Investigating Crime: Geoforensics at Work
Submitting Institution
Queen's University BelfastUnit of Assessment
Geography, Environmental Studies and ArchaeologySummary Impact Type
LegalResearch Subject Area(s)
Law and Legal Studies: Law
Summary of the impact
Geoforensics in the School of Geography, Archaeology & Palaeoecology
(GAP) has developed
three principal avenues of inquiry for improving the application of Earth
Science research in
criminal investigations: (a) development of strategies for the search and
recovery of
buried/submerged items; (b) advancing the use of spatial sampling systems
at crime scenes; and
(c) furthering the non-destructive testing of trace evidence. The impact
of our research is advising
law enforcement organisations worldwide on improved procedures for
collecting evidence at crime
scenes and directly working with such bodies in gathering, analysing and
testing evidence during
criminal investigations. Evidence has been presented as expert witnesses
in court cases for
defence and prosecution (e.g. environment agencies, police forces, law
firms), and training has
been provided to professional forensic scientists employed by various law
enforcement bodies
including the UK and Irish police, Colombian Forensic Laboratory,
Australian Federal Police and
US Army/FBI.
Underpinning research
GAP research on Geoforensics has developed from the late 1990s (first
published in 2002,
Reference 1) and is mainly undertaken by Ruffell (1990- Lecturer, 2009- Reader; search,
geophysics, trace evidence) and McKinley (2004- Lecturer, 2010- Senior
Lecturer; Geographic
Information Systems, geostatistics). Experiments have been undertaken in
(a) new ways of
searching the ground and water; (b) best practice for soil sampling and
(c) novel trace evidence
testing, all through grant-funded research, in order to better inform law
enforcement. The research
uses field and laboratory experiments (Reference 2: Northern Ireland
Department of Education and
Learning [DEL] funded PhD student Antoinette Keaney) as well as
consultancy-driven work at
crime scenes to develop better and more efficient methods of searching,
sampling and statistical
testing to assist in forensics (Reference 3). This approach of using both
experimental and `real'
crime sites has enabled development of the research towards the interests
of wider societal
agencies (Section 4). At the macro scale, research on improved methods of
searching for buried
objects has included, for example, experiments and casework on using
geophysics to detect both
water-submerged objects and illegally-buried toxic waste (References 4
& 5). Searching narrow
bodies of freshwater can prove difficult for dive teams, but use of our
`ground penetrating radar in a
boat' method has proven effective in three cases worked on by us (one
recorded in Reference 4,
the others in Reference 6). This method is now used by geophysical
contractors in the UK and the
police in Australia and Brazil. We have demonstrated that the volume of
illegally-buried toxic waste
can be established with geophysics, rather than intrusive digging, and
this is used to determine the
amount of fine and/or prison sentence imposed by the courts (six cases of
the 21 we have worked
on are summarised in Reference 5). At the medium scale we have used
spatially-referenced
sampling to better inform the collection of evidence at crime scenes
(Reference 3). Prior to our
work, aerial photography, ground-based digital topography and spatial
sampling were rarely
integrated by investigating police forces: our work (Reference 3)
demonstrates the better
understanding and visualisation (e.g. by a jury) of such a scene of crime.
At the micro-scale we
have developed new methods of non-destructive analysis (Reference 2),
developed both in
response to increased criminal knowledge of how to `clean-up' following an
offence, as well as
increasing the number and speed of analyses. Prior to the start of our
work in 1998, the Northern
Ireland justice system rarely used soil or sediment analyses in cases.
Over 120 cases have now
now concluded, providing more robust evidence in a timely manner for
consideration by the
criminal justice system. Similar non-destructive work is being adopted in
the USA as a result of our
advice (Ruffell is the external adviser on the US Army-funded Scientific
Working Group on
Geological Forensic Materials). Improved sampling and statistical
knowledge underpin all three
scales of our research, which has now been published in a range of
peer-reviewed scientific and
legal journals (over 20 articles) and distributed in training sessions in
Colombia (70 attendees),
Australia (25 attendees, representing the Australian federal and state
police, with police
investigator attendees from Netherlands and Brazil) and Russia (including
CIS countries, with 50
attendees), delivered through the auspices of the UNESCO/IUGS Intitiative
on Forensic Geology,
of which McKinley and Ruffell are committee members. Publication topics
range from describing
criminal casework, exploring new methods of using Earth Science in
assisting the law, to unusual
applications of regular geological analysis, for instance, the use of
ground-penetrating radar in
fresh water for the search for submerged objects such as bodies, boats,
contraband (work with
DEL-funded PhD student Rachael Parker). A monograph by Ruffell and
McKinley, Geoforensics,
summarises this research and traces the diversity of Earth science
techniques that are used (and
will be used) in criminal, environmental and engineering forensics.
Reviews of the book include a
description of the work as "an essential reference source for all
interested in forensic geology and
geography — law enforcement and environmental agencies" (2009, Geophysical
Journal
International). Ruffell and McKinley work in collaboration with the GAP
Centre for Archaeological
Fieldwork and individual School specialists in radiocarbon dating, pollen
analysis,
dendrochronology and body recovery (Reimer Lecturer 2004, Professor 2009;
Bennett Professor
2007; Hunt Senior Lecturer 2005, Reader 2006; Murphy Senior Lecturer
2008).
References to the research
1. Ruffell, A. 2002. Remote detection and identification of organic
remains. Archaeological
Prospection, 9, 115-122.
2. Keaney, A., Ruffell, A. & McKinley, J. 2009. Geological trace
evidence: forensic and legal
perspectives. In: Ritz, K., Dawson, L. & Miller, D. (eds) Criminal
and Environmental Soil Forensics,
Springer. p.221-237.
3. McKinley, J., Ruffell, A., Harrison, M., Meier-Augenstein, W., Kemp.
H., Graham, C. & Barry, L.
2009. Spatial thinking in search methodology: a case study of the `no body
murder enquiry', West
of Ireland. In: Ritz, K., Dawson, L. & Miller, D. (eds) Criminal
and Environmental Soil Forensics,
Springer. p.285-302.
4. Ruffell, A. 2006. Under-water Scene Investigation Using Ground
Penetrating Radar (GPR) in the
Search for a Sunken Jet ski, Northern Ireland, Science & Justice, 46,
221-230.
5. Ruffell, A. & Kulessa, B. 2009. Application of Geophysical
Techniques in Identifying Illegally
buried Toxic Waste. Environmental Forensics, 10, 196-207.
6. Ruffell, A. & McKinley, J. 2008. Geoforensics.
Wiley, London & New York. 352pp.
Grants (either resulting from, or impacting on, Geoforensic
research)
- 2010 — ongoing. Leachate plumes from illegal waste. Tellus Border
Survey (£4.1 million in total,
£65,000 to Queen's), INTERREG IVA/Special EU Programmes Body.
Collaborative with QUB
(Engineering) and the two geological surveys of Ireland. Developed from
consultancy on buried
illegal waste.
- 2009. Emerging technologies for underwater imaging (£62,925), funded by
Knowledge Transfer
Partnership scheme. Developed from assisting police searches.
- 2008. WASTEMON: Remote Sensing for Detection of Buried Toxic Waste
(€247,384, 10% to
Queen's) funded by European Space Agency, collaborator with ERA-MAPTECH,
Dublin.
Details of the impact
Geoforensic evidence gathered by techniques developed in GAP has
contributed at the heart of
criminal court cases across a range of jurisdictions. In the absence of
eyewitness testimony or
other corroborating evidence, geoforensic data has been crucial to the
conviction or acquittal of
those accused of serious criminal activity. GAP geoforensic research has
provided mechanisms for
enhancing the quality of the collection, sampling, testing and statistical
analysis of geomaterials
and consequently has improved the veracity of such evidence. It has
further developed a
distinctive blend of applications at macro- (landscape) to micro- (trace
evidence) scales by advising
and training police personnel in several jurisdictions worldwide, where
Ruffell and McKinley have
been consultants in a variety of cases. Seventy serious crime cases
(murder, rape, kidnap,
smuggling, all funded by police consultancy) have been concluded, with 16
going to court. Thirty-three
geotechnical and military cases have also been undertaken, with 16
successfully concluded,
including one concluded court case. Ruffell and McKinley have completed or
are involved in 21
environmental crime cases, with 13 through the courts or ongoing. Overall
GAP research expertise
has been applied to over 120 cases. It has had a direct and verifiable
impact on the preparation
and prosecution of cases in two interrelated ways, detailed below.
i) Case Work
Serious Crime Since 2008 the ability of Ruffell and McKinley to
conduct spatially-referenced
search and sampling at a range of scales has involved them in criminal
cases including theft, sex
offences, drug dealing and murder. They have worked with the PSNI (Item 1)
and other law
enforcement agencies in sampling scenes of crime, investigation of
burials, analysis of bulk (soil
and rock) and trace evidence (dust), report writing, case reviews, and
court appearances as expert
witnesses including Belfast Crown Court and the Crown Court in Perth
(Western Australia). For
example, Ruffell and McKinley's work on the murder of Shirley Finlay
(2009) was used in the
successful prosecution case of serial sex offenders and murderers Trevor
Hamilton and Henryck
Gorski (Item 1). Both cases used a variety of soil/rock analytical methods
(the multi-proxy
approach), which became established best practice in trace evidence
testing. They assisted in the
search for six missing persons (Arlene Arkinson, Lisa Dorrian; two
un-named drug dealers; two
neonate infants [latter successful]). In a substitution case in 2008,
high-value computer parts sent
to the UK from the Far East were stolen from packaging and swapped with
rock and soil,
successfully identified by Hunt and Ruffell, and a culprit identified.
Ruffell assisted the Royal
Canadian Mounted Police in the search for a murder weapon in a pond
(2009). As well as
impacting on the outcome of specific court cases, involvement has
influenced the wider legal
system (Item 2) in general by highlighting the types of robust forensic
evidence that can aid either
prosecuting or defence lawyers. Ruffell was co-commissioned (with Dr
Laurance Donnelly, global
expert in search) by Surrey Police to review the evidence against Levi
Belfield in the Amanda
Dowler murder case.
Environmental Crime 21 environmental legal cases have benefitted
from Ruffell's expert advice,
including the use of innovative research-based technology (airborne and
terrestrial geophysics) to
identify and map illegal waste dumps and give evidence in prosecuting or
defending the accused.
Of these cases, 18 were located in NI (working with the Northern Ireland
Environmental Agency
[NIEA]), one in the Republic of Ireland, and two in Scotland. The
monitoring of the location of
waste, particularly hazardous waste, has facilitated the prosecution and
conviction of those
responsible for causing pollution (including two jail sentences), and this
work has also had a wider
impact by attracting media and public awareness of the potential
environmental dangers,
particularly for those living adjacent to such sites. For instance,
Ruffell undertook a geophysical
analysis of a site outside Belfast (2009) on behalf of NIEA against
suspected illegal dumping, as
part of an ongoing investigation.
Geotechnical (Forensic Engineering) A number of geotechnical
consulting projects have been
undertaken that surveyed unstable structures (all subject to legal
enquiries) using geological and
geophysical techniques. The impact of these has been the provision of
hazard assessment and
safety recommendations. For instance, the stability of Thompson's Dry Dock
in Belfast's Titanic
Quarter in 2010 was determined by Ruffell and he undertook a geophysical
survey of the runway at
Belfast City Airport (2010) in order to detect any subsurface instability
(subjudice).
ii) Training and Advice (examples)
(a) United Kingdom Forensic Science Regulator. Ruffell (Chair, Geological
Society of London,
Forensic Geoscience Group) provided guidance and advice to the UK Forensic
Science Regulator
on the principles, protocols, and best practices for the collection of
evidence at crime scenes. (Item
2). This advice is now being incorporated into a publication by the
International Union for
Geosciences (International Forensic Geology sub-committee).
(b) Ruffell was one of four invited contributors (lectures and training)
to the First Ibero-American
Meeting on Forensic Geology (2008), attended by forensic science students,
laboratory workers,
police officers and lawyers/judges, who now use their advice (Item 3).
(c) United States law enforcement agencies (FBI, federal police, army).
Ruffell sits as the
international member on GEOSWGG (forensic geology working group, funded by
the US army, to
develop forensic geology protocols, many of which are now in use).
(d) Australian Federal Police (AFP). Organised and funded by the IUGS
(August 2012), McKinley
provided training in best-practice search methods using Geographic
Information Systems (Item 4).
(e) International Committee for the Location of Victims' Remains (ICLVR).
Since 2008, GAP staff
(McKinley, Pilcher, Reimer, Ruffell) have regularly provided advice to the
commission on using
geophysics, radiocarbon dating and palaeoecology in the search for The
Disappeared of the
Troubles in Ireland (Item 5).
Sources to corroborate the impact
- Letter from Major Crime Forensic Advisor, Police Service of Northern
Ireland.
- Letter of commendation from UK Forensic Science Regulator.
- Letter from conference chair: First Ibero-American Conference on
Forensic Geology. Bogota.
- Letter from chair of the International Union of Geological Sciences
(IUGS) Initiative for Forensic
Geology (IFG).
- Letter from the International Commission for the Location of Victim's
Remains (ICLVR).