Contributing to the development of national and international early childhood policy
Submitting Institution
University of East LondonUnit of Assessment
EducationSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration, Social Work
Summary of the impact
UEL's International Centre for the Study of the Mixed Economy of
Childcare (ICMEC) researches service costs and equity risks associated
with the marketisation and privatisation of early childhood education and
care (ECEC). Its interdisciplinary research, which is frequently cited in
national and international policy documents, has contributed to policy
debate within the European Union, Organisation for Economic Co-operation
and Development, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organisation and other supra-national bodies, and informed the UK
Government's development of ECEC and child poverty policies.
Underpinning research
The impacts described here arise from research undertaken within ICMEC,
which was established in 2007 by Helen Penn (UEL Professor of Early
Childhood since 1999) and Eva Lloyd, (UEL Reader in Early Childhood since
2007). The collaborative and individual research underpinning its
establishment reflects its co-directors' expertise in distinct — as well
as overlapping — areas within the field of early childhood studies, but is
unified by its focus on the viability, quality and accessibility of
publicly-supported early childhood services. The complementary and
mutually reinforcing emphases within Lloyd and Penn's work are further
unified within ICMEC's analytical framework, which may be characterised as
policy ethnography. This approach encompasses analyses of national and
international policy documents, official statistics and academic
literature, alongside key stakeholder interviews.
Penn's national and international research highlights the increasing
delivery of early childhood provision by private-for-profit businesses and
its repercussions for related services [1]. It has informed much
subsequent work in this area, including her widely-cited EU report about
policy rationales underpinning ECEC services [2]. Between 2009 and 2011,
she coordinated EU research on financing and regulation of childcare as
part of a wide investigation of welfare service privatisation across EU
countries. Since around 2000, Penn has also analysed the operation of
private-for-profit childcare in the global South, notably for UNESCO [3].
She undertook a secondary analysis of the OECD Family Database for a study
for the Department for Education (DfE) commissioned by the UK Childhood
Wellbeing Research Centre (CWRC), an independent centre funded by the DfE
to provide high quality research, analysis and expert advice on childhood
wellbeing. [4].
While Lloyd works primarily on UK policy developments [5], her research
has likewise informed ICMEC's focus on childcare marketisation and
privatisation and their relationship to child poverty. In a 2009/10 study
she compared UK childcare policy with that of the Netherlands [6], and in
2013 contributed a Dutch case study to Penn's research on comparative
childcare costs commissioned by the Childhood Wellbeing Research Centre.
She has also contributed to national evaluations and surveys commissioned
by government departments from the National Centre for Social Research
including its influential 2009 evaluation of the piloting of free
education for disadvantaged two year olds [7]. To this and other
commissioned studies — which particularly explored the impacts of
childcare policy developments on disadvantaged families — Lloyd
contributed policy and research background and co-wrote conclusions and
recommendations, highlighting the role of the mixed economy of childcare
in the outcomes. ICMEC has produced a significant and growing body of
interdisciplinary work on the nature and operations of mixed economies of
childcare, particularly in terms of the growth of private for-profit
provision and its impacts on the viability, quality and sustainability of
early childhood services and equity more generally. Lloyd and Penn have
tracked this market's growth, often in interdisciplinary collaborations
with both academic and public policy colleagues [8]. The ICMEC
international seminar series, run annually at UEL since 2007, has both
facilitated the expansion of this collaborative, cross-disciplinary
approach and enhanced opportunities to deliver research impact by bringing
together mixed audiences of academic and think tank researchers, local and
central governmental policymakers, childcare business leaders,
practitioners, journalists and students.
References to the research
[1] Penn, H. (2009a) `International perspectives on quality in mixed
economies of childcare', National Institute Economic Review, 207,
(1), pp. 83-89. doi: 10.1177/0027950109103687
[2] Penn, H. (2009b) Early childhood education and care: key lessons
from research for policy makers. Report for the European Commission
Directorate of Education and Culture on behalf of the Network of Experts
in Social Sciences of Education and Training. Brussels: European
Commission. http://www.nesse.fr/nesse/activities/reports/ecec-report-pdf
[3] Penn H. (in press) `Childcare markets: implications for equity and
quality'. UNESCO Handbook of Early Care and Education. Paris:
UNESCO. (Due for publication autumn 2013)
[6] Lloyd, E. and Penn, H. (2010) 'Why do childcare markets fail?
Comparing England and the Netherlands', Public Policy Research, 17
(1), pp. 42-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-540X.2010.00600.x
[7] Smith, R., Schneider, V., Purdon, S., La Valle, I., Wollny, Y., Owen,
R., Bryson, C., Mathers, S., Sylva, K. and Lloyd, E., 2009, Early
Education Pilot for Two Year Old Children — Evaluation. Research
Report DCSF-RR134. London: DCSF. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/10651/1/DCSF-RR134.pdf
[8] Lloyd, E. and Penn. H. (eds.) (2012) Childcare markets — can they
deliver an equitable service? Bristol and Chicago: The Policy
Press/University of Chicago Press. http://doi.org/p4n
Details of the impact
ICMEC's research has delivered impacts for policy-makers, childcare
professionals and families with young children within the UK, Europe, and
also the global South. This is achieved not only via its co-directors'
provision of expert advice to those stakeholders, but also through their
contributions to national media debate and discussion and, subsequently,
to enhancing public awareness of and engagement with their research and
with important associated issues. In recognition of these many significant
impacts, Lloyd was awarded an OBE (2013).
Contributions to and influence on the development of international
policy: Penn's extensive work for OECD generated numerous
requests for her provision of expert advice to international policy-makers
and practitioners, including in Canada, where it has been widely promoted
by the Childcare Research and Resource Unit, a clearing house for
pertinent national and international policy research [a]. In New Zealand,
government advisers and early childhood provider representative groups
have also used ICMEC research to articulate high level policy
recommendations [b]. Within the EU, Penn has undertaken studies for
various EU directorates and contributed to EU presidential conferences in
Hungary (2011), The Czech Republic (2009) and Cyprus (2012). In 2010, the
Education Directorate convened a special conference for senior policy
makers in Brussels to discuss her paper on ECEC [2]. Penn has also worked
widely in Southern Africa, where research impacts derive particularly from
her links with local Non Governmental Organisations. Dr Marito Garcia,
chief economist for Africa in the World Bank's Human Development Division,
accepted Penn's invitation to launch an important World Bank publication
at a 2010 ICMEC seminar run in partnership with the Overseas Development
Institute [c]. The launch of that publication — which proposed ways
forward for ECEC policy and practice in Southern Africa — at an ICMEC
event, demonstrates the international standing and influence of the
Centre's research in this area. The Global South strand of ICMEC's work
also generated Penn's keynote on financing ECEC, given at the 2010 first
UNESCO World Conference on Early Childhood to an audience of global policy
makers. That presentation's publication in the Russian education journal Pedagogy
and Practice and in a UNESCO ECEC Handbook [3] means that it has
also informed a large practitioner audience both within and beyond Russia.
Contributions to and influence on national policy: In 2009
Lloyd co-authored the national evaluation of the piloting of free
education for disadvantaged two year olds [7]. This is the first reference
listed among the body of studies forming the evidence base for policy
options and proposals set out in two key policy documents steering this
initiative's further development under the Coalition Government; key
evaluation findings are cited prominently among its evidence base [d].
This work led the DfE to trial new approaches to improving quality in
provision for targeted two year olds after 2010, paving the way for the
expansion of the current offer to reach 40% of two year olds by 2014/15.
This programme is now the Coalition's major child poverty initiative. The
OECD childcare costs research was commissioned on the DfE's behalf to
inform the Coalition Government's 2012 Childcare Commission [4]. Having
been widely referred to in the written and broadcast media, its
publication coincided with the Government's response to this Commission's
recommendations. Both this paper and Lloyd and Penn's co-edited book on
childcare markets [8] have directly informed political discussion and
debate within and beyond both parliamentary houses. For example, on 15
June 2012 Lloyd met with Crossbench Peer the Earl of Listowel to discuss
the book's findings. The day after its publication, he mentioned Childcare
Markets in a House of Lords debate, referring to ICMEC's work in
support of the contention that private-for-profit involvement in mixed
social welfare markets may be problematic.
Penn and Lloyd discussed childcare market issues raised in their Costs
of Childcare report with Sharon Hodgson MP, Labour's Shadow Minister
for Children and Families, in December 2012. Hodgson has since asked
questions in the House about this research and referred to ICMEC's work in
a Committee meeting on the 2013 Children and Families Bill [h]. ICMEC's
co-directors were also invited to a January 2013 high level meeting called
by Shadow Education Secretary Stephen Twigg MP to discuss future childcare
policy and the Labour Party's own Childcare Commission. ICMEC's position
was subsequently cited in Labour party documentation [i]. These citations
in parliamentary discussion and policy documents demonstrate the
contribution by this research to high level debate about the UK childcare
market and thus to present and future early childhood service quality,
accessibility and affordability.
ICMEC research has also informed policy development via its authors'
contributions to policy and strategy advisory boards. Between 2010 and
2012, Lloyd was a member of an Expert Panel advising the NICE Public
Health Interventions Advisory Committee (PHIAC) on the development of
guidelines promoting the social and emotional wellbeing of vulnerable
children under five, published in 2012. As a result of her input, these
guidelines reflect an enhanced understanding of the effect of the British
childcare market on the sustainability and quality of early childhood
provision for vulnerable children [e]. From 2011-2013, she was the only
academic member of the Co-production Steering Group, a high-level advisory
group convened by Ministers at the DfE and Department of Health. In this
role she made a significant contribution to the planning and drafting of
proposals in the Coalition Government's 2011 policy statement Families
in the Foundation Years, and to their subsequent implementation [f].
This resulted in an increased emphasis on provision quality as a
pre-condition for beneficial developmental outcomes for children. Lloyd
also co-chaired the DfE's Early Education Co-production Group, which was
selected as an Expert Reference Group for the 2012 National Audit Office
inquiry into value for money in delivering the free early education
entitlement for three and four year olds. NAO's influential report
prompted the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee to require DfE to
make changes to ECEC monitoring and regulation processes at local and
national level [g]. Both Lloyd and Penn participated in numerous childcare
policy roundtable discussions held by government departments, the Greater
London Assembly and public policy think tanks such as IPPR, IFS, Policy
Exchange and the Resolution Foundation, as well as having individual
discussions with national policymakers. They were among six experts
invited to a September 2012 Department of Work and Pensions Roundtable
discussion forming part of DWP's work programme for the 2012/1213
Coalition Government Childcare Commission. They contributed advice about
the likely effect on service quality and equality of access of the
for-profit sector's rapidly increasing childcare market share. Indicative
of ICMEC's national standing as an authoritative source of such research
was the fact that two of the other four experts present were current and
past ICMEC Advisory Board members.
Contributions to practitioner press and popular media discourse
about childcare-related issues: In spring 2012, politicians
mooted childcare deregulation in order to reduce its costs (for instance
by relaxing adult/child ratios); concrete deregulation proposals followed
in a January 2013 DfE policy paper, More Great Childcare.
Responding to these, Lloyd and Penn used ICMEC research to highlight
deregulation's risks to ECEC quality, its lack of impact on costs, and the
inappropriateness of the international examples used in support of these
proposals, in the practitioner press. They also contributed several
analysis and opinion pieces, some co-authored with members of the Centre's
network of scholars. The OECD childcare costs research and the comparative
study of the Dutch childcare market featured in ensuing media debates on
childcare costs and ratio changes. In subsequent media appearances by
Lloyd and Penn they shared these studies' key facets with large national
audiences. Since May 2012 ICMEC's co-directors have made at least 10 live
media appearances and ICMEC's research has featured on national television
and radio programmes, including BBC 2 Newsnight, Sky TV News, Sky TV Adam
Boulton Politics show and on the Radio 4 programmes Today, You and Yours,
Woman's Hour and PM. Apart from mentions on Channel 4 and BBC1 News,
ICMEC's Dutch childcare market research was used in Channel 4's FactCheck
web pages to query the accuracy of the government's statements on ECEC. In
the same period ICMEC's research was cited in the Sunday Telegraph,
the Observer, the Independent on Sunday, the Daily
Mail, the Irish Times and Metro [j]. In June 2013
the ratio relaxation plans were dropped by the Coalition government, a
decision influenced in part by ICMEC's research findings. The public
attention attracted by media coverage of this debate promoted enhanced
public awareness and engagement with issues relating to ECEC
marketisation.
Sources to corroborate the impact
[a] ICMEC citation by the Canadian Childcare Research and Resource Unit
and its contributions to policy debate beyond that Unit: http://bit.ly/18a8SIw
[b] For the influence of ICMEC research on New Zealand ECEC policy see
May, H. and Mitchell, L. (2009) Strengthening community-based early
childhood education in Aetoroa — New Zealand. Report of the Quality
Early Childhood Education Project. Wellington, NZ, pp.15-17.
[c] The World Bank report on Southern Africa's ECEC policy and practice
launched at a 2010 ICMEC seminar is: Garcia, M., Pence, A. and Evans, J.
(eds.) (2010) Africa's Future, Africa's Challenge — Early Childhood
Care and Development in Sub-Saharan Africa.
[d] Output 7 [above] is cited in: Department for Education (2011) Disadvantaged
Two Year Olds Entitlement to Early Education: Options for Extended
Eligibility, Impact Assessment (IA). London: DfE; and Department for
Education (2011) Disadvantaged Two Year Olds Entitlement to Early
Education. Equality Impact Assessment. London: DfE (particularly p.
2). Available on request.
[e] NICE Public Health Innovations Advisory Committee's draft guidance on
social and emotional wellbeing in the early years lists Lloyd role as
Expert Adviser during 2010-2012: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/index.jsp?action=folder&o=58878
p. 32.
[f] The impacts of Lloyd's work on early childhood policy can be
corroborated by the Director of the DfE's Childcare, Special Needs and
Children's Strategy Policy Family. Lloyd's contribution to the Families
in the Foundation Years policy document is acknowledged in the
Minister's personal 19/07/11 letter: "Your advice has been invaluable both
in developing policy and in helping us to describe and communicate a
vision that will, I hope, resonate with families and with other
professionals." Copy available on request.
[g] The input of the early Education Co-Production Group's (chaired by
Lloyd) to the 2012 National Audit Office report Delivering the free
entitlement to education for three- and four-year olds, is
acknowledged on p. 10 of that report, available at: http://bit.ly/19pRdIY
[h] For reference to [8] in House of Lords debate: Hansard, House of
Lords Deb, 21 June 2012: http://bit.ly/1au4eF1
c1873. For House of Commons questions about ICMEC's childcare costs
research: Hansard, HC Deb, 7 February 2013: http://bit.ly/1hL4Xbo
c405W. For reference to the research recommendations in a Children
and Families Bill Committee meeting: Hansard, Children and Families
Bill Deb, 18 April 2013: http://bit.ly/15mw9pO
c628.
[i] For the influence of ICMEC's position in Labour party childcare
policy: http://bit.ly/UzDA6T
[j] For examples of coverage of ICMEC research in the national press see
articles in the Independent: http://ind.pn/UHC4wt;
Guardian: http://bit.ly/19pRQSS;
and Telegraph: http://bit.ly/10rBsDb