Economic and environmental benefits from commercialisation of a smouldering remediation process for heavily contaminated soil
Submitting Institution
University of StrathclydeUnit of Assessment
Civil and Construction EngineeringSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Environmental Sciences: Environmental Science and Management, Soil Sciences
Engineering: Environmental Engineering
Summary of the impact
Research by Dr Switzer since 2009 has led to scale-up and
commercialisation of a new smouldering combustion-based remediation
technology: Self-sustaining Treatment for Active Remediation (STAR). STAR
is sold commercially by SiREM, a division of Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.
that has an exclusive worldwide licence. Since its commercial launch in
2010, STAR has [text removed for publication] and now employs 5 staff.
Clean-up rates for STAR far exceed those of other methods, achieving
99.9+% destruction of contaminants in the soil and delivering cleaned soil
suitable for reuse.
Underpinning research
Context In the UK the Environment Agency estimates there are over
100,000 contaminated industrial sites within England and Wales alone.
North American environmental liability is far higher because there are
much larger areas of contaminated land. Simple, non-biological, easily
engineered clean-up solutions are imperative to limit environmental
liability. Historically, clean-up of soils heavily contaminated with
organic liquids, such as coal tar, has been of very limited success.
Switzer's research played a key role in the development of a treatment
process for land polluted with tar and oil, which removes a high
percentage of the contaminants.
Key Findings
The treatment process, named Self-sustaining Treatment for Active
Remediation (STAR), uses targeted smouldering combustion to destroy
organic liquid contaminants in soil and other porous materials. The heat
generated by the reaction locally supports the propagation of the
smouldering front through the remaining contaminated soil. STAR very
quickly becomes self-sustaining, which means that it can provide all of
the energy necessary to support itself, but is completely controllable by
regulating the flow of air to the process. It has achieved better than
99.9% remediation in many cases and is particularly effective on high
molecular weight hydrocarbons such as coal tar and oil wastes [2], which
are among the most difficult organic contaminants to treat. There are two
typical field deployments of STAR. Ex situ STAR treats waste
materials in a reactor [1,4]; these materials may or may not be soils and
may or may not require mixing prior to treatment. In situ STAR
involves the application of smouldering with purpose built hardware to
contaminated soils (or "made ground") in place. Each type of deployment
has key advantages that make it appealing for customers with specific
waste management needs. Commercial deployment of in situ
remediation processes requires a two-stage approach to field
implementation. Once a laboratory treatability study shows that a
contaminated material is well-suited to STAR, an initial field remediation
(Stage 1) is carried out to evaluate the technology in a representative
test area before proceeding to full-scale remediation (Stage 2). Because
of the complexity of applying remediation technologies in the field,
multiple in situ tests may be carried out at the Stage 1 scale
before proceeding to Stage 2. In an ex situ setting, on the
strength of Stage 1 testing already carried out, many waste materials can
proceed directly to Stage 2.
Successful progress of the STAR technology from research papers to
commercial impact has relied on a number of key findings
- `Beaker-scale' proof of concept that organic liquids, mixed with sand,
can be converted to gases through the process of smouldering combustion
leaving less than 0.01% residual contaminant mass [2].
- Development of the engineered STAR system using pilot scale studies
from lab/column-scale through to 3m3 scale [1,2,4],
- Demonstration of in situ field-scale treatment of 300m3 of
water-saturated soil in the US, that achieved a 99.7% soil contaminant
destruction, including design of the necessary emissions capture and
filtration systems on site. The soil was cleaned to a standard well
below the regulatory limits and the data from this demonstration project
were shared commercially as part of a Project Spotlight
- Demonstration that following STAR treatment, the in situ soils
remain largely stable and geotechnically usable for the purposes of
subsequent construction and on-site operation [3,6]. Soils experience
drying ahead of the STAR process [1,2,5], aggressive chemical reactions
at the soil grain surface [2,6], and subsequent re-wetting via recharge
from groundwater and rainwater infiltration after remediation [4].
Despite changes to the soil, it remains suitable for reuse [3].
Key Researchers: The research is the result of an international,
interdisciplinary collaboration between the Universities of Strathclyde,
Edinburgh, Western Ontario (Canada), and Queensland (Australia). Dr
Switzer (environmental engineer) joined the University of Strathclyde as a
Lecturer in January 2009. Dr Switzer's key academic collaborators are:
Prof Tarantino (geotechnical engineer) appointed to Chair at the
University of Strathclyde in March 2010; Dr Jason Gerhard (contaminant
hydrologist) University of Edinburgh then University of Western Ontario;
and Prof José Torero (fire safety engineer) Universities of Edinburgh and
Queensland. Dr Gavin Grant, Mr Grant Scholes, and Dr David Major lead the
STAR team at SiREM.
References to the research
References 1, 2 and 3 best indicate the quality of the underpinning
research. References 2 and 3 are included in the REF2 submission UoA 14.
[1] Grant, G., D. Major, J. Gerhard, J. Torero, G. Scholes, P. Pironi,
and C. Switzer. Method for volumetric reduction of organic liquids,
International PCT Application PCT/US2012/035248, filing date: 26 Apr 2012.
[2] Pironi, P., C. Switzer, J.I. Gerhard, G. Rein, and J.L. Torero.
(2011) Self-sustaining Smoldering for NAPL Remediation: Laboratory
Evaluation of Process Sensitivity to Key Parameters. Environmental
Science & Technology 45(7) 2987-2993.
[3] Zihms, S., C. Switzer, J. Irvine, and M. Karstunen. (2013) Effects of
high temperature processes on silica sand, Engineering Geology.
(doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.06.004).
[4] Tarantino A, Gallipoli D, Augarde CE, De Gennaro V, Gomez R, Laloui
L, Mancuso C, El Mountassir G, Munoz J, Pereira J-M, Peron H, Pisoni G,
Romero E, Raveendiraraj A, Rojas JC, Toll DG, Tombolato S, and Wheeler S.
(2011). Benchmark of experimental techniques for measuring and controlling
suction. Géotechnique, 61(4): 303 - 312.
[5] Browder, T. Switzer C., Pironi P., Rein G., Gerhard J.I., and Torero
J.L. (2010) Remediation of Oil Drilling Waste Using Smoldering Combustion.
Spring Technical Meeting of the Western States Section of the Combustion
Institute, Boulder, CO. Paper # 10S-55
Other evidence for quality of research (grants, patents etc.)
The quality of the research has been recognised by Lord Ezra Award for
Innovation in Combustion, awarded by the Combustion Engineering
Association on 8 October, 2009. It has been supported by funding:
• C. Switzer, T. Aspray and J.L. Torero. Suitability of PAS100 accredited
composts as filtration media for hazardous organic vapours from high
temperature processes, funded by the Waste & Resources Action
Programme. April 2009 — March 2010, £41,267.42
• EPSRC Early Career Researcher Small Equipment Grant to C. Switzer for
STAR hardware, £8,100 (awarded 2012)
• SiREM contribution to PhD student scholarship at Strathclyde on STAR,
£21,000 (awarded 2011)
Details of the impact
Process/Events from Research to Impact:
The original research team developing STAR consisted of Dr Switzer (lead
experimental PDRA) and Dr Rein (computational PDRA) at the University of
Edinburgh under the direction of Dr Gerhard (PI), Prof Torero (Co-I). All
researchers moved to other institutions beginning with Dr Gerhard's
departure to University of Western Ontario in 2007. Dr Switzer, Dr
Gerhard, and Prof. Torero agreed research licences with the University of
Edinburgh to continue research on STAR. In 2009, Dr Switzer joined the
University of Strathclyde and continued her research to develop the
engineered system. This was first achieved at 3m3 scale [4] and
then during in situ and ex situ field studies [Source B].
After 2009 Dr Switzer supervised Ph.D researchers with Prof. Tarantino
focussing on scale-up of the STAR process (Robson) and geotechnical and
geochemical properties of the resulting soils (Zihms), which industrial
site owners and other clients have said are key issues.
Smouldering remediation technology is delivered commercially as
Self-sustaining Treatment for Active Remediation (STAR) by SiREM, a
division of Geosyntec Consultants, Inc., which is a multi-national
environmental consultancy that employs 1000+ individuals [Source A]. SiREM
was founded in 2002 with the mission of bringing to market unique,
science-based products and solutions in support of groundwater
remediation.
Types of Impact from the adoption of new technology:
Economic benefits: In 2010, STAR was officially launched within
SiREM as a side project of one Geosyntec employee. In 2012, the first full
time STAR employees were appointed. Since that time, STAR has grown to be
a department (January 2013) with 5 employees working full time and varying
numbers of other employees part time as needed on STAR projects. [text
removed for publication] SiREM has formed strategic partnerships with two
large, international Fortune 500 companies (who have asked not to be
named). Stage 1 remediations with STAR have been carried out on
contaminated materials from the USA, Canada, Australia, and Europe. STAR
projects have been highly profitable for Geosyntec, given them access to
new clients, and increased revenue to other parts of the company [Source
A].
A major international manufacturing company commissioned the first in
situ Stage 1 implementation of STAR at the site of a former creosol
manufacturing facility in the USA in 2009. Dr Switzer provided extensive
consultancy support during all stages of the remediation, including advice
on planning and design of initial tests; experimentation at Strathclyde to
develop the ignition protocol for in situ ignition; on site support during
initial tests; monitoring and data analysis during the tests; and further
analysis and interpretation after the tests [Source C]. During her time on
site and afterwards, Dr Switzer trained SiREM personnel how to run STAR
and interpret field data. Based on the success of these initial tests, the
client commissioned the design of the full Stage 2 system for
implementation in 2014 to enable redevelopment of the site in 2016. [text
removed for publication] This client demonstrated their commitment to
implementing STAR by terminating the lease with the existing site tenant
(waiving additional income) and clearing the site for remediation. The
Stage 1 remediation was published as a Project Spotlight [Source D] and
has been presented at major remediation conferences around the world since
2010.
SiREM agreed a second strategic partnership with a Fortune 500 oil and
gas company to commission a prototype ex situ reactor and a series of
tests on its waste materials [text removed for publication] which it paid
to ship from Australia to Canada. The design of this reactor was directly
influenced by research [Refs 1,2,4]. Dr Switzer provided consultancy in
the form of guidance during the design of the reactor, planning of initial
tests, and interpretation of data after the tests.
Environmental impacts: STAR provides significant environmental
improvements to sites contaminated with heavy hydrocarbons. In both of the
cases outlined previously, STAR was the only viable option for
remediation. STAR destroys 99.9+% of contaminant mass in place in the soil
whereas competing technologies recover some of this mass and require its
disposal as hazardous waste. STAR returns visibly cleaned soil that is
suitable for reuse [Reference 3 and Source A]. Sustainability analysis by
SiREM in year, for the client who commissioned the first in situ Stage 1
test of STAR, showed that remediation with STAR provided significant
reduction in lifecycle carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions relative to their
expensive dig and dump alternative because STAR generated most of its own
energy for remediation. Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions in tonnes of
equivalent CO2 emissions (eCO2) showed STAR would emit less
than 10% of other potential remediation approaches: 4,400 eCO2
from STAR compared to 41,000 eCO2 for low temperature thermal desorption
and 46,000 for excavation and disposal. This analysis, which was based on
the Stage 1 remediation supported by Switzer, created further value to the
client who wanted to maintain their corporate reputation for
sustainability alongside their commitment to remediate the site.
Practitioners and Professional Services: Dr Switzer tested field
hardware (2009) and provided field trial support on site (2009-11),
directly supporting field operations, interpreting critical process data,
and effectively training SiREM employees on the job for in situ and ex
situ Stage 1 tests. She provided further support remotely through
conference calls, emails, and file sharing (monthly or more frequent
engagement, (2009-present). Her interpretations were based on experience
gained during the research, particularly scale-up and emissions
interpretation [1,4]. The United States Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) began including STAR in their training materials for remediation
practitioners in 2012 [Source E]. USEPA is the main environmental
regulator in the USA and the precedents that it sets have global
implications for the uptake of STAR technology, as it meets these widely
accepted standards. USEPA has conducted independent evaluations
(2012-2013) of the technology and continues to advocate for STAR to USEPA
project managers [Source A].
Reach and Significance:
SiREM and Geosyntec [text removed for publication] benefitted from the
development of highly-skilled employees, and increased the potential to
gain access to new sites and commercial clients. SiREM's clients are
supporting the development of STAR because they see benefits from early
access to this remediation technology, substantial cost savings, carbon
footprint reduction, and reduction of their environmental liabilities. In
many cases, STAR will be the only viable remediation option for their
contaminated soil or waste. In three years of commercial activity, SiREM
has formed strategic development partnerships with two major international
Fortune 500 companies, each with unique waste management needs. Their
investment activity has been key to demonstrate STAR in Stage 1 tests in
both in situ and ex situ settings for contamination issues
of worldwide relevance. One client has requested that Geosyntec develop a
full-scale design of in situ remediation and that the potential
application be staged to allow further evaluation of STAR to meet their
remedial objectives. The USEPA now includes STAR in its training materials
[Source E]. Further, rapid escalation of STAR is expected to follow these
significant, initial developments.
Sources to corroborate the impact
A. Senior Engineer (SiREM) will support all commercial claims including
generation of investment, employment, site operation, and remediation
success. Consultancy of Dr Switzer, including conference calls, site
visits, training of employees, and other engagement, was essential to
their commercial development of STAR.
B. Head of School, School of Civil Engineering, University of Queensland
will support Dr Switzer's research leadership, particularly with scale-up
of the process (from lab, to in situ Stage 1 test, to full scale
operation).
C. http://star.siremlab.com/publications.php
shows references to Switzer's published research used by SIREM since 2009
D. http://star.siremlab.com/pdf/STAR%20Project%20Spotlight.pdf).
E. USEPA online presentation to the National Association of Remedial
Project Managers Annual Training Program http://narpm.trainex.org/materials/724/DNAPL_CummingsPart1.pdf
will support the claim(s) that USEPA has incorporated information on STAR
into their training materials for remediation practitioners. US EPA is
aware in situ Stage 1 site is proceeding to Stage 2 full-scale
remediation.