Shaping public perceptions of the Roman army
Submitting Institution
University of St AndrewsUnit of Assessment
ClassicsSummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Language, Communication and Culture: Literary Studies
History and Archaeology: Archaeology, Historical Studies
Summary of the impact
Dr Coulston's pioneering research on the Roman army and on ancient
representations of Roman soldiers (especially but not exclusively in
visual media) has:
i. enabled several UK museums to improve the classification and display
of their Roman material. (Heritage management)
ii. helped a wide range of media companies in the UK and North America to
produce historically accurate representations of the Roman army. (Contributing
to creative sector)
iii. enriched the experience of various non-academic user groups in the
UK, Europe and North America with a passionate interest in the Roman army,
including (a) Roman army re-enactors, modellers, illustrators and amateur
historians, as well as (b) other members of the general public. (Public
understanding and enriching cultural life)
Underpinning research
Study of the Roman army — from both archaeological and
cultural-historical perspectives — has been a vigorous growth area in
recent scholarship. Coulston has been a leading figure in that
development. Since appointment at St Andrews in 1995, his research has
deepened our understanding of the equipment and appearance of Roman
soldiers, their self-representation in visual media, and their treatment
by other communities in the Roman world. His work is based on comparative
study of (i) equipment artefacts archaeologically recovered from Roman
military contexts, and (ii) representations of and by soldiers from across
the territory of the former Roman empire. Key outputs include:
(a) The second edition of Bishop and Coulston, Roman Military
Equipment (output 2). Internationally recognised as the
authority in the field, it is indispensable for anyone interested in the
Roman army. The book surveys the appearance and function of the full range
of military equipment items and draws new conclusions about the evolution
of Roman military equipment and the social status of the Roman soldier.
The second edition (2006, 1200 items in the bibliography) involved
large-scale expansion and revision from the first (1993, 700 items), in
order to take account of new developments in many areas of the field.
(b) Studies of representations of Roman soldiers in metropolitan Rome:
esp. Coulston 2000 (output 1) which engages with the 2,662 human
figures and 542 items of spoliated equipment on Trajan's Column in Rome
(facilitated by access to scaffolding covering the monuments) and offers
new arguments about the significance of those images for our understanding
of the Roman army.
(c) Studies of the self-representation of military communities. Coulston
2007 (output 3) analyses 750 surviving figural gravestones from
across the Roman world which depict Roman soldiers as they wished to be
remembered. Coulston 2013 (output 5) explores perceptions of
courage and cowardice by serving soldiers and veterans, and sheds new
light on the ancient evidence by comparing it with post-classical military
cultures.
(d) A study of the self-representation of gladiators: Coulston 2009 (output
4) offers new arguments for the differences between gladiators and
soldiers, but also especially for similarities in their techniques of
self-representation: gladiators are often depicted in similar form to
soldiers and in many of the same media, especially figural gravestones,
despite the fact that they had much lower status.
References to the research
1. Coulston, J.C.N., `"Armed and belted men": the soldiery in imperial
Rome', in Coulston, J. and Dodge, H. (eds.), Ancient Rome. The
Archaeology of the Eternal City, Oxford, 2000, 76-118
[peer-reviewed edited volume]
2. Bishop, M.C. and Coulston, J.C.N., Roman Military Equipment from
the Punic Wars to the Fall of Rome, Oxford, 2006
[internationally recognised as the authority in the field]
3. Coulston, J.C.N., `Art, culture and service: the depiction of soldiers
on funerary monuments of the 3rd century AD', in Blois, L. de (ed.), Impact
of Empire VI, Amsterdam, 2007, 529-61 [peer-reviewed chapter
presenting new approaches to the funerary iconography of soldiers based on
the whole corpus of empire-wide finds]
4. Coulston, J.C.N., `Victory and defeat in the Roman arena: the evidence
of gladiatorial iconography', in Wilmott, T. (ed.), Roman Amphitheatres
and Spectacula: a 21st Century Perspective, Oxford, 2009,
195-210 [an innovative study of gladiatorial fighting-styles,
body-language and status in Roman society]
5. Coulston, J.C.N., `Courage and cowardice in the Roman imperial army',
War in History 20.1, 2013, 7-31 [peer-reviewed article in
the UK's leading journal of warfare studies] [DOI: 10.1177/0968344512454518]
Details of the impact
Bishop and Coulston 2006 (output 2) lies at the heart of the
impact claimed here. It is regularly consulted by museum staff, media
companies, artists, and historical re-enactors striving for accurate
identification and depiction of Roman military equipment. The research
underlying that work has enabled Coulston to offer advice on these issues
to a large number of organisations. More broadly, the research underlying
all five of the listed publications has allowed him to enhance public
understanding of the Roman army both nationally and internationally, for
example through his media consultations (including work for North American
magazine and television companies) and public lectures. These influences
have been concentrated in three areas.
i. Heritage management: improvement of museum displays
A number of UK museums have drawn on Coulston's research, by direct
consultation and by use of Bishop and Coulston 2006 (output 2), in
order to improve the classification and public display of their holdings.
Most importantly, in 2012, Coulston acted as advisor to a restructuring
project for Housesteads Museum on Hadrian's Wall, a UNESCO World Heritage
Site. A senior curator for English Heritage writes (source 1): `[After
initial consultation in person] I commissioned a report [from him] on
the sculptural and epigraphic material from the site. The project also
relied heavily on Coulston's earlier work on Roman military fittings
with Dr Mike Bishop. Coulston's analysis was key to our selection of
artefacts for display, and in how we chose to interpret them. Beyond the
rigour of academic description, his willingness to consider the
circumstances, mechanisms and personal aspects which may have inspired
the creation of the pieces provided a more personal and intimate
narrative though which our audiences now access meaning in the
collection... Dr Coulston's ability to make comparison with other
assemblages from along the Wall and elsewhere in Britain, and to then
distill the particular significances and narratives within the site
collection was essential in giving our interpretation depth, confidence
and clarity'. Bishop and Coulston 2006 (output 2) has also
been used regularly by staff in the National Museum of Scotland during
2008-13 for informing new displays on Roman material, researching newly
excavated finds and answering public queries. In addition, since 2009
Coulston has annually presented his study of Roman military equipment
finds on ancient battlefields at the Conflict Archaeology Short Course
held jointly by Cranfield University and The Joint Defence Academy of the
United Kingdom at Shrivenham, a public event attended by numerous heritage
industry professionals.
ii. Contributing to the creative sector: consulting work for media
companies
Coulston regularly advises media companies seeking to meet the huge
public demand for material on Roman military and gladiatorial culture.
During 2008-13 he has helped a range of television and print media
companies to produce historically accurate representations and
interpretations. That advice has been underpinned by decades of research
on the Roman army, and in particular by the five outputs listed above.
Examples include:
(a) Consultations and filmed interviews for television
documentaries on Roman military and gladiatorial subjects during
2008-2013. i) The Varian Disaster, series Perfect Storms,
EOne Entertainment, Toronto, for History TC Canada, UK Yesterday and
National Geographic Channel (filmed interviews, London, May 2012), where
his contribution focused both on military equipment and on the experience
of warfare in the forests of Germany, drawing esp. on output 2 and
output 5. ii) Truth Behind the Film: Gladiator,
Blinkfilm for National Geographic Channel (filmed interviews, London, June
2010), where his contribution focused on gladiatorial experience and self-presentation,
and on the connections between soldiers and gladiators,
drawing esp. on outputs 1 and 4. iii) Septimius
Severus, Lion TV Scotland (filmed interviews, Scotland, Oct. 2009),
putting Roman warfare in northern Britain into the context of the Roman
army and military equipment in the wider Roman world, drawing esp. on outputs
1 and 2.
(b) Contributions to print media during 2008-2013. i) Ongoing
consultancy work for the archaeology correspondent of the Independent,
which has involved lengthy telephone conversations on average three or
four times per year during 2008-13. Recent consultations have involved
discussion of new finds of Roman helmets at Hallaton Hill, Leics and
Crosby Garrett, Cumbria (the latter having been reconstructed and
auctioned controversially without proper archaeological consultation),
drawing on Dr Coulston's military equipment specialisation (esp. output
2); and the Roman cemetery at York (where the evidence of skeletal
pathology suggests burial of gladiators), drawing on Dr Coulston's
expertise in gladiatorial culture (esp. output 4). The Independent's
archaeology correspondent writes (source 2): `My ability to
communicate new discoveries, new ideas and new thinking to the general
public is...utterly dependent on the quality of the information I
receive from the academic world. In the field of Roman military
archaeology (essential to creating a public understanding of Roman
Britain and its long-term impact on modern Britain), Jonathan Coulston's
knowledge, published articles, commitment and advice have been essential
in enabling me to inform my readers'. ii) Consultant on Roman
military and gladiatorial equipment for two pictorial reconstructions in National
Geographic Magazine, drawing especially on outputs 2 and 4
(`Roman Frontiers', Sept. 2012, 106-27; `New Old Libya', Feb. 2013,
28-59). A representative of the magazine writes (source 3): `Dr
Jon Coulston has been instrumental in helping us to create and refine
artwork developed in conjunction with two...stories... His in-depth
knowledge of the time period, numerous publications (Roman Military
Equipment in particular), and keen eye for detail have been invaluable
to our research staff, editors, and artists. His expertise helped us to
achieve the standard of excellence and journalistic integrity our
readers have come to expect from the magazine.' iii) Popular
magazine interview on aspects of Roman army training, equipment and battle
by Ben Beaumont-Thomas, `Could you have survived as a Roman soldier?', FHM,
April 2011, 94-102, drawing esp. on outputs 2, 3 and 5.
iv) Authored article, `Late Roman Military Equipment: Culture, Arms and
the Man during the Dominate', Ancient Warfare, Dec. 16, 2012,
14-19, including collaboration with a commissioned artist to produce a
historically accurate depiction of Roman military equipment and dress,
drawing esp. on output 2.
(c) Production of online material. He has contributed to the BBC
website The Roman Army with a series of own-copyright images and
supporting texts which focus on Roman military equipment and iconography
(http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ancient/romans/romanarmy_gallery.shtml),
drawing especially on outputs 1, 2 and 3, and providing
images for public engagement which would otherwise be difficult to access
(last updated in 2011).
iii. Cultural life: enriching the experience of our cultural heritage
In addition to influencing heritage managers and media companies, the
research underlying the listed publications has made a major difference to
wider public understanding of the Roman army.
Particularly striking is Coulston's influence on Roman army re-enactors,
modellers, illustrators and amateur historians. Bishop and Coulston 2006 (output
2) is heavily used by these groups to inform their reconstructions
of costumes and equipment. The Chair of the late Roman reconstruction
group Comitatus and of the organisation `Historical
Interpretations', which provides activity days for school children, writes
(source 4): `Via "Historical Interpretations" Roman days, Jon's
ideas on the Roman military are taught to roughly 2,000 children each
year. Comitatus relies heavily on Jon's work... With 50 active members
Comitatus performs to around 24,000 members of the public each year.
While the military displays are visually stimulating, the scripted
commentary carefully describes the equipment on display and the nature
of the late Roman army. Much of this can be traced to Jon's
publications... His views on Roman archery and especially the use of
strung bow cases caused a new approach to be taken within Comitatus, and
he is the touchstone against which new items of equipment are
introduced... It is fair to say every re-enactment group uses Jon's work
to improve their presentation, and this in turn has an impact on the
heritage industry. Archaeological sites hire Roman re-enactment groups
to help boost visitor numbers, while cities with a strong Roman
connection such as Chester and York use costumed guides dressed to help
tourism. The standard of such off-the-shelf Roman equipment has
noticeably improved over the past twenty years in part due to Roman
Military Equipment. Computer and figure war gamers use Jon's work to
develop figurines and models, while military illustrators base their own
reconstructions on Jon's work'. One member of the Ermine St Guard
(Britain's first Roman re-enactment society) writes (source 5): `it
is fairly safe to say that Bishop and Coulston rank alongside Carol van
Driel-Murray, Simon James and Mark Hassal as the chief influences on the
society'. Coulston's work has also had sustained influence on
authors for the popular history-of-warfare Osprey series (it is cited in
11 volumes from that series). Graham Sumner, a leading reconstruction
artist, describes Coulston's influence on his work as an illustrator and
author for the Osprey series and other popular-history publications (with
reference among others to Sumner (2008) Roman Military Dress,
D'Amato (2009) Arms and Armour, and various titles in the `Roman
Conquest' series for Pen and Sword Books: 4 volumes in 2009-13) (source
5): `Whenever I am working on a painting dealing with a
re-construction of a Roman soldier I always as a matter of course refer
to one if not all of these publications [i.e. Bishop and Coulston 2006,
and earlier editions] first'. See also source 6 for online
description of engagement with Bishop and Coulston 2006 in reconstructing
Roman caligae (boots). Coulston is also a regular contributor to
the internet forum Roman Army Talk (RAT), an international online
community of 6,500 Roman army enthusiasts, and regularly draws on his
research to answer enquiries from non-academic members. He delivered a
paper (`Arming the Late Roman soldier') at the annual RAT
conference 2011, in York (audience of 30).
In addition, Coulston's work has helped to improve understanding of the
Roman army for members of the wider public with no specialist interest.
His museum consultations continue to influence the experience of thousands
of visitors. Housesteads has more than 100,000 visitors per year;
Segedunum Roman Fort Baths and Museum (where displays on which Coulston
advised before 2008, helping especially with interpretation of monumental
sculpture fragments from the site, are still in place, and so have
continued to have an impact on the experience of visitors during 2008-13)
has approximately 50,000 visitors per year. The contributions to
television and print media listed above under 4(ii) have reached a
wide non-specialist audience. In addition to the consultations listed,
Coulston made contributions to a number of other television projects
before 2008 which continue to be syndicated worldwide and to reach a wide
audience: e.g. Gladiator Graveyard (filmed interviews, London;
script editor for final cut; originally aired on BBC, Oct. 2007) and The
Roman Way of War (filmed interviews, London; script editor for final
cut; originally aired on BBC 1998). National Geographic has a
global circulation of 8 million, and an estimated monthly readership of 60
million; FHM had circulation of more than 150,000 in 2011; Ancient
Warfare has circulation of approximately 10,000. He has also given a
large number of public talks in museums and schools exploring the place of
the army in Roman society (underpinned by all five of the outputs in 3
above), e.g.: i) `A Century of Archaeology in Rome', Kirkcaldy Museum and
Art Gallery (15 Sept, 2008) (audience of 60); ii) `Trajan's Column: Window
on the Roman Army?' (44th Annual Roman Army Conference, Durham,
5 April, 2009) (40); iii) `Augustus, Mussolini and the City of Rome',
Fettes College, Edinburgh (6 Oct, 2009) (30); iv) `Reconstructing the
Roman Army in North Britain', Perth Museum and Art Gallery (14
Oct., 2009) (40); v) `Art and Service: the presentation of Roman soldiers
on Figural Gravestones', Museum of Archaeology, Warsaw (13 May, 2011)
(60); vi) `Gladiators in Fact and Fiction', St Leonards School, St Andrews
(10 May, 2012) (25).
Sources to corroborate the impact
- Senior Curator, English Heritage
- Archaeology Correspondent, The Independent
- Editor, Art Research and Senior Graphics Editor, National
Geographic (joint letter)
- Chair of Comitatus, late Roman re-enactment group
- Graham Sumner, independent illustrator
- Description of engagement with Bishop and Coulston 2006 in
reconstruction work (24/8/10): http://www.legiotricesima.org/campusMartis/MakingCaligae/MakingAuthenticCaligae.html
(corroborating the claims above about engagement with output 2
by reconstructionists)