth)
Food hypersensitivity (FHS) is an adverse reaction following food
ingestion that can be either a food allergy (if immunologically mediated)
or a non-allergic FHS. It is important that those producing guidance or
developing education programmes have robust population-based
epidemiological data regarding prevalence and risk factors of FHS to key
food allergens in children and other age groups.
Whilst there is evidence demonstrating increasing prevalence of other
manifestations of allergies such as asthma and atopic dermatitis, there
had been a paucity of studies, investigating the prevalence of FHS.
Following a competitive call Professor Dean was commissioned1
by the Food Standards Agency to establish the first UK birth cohort with
the specific aim of establishing prevalence of FHS using the objective
outcome measure of food challenges2. The team specifically
investigated the prevalence of peanut allergy, which is the most common
cause of food induced anaphylaxis in children, in a whole population birth
cohort (total 969 children) born between 2001 and 2002. This cohort was
compared with previous cohorts of children born in the same geographical
location, Isle of Wight, UK. The cohort was recruited ante-natally and
followed up at 1, 2 and 3 years of age: the 10 year follow up is the
subject of a current NIHR Fellowship. Prevalence of FHS to peanuts and
other foods was 1.9%, 3.8% and 4.5% at ages 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Based
on double-blinded, placebo-controlled, food challenge (DBPCFC), a gold
standard methodology used for such studies, and a good clinical history,
the cumulative incidence of FHS was 5.0% (48/969, 95% CI: 3.7-6.5).3
The research team also established, using a validated food frequency
questionnaire for consumption of allergenic foods, that maternal dietary
intake of food allergens, and peanut in particular, during pregnancy and
breast-feeding did not influence subsequent development of FHS in children4.
We also discovered that the governmental advice to avoid peanuts was
actually followed by mothers regardless of their family history of
allergy, which could have had a detrimental effect and actually increase
the prevalence of allergic disorders in children5. The team was
able to use this evidence, based on their robust methodology, to call into
question results from previous studies. Overall, 33.7% of parents reported
a food-related problem and, of these, only 12.9% were diagnosed with FHS
by DBPCFC and history. Consequently, the results from this study
challenged the previously-held perception that peanut allergy and other
food allergies are increasing.6 The team demonstrated that
peanut allergy prevalence has changed over time, with a peak in peanut
sensitisation and reported allergy in children born in 1994-1996, but,
since the late 1990's, this seems to have stabilised.
References to the research
1. Food Standards Agency (sponsor), awarded to: Prof Taraneh Dean (PI), Prevalence
and Incidence of Food Allergy and Intolerance in British Population,
grant period: 2001-2006; £603,605 (Grant ref.T07023). Food Standards
Agency (sponsor), awarded to: Prof Taraneh Dean (PI), Trends in
incidence of peanut allergy in England in the last 15 years, grant
period: 2003-2006, £115,758 (Grant ref. T07034). Professor Dean was the
single applicant for both awards.
2. Venter C, Pereira B, Grundy J, Clayton B, Roberts G, Higgins
B, Dean T. Incidence of parentally reported
and clinically diagnosed food hypersensitivity in the first year of
life. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2006; 117:
1118-1124. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.12.1352.
Web:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091674906001680
Web of Science citation count: 76 (rated in the top 5% of outputs for
Immunology and
Allergy journals); Impact factor: 12.047
3. Venter C, Pereira B, Voigt K, Grundy J, Clayton CB, Higgins
B, Arshad SH, Dean T. Prevalence and cumulative
incidence of food hypersensitivity in the first 3 years of life.
Allergy 2008; 63: 354-359. DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01570.x.
Web:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01570.x/abstract
REF 2 output: 2-TD-002 Scopus citation count: 75 (rated in the top 5% of
outputs for
Immunology and Allergy journals); Impact factor: 6.271.
4. Venter C, Pereira B, Voigt K, Grundy J, Clayton CB, Higgins
B,Arshad SH, Dean T. Factors associated with maternal
dietary intake, feeding and weaning practices, and the development of
food hypersensitivity in the infant. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2009;
20: 320- 327. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2008.00832. REF 2 output: 2-BH-004
Web:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1399-3038.2008.00832.x/abstract
Web of Science citation count: 14 (rated in the top 25% of outputs for
immunology and allergy journals); Impact factor: 3.376
5. Dean T, Venter C, Pereira B, Grundy J, Clayton CB, Higgins
B. Government advice on peanut avoidance during pregnancy - Is
it followed correctly and what is the impact on sensitization?
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 2007; 20: 95-99. DOI:
10.1111/j.1365-277X.2007.00751.x.
Web:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-277X.2007.00751.x/abstract
Web of Science citation count: 14; Impact factor: 1.972
6. Venter C, Arshad H, Grundy J, Pereira B, Clayton C, Voigt K, Higgins
B, Dean T. Time trends in the prevalence of peanut
allergy: three cohorts of children from the same geographical location
in the UK. Allergy, 2010; 65: 103-108. DOI:
10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02176.x.
Web:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02176.x/abstract.
REF 2 output: 2-TD-001
Scopus citation count: 48 (rated in the top 5% of outputs for Immunology
and Allergy journals); Impact factor: 6.271
Details of the impact
Three sets of impact has been established by this research:
1) Changes to DoH guidelines. In June 1998, the UK government's Committee
on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment
(COT) published a report on recommending that ``pregnant women who are
atopic or for whom the father or any sibling of the unborn child has an
atopic disease, may wish to avoid eating peanuts and peanut products
during pregnancy and breast feeding.'' This advice was given in the
absence of any robust studies on the prevalence of peanut allergy and its
trend, and in the absence of any link between maternal peanut consumption
and peanut allergy in their offspring. The House of Lords, Science and
Technology Committee report on Allergy (6th Report, Session
2006-7) reviewed the evidence in the area and recommended "that this
advice should be withdrawn immediately pending a comprehensive review by
the Food Standards Agency and the COT". COT's Statement on the review of
the 1998 COT recommendation on peanut avoidance stated that "Since the COT
recommendations were made, there have also been several studies published
on the frequency of sensitisation and allergy to peanuts, which could
inform understanding of whether the prevalence of this allergy is
increasing. It was therefore considered timely to re-assess the current
state of scientific knowledge in this area and, based on the evidence now
available, to re-consider whether the 1998 COT dietary recommendations
remain appropriate" (CS1: http://cot.food.gov.uk/pdfs/cotstatement200807peanut.pdf).
Nine out of the 14 UK studies examined, originated from the Isle of Wight
Team (http://cot.food.gov.uk/pdfs/cotstatement200807peanut.pdf
page 12) illustrating the major contribution the team has made to the
evidence base. Following this review COT Committee concluded that "the
previous dietary recommendations are no longer appropriate because of a
shift in the evidence base (CS2)". The roll out of their revised guideline
and advice has benefitted groups along the entire healthcare supply chain:
individual parents, GPs and allergy services. The revised advice is also
being included within general advice given to mothers about pregnancy and
development of their baby, including the `Pregnancy' and `Birth to Five'
books (http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/pregnancy-and-baby/pages/foods-to-avoid-
pregnant.aspx#Peanuts)
(CS3).
2) Provision of evidence that food allergy levels have not increased. The
birth cohort established by Professor Dean is the only birth cohort
worldwide set up specifically to investigate epidemiology of food allergy
using objective measures and her findings provided the first demonstration
that unlike other manifestations of allergic disorders (eg Asthma) the
rates of food allergy has not increased. This key evidence has informed
policy (CS4,5) as well as the advice that allergic consumers receive from
healthcare professionals and supporting organisations. As a result Prof
Dean and Dr Venter have delivered expert advice to bodies including the
European Food Safety Authority, the National Institute of Clinical
Excellence, the Royal College of Paediatrics and the European Academy of
Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Their prevalence data has significant
reach and has been included in 2010 US Food Allergy Guidelines (CS6). The
impact of this work has been confirmed by the chief executive of
Anaphylaxis Campaign (CS7): "Their research is in these areas is world
leading in part because they are in a unique position to perform
longitudinal cohort studies with very little attrition. In the Allergy
world `Isle of Wight cohorts' are recognised by all".
3) Changes in public awareness with respect to the prevalence of food
allergy. Since the publication of their findings Professor Dean and Dr
Venter have contributed to numerous public engagement exercises (e.g.
Focus on Health: Asthma and Allergy in your Family, http://www.port.ac.uk/uopnews/2012/11/29/expert-advice-for-asthma-and-allergy-sufferers/)
and training events for healthcare professionals (e.g. Allergy Academy
flagship training event for all healthcare professionals http://allergyacademy.org/),
ensuring there is widespread awareness that prevalence of food allergy has
not increased. As stated in a letter by the director of Allergy Academy
(CS8), which has led the delivery of education in Allergy to over 5000
healthcare professionals, "The information on prevalence of food allergies
as provided by Professor Taraneh Dean and her team has been used to inform
many of the educational sessions given at the Allergy Meeting.
4) The paper: Venter, C.; Pereira, B.; Voigt, K.; Grundy, J.; Clayton, C.
B.; Higgins, B.; Arshad, S. H.; Dean, T. Prevalence and Cumulative
Incidence of Food Hypersensitivity in the First 3 Years of Life. Allergy
2008, 63, 354-359, was included in the 2008 version of the "If you only
read five papers this year..." session thus reflecting its value to the
clinical allergy community.
Our work on raising the awareness has also been subject of critical media
review (CS9).
Sources to corroborate the impact
CS1.
http://cot.food.gov.uk/pdfs/cotstatement200807peanut.pdf
Department of Health's Revised COT statement
CS2. Letter from Head of Food Allergy Branch, Food Standards Agency UK to a
British Dietetic Association, Royal College of Midwives,
Community
Practitioners and Health Visitors Association and British Society of Allergy
and Clinical Immunology
CS3.
http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/pregnancy-and-baby/pages/foods-to-avoid-
pregnant.aspx#Peanuts Pregnancy and childbirth handbook
CS4. Letter from Head of Food Allergy Branch, Food Standards Agency UK re.
Dean et al. Prevalence studies.
CS5. Buck, J., Hattersley, S., & Kimber, I. (2010). Food allergy-science
and policy needs-The UK Food Standards Agency Research Programme.
Toxicology,
278(3),
319-325.
DOI:
10.1016/j.tox.2010.08.007
CS6. Letter from Professor of Pediatrics and Division Chief, Food Allergy
Institute, Mount Sinai Medical Center, USA and Lead author of the American
Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidance on allergy prevention and Associate
Editor of the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
CS7. Letter from Chief Executive Officer of The Anaphylaxis Campaign UK re
Dean et al. Prevalence studies.
CS8. Letter from Joint Clinical Lead for Allergy at Guy's & St Thomas'
Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, the UK's largest specialist allergy service,
since 2007 and Director of the King's College London Allergy Academy
CS9.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7218276.stm
Baby allergy fears 'over the top' (31/01/2008), BBC News