High throughput molecular fish fingerprinting assay for measuring fish stocks
Submitting Institution
University of East AngliaUnit of Assessment
Biological SciencesSummary Impact Type
EnvironmentalResearch Subject Area(s)
Biological Sciences: Genetics
Summary of the impact
In the early 2000s, Taylor and Rico, C. at UEA developed a
molecular fingerprinting assay to
identify visually indistinguishable cod, haddock and whiting eggs for the
accurate assessment of
fish stocks. This is essential in setting fishing quotas for healthy
populations. The impacts are:
- The Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science
(Cefas) developed a
molecular lab, with advice and assistance from Taylor and substantial
funding from Defra.
- The assay was used between 2006 and 2010 in the annual Cefas
assessment of cod and
haddock stocks in the Irish Sea.
- The assay is also used to map cod spawning grounds in the Eastern
Baltic Sea by the
Swedish Board of Fisheries.
Underpinning research
Research initiated by Taylor and Rico, C. at UEA in the early 2000s led
to the development of new
molecular methods to survey and accurately distinguish between the
important fish species
haddock, cod and whiting, whose eggs and early stages are impossible to
distinguish by visual
inspection. This molecular genetic assay allows high throughput genetic
identification of the
species of individual pelagic fish eggs. This real-time PCR-based assay
uses Taqman
hybridisation probes labelled with different fluorescent dyes to
simultaneously identify cod,
haddock and whiting eggs in a single reaction that includes both
"universal" primers (which amplify
the DNA of all three species) and three species-specific probes. The assay
is >95% accurate and
allows large numbers of egg samples to be processed in relatively short
times. For example, DNA
can be extracted from individual eggs in 96-well format using either
manual or robotic platforms.
Genetic identification also occurs in 96-well format allowing eggs to be
identified in 20 minutes
using the Applied Biosystems fast — real-time PCR system (research
references 1-4).
This has solved several problems and inaccuracies previously associated
with fisheries stock
assessments, which can be conducted using (i) catch-dependent or (ii)
catch-independent
methods.
(i) Catch-dependent methods require data on the mass and
distribution of fish-landings. These are
prone to bias due to misreporting of landings, undeclared discarding and
model assumptions that
are violated at low stock abundances.
(ii) Catch-independent methods rely on other forms of data not
obtained from recorded catches
(e.g. the abundance of eggs in the water column). They involve identifying
and counting fish eggs
and larvae (ichthyoplankton surveys), and can be used as an additional
stock assessment tool that
is largely free from catch-dependent biases. Egg production information is
combined with
estimates of weight-specific fecundity of the female fish, levels of
atresia (degradation and
absorption of oocytes prior to spawning), and the sex ratio of the
population to produce an estimate
of the spawning stock biomass. However, in the North and Irish Seas,
cod, haddock and whiting
co-exist and spawn at similar times and in similar places. Since
their eggs are visually
indistinguishable during the early stages of development, initial attempts
to use the egg production
method pooled all cod-like eggs (a mixture of cod, haddock and whiting
eggs). Not surprisingly, this
resulted in overestimates of cod abundance (in comparison to
catch-dependent methods).
Key researchers: Ricardo Pereyra (postdoctoral research associate
employed on DEFRA Grant
MF0151; Martin Taylor (postdoctoral research associate employed on MF0146
&
researcher/principal investigator employed on MF0156.
References to the research
Publications
(UEA researchers in bold)
1. Taylor, M. I., Rico, I., Fox, C. & Rico, C.
(2002) Species specific Taqman probes for
simultaneous identification of cod (Gadus morhua L.), haddock (Melanogrammus
aeglefinus
L.) and whiting (Merlangius merlangus L.). Molecular Ecology
Notes 2:599-601. (48 Citations).
doi: 10.1046/j.1471-8278. 2002.00269.x
2. Fox, C.*, Taylor, M. I.*, Pereyra, R., & Rico,
C. (2005) TaqMan DNA technology confirms
likely overestimation of cod (Gadus morhua L.) egg abundance in the
Irish Sea: implications
for the assessment of the cod stock and mapping of spawning areas using
egg-based
methods. Molecular Ecology 14:879-884. * Joint
first authors. (33 Citations).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02439.x
3. Fox, C. J., Taylor, M. I. et al. (2008) Mapping the
spawning grounds of North Sea cod (Gadus
morhua) by direct and indirect means. Proceedings of the Royal
Society of London B.
275:1543-1548. (25 citations).
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0201
4. Börjesson P., Jonsson, P., Pacariz, S., Björk, G., Taylor, M. I.,
and Svedäng, H. (2013).
Spawning of Kattegat cod (Gadus morhua) — mapping spatial
distribution by egg surveys.
Fisheries Research 147:63-71. (0 Citations)
doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2013.04.012
Key grants (1998-2006)
1998-2001 DEFRA MF0146 (£166,829) Genetic identification of fish
eggs by species specific DNA
markers for use in stock biomass assessment. Awarded to Rico, C.
2003-2004 DEFRA MF0151 (£41,911). A field trial of genetic probes
for the identification of gadoid
eggs. Collaborative project with Cefas Lowestoft. Awarded to Taylor.
2004-2006 DEFRA MF0156 (£137,268). Genetic analysis of gadoid eggs
from North Sea
Ichthyoplankton surveys. Collaborative project with Cefas Lowestoft.
Awarded to Taylor.
Details of the impact
The assay developed by Taylor and colleagues was used to identify pelagic
cod-like eggs collected
in ichthyoplankton surveys in the Irish and North Seas by International
government-funded
fisheries institute partners from England (Cefas), Scotland (Fisheries
Research Services),
Netherlands (Institute for Marine Resources and Ecosystem Studies), Norway
(Institute of Marine
Research), Denmark (Danish Institute of Fisheries Research) and Germany
(Leibniz Institute of
Marine Sciences) and coordinated by the Planning Group on North Sea Egg
Surveys of the
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (research
references 1-3). ICES is an
intergovernmental organization whose main objective is to increase the
scientific knowledge of the
marine environment and its living resources and to use this knowledge to
provide advice to
competent authorities. The ICES network comprises > 4000 scientists
from almost 300 institutes
with 1600 scientists participating in activities annually.
The Irish Sea survey revealed the spawning grounds of cod, haddock and
whiting, demonstrated
that a spawning stock of haddock existed in the Irish Sea and indicated
that previous estimates of
cod stocks using the annual egg production methods (AEPM) were biased
upwards due to
inclusion of haddock and whiting eggs in the calculations. The North Sea
survey also identified the
current spawning grounds of cod, confirming that major historical spawning
grounds for North Sea
cod were still active in 2004 but that some localized populations may have
been reduced to levels
where it was difficult to find cod eggs in the plankton. These populations
could be at particular risk
of severe depletion and were identified as potentially requiring targeted
conservation measures
(corroborating source D)
In 2005, the assay was adopted by Cefas after they set up a molecular lab
with funding from
DEFRA and assistance with design and specification from Taylor. Cefas then
implemented the
assay in routine pelagic egg surveys to provide a more accurate use of
AEPM for stock
assessments in the Irish Sea (corroborating sources A-C). By their own
assessment, Cefas have
repeatedly used this methodology very successfully for large scale egg
surveys in the North and
Irish Seas (corroborating source D).
Cefas also used the assay successfully in the 2008 and 2010 egg surveys
in the Irish Sea for
which `cod-like' eggs were genetically analysed, and the annual egg
production method was
conducted to estimate stock size for cod in the Irish Sea (corroborating
sources C and E). Since
cod fishing is effectively banned in the Irish Sea, this methodology has
been essential for Cefas to
be able to accurately measure the recovery of cod stocks in this area. A
letter of support, from the
Chief Scientist at Cefas, states that the assay developed by Taylor `represents
a very significant
contribution to the sustainable exploitation of cod stocks around UK
waters' (corroborating source
F).
The assay has also been implemented in an egg survey at an International
level in the Baltic Sea
by the Swedish Board of Fisheries (now under the control of Swedish
University of Agricultural
Sciences SLU) (http://sustainability.formas.se/en/Issues/Issue-2-May-2011/Content/In-
brief/Swedish-Board-of-Fisheries-rd-transferred-to-SLU/ ) and a
letter of support confirms the
impact of the research for fisheries conservation — `the assay
represents a significant contribution
to catch-independent fisheries monitoring'. The assay will be used
again in this year's analysis of
the 2013 Swedish ichthyoplankton survey (corroborating source G).
Sources to corroborate the impact
A. DEFRA Final Report on Project MF160 "Pilot study for
fishery-independent monitoring of
cod recovery in the Irish Sea by means of egg production surveys"
Held on file at UEA and available at:
http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&Comple
ted=0&ProjectID=14322
This shows how the assay was used by Cefas to estimate spawning stock
biomass for
cod in the Irish Sea using the results of the assay developed by Taylor.
B. The Cefas website: http://www.cefas.defra.gov.uk/our-science/fisheries-
information/surveys/estimating-spawning-stock-biomass-using-egg-surveys.aspx.
This web site provides information about how and why Cefas carry out
egg surveys
and why Taylor's method is so important
This Cefas website also gives details of how Cefas, in conjunction
with Taylor at UEA,
developed gene-probes to identify the eggs of cod, whiting and haddock,
and how
these have been used very successfully in large-scale egg surveys of the
North Sea
and the Irish Sea. They identify the key references as Taylor et al.
(2002) and Fox et al.
(2005) (see Section 3, Refs 1 and 2].
C. The Marine Fisheries Science Yearbook
A copy is held on file at UEA and available at:
http://archive.defra.gov.uk/environment/marine/documents/science/marine-fish-year.pdf
This details aspects of this work on page 14 and states:
"Working with the University of East Anglia, Cefas has developed
genetic probes to
identify cod, haddock and whiting eggs that have previously been
difficult to distinguish
visually...."
D. Scottish Industry / Science Partnership (SISP) Report No 03/08: Identifying
Critical
Spawning and Nursery Areas for North Sea Cod; Improving The Basis for
Cod
Management
A copy is held on file at UEA and available at:
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Uploads/Documents/SISPReportNo0308.pdf
This report cites Fox et al 2008 (see Section 3, Ref 3] and shows how
the information
was used to compare past and present spawning grounds of cod and also to
compare
adult and juvenile densities in different places in the North Sea with
egg survey data.
The report confirmed that some of the major historical spawning areas
for the North
Sea cod are still active, but some localised populations may now be
reduced. These
populations could be at particular risk of severe depletion and may
require targeted
conservation measures.
E. Maxwell D.L, Armstrong M.J., Beggs S. and Aldridge J.N. (2012). Annual
egg production
estimates of cod (Gadus morhua), plaice (Pleuronectes platessa)
and haddock
(Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in the Irish Sea: the effects of
modelling choices and
assumptions
Fisheries Research, Volumes 117-118, Pages 146-155. doi:
10.1016/j.fishres.2011.09.005
This gives Cefas egg production estimates in 2008 in Irish Sea. Cites
Fox et al 2005
and 2008, on which Taylor is joint first author, and co-author
respectively [see Section
3, Refs 2 and 3].
F. Letter of support from the Chief Scientist at Cefas, held on file at
UEA, in which it is stated
that:
the assay developed by Taylor "represents a very significant
contribution to the
sustainable exploitation of cod stocks around UK waters".
G. Letter of support from the Head of Stock Assessment Unit, Swedish
Fisheries, held on file at
UEA, in which it is stated that:
`the assay represents a significant contribution to catch-independent
fisheries
monitoring'