Changing industrial practice through lifecycle modelling
Submitting Institution
University of SurreyUnit of Assessment
General EngineeringSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services: Business and Management
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration
Summary of the impact
Developing sustainable consumption and production policies and practices
in industry requires
analysis of technical, environmental, economic and social performance of
supply chains delivering
goods and services. In a programme covering the 20 years since its
foundation, the University of
Surrey's Centre for Environmental Strategy (CES) has played a major role
in developing a
systematic "whole system" approach to assessing and managing supply
chains, starting from Life
Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Management (LCM) and progressing to
sustainability
analysis.
This approach underpins current national and international standards and
policy and is embodied
in the corporate strategies of a number of major companies (for example
Unilever and M&S); the
approach is also starting to be adopted in guiding the development of new
consumer products.
Underpinning research
Achieving sustainable consumption and production requires analysis of
technical, environmental,
economic and social performance of the supply chains delivering goods and
services [1]. Since
its foundation in 1992, CES has been a leader in developing a systematic
"whole system"
approach to the class of environmental system analysis tools for assessing
and managing supply
chains which started with the quantitative modelling approach of Life
Cycle Assessment (LCA)
and, through integration into general decision-making processes, developed
into the use of LCA
for Life Cycle Management (LCM) and wider sustainability analysis.
Surrey's Research has been
pursued with and for analysts and consultants using these tools and
approaches to develop
evidence-based policy and commercial strategy for selecting and designing
more sustainable
processes [2]; designing, making and certifying more sustainable products
[3,4]; and managing
resource use and waste [5,6].
This area of research was initiated by Professor Roland Clift (1992-
present) and over the
following two decades has been refined and applied by many other
researchers, some of whom
subsequently developed activities elsewhere based on their experience at
Surrey. Current CES
staff active in this area include Drs. Elghali, Lee and Sadhukhan and
Prof. Murphy. Dr. Mila i
Canals spent 5 years with Unilever embedding the approach within a global
consumer products
company; he now has a senior role in the LCA programme of the UN
Environment Programme.
Dr. Cowell now leads an active research group as Associate Professor in
Life Cycle Management
at Massey University (NZ). Dr Basson is now advisor on "green enterprise"
to the Government of
Western Cape Province (South Africa). Prof. Azapagic, now at the
University of Manchester,
leads a group applying the particular quantitative modelling approach on
which she worked in
CES. Prof. Clift was awarded the Royal Academy of Engineering's Sir Frank
Whittle Medal in
2003 "in recognition of an outstanding and sustained engineering
achievement contributing to the
well-being of the nation", specifically for the programme of work referred
to in this case.
A specific contribution of the research to LCA methodology has been the
distinction between
"Foreground" and "Background" sub-systems to delineate where primary data
on the
energy/resource inputs or pollution outputs of each stage in a supply
chain are essential and
where it is acceptable to use secondary data from quality-assessed
databases [5]. Surrey's
current research focuses on the distinction between application of
attributional [i.e. accounting]
approaches used, for example, in product labelling and consequential
[prospective] approaches
for strategy and policy; this is particularly important in assessing the
impacts of land-use change
[4]. CES is one of the leaders in driving this research and is involved in
the efforts of the
European Commission and other bodies, including standardisation
organisations, to develop
clarified and standardised approaches.
Effective use of this kind of system analysis for decision support and
supply chain management
requires quantitative LCA to be combined with other approaches including
multi-criteria decision
analysis and other forms of stakeholder engagement based on understanding
of behavioural
change. Combining quantitative system analysis with more qualitative
approaches is a key
feature of the research. Assessing the sustainability of supply chains
requires assessment of the
distribution of social benefits as well as environmental and economic
impacts along supply chains
[1,3].
References to the research
1. Clift,R., Sim, S. and Sinclair,P. (2013) Sustainable
Consumption and Production: quality,
luxury and supply chain equity. In: Treatise in Sustainability Science and
Engineering. (Ed.
I.S.Jawahir, S.Sikhdar and Y. Huang), Springer Publishers.
2. Azapagic, A., & Clift, R. (1999) Life Cycle Assessment as a
Tool for Improving Process
Performance: A Case Study on Boron Products. International Journal of LCA,
4(3), pp.133-142.
3. Clift, R., & Wright, L., (2000) Relationships between
Environmental Impacts and Added
Value along the Supply Chain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,
65, pp.281-295.
4. Cederberg, C., Persson, U.M., Neovius, K., Molander, S. and
Clift, R. (2011) Including
carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of Brazilian
beef, Env. Sci and
Tech., 45, pp.1773-1779.
5. Clift, R., Doig, A., & Finnveden, G. (2000) The Application
of Life Cycle Assessment to
Integrated Solid Waste Management: Part 1 - Methodology. Trans IChemE
(Process Safety
and Environmental Protection), Special Issue: Sustainable Development, 78,
pp.279-287.
6. Muñoz, I., Milà i Canals, L. and Clift, R. (2008) Consider a
spherical man — a simple model
to include human excretion in Life Cycle Assessment of food products,
Journal of Industrial
Ecology, 12(4), pp.521-538.
Details of the impact
The approach to LCA developed at Surrey (notably "Foreground" and
"Background" analysis) is
now standard practice in industry and amongst LCA practitioners: it is
embedded in the tools used
by local authorities for waste management planning and public engagement;
it is embodied in
industry-standard tools and software packages for LCA more widely; it
provides the basis for
"ecolabelling" of products and services to inform consumer purchases; it
has shaped commercial
efforts to improve supply chain sustainability and it underpins
development of some innovative
consumer products.
Surrey's approach to LCA is embedded in the tools for waste management
decision support
developed by the UK Environment Agency for use by local authorities and
waste management
authorities, `WIZARD' and `WRATE'. These tools are also used as a vehicle
for public
engagement in what can be highly contested local decisions. The Science
Manager at the
Environment
Agency who led this work says "the CES approach of distinguishing
between
'foreground' and 'background' in the system and the related processes
and also between
process- and material-related burdens was essential and provided one of
the bases for the
approach adopted by the government... The researchers at CES have been
the academic
leaders in the UK in developing sound but practical LCA methodology."
[a].
The approach has been embodied and extensively referenced in the world's
first standard for
carbon labelling of products and services: the British Standards
Institute's (BSI) "PAS 2050:
Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas
emissions of goods and
services", developed in 2008 and updated in 2011 [b]. PAS 2050 is the
basis for the "carbon
footprint" labels now carried by many consumer goods. Surrey's Professor
Clift and Professor
Jackson were key members of the group which developed and revised PAS
2050, at the specific
invitation of Defra and the Carbon Trust. An extensive industry has also
been spawned based on
PAS 2050: for example Lloyds register promote environmental quality
assurance and regulatory
compliance services by implementing the standard and Arup and the Carbon
Trust developed
Footprint Expert™, a toolkit aimed at delivering PAS 2050 assessments to
businesses. The
Carbon Trust state that they are `the world's leading certifier of
organisational carbon footprint
reduction' and `global leader in product carbon footprinting certification
for PAS 2050', with 650
organisations achieving the carbon Trust Standard in the past 5 years [c].
The International Standards Organisation (ISO) has now issued a technical
specification for
carbon labelling which embodies the CES and PAS 2050 approach, and ISO is
developing a
standard for the carbon footprint of products, ISO 14067: `The document is
currently at the stage
of Draft International Standard (DIS) and is expected to be finalized for
publication in March
2014'. `ISO 14067 will be consistent with ...BSI PAS 2050' [d]. In
parallel, a business-NGO
partnership called the GreenHouseGas protocol initiative launched in 1998
to develop accounting
tools for government and business to understand and manage greenhouse gas
emissions. More
than 1,000 organisations internationally have used the GHG Protocol,
including 63% of the
Fortune 500 companies. The GHG Protocol built on the initial PAS 2050
method in development
of its Product Standard.
This area of research continues to be taken up by industry-standard
models and databases.
Muñoz et al. [6] presented the first model to include human digestion and
excretion in LCA.
Surrey researchers agreed for it to be incorporated into the algorithms of
`EcoInvent v3', which is
the industry standard life cycle inventory database tool. Future LCA
studies of food supply and
related agricultural land use undertaken by researchers, industry and
policy-advisers
internationally may thus be extended and improved, based on this piece of
research.
The approach to analysing and managing supply chains and consumption has
also been applied
to help develop industry-leading initiatives such as Marks and Spencer's
"Plan A" and Unilever's
"Less Environmental Impact", which consider social benefit as well as
environmental impact.
The impact of this research is truly international. Among the growing LCA
community worldwide,
there is a particularly active group in New Zealand (LCANZ), motivated by
the need to establish
environmental credentials for international trade; every one of the
founding officers of LCANZ is a
CES alumnus, including Prof. Cowell. LCANZ is one of the leading bodies
outside Europe
providing accredited carbon labels, which are changing the practices of
producers and changing
purchasing practices of consumers.
The International Council on Mining and Metals commissioned a report
(2013, in press) on the
application of life cycle approaches in the primary resource sector,
written by Prof. Clift and Dr.
Basson with Prof. J.G. Petrie (now Energy Advisor to the Government of the
Western Cape,
South Africa, and a Visiting Professor in CES).
One specific piece of work applying consequential LCA to land-use change
was an analysis of the
carbon footprint of Brazilian cattle farming [4]. Surrey's research had
impact internationally,
resulted in it being quoted in BSI's PAS 2050 and prompting more than 60
secondary articles and
provoking a specific defensive press release by the Brazilian beef
industry [e].
The approach developed by Surrey is now also being applied to specific
product and service
innovation. It underpinned development of a new type of beverage
packaging, delivering chilled
drinks without refrigerated storage. The packaging was developed in the US
by the Joseph
Company with the benefit of saving energy for refrigeration and emissions
of refrigerants (which
are potent greenhouse gases) from poorly-maintained soft drinks dispensers
[f]. The initial
product, cooled by refrigerant release, was banned by the then UK
Department of the
Environment (DoE) in 1998 because of its disproportionate contribution to
climate change. A more
environmentally benign form, chilling through release of carbon dioxide
adsorbed onto activated
carbon produced from organic waste, was then proposed by the company. DoE
agreed to lift the
ban on the express condition that an LCA was undertaken, by Surrey
researchers, that showed it
to be no worse than conventional refrigeration. Surrey researchers have
subsequently worked
with the Joseph Company applying LCA and systems methods to re-design the
chilling system
and the supply chain. ChillCan was launched in Spring 2012 as an
environmental "disruptive
technology", winning two major industry awards: Editor's Choice Award for
Packaging Design at
Supply Side West (the leading international food and beverage exposition
in Las Vegas) and Best
Package 2012 by the beverage industry's stalwart publication, The Beverage
Industry [g].
Sources to corroborate the impact
[a] The then Science Manager at the Environmental Agency affirms
Surrey's role in the
development of WIZARD and WRATE. Provided Statement.
[b] Details of PAS 2050: http://www.bsigroup.com/en/Standards-and-Publications/How-we-can-help-you/Professional-Standards-Service/PAS-2050/PAS-2050/
[c] Carbon Trust and PAS2050 certification http://www.carbontrust.com/client-services/footprinting/footprint-certification
[d] Development of the ISO standard
http://www.iso.org/iso/home/news_index/news_archive/news.htm?Refid=Ref1643
[e] Carbon footprint of Brazilian beef: listing available on
request of more than 60 media and
other articles following publication of paper [4]
[f] Article describing Chillcan http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2165903/Now-men-longer-need-fridges-First-self-chilling-beer-sale-UK.html
[g] See http://chillcan.com/self-chilling-vending-machine-debuts-at-the-university-of-surrey/