Advancing policy and practice for sustainable, climate ready suburbs
Submitting Institution
University of the West of England, BristolUnit of Assessment
Architecture, Built Environment and PlanningSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Human Geography, Policy and Administration
Summary of the impact
The majority of people in developed countries live in neighbourhoods
characterised as `suburban'. Yet, suburbs in their current form are
unsustainable: they contribute to, and are at risk from, climate change.
UWE's research on how suburbs can become more sustainable has been used by
international agencies, Governments and local authorities to develop
policies, and to identify and tackle climate risks. It has informed the
OECD's stance on suburbs within urban intensification policies. It has
helped shape the National Adaptation Programme for England, and improved
UK Government's ministers' and departments' (CLG, DEFRA, DECC)
understanding of climate risks. UWE's research has modified the delivery
of the Government's flagship energy efficiency Programme: Green Deal,
which retrofits dwellings for energy efficiency, to ensure that its
implementation does not result in homes overheating. It has also
benefitted local authorities, helping them plan effectively for climate
change. Overall, it has helped ensure that suburbs contribute to
sustainable development patterns, and remain liveable.
Underpinning research
The research was undertaken by Professor Katie Williams and her
team (Smith, Hambleton, Joynt, Hopkins) in UWE's Centre for
Sustainable Planning and Environments (SPE), in
collaboration with academic, policy and industrial partners, since Williams'
move to UWE (from Oxford Brookes University — OBU) in Sept 2007. It has
concentrated on how suburbs can contribute to sustainable cities, but also
be adapted (climate proofed) in the face of inevitable climate change. The
research has been funded by EPSRC under the Sustainable Urban
Environments (SUE) and Adaptation and Resilience to a Changing
Climate (ARCC) Programmes.
Compact city policies, often encompassed in `Smart' or `Green' Growth
strategies, are now central to spatial policies in most developed
counties, and are advocated by OECD, World Bank and the EU. However, the
theory behind these policies problematises suburbs as resource-rich places
lacking in cultural and social value. Hence the policy response is usually
either to intensify suburbs, making them more `urban', or to exclude them.
Williams has built the case that instead of vilifying suburbs,
urban policy makers should view them as part of the solution to
sustainable cities (R1). In particular, changes in climate mean that we
will need suburbs to provide desirable places for people to live
sustainably, and space for green and blue (water) infrastructure, with
benefits for food growing, autonomous forms of energy production, cooling,
and surface water management (R1,2). Importantly, this means that existing
suburbs will need development strategies that adapt them to reduce
emissions and cope with inevitable climate change, most notably heat
stress and flooding. In England, 22 million homes are in neighbourhoods
categorised as `suburban', so this is a major national challenge (R2,3,4).
The Neighbourhood Design and Sustainable Lifestyles project
(funded under SUE) (Williams PI), studied 13
`sustainable' developments in England and showed that new neighbourhoods can,
if designed well, provide the setting for sustainable lifestyles and land
uses. If a range of sustainable design features are included, then people
can be supported to make sustainable travel choices and engage in
activities that develop social capital (R4,5).
The Suburban Neighbourhood Adaptation for a Changing Climate (SNACC)
project (funded under ARCC) (Williams, PI) provided
new evidence on the `best' ways of adapting the UK's suburbs so they are
resilient to climate change, and liveable (R3). The project developed
conclusions with policy and practice relevance, namely:
-
Changes to the physical environment of suburbs must encompass
adaptation and mitigation together, not separately, as has been
the case in England. We must also consider all potential climate
risks simultaneously, not retrofit for one threat.
-
Overheating is a much bigger problem in the UK than previously
thought. Modelling and further analysis of the different
types of suburb, undertaken collaboratively by UWE and OBU (Prof.
Gupta) demonstrated that in many suburbs 100% of homes will
overheat by 2050. In England 2,000 people died prematurely in the 2007
heat wave. Projections are for a 3-fold increase in heat deaths by 2050,
14 million lost working days, and increased hospital admissions. Yet
SNACC showed that many energy efficiency measures being promoted by
Government, NGOs and industry, such as additional insulation, could increase
these risks.
-
Many adaptations have multiple benefits, are effective, acceptable
and feasible: e.g. shading and a micro-climate tailored approach
(trees, greenery) are effective in neighbourhood cooling; sustainable
urban drainage systems are effective in preventing much flooding, but
rarely considered in existing suburbs.
-
Promotional campaigns and incentive schemes to encourage
householders to make changes to their homes should not focus on
climate change or risk: people are more motivated by saving money,
changing the image of their home and essential maintenance. Schemes
should also be targeted at key times: (e.g. during house
moves/improvements), and by key agents, like estate agents,
providers of DIY products, and builders.
-
Institutional responses (from local authorities, utilities, NGOs)
are most effective when they build on existing capacity, and link
to other policy agendas, such as fuel poverty, `greening', and carbon
reduction (R2,3,6).
Key research staff: Katie Williams, Professor of Spatial
Planning, 01/09/07 - date; Ian Smith, RF, 03/08/98 - date; Robin
Hambleton, Professor of City Leadership, 01/09/07 - date; Jennifer
Joynt, RF, 28/01/09 - 31/08/12; Diane Hopkins, RF, 14/03/11
- 30/11/12.
References to the research
R1. Williams K, Joynt, J and Hopkins D (2010) Adapting to climate change
in the compact city: the suburban challenge, Built Environment,
Special Issue: The Compact City Revisited, 36(1), pp.105-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.2148/benv.36.1.105
R2. Williams K, Gupta R, Hopkins D, Gregg, M, Payne C, Joynt J, Smith I,
Brkljac-Bates N (2013) Retrofitting England's suburbs to adapt to climate
change, Building Research and Information, 41(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2013.808893
R3. Williams K, Gupta R, Smith I, Joynt J, Hopkins D, Bramley G, Payne C,
Gregg M, Hambleton R, Bates-Brkljac N, Musslewhite C (2012) Suburban
Neighbourhood Adaptation for a Changing Climate: Final Report, UWE
Bristol. ISBN:978-1-86043-508-9. — Available through UWE.
R4. Williams K, Dair C and Lindsay M (2009) Neighbourhood design and
sustainable lifestyles, in Dimensions of a Sustainable City, Jones
C and Jenks M (eds), pp.183-215, Springer. ISBN: 978-1-4020-8646-5. —
Available through UWE.
R6. Gupta R, Gregg M, Du H and Williams K (2013) Evaluative Application
of UKCP09-based downscaled weather years to simulate overheating risk in
typical English homes, Structural Survey, 31(4), pp.231-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ss-01-2013-0005
Key Projects
• The `Neighbourhood Design and Sustainable Lifestyles' Project (Prof
K. Williams PI) (£260,047) (http://www.city-form.com/lifestyles),
part of The Sustainable Urban Form Consortium (CityForm)
(Professor M. Jenks, Oxford Brookes, PI, Prof K. Williams
Co-I, plus 6 further Co-Is), EPSRC, £1,881,989 (http://www.city-form.com)
(GR/S20529/01) (01/10/03 - 05/10/07). CityForm was rated `tending to
outstanding' in EPSRC's final review.
• Suburban Neighbourhood Adaptation for a Changing Climate:
identifying effective, practical and acceptable means of suburban
re-design (Prof K. Williams PI, UWE, Prof R. Gupta,
OBU Co-I and Prof G. Bramley, Heriot Watt, Co-I) EPSRC-funded,
£626,138. (EP/G061289/1) (1/08/2009 - 31/08/2012) in partnership with
Oxford, Stockport and Bristol City Councils, 12 industrial partners and
five international partners (from USA, Sweden, Australia and Portugal) http://www.snacc-research.org.
Details of the impact
The research has had an impact on urban and climate change discourse and
policies at international, national and local levels.
Impact on OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development) policies on suburbs within compact cities
The OECD sees the compact city as a significant plank of its Green Growth
agenda. In 2012, it launched a comprehensive report: Compact City
Policies: A Comparative Assessment (S1), which is `the first
comprehensive report across the world that redefines the concept of
compact city in today's context' (S2). Two of Williams' papers
(R3,7) are cited, providing evidence on the role of suburban areas in
future climate conditions, and cautioning the impacts on social
sustainability (p.70,71). She was subsequently invited by the OECD to
undertake an independent assessment of the report. The OECD's Senior
Policy Analyst for Regional Development Policy states that Williams'
research `provided an important insight that compact city policies may not
be a universal solution' (S2) and that `...by referring to her paper we
pointed out compact cities' risk against extreme weather and natural
disaster, which was lacking in previous draft versions' (S2), and that
`compaction may have a negative impact on privacy in the home and on
social interaction' (S2).
Impact on the National Adaptation Programme (for England) and on
Government's and industry's understanding of risks to suburbs from
climate change
The SNACC research was undertaken at a key time for UK climate change
policy development. Following the Climate Change Act (2008), the
Government published the National Adaptation Programme (NAP) (S3)
in July 2013. This sets out how government, businesses, communities
and civil society should prepare for, and adapt to, climate change.
Chapter 2 of the NAP `Built Environment' reports on future risks of
overheating and cites SNACC (p.26) as providing evidence on overheating
risks at neighbourhood and individual building levels. The Built
Environment chapter of the NAP, and the Government's broader understanding
of the problems of adaptation, are also informed by Williams et al's
research. DCLG's, Head of Climate Change and Sustainable Buildings
team reported that SNACC's findings have `strengthened the evidence base
underpinning the Built Environment chapter' (S4), and that findings on
`overheating, flood risk and the importance of community resilience were
particularly useful in helping DCLG officials and Ministers to
understand future climate risks' (S4). He also valued findings around
motivations for adaptation actions by householders, reporting they offer
insights to DCLG into behavioural issues (S4). Similarly, DEFRA's Head
of Buildings and Infrastructure Team reported that SNACC had
improved understanding of how to adapt suburbs, particularly highlighting
the risk of overheating, the range of effective solutions, the need for
local councils to work with community groups to build capacity, and how
adaptation has to be built into other policy interventions (S5). He
reports that the research helped develop the approach of the `Green
Infrastructure Partnership' in considering planting, shading and
external microclimate for cooling (S5).
Prior to the NAP's publication, SPE's research helped
inform a growing evidence base on adaptation that is now used across
Government and by industry. In response to growing concerns about
overheating from SNACC and others, DCLG commissioned an Investigation
into Overheating in Homes (S6) which cites SNACC as a source of
evidence (p 79, 80, 117,119). Concurrently, DEFRA was also keen that
practitioners had up-to-date evidence, so commissioned an industry guide:
Overheating in Homes: An Introduction for Planners, Designers and
Property Owners (S15). Williams provided evidence for
this guide and a paper (R3) and the SNACC Final Report (R5) are cited. The
guide is publicly available for practitioners (info@zerocarbonhub.org).
In 2012, SNACC's Final Report (R5) was launched in London by the Right
Honourable Don Foster, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State and
Minister for Localism and Climate Change. In his speech he stated he
was: `surprised to hear such a strong emphasis on overheating as a climate
change issue', and concluded that `[t]his is an important report from
which government is already learning. Central Government has a role, and I
will make sure that the SNACC findings are taken on board as Government
develops the National Adaptation Plan' (S8).
Impact on the implementation of `the Green Deal'
The Green Deal is a scheme launched by DECC to enable householders and
businesses to make energy-saving improvements without having to pay all
the costs up front. It targets 14 million homes that could benefit from
such improvements and will bring large numbers of new players into the
energy efficiency market as authorised Green Deal assessors, providers and
installers. Between January and September 2013, 71,000 Green Deal
assessments had been completed.
SNACC, along with other ARCC projects (CREW, LUCID, see
www.arcc-cn.org.uk) produced research findings that indicated that some
Green Deal measures could create problems with overheating. Williams
(and Gupta) worked closely with ARCC-CN and DCLG, DECC and DEFRA
to provide accurate guidance, summarised in Synthesised Advice on
Identifying and Preventing Overheating in Homes under the Green Deal
(S9). This resulted in DECC issuing guidance to Green Deal suppliers to
ensure energy efficiency measures are installed correctly so that
overheating is not a common problem. In addition, DECC is now working to
ensure that energy efficiency supply chains, including those working
within Green Deal, are aware of overheating risk, and that guidance is
provided on homes which are most likely to be vulnerable, and the measures
that could be taken to minimise risk. These changes mean that Green Deal
should result in effectively adapted, comfortable homes, avoiding
significant overheating problems.
The research on overheating and Green Deal from the ARCC projects
received media attention during the warm summer of 2013. BBC News
reported: `Green Deal could lead to deadly summer overheating', which was
followed by a similar article in The Daily Mail (both citing the ARCC-CN
advice) (S9). Coverage led to commentaries on numerous housing,
environmental and climate websites, as well as from professional
institutions (e.g. RICS), raising public and practitioner awareness about
the UK's preparedness for climate change.
Impact on local responses to climate change adaptation in suburbs
SPE's research has assisted local level strategies for
suburban adaptation. As an example, the SNACC team has worked closely with
Bristol City Council to develop jointly our understanding of local risks
and strategies. The research has informed the Council's Sustainability
Advisor and her team who have used SNACC's findings to provide the
evidence base for assessing some climate risks in the city, but also to
feed into strategic planning policy, community resilience, neighbourhood
planning, asset management, protection of vulnerable people, and the
City's own retrofitting programme (S10). SNACC has also
provided case studies of `successful adaptation' which are now used by
local authorities (via London Climate Partnership), Sustainability West
Midlands, and across Europe (via CIRCLE-2, a database of climate
adaptation projects).
Overall, SPE's research has had a significant impact on
international, national and local policy and practice responses to the
very pressing issue of how best to adapt and plan neighbourhoods and
suburbs in response to future climatic conditions.
Sources to corroborate the impact
-All available through UWE-
S1. OECD (2012) Green Growth Studies: Compact City Policies: A
Comparative Assessment, OECD Green Growth Studies, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264167865-en,
citations pp.4, 70, 71.
S2. OECD Senior Policy Analyst, Regional Development Policy, Public
Governance and Territorial Development Directorate, Testimonial. [1 on
REF Portal]
S3. H M Government (2013) The National Adaptation Programme: Making the
Country Resilient to a Changing Climate, The Stationery Office, London,
ISBN: 978-0-10-851238-4, citation, p.26.
S4. DCLG (Department for Communities and Local Government) Head of
Climate Change and Sustainable Buildings, Testimonial. [2]
S5. DEFRA (Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), Head
of Buildings and Infrastructure, Adapting to Climate Change Team,
Testimonial. [3]
S6. AECOM (2012) Investigation into Overheating in Homes: Literature
Review, DCLG, London, ISBN: 978-1-4098-3592-9, citations pp. 79, 80,
117,119.
S7. Zero Carbon Hub (2012) Overheating in Homes: An Introduction for
Planners, Designers and Property Owners, for DEFRA and First Wessex HA,
http://www.zerocarbonhub.org/overheatinginhomes8pp-2013_8March.pdf,
citations pp. 6,8.
S8. Right Honourable Don Foster, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State
and Minister for Localism and Climate Change, transcript of speech given
at SNACC Final Report launch, 23rd October, 2012, Royal
Institution of Chartered Surveyors, Parliament Square, London. [4]
S9. Adaptation and Resilience to a Changing Climate Coordination Network
(ARCC-CN) (2013) Synthesised Advice on Identifying and Preventing
Overheating in Homes under the Green Deal, synthesis of SNACC findings on
all pages. http://www.arcc-cn.org.uk/wp-content/pdfs/ACN-overheating-and-green-deal.pdf
S10. Vilarkin L (2013) A Stakeholder View on the SNACC (Suburban
Neighbourhood Adaptation for a Changing Climate) Research Project, Bristol
City Council, http://www.arcc-cn.org.uk/wp-content/pdfs/SNACC-Evaluation-Jan2013.pdf