Responding to Political Disaffection and Designing Civic Participation
Submitting Institution
University of SouthamptonUnit of Assessment
Politics and International StudiesSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration, Political Science, Sociology
Summary of the impact
Research from the Centre for Citizenship, Globalisation and Governance
(C2G2) led by Stoker and
Smith has sought to understand disenchantment with politics in democracies
and articulate
responses to this condition. The work has focused initially on exploring
the attitudes of
governmental and non-governmental actors to issues of political
disaffection and re-engagement.
The research has been used by institutional actors to inform the design of
participatory projects
and other mechanisms as responses to the issues of anti-politics. In
particular it has played a key
role in the development of a web-based resource used to spread good
practice in civic
participation.
Underpinning research
This research by Gerry Stoker (Professor of Politics and Governance since
2007), Will Jennings
(Reader in Politics since 2012-) and Graham Smith (Professor of Politics
1999-2012) is part of a
broader agenda represented in the collectively authored C2G2 volume Prospects
for Citizenship
(2011) [3.1]. Three main projects express the research agenda:
- Empowering Communities to Influence Local Decision-Making (2009)
undertaken for the
Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) in conjunction
with the Local
Government Research Unit, De Montfort University [3.2]
- Anti-Politics: Characterising and accounting for Political
Disaffection (2011-12) with Colin Hay
at the University of Sheffield and The Hansard Society [3.3] and
follow-up studies in Britain
(Stoker and Jennings) [3.4] and Australia (Stoker) in 2013 [3.5]
- Austerity and Its Impact on Anti-Politics (2013) — a survey funded by
C2G2 and YouGov
reported by Will Jennings and Gerry Stoker. [3.6]
This research builds on earlier work by Stoker and Smith. Stoker has
worked on issues of
participation and decentralisation since the 1980s with a major and
internationally-oriented
statement emerging in his award winning Why Politics Matters
(2006) which has been translated
into four other languages, while Smith's report for the Power Inquiry on
democratic innovation
provided the empirical basis for Smith's book Democratic Innovations
(CUP) in which, supported
by a fellow-member of C2G2 (Owen, Professor of Politics 2008-), he
developed an innovative and
original methodological framework for the comparison and evaluation of
different types of civic
participation project.
The Empowering Communities project investigated the role of citizens
within their local
communities in, for example, making decisions and running community
facilities or regeneration
projects. Through interviews with key stakeholders and an extensive
literature review of both
published and grey material, Stoker and Smith identified six key
mechanisms for supporting
community self-rule: asset transfer, citizen governance, electronic
participation, participatory
budgeting, petitions and redress. They used techniques of systematic
review to establish the
success factors behind the implementation of these mechanisms.
The Anti-Politics project was developed with a leading think tank, the
Hansard Society. It extends
the survey analysis of the Hansard Society's annual audit of political
engagement with a series of
citizen focus groups to provide a more nuanced understanding of public
cynicism towards politics
and the robustness of such attitudes. Stoker and his collaborators found
that a central source of
disaffection is the popular judgment that too many politicians are
self-serving and let special
interest groups dominate decision-making. The role of the tabloid media in
confirming the sense of
anti-politics among citizens is also significant and was reported in
evidence to the Leveson Inquiry.
Citizens' reform ideas were explored and found to diverge from the
standard constitutional reforms
on offer. Stoker has extended the analysis through a survey of the
attitudes of Australian citizens
and with Will Jennings further work in Britain in 2013 looked at the
difference between active and
"standby" citizens.
The Austerity project, developed by Jennings and Stoker with YouGov,
explores factors that might
explain why in the context of austerity, citizens might see politics as
failing and finds that it is
concern about the behaviour of politicians rather than fatalism about the
capacity of government
that matters.
References to the research
3.1 Gerry Stoker et al. (2011) Prospects for Citizenship
London: Bloomsbury Academic
Grants
G1. "Empowering Communities to Influence Local Decision-Making"
(with Local Government Unit,
De Montfort University), Department for Communities and Local Government,
2008-9,
£175,000.
G2. ESRC: "Anti-Politics: Characterising and Accounting for
Political Disaffection". Stoker PI. Start
date: 01 April 2010. End date: 30 June 2012. Funding: £77048.53.
Details of the impact
This research has had three distinct impacts:
- Shaping the understanding and attitude of governmental and
non-governmental actors to
issues of political disaffection and re-engagement.
- Informing the design of participatory projects and other mechanisms as
responses to the
issues of anti-politics by institutional actors.
- Playing a pivotal role in the development of a critical resource for
designing civic participation.
Shaping understanding and attitudes
The credibility of asset transfer and community ownership and control
policies that were key
mechanisms in Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act
(2009) was
established by Smith and Stoker's research on Empowering Communities. The
impact continues:
as a leading civil servant commented: "Southampton University's
research has had a long-term
impact on DCLG policy under Labour and Coalition governments. Gerry
Stoker and his team have
enormous credibility. " (Ariana Haberis, DCLG) [5.1].
The anti-politics research led by Stoker provided the basis for an
article published in the ESRC's
annual newsstand magazine Britain in 2013 which reaches a wide
audience (15k copies sold and
an average of two readers a copy). The evidence to the Leveson Inquiry on
the role of the media
was accepted [5.2] and its impact on politics was picked up and
used by Lord Puttnam [5.3] in his
campaigning around the issues. Stoker's British Academy publication led to
an invitation in 2013 to
develop with St George's House, Windsor Castle, a consultation with
high-level governmental and
non-governmental actors to discuss disenchantment with politics and its
implications for
democracy [5.4]. The Hansard Society used the research with Stoker
to offer a range of
workshops aimed at policy makers and practitioners in 2012/13 to raise
awareness and inform
practice.
International impact is concretely demonstrated by the decision of the
German-based pan-European
Bertelsmann Foundation to use Smith's research as the basis on which to
develop
criteria for the Reinhard Mohn Prize on innovative participatory
approaches worldwide as part of
their programme to raise awareness about citizen participation innovations
among senior German
politicians [5.5]. At the same time, the significance and reach of
the research is demonstrated by
invitations to address policy audiences concerning its finding. For
example, in September 2012,
Stoker presented findings on the causes of political disenchantment and
how to respond under the
auspices of the Australian and New Zealand School of Government in
Auckland which led directly
to a follow-up discussion of the research based on Australian data in
Canberra in Parliament
House on 26th June 2013 attended by a range of Federal-level politicians
and civil servants as
well as journalists [5.6]. In addition Stoker on 18th September
2013 presented the findings at an
international symposium `The Second Members Building of the House of
Representatives' in
Tokyo, Japan, which was attended by leading politicians and civil
servants. [5.7]
Informing the design of civic participation by other institutional
actors
The World Bank has taken up (and slightly adapted) the innovative
analytical framework developed
by Smith in order to compare and evaluate their own interventions, while
Smith's research on
`mini-publics' as a form of effective public consultation has led directly
to the Bank's advocacy of
their use by a number of governments. The Bank is designing international
pilot schemes directly
based on this research [5.8]. Stoker's work on anti-politics and
engagement led to an invitation to
provide advice about the format (consisting of 33 politicians and 66
ordinary citizens selected at
random) of a constitutional convention (CC) launched in the Republic of
Ireland at a two day event
in Dublin early in November 2012. The same work was used in 12 March 2013
in response to an
invitation from the Brazilian Government to advise on public engagement
strategies [5.9].
Playing a pivotal role in the development of a critical resource for
designing civic participation
Participedia — an international, Harvard-led knowledge e-platform
designed to provide information
about global strategies in citizen participation to practitioners,
activists and government officials — has
adopted Smith's framework as the basis on which Participedia's own data
collection is
structured, and many of the innovations he researched have served as test
cases for the project.
Subsequently, in 2009, Smith was invited to join the steering board of
Participedia which is
supported and has been used by major organisations including the Chilean
Innovation Programme,
European Institute for Public Participation, Institute for Local
Government (US), Involve (UK),
Deliberative Democracy Coalition for Dialogue and Deliberation (USA) and
Open Democracy (UK).
The website has had more than 14,000 unique hits and traffic is
consistently around 100 visits a
day [5.10].
Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1 Interview with Arianna Haberis, CLG, June 2012. For details
see Judith Smyth (2013),
Achieving and demonstrating impact: a case study of Southampton
University's C2G2 (Centre
for Citizenship, Globalisation and Governance) p16. Available at C2G2
Website
(http://www.southampton.ac.uk/C2G2/)
5.2 See evidence presented to the Inquiry at
http://www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/evidence/?witness=hansard-society
5.3 See newspaper article by Lord David Puttnam
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/mar/22/press-regulation-royal-charter-democracy
5.4 Email sent by Programme Director, St George's House, Windsor
Castle, 30 May 2013.
5.5 See emails from Bertelsmann staff in Judith Smyth(2013),
Achieving and demonstrating
impact: a case study of Southampton University's C2G2 (Centre for
Citizenship, Globalisation
and Governance), p25
5.6 See http://www.anzsog.edu.au/events/events-calendar/2012/09/16/ssc-new-zealand-partnership-program-event/362/gerry-stoker-citizen-empowerment-and-civic-participation-auckland and link to Canberra talk http://www.governanceinstitute.edu.au/resources/media-centre/media-releases/27/australian-survey-of-political-engagement-findings-2013-released
5.7 Conference brochure, Japan, 18 Sept 2013
5.8 See email from Tiago Peixote in Judith Smyth(2013), Achieving
and demonstrating impact: a
case study of Southampton University's C2G2 (Centre for Citizenship,
Globalisation and
Governance) p23
5.9 On the Dublin event see:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3E6Z_AW3CRk&feature=youtu.be
and on the event in
Brazil see http://publicpolicy.southampton.ac.uk/innovationingovernancepractie/
5.10 www.participedia.net.
For quotes, see emails in Judith Smyth(2013), Achieving and
demonstrating impact: a case study of Southampton University's C2G2
(Centre for
Citizenship, Globalisation and Governance)n pp23-4. See also
http://blogs.worldbank.org/category/tags/participedia