Submitting Institution
Goldsmiths' CollegeUnit of Assessment
Communication, Cultural and Media Studies, Library and Information Management Summary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Creative Arts and Writing: Journalism and Professional Writing
Language, Communication and Culture: Cultural Studies
Summary of the impact
Research by members of the Department of Media and Communications on news
and journalism in the digital age has been critical in three main areas of
impact. Most importantly, it has been used to develop civil society
engagement and high-level recommendations to media policy-makers and
politicians, on media reform and the Leveson Inquiry. Secondly, this
research has been used by the news industry itself in developing its
practice for the digital age. Thirdly, recommendations made in the
research on collaborative relationships between news organizations and
civil society associations have been implemented across the country by the
Media Trust.
Underpinning research
From 2007 to 2012 the Goldsmiths Leverhulme Media Research Centre ran a
£1.25 million grant from the Leverhulme Trust (2007-12): one of the five
projects, Spaces of the News, involved James Curran, Natalie
Fenton, Des Freedman, Peter Lee-Wright, Angela Phillips and others; all
those named have been employed as academic staff at Goldsmiths throughout
the period of that grant to the present date [1]. The project investigated
the nature of news in the digital age, exploring the changing dynamics of
news production through 170 interviews with news media professionals,
mini-ethnographies in three news production sites and a qualitative
analysis of online news content.
The research challenges utopian visions of the internet as a brave new
world with everyone connected to everyone else. `New' media have not
expanded the news that we read or hear, or changed mainstream news values
and formats; neither have they connected a legion of bloggers to a mass
audience. Instead, professional journalism suffers as the economic model
for traditional news production falls apart in the digital age. There is
pressure in the newsroom to fill more space at greater speed, with fewer
journalists in permanent positions and more job insecurity. Journalists
are thrust into forms of news production which are more akin to creative
cannibalisation than the craft of journalism. While having improved access
to stories and sources online, they talk less to their sources and are
captured in desk-bound, cut-and-paste journalism. Ready-made fodder from
tried and tested sources takes precedence over the sheer difficulty of
dealing with the mass of user generated content or the overload of online
information. This leads to the homogenisation of content as
ever-increasing commercial pressures add to the temptation to rely not
just on news agencies but also on all cheaper forms of news gathering.
Follow-up work, supported by Carnegie, considered the role of civil
society in news media, in the context of the recommendation (now
abandoned) for Independently Funded News Consortia. It revealed that Civil
Society Associations can play a key role in the extended news environment
of the digital age. They can act as wardens of and contributors to news
media; facilitate deliberation; expand the diversity of views on existing
news platforms; and even develop news platforms of their own.
Additional work supported by the Media Trust explored the news needs of
local communities via four in-depth case studies, including a study of
community news outlets and their relationship with mainstream news media.
The methodology involved interviews with key news providers and
protagonists, community focus groups, and interviews with news policy
leaders. The research supports the link between local news and democracy
by interrogating how it functions and what is required for it to thrive.
It also considers in detail the demand side of news. What do people want
from their local news and why does it matter to them? It then puts these
into an economic, regulatory and technological context in order to
understand the changes that are taking place. This research offers a
direct response to the current crisis in local news, with concrete
suggestions on how to deliver an independent local news service that meets
the needs of local communities.
Most recently, funding from the OSF and the Andrew Wainwright Reform
Trust has enabled us to set up the Coordinating Committee for Media Reform
with the explicit task of seeking to impact upon the Leveson Inquiry, the
Communications Review and the subsequent white paper on the basis of our
research in this field to date.
Research outputs underpinning the wider public impact have included
numerous books from prestigious publishers [2-4], as well as 14
peer-reviewed journal papers and chapters (e.g. Journalism Studies;
International Journal of Press/Politics; Journalism Practice; European
Journal of Communications; Convergence; Global Media and Communication)
[examples at 5-6], 60 conference papers and 5 submissions to government
consultations [example at 7].
References to the research
All the outputs listed below are available on request from the Goldsmiths
Research Office (including complete volumes where only chapters are
submitted to REF2).
Evidence of the international quality of the research: the
large grant [1] was obtained after rigorous national competition, while
the books at [2-4] are published by two of the most respected publishers
in the field. [2] has been adopted as reading in 73 UK and five overseas
universities.
1. The Goldsmiths Leverhulme Media Research Centre: £1.25 million grant
from the Leverhulme Trust (2007-12), including Spaces of the News
as one project of five, involving Curran, Fenton, Freedman, Lee-Wright,
Phillips and others.
2. Fenton N (ed.) (2010) New Media, Old News: Journalism and
Democracy in the Digital Age. London: Sage. [chapter in REF2].
3. Phillips A, Lee-Wright P, Witschge T (2012) Changing Journalism.
Abingdon and New York: Routledge. [chapter in REF2].
4. Curran J, Fenton N, Freedman D (2012). Misunderstanding the
Internet. London and New York: Routledge. [chapters in REF2].
5. Fenton N (2012) Online journalism — the de-democratisation of the
news? In E. Siapera and A. Veglis (eds.), The Handbook of Global
Online Journalism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp 119-135.
6. Fenton N (2013) Cosmopolitanism as conformity and contestation: the
mainstream press and radical politics. Journalism Studies, 14,
172-186. DOI:10.1080/1461670X.2012.718546 [in REF2].
7. Fenton N, Curran J, Freedman D (2009) Submission
to the DCMS Consultation on Sustainable independent and impartial
news; in the Nations, locally and in the regions.
Details of the impact
The Leveson Inquiry and media reform
To increase the impact of its work, the Spaces of the News team founded
the Coordinating Committee for Media Reform (CCMR), later renamed the
Media Reform Coalition (MRC), which consists of 30+ pressure groups and
numerous academics. Each section has an elected chair, all of whom are
members of the Spaces of News Research team, to campaign on a specific
issue. Fenton was asked to join Hacked Off's Board in July 2012 and later
became Vice-Chair.
The proposals for media reform developed from this research were adopted
by the TUC as policy, with the full endorsement of the NUJ and BECTU. Five
written submissions were made to Leveson, one requested by Leveson
himself, and Curran and Phillips each gave evidence to the Leveson
inquiry. The Leveson report refers to the work of the CCMR in volumes 1
and 4 [1]. It has been presented at meetings around the country
co-organized by the NUJ and associated pressure groups, and at a special
TUC conference and numerous other public meetings in London. In
association with NUJ and Hacked Off, fringe meetings were held along with
private dinners for MPs at all the party conferences in 2012 as well as a
fringe meeting at the TUC congress in the same year. MRC also organized a
public lecture by Baroness O'Neill on media regulation; a conference on
internet and the law with the NUJ; an Early Day Motion on the issues; two
well-attended public rallies addressed by politicians and civil society
representatives; plus a lobby of Parliament on the recommendations of the
Leveson report.
This work has brought the team into regular contact with many
parliamentarians. Fenton has presented the work of the MRC to Harriet
Harman, the Shadow Cabinet Minister for Culture Media and Sport, and
Fenton and Curran presented the work to the Shadow Minister Helen Goodman.
The work is feeding Labour policy on media ownership for the Party's next
election manifesto. Goodman used the research on local news for a speech
referring to Goldsmiths [2]. Harman referred to the research in a speech
she gave to the Westminster Media Forum [3].
The researchers took part in a stakeholder discussion at the DCMS
concerning amendments to the Crime and Courts Bill that affect online
journalists and small publishers. MRC held a public consultation and
recommended that cost benefits available to those who sign to any new
recognized self-regulatory body should be extended to small-scale news
bloggers, and that micro-businesses should be exempt from the Crime and
Courts Bill which defines penalties and exemplary damages for those who
refuse to join a regulator. The government adopted and enacted these
recommendations.
In her role as Vice-Chair of Hacked Off's Board, Fenton has played a
major role in trying to ensure that any media reform relating to press
regulation complies with the recommendations in the Leveson report and is
independent and effective. Unprecedented and historic progress has been
made towards the achievement of these objectives, and Hacked Off has been
instrumental in this. In March every party in parliament gave its backing
to a Royal Charter with underpinning legislation that will implement the
Leveson recommendations — providing for effective press self-regulation
that is independent both of government and of editors and proprietors. In
October 2013 this Royal Charter was sealed. In seven decades of
controversy on this issue no parliament has ever gone nearly so far (and
this without impinging in any way on freedom of expression).
Hacked Off drove this process, both in the public sphere by articulating
the case for Leveson implementation, mobilising and focusing opinion, and
in the political sphere by ensuring that key politicians understood the
issues, were aware of strong public feeling, and had the means and tools
to implement Leveson. Hacked Off lobbied, rebutted, drafted, persuaded,
analysed, reported, denounced, advocated, briefed, argued and manoeuvred
at a high level of intensity working closely throughout with victims of
press abuses and with other reform-minded groups. It also operated in the
teeth of relentless and often bitterly hostile resistance from leading
national newspaper groups, making Hacked Off the most successful media
campaign in history.
The state of news in the digital age
This research was cited extensively in the Parliamentary Select Committee
Report on Media Ownership in 2008, in the Ofcom report on the proposed
complete purchase of BSkyB by News Corporation, and in Ofcom's advice to
the Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport [4]. It
contributed to NUJ strategy, and the NUJ's then General Secretary, Jeremy
Dear, quoted it in a speech to the European Parliament [5]. The Chartered
Institute of Journalists has also used the work in its lobbying [6].
Fenton and Freedman have held regular meetings on the state of the news
in the digital age with key personnel at Ofcom and DCMS. The work has also
informed news organisations' own internal reviews and discussions. This
has involved engagement with prominent journalists from the Guardian and
Radio 4, as well as ITN's own research into the future of news. The
Principal of ITN Consulting commented that the meeting held between Fenton
and himself was `extremely useful' [7].
Local media and citizen journalism
This research led to the launch of the Media Trust's Newsnet, an online
project giving people the unique opportunity to connect, share and learn
to tell their local story. Newsnet is a UK-wide community of citizen
journalists, community reporters and local storytellers, which gives them
the tools, skills and connections to get more from their local news. The
marketing director of Media Trust has said that `if Goldsmiths hadn't
identified citizen journalism as having such potential, we may never have
taken this approach' [8].
The work also triggered the development of the East London Lines, a
successful local news website run out of the department.[9]
Sources to corroborate the impact
All sources listed below are available in hard or electronic copy on
request from Goldsmiths Research Office.
-
`An inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the press'
[Leveson report], Vols. 1 and 4
-
Speech
by Helen Goodman MP, Shadow Media Minister
- Transcript of speech by Harriet Harman MP, Shadow Secretary of State
for Culture, Media and Sport, in Westminster Media Forum briefing
document, `The Communications Green Paper' (March 2012) available on
request.
- (i) `The Ownership of the News Volume I: Report'
(2008)
(ii) Ofcom, `Report
on public interest test on the proposed acquisition of British
Broadcasting Group plc by News Corporation' (2010)
(iii) `Measuring media plurality: Ofcom's advice to the Secretary of
State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport', Annex
7: Media plurality and news — a summary of contextual academic
literature
- Text of speech and related NUJ emails available on request.
- Email from the Chartered Institute of Journalists available on
request.
- Email from the Principal of ITN Consulting available on request.
- Email from the marketing director of Media Trust Media Trust available
on request.
- http://www.eastlondonlines.co.uk/