Improving the robustness of monetary policy under uncertainty in emerging economies
Submitting Institution
University of SurreyUnit of Assessment
Economics and EconometricsSummary Impact Type
EconomicResearch Subject Area(s)
Economics: Economic Theory, Applied Economics, Econometrics
Summary of the impact
Research by Surrey's Centre for International Macroeconomic Studies
(CIMS) has had significant
impact on monetary policy in several emerging economies.
This case study highlights impact in Nigeria and Pakistan. Both are
important emerging
economies: Nigeria is the second largest economy in Africa and ranks 30th
by world GDP (adjusted
for purchasing power parity), while Pakistan ranks 27th; yet
GDP per capita is relatively low in both.
Since 2008, Surrey research has: (1) led to the establishment of a new
Centre for Survey
Research at the State Bank of Pakistan, collecting data that have directly
influenced the Bank's
monetary policy; (2) steered reform of the macroeconomic models used by
the State Bank and the
Central Bank of Nigeria; and (3) helped develop a new approach to monetary
policy Nigeria.
Underpinning research
Whilst macroeconomic policy rules for developed economies are reasonably
well established,
emerging economies create several challenges for standard models. This
becomes increasingly
important as Asia, Africa and South America gain economic prominence.
Examples of the unique
features of these economies include the potential use of outside
currencies in parallel with the
domestic one (`dollarization'), significant household liquidity
constraints, numerous other financial
frictions and large-scale informal sectors. Macroeconomics research at
Surrey (currently within its
Centre for International Macroeconomic Studies, CIMS, of which all authors
named in Section 3
below are members) has been at the forefront of key developments in models
to take account of
these issues and a number of the results have influenced macroeconomic
policy and policymakers
in several such economies.
The key features of Surrey's research revolve around significantly
amended dynamic stochastic
general equilibrium (DSGE) models of the economy in which agents and
policymakers base their
actions over time on the current state of the economy, their understanding
of how it functions and
perceived present and future policy. In this context, policy rules are
designed to minimise
consumers and producers vulnerability to `shocks' particularly those
arising from international
openness. Policy needs to be `robust' in the sense of performing well
against such shocks, and
uncertainty about the true model of the economy. We note several results
arising from our work.
First, over a number of years, CIMS has produced leading research in the
design of robust
monetary policy. Papers (1), (2) and (3) provide new results and clear
policy guidance about the
nature of the probability models necessary here and (in paper (4)) the
need for commitment from
policy makers. In 2009, Levine gave the State Bank of Pakistan's annual
Zahid Hussain memorial
lecture, and an invited keynote Conference lecture for the Central Bank of
Nigeria, both on the
application of these results to research in emerging economies. This told
policy makers to
recognise serious microstructural differences between emerging and
developed economies when
building and applying macro-models, and the role of measurement error in
creating uncertainty
which could be ameliorated by better data collection.
Second, by amending DSGE models to take account of the openness of
emerging economies and
key financial frictions, we have identified robust policies for such
settings. Paper (5) demonstrates
that this involves the "twin pillars" of flexible exchange rates and
inflation targeting. This is a new
result with the clear policy recommendation: economies exhibiting emerging
market frictions should
consider adopting these twin policies, as opposed to their more
traditional use of active exchange
rate management, to accommodate fluctuations in capital inflows and anchor
the inflation rate.
Third, recognising informal (i.e. `black market') activity in emerging
economies leads to key
modelling changes and new results. Paper (6) examines a DSGE model where
an `informal' sector
avoids the attention of the tax and regulatory authorities. Here, the use
of standard inflation
measures weakens the link between monetary policy and economic activity
and effective policy
must recognise this; in particular, it needs better measurement of price
formation in the informal
sector.
Fourth, another strand of CIMS' research has examined forward-looking
inflation targeting. Paper
(3) highlights the implications of such policy, but cautions against
incorporating especially `long'
sighted expectations, which can render policy `un-robust' (in the sense
above).
References to the research
1. Levine, McAdam & Pearlman (2012): "Probability models and
robust policy rules",
European Economic Review, vol 56, pp. 246-262.
2. Levine & Pearlman (2010): "Robust monetary under
unstructured model uncertainty",
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol 34(4), pp. 456-471.
3. Batini, Justiniano, Levine & Pearlman (2006): "Robust
inflation-forecast-based rules to
shield against indeterminacy", Journal of Economic Dynamics and
Control, vol 30(9-10), pp.
1491-1526.
5. Batini, Levine and Pearlman (2010): "Monetary rules in emerging
economies with financial
market imperfections", in Gali & Gertler (eds) International
Dimensions of Monetary Policy,
University of Chicago Press. (Originally NBER Discussion Paper 2007).
6. Gabriel, Levine, Pearlman & Yang (2012): "An estimated DSGE
model of the Indian
economy", in Ghate C (ed.) Oxford Handbook of the Indian Economy,
Oxford University
Press.
Details of the impact
The foregoing research has influenced monetary policy in several emerging
economies; indicating
significant impact and reach. Since 2008, CIMS researchers have worked
with the subjects of this
case study (in Nigeria and Pakistan), as well as the IMF in Peru, and the
National Institute of Public
Finance and Policy in Delhi. The case study arose from the State Bank of
Pakistan recruiting a
member of CIMS to be Research Director in 2008, and the Central Bank of
Nigeria's recruitment of
one of our PhD students; both led to Levine's lecture invitations. The
Nigerians have subsequently
participated in our DSGE Training Courses, generating a strong
relationship and channel for
impact between us. Several examples illustrate our impact:
(a) Impact on the foundation of a new survey centre in the State Bank of
Pakistan, specifically for
collection of micro-founded data.
(b) Impact on the design of macro models at the Central Bank of Nigeria
and the State Bank of
Pakistan.
(c) Impact on monetary policy in Nigeria and Pakistan.
(a) Impact on the foundation of a new survey centre in the State
Bank of Pakistan (SBP)
Our research identifies accurate data on forward-looking inflationary
expectations and measures of
the informal sector as key to building models of emerging economies.
Neither was available in
Pakistan until the SBP established a new Centre for Survey Research in
2011. Employing 11 full-time equivalent staff, this collects such data in support monetary policy
making. [C1] confirms our
role: "influenced by CIMS researchers, [SBP] taken much more seriously the
need for good data in
order to implement such models, and conduct robustness analysis, in the
presence of an informal
sector. As a result, we have invested in a designated Centre for Survey
Research." Our support
with the "theoretical background, development and implementation" of the
Centre is publicly
acknowledged in [C2]; in particular we provided conceptual underpinnings,
and Vasco Gabriel
advised on sample and questionnaire design. Notably, the Centre's planning
and implementation
has happened "under the guidance" [C1] of a former full-time member of
CIMS (see above), who
"brought a number of ideas from CIMS", and excellent lines of
communication between ourselves
and the Bank.
The Centre collects bi-monthly data on inflation expectations from 2,000
households and organizes
national data collection on prices and wages from 1,000 firms. Crucially,
approaching individual
firms rather than observing purchases captures the informal sector's role
in price formation [C3].
(b) Impact on the design of macro models at the Central Bank of
Nigeria (CBN) and the State
Bank of Pakistan (SBP)
At the CBN, [C4] reports that Levine's 2009 lecture to them and a
subsequent presentation to
research staff and top management, "brought a completely new foresight to
our modelling
framework and policy analysis." Through an ongoing "collaborative
initiative" (including attendance
at our DSGE Training Courses), the CBN has "learnt to avoid the previous
constraints of using
single — large macro models and [is] now trying to develop micro DSGE
models that are designed
around interest rate rules that are robust across rival models." (See
papers (1)-(3).) "Based on
CIMS research" the models include distinctive features of Nigeria: "oil,
dollarization, financial
frictions and a large informal economy". [C4] recognises our research "has
had a considerable
influence on the way we are now modelling the Nigerian economy" and
believes this has "improved... our monetary policy through its
country-specific structure and ability to deal with uncertainty."
At the SBP, [C1] describes a new "research program that uses the
probability models
recommended in Prof Levine's lecture and in CIMS' publications" and
mentions papers (1), (5) and
(6)). "Because of this, the [SBP] is developing a series of ... DSGE
models for Pakistan". [C1]
continues: "We have developed our models to incorporate the informal
sector, as recommended by
Levine's invited lecture." The first model was publicised in [C5] in 2012.
[C6] describes a
"macroeconomic model incorporating the microeconomic features of the
informal sector of the
Pakistan economy" (as collected above). As anticipated, the model performs
"better" than
available alternatives according to [C5] — see also [C6]. The authors of
the model [C5] cite papers
(5) and (6) as demonstrating the "significance" of, and "providing
important evidence" for, their
modelling approach.
(c) Impact on monetary policy in Nigeria and Pakistan
In Nigeria, [C4] notes that "CIMS research has significantly improved the
output of the Research
and Monetary Policy Departments, which generally guide the Monetary Policy
Committee
members." The CBN has "drawn extensively from the research by CIMS ... to
review Nigerian
exchange rate policy and recently announced [an] inflation targeting
framework.", moving the Bank
from monetary targeting and a guided exchange rate. It has "benefitted
from CIMS research on
comparisons between inflation and exchange rate targeting and ... in its
recent Board Retreat,
announced the plan to implement an inflation targeting monetary policy
framework for Nigeria." —
exactly as in paper 5.
In Pakistan, the data collected in (a) now feature prominently in
monetary policy. For instance, the
SBP's Monetary Policy Committee used the data explicitly in its June 2013
Monetary Policy
Decision on interest rates — see [C7], and paper (3). The Centre's data
have become "vital in
conducting forward-looking monetary policy and ... a vital rudder in our
decisions and overall
analysis of the economy." ([C8], p. 60).
Sources to corroborate the impact
Sources selected in line with REF Guidelines:
"Independent documentary evidence of links between research and
claimed impacts."
[C1] Chief Economic Advisor, State Bank of Pakistan. (provided
statement)
[C2] State Bank of Pakistan Annual Report 2012-2013 (State of the
Economy, Volume 1),
Chapter 4, forthcoming.
[C3] Choudhary, Naeem, Faheem, Hanif & Pasha (2011): "Formal
sector price discoveries:
Preliminary results from a developing country, SBP Working Paper no. 42.
[C4] Director, Research Department, Central Bank of Nigeria.
(provided statement)
[C5] Ahmad, Ahmed, Pasha, Khan & Rehman (2012): "Pakistan
economy DSGE model with
informality", SBP Working Paper no. 47.
[C6] State Bank of Pakistan Annual Report 2011-2012, Volume 2,
Chapter 1.
[C7] State Bank of Pakistan, Monetary Policy Committee, Monetary
Policy Decision, 21 June,
2013.
[C8] State Bank of Pakistan Annual Report 2011-2012 (State of the
Economy, Volume 1),
Chapter 5, Pages 59-60.
State Bank of Pakistan Annual Reports available from; http://www.sbp.org.pk/reports/annual/