Changing the way the European space industry verifies the safety of complex systems
Submitting Institution
University of ExeterUnit of Assessment
Mathematical SciencesSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Information and Computing Sciences: Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing
Engineering: Aerospace Engineering
Economics: Applied Economics
Summary of the impact
The difficulty of certifying the safety (often termed Verification and
Validation — V&V) of increasingly complex and more autonomous
Guidance, Navigation and Control (GNC) systems is now widely accepted to
be a serious threat to the success of future space missions. In response
to this threat, the European Space Agency has funded Dr Prathyush P Menon
and his team to develop a suite of mathematical tools for the V&V of
advanced GNC systems. These tools have now been widely adopted throughout
the European Space industry, and have been successfully applied by major
companies such as Astrium, Thales-Alenia and GMV to systems ranging from
flexible and autonomous satellites, to launch vehicles and hypersonic
re-entry vehicles.
Underpinning research
In the current V&V process for mission-critical space control
systems, worst-case deviations from expected system performance due to
uncertainties and variations in the system and its environment must be
calculated in order to provide confidence that the mission objectives will
be met. The European space industry has to date relied almost completely
on Monte Carlo (MC) simulations for the V&V of advanced control
systems. In this approach, high-fidelity spacecraft computer simulation
models are run repeatedly with their parameters randomly scattered to
reflect likely sources of uncertainty. However, MC techniques require a
large number of simulations to accurately represent the statistical
distributions characterizing variations in performance. As a result, MC
simulations are one of the largest consumers of time and computing
resources for industrial companies involved in ESA missions, with
thousands of simulation runs taking weeks of computing time for critical
mission phases such as spacecraft rendezvous, planetary entry, descent and
landing (EDL). This translates directly into increased development costs,
via increased computational and person-hour requirements. There is
increasing concern throughout the European space industry that the cost of
V&V for future more autonomous and complex systems will become
prohibitive using current approaches.
Since his appointment in 2010, Dr Menon and his team at Exeter, which
includes Dr Wenfei Wang (Research Fellow), and three industry-funded PhD
students, have been working with their industrial collaborators to develop
techniques for the V&V of the next generation of space systems. This
research [1-6] has investigated how advanced optimisation algorithms could
be used to more efficiently search for worst-case scenarios that violate
mission-critical performance specifications. This research has resulted in
the creation of the worst-case analysis tool (WCAT), a suite of software
incorporating advanced probabilistic and deterministic optimisation
methods that allow worst-case deviations from multiple performance
objectives over any particular phase of the mission to be computed. In
collaboration with our industrial partners, the WCAT tool has now been
applied on a wide range of different space systems, from flexible
telecommunication satellites [2], Earth Observation Satellites [3] and
autonomous rendezvous systems [1], to rocket launchers and hypersonic
re-entry vehicles [4,5]. These studies have demonstrated the ability of
WCAT to deliver more accurate and reliable analysis results (in terms of
uncovering true worst-case behaviour of the control system), at
significantly lower computational cost, than those produced by current
industrial practice [1]. This translates directly into reduced costs for
industry via reductions in development timeframes. Results of these
studies have been published in leading international journals and
conferences [1-6], including specialist ESA-organised workshops, and
several of the leading European space companies, including Astrium, GMV,
Thales Alenia, SCISYS and NGC (see list of key supporting grants), have
initiated collaborations with Dr Menon's group in order to incorporate the
WCAT into their in-house V&V process (see evidence item a and
evidence item b in Section 5).
References to the research
Evidence of the quality of the research that underpins this case study is
provided through the following peer-reviewed publications and grants
secured through competitive funding sources.
[1] Verification and Validation of Autonomous Rendezvous Systems in the
Terminal Phase, W. Wang, P.P. Menon, D.G. Bates, N. M. Gomes Paulino, E.
Di Sotto, A. Bidaux, A. Kron S. Salehi and S. Bennani, Provisionally
accepted to the AIAA Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2013 (preliminary
results in Proceedings of the AIAA Conference on Guidance, Navigation and
Control, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 2012.)
[2] An Integrated Analytical/Numerical Framework for Verification and
Validation of Attitude Control Systems for Flexible Satellites, W. Wang,
P.P. Menon, D.G. Bates, A. Bidaux, A. Garus, A. Kron, C. Charbonnel, F.
Ankersen, S. Bennani, in Proceedings of the AIAA Conference on Guidance,
Navigation and Control, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 2012.
[3]** Integrated Structure/Control Optimization Applied to the BIOMASS
Earth Observation Mission, M. Watt, M. Yu, A. Falcoz, A. Kron, P.P. Menon,
F. Ankersen, L. Massotti, in Proceedings of the AIAA Conference on
Guidance, Navigation and Control, Boston, USA, 2013.
[4]** Robust Safety Margin Assessment and Constrained Worst-Case Analysis
of a Launcher Vehicle, A. Kamath, P.P. Menon, D.G. Bates, M.
Ganet-Schoeller, S. Bennani, in Proceedings of the IFAC Symposium on
Robust Control Design, Aalborg, Denmark, 2012.
[5] Worst Case Analysis of a Launcher Vehicle Using Surrogate Models, A.
Kamath, P.P. Menon, M. Ganet-Schoeller, M. Guillaume, S. Bennani, D.G.
Bates, in Proceedings of the IFAC Symposium on Robust Control Design,
Aalborg, Denmark, 2012.
[6]** Robustness Analysis of Attitude and Orbit Control Systems for
Flexible Satellites, W. Wang, P.P. Menon, D.G. Bates, S. Bennani, IET
Control Theory and Applications, 2010, 4 (12), pp. 2958-2970
** Papers that best indicate quality of underpinning research.
Key Supporting Grants:
• Maturation of the Worst-Case Analysis Tool, 2012-2013, European Space
Agency, €60K.
• Integrated Guidance Navigation and Control for Mars Sample Return,
2011-2013, European Space Agency, (with GMV-Spain, Thales-France), €55K.
• Scalable Autonomous GNC for Entry Descent and Landing, 2011-2013,
European Space Agency, (with SciSys-UK, Thales Alenia-France, NGC-Canada),
€35K.
• Modern Satellite Attitude Control, 2011-2012, European Space Agency,
(with Astrium-UK), €20K.
• Robust Flight Control System Design Verification and Validation
Framework, 2011-2012, European Space Agency, (with Astrium Space
Transportation-France), €75K
• Generic Rover Dynamics Model Framework for Autonomous Capability
Development, Verification and Validation, Oct 2013 - 2014, CREST2 — UK
Space Agency, (with Astrium-UK), £50K
Details of the impact
The European space industry has an annual turnover of approximately €8B
and employs over 35,000 people [evidence item c]. The UK space
industry has an upstream turnover of £930M and a downstream turnover of
£6.6B per annum, and directly employs over 8,000 people, mostly in highly
skilled occupations [evidence item d]. Over the past number of
years Dr Menon and his group have, uniquely for a UK-based mathematics
research group, worked with almost every major European company in this
sector, including Astrium (UK/France/Germany, turnover €5B), Thales/Alenia
Space (Italy, turnover €2B), GMV Space (Spain, turnover €50M), SCISYS PLC
(UK, £43M), Deimos Space (Spain, turnover €20M). Total research income to
Dr Menon's group from these contracts has exceeded €400K and has supported
4 full-time PhD students, a level of ESA funding that is unmatched by any
other maths-based research group in Europe. As a result of these
collaborations, the WCAT software tool developed by Dr Menon's group has
transformed the way that the European space industry performs V&V. Use
of the tool by European Space companies is now actively encouraged, and
increasingly mandated, by the European Space Agency, through specific
requirements written into Statements of Work (SoW) [see evidence item
e and evidence item f] for recent and future ESA projects.
By leveraging the power of advanced global optimisation techniques, and
packaging these methods in a user-friendly software environment, WCAT
allows industrial companies to make significant reductions in the cost of
the V&V process for advanced space control systems. This potential has
now been demonstrated in a number of different ESA-funded projects, across
several different application platforms. The results of the application of
the WCAT to an autonomous satellite rendezvous system developed by the
Spanish company GMV, where a "chaser" satellite is required to rendezvous
with and capture a small canister containing samples from the surface of
Mars. While 1000 Monte Carlo simulations (taking more than a week of
computations) uncovered no failure cases, the WCAT found a case for which
the chaser failed to capture the canister in only 339 simulations [1]
representing a saving of 60% in the cost of this stage of the V&V
process.
In another recent study [2], use of the WCAT for the V&V of an
attitude control system for a flexible telecoms satellite revealed
significant shortcomings in the traditional Monte Carlo simulation
approach. For a range of satellite fuel-tank filling ratios (FR), two
hybrid optimisation algorithms encoded in the WCAT (HGA and HDE) were able
to identify higher values than Monte Carlo simulation (MC) of a
sensitivity function (S) reflecting the fragility of the attitude
controller to uncertainties in the bandwidth of the satellite's flexible
modes. This more accurate evaluation of the controller's robustness was
achieved in each case with fewer simulations than the 1000 typically
required to ensure adequate statistical confidence intervals in MC
simulation campaigns.
Based on the demonstrated successes of the WCAT tool on several recent
projects, Dr Menon's group were approached by ESA in 2012 to produce an
updated version of the tool [evidence item e]. This work, funded
directly by ESA via a €60K research contract directly with Exeter
University (ESA Contract No. 4000104541) will leverage recent theoretical
work by Dr Menon's team on surrogate modelling and robust safety-margin
analysis to produce an enhanced and expanded version of WCAT for
application to a number of future ESA missions [4,5].
Head of Guidance and Control at ESA [see evidence item a]
`Our team at ESA and other key industrial partners significantly
benefit from the advanced verification and validation tools developed at
Exeter. The benefits are in terms of the reduction of the time to market
and associated development cost while achieving sufficiently reliable
validation and verification results for multiple projects. Especially
the methodology and tools developed at Exeter is capable of determining
the worst case performance and safety margins of designs and missions in
an efficient and consistent manner.'
Dr Menon was keynote speakers at an international workshop on "Worst Case
Analysis Tools For Guidance Navigation & Control Systems" organized by
ESA at ESTEC headquarters in Noordwijk on November 13th &
14th 2012 [evidence item g]. This workshop, which included
participants from all the major European space companies, research
organizations (CNES-France, DLR-Germany) and leading US/EU universities
(Berkeley, Minnesota, Stuttgart, Exeter) has effectively set the agenda
for ESA-supported research and development in this field for the next five
years. In February 2013, Dr Menon's group initiated a new collaboration
with the Advanced Studies Group at Astrium UK in Stevenage, with the aim
of further integrating the WCAT tool into Astrium's design process for a
range of current and future missions [evidence item b]. In October
2013, Dr Menon's group was awarded £50K, by esteemed CREST 2 — UK Space
Agency initiative of significant national importance [evidence item h], to
integrate the Worst Case Analysis Tool for developing a rapid auto tuning
tool for the Generic Rover Dynamics Model framework with Astrium Ltd.,
Stevenage, which also aim towards final integration and testing at ESA
Harwell Centre, Harwell, Oxford.
Sources to corroborate the impact
a. Letter of corroboration from Head of Guidance Navigation &
Control Systems European Space Agency
b. Letter of corroboration from Head of AOCS/GNC & Flight
Dynamics, EADS Astrium
c. Eurospace Annual Report, 2011
d. UK Space Agency Report, 2011
e. SoW for WCAT-II Maturation of the Worst Case Analysis Tool,
TEC-ECN-SoW-SB-02, Dt. 28-06-2011.
f. SoW for "Scalable EDL GNC & Avionics System Demonstrator"
Appendix 1 to ITT AO AO/1-5966/08/NL/BJ -ESA issue 2 rev 3
g. ESA-CNES-DLR Workshop on Worst Case Analysis Tools for
Guidance, Navigation and Control Systems, ESA-ESTEC, Noordwijk, 13-14 Nov.
2012.
(http://space-env.esa.int/indico/confLogin.py?confId=18)
h. UK Space Agency CREST Initiative: http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/ukspaceagency/docs/crest-guidelines.pdf