Collaboration research influencing defence and security policy, strategy and stabilisation operations
Submitting Institution
University of BathUnit of Assessment
Computer Science and InformaticsSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Information and Computing Sciences: Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing, Information Systems
Psychology and Cognitive Sciences: Psychology
Summary of the impact
Peter Johnson's research on collaboration and autonomous systems has been
adopted by the
MoD Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, through both collaborative
research and his
appointment to advisory roles. This has led to impact on defence and
security policy and strategy,
with a primary focus on "Humans in Systems". Specific points of impact
are:
a) In Cyber Influence & Stabilization, Johnson's Life-Story
research provided a conceptual
framework for collecting and organizing information on people and groups
to support stabilization
efforts in unstable regions;
b) In Human Capability Science & Technology, Johnson's
Autonomous Systems and Human-Computer
Interaction research influenced the strategic direction,
requirements setting and
allocation of resources on the £11.6M Human Capability Research Programme;
c) In the organisation of DSTL's engagement with research,
Johnson's advice and involvement
resulted in the development of, and commitment of resources to, a formal
Visiting Scientist
scheme.
Underpinning research
The research underpinning this case study was led by Peter Johnson
(Professor at Bath since
2000) from 2004 onwards. Johnson's work concerns understanding and
supporting HCI in
Complex Systems including where collaboration occurs between
groups of people and between
people and autonomous systems, with continued support from BAe Systems and
EPSRC.
Johnson and Coughlan, his research student and later PDRA at Bath from
2006, investigated
technology support for creative groups through the development of models
of collaborative
creativity [1,2,3]. This work argued that creative interaction can
be usefully viewed in terms of i)
Productive Interaction: focused engagement on the development of a
creative outcome, ii)
Structural Interaction: the development of the structures in which
production occurs, and iii)
Longitudinal Interaction: the long-term development of resources and
relationships that increase
creative potential. These perspectives were used as a basis for the design
of tools to support such
interactions. A prototype tool for supporting collaborative creativity
grew out of this work and
formed the beginning of the "Life Stories" approach in the impact
described below.
Johnson and his colleagues also investigated human-automated systems
where failures have
occurred that have often been attributed to human error or poor display
design. On investigation,
Johnson was not satisfied with the explanations and assumed causes.
Previous analyses had
largely considered the human as the operator or controller of the
automation. However the
automation technology had advanced faster than the human-factors
understanding, such that the
technology was not merely carrying out tasks but making decisions and
invoking actions. For
example, modern aircraft comprise complex collaborative systems of humans
and automated
agents working together to fly the aircraft. Johnson's work systematically
investigated this new
paradigm for human/automation interaction, developing original insights
into human-system
behaviours, novel design solutions and improved human-system performance.
For example, [4]
showed how errors previously thought of as display mode errors, resulting
in fatal air disasters, are
better and more fully explained and mitigated by understanding awareness
of the context of
decisions by the auto-pilot and the human pilot. Novel design features
that increased the human
pilots' awareness of the decisions that had been made, their contexts and
intended consequences
were shown to reduce errors significantly.
Johnson and his team went on to develop a framework for collaboration
that links models of the
different structures of the collaborating teams, roles, tasks, and
resources, providing a basis for the
design, support and management of complex collaborative systems that can
be applied and tested
in various real world settings. In [5] they developed the concepts of
"collaborative flow" and
"working as one" as descriptive expressions of what good collaborative
teamwork can be in such
scenarios, and demonstrated the utility of their framework in modelling
and supporting
collaboration in complex system structures.
References to the research
[1] * Hourizi R. & Johnson P. (2004) Designing to support awareness:
a predictive, composite
model. ACM CHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems,159-166.
[DOI:10.1145/985692.985713]
[2] Johnson P, Hourizi R, Carrigan N & Forbes N, (2010) A Framework
to Manage the Complex
Organisation of Collaborating: Its Application to Autonomous Systems,
EPTCS, vol 16: Proc.
Second Workshop on Formal Aspects of Virtual Organisations. [DOI:10.4204/EPTCS.16.5]
[3] * Coughlan, T. & Johnson, P. (2006) Interaction in creative
tasks: ideation, representation
and evaluation in composition. ACM CHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing
Systems, 531-540.[DOI:10.1145/1124772.1124854]
[4] * Coughlan, T & Johnson P. (2009) Understanding productive,
structural and longitudinal
interactions in the design of tools for creative activities. ACM CHI Conf.
Creativity and
Cognition, 155-164.[DOI:10.1145/1640233.1640258]
* marks the outputs best indicative of the quality of underpinning
research
Details of the impact
Since 2009, Johnson has been working with the Ministry of Defence (MoD),
the Defence Scientific
Advisory Council (DSAC), and the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory
(DSTL),
transferring the findings of his research to inform defence and security
policy, strategy and
practice. He has:
a. developed and delivered a software tool that repurposes his research
on collaborative
creativity [1,2,3] to provide support to stabilization efforts
b. influenced the strategic direction and allocation of resources within
the Human Capability
Research Programme to reflect his work on collaboration between people and
systems
[4,5]
c. demonstrated the value to DSTL of direct engagement with academics and
other external
establishments, resulting in the development of the DSTL Visiting
Scientist scheme and
other commitments of resources.
a) Cyber Influence & Stabilisation: the LifeStories environment
and tool
The Government's National Security Strategy (NSS) highlights the risk to
UK security due to
instability: "Fragile, failing and failed states around the world provide
the environment for terrorists
to operate as they look to exploit ungoverned or ill-governed space". As
part of the responses to
the threat from unstable countries, the NSS states that the UK will "help
resolve conflicts and
contribute to stability". To this end the NSS identifies eight National
Security tasks, of which one is
"Tackle at root the causes of instability". This concern is emphasized in
the Strategic Defence and
Security Review, which details the threats associated with instability,
and notes that the cost of
military intervention is far greater than that of tackling instability
before it flares up into violence.
The Ministry of Defence became interested in Johnson's work in 2009 when
he was invited to
attend a two-day invitation only workshop in Whitehall ("Counter Terrorism
Attack The System") on
novel approaches to counter terrorism. He outlined how his research in
understanding and
supporting collaboration could be relevant to understanding tribal
structures and relationships in
unstable countries. He was subsequently asked to provide a more detailed
report and presentation
to MoD in February 2010. In this report he developed the ideas from [1,2]
to suggest how they
could be used to build and share life-stories of people and groups in
other cultures.
The ongoing operation in Afghanistan and the International Stabilisation
Response Team in Libya
identified challenges with the current way in which UK stabilisation
practitioners operate. Given the
large amount of data gathered and the speed with which practitioners
operate it is critical to gather,
assess and exploit information rapidly. In addition, being able quickly to
review previously gathered
information linked to an individual, location or situation both increases
the impact of the personnel
and enables them to understand incidents or actions more rapidly and
accurately. As
demonstrated in Afghanistan and Libya, stabilisation is a multi-agency
activity, employing both
military and civilian personnel, so the ability to work across
organisation boundaries and share
information rapidly is essential. Currently this is done using paper
notebooks. This quickly
becomes unwieldy and it is difficult to search for pertinent information
or to make new links in a
timely manner.
Johnson's report to the MoD in February 2010 detailed how re-purposing
his work on the Digital
Scrapbook developed in [1,2] could assist with this facet of stabilisation
operations. In February
2011 DSTL awarded funding to develop a prototype of the proposed tool.
This work produced a
prototype digital scrapbook, a user manual and training guide, delivered
in May 2011. In June 2011
Johnson ran a short training course for DSTL on how to use the scrapbook
to develop life stories of
people, villages, and their activities and contexts.
The MoD have since used the ideas taken from the life-story modelling tool
in the Cyber Influence
and Stabilisation part of the DSTL Cyber and Influence Science and
Technology Centre
(https://www.dstl.gov.uk/cyberandinfluence) to develop awareness and
understanding of people,
villages and activities in different cultures, for use as a "get you in"
pack for military personnel on
stabilization operations. The scrapbook ideas showed how to improve
information collection and
availability to the military, increasing the links between different
pieces of information and providing
a more accessible, readily intelligible, portable and effective source of
information. This enhances
the stabilization efforts. Further work by DSTL resulted in a range of
tools being evaluated during
"Exercise Civil Bridge" carried out for one month in 2012 in Uganda
involving military and civil
personnel. Johnson's life-story concepts were used as the benchmark on
this exercise.
A principal scientist from the DSTL Cyber and Influence centre confirms
that "this tool was also
shared with military stabilisation practitioners and utilised for
contingency training. The concept of
displaying and linking information in easy to view schemas is becoming
more widely utilised across
the military and Prof Johnson's research has provided some of the
underpinning foundations for
this." [S1]
b) Advisory work influencing Human Capability Science &
Technology investment
Johnson's work has had a direct influence on the direction and allocation
of resources within
DSTL's Human Capability Research Programme
(http://www.defencehumancapability.com/). This
programme represents a significant contribution to defence research in
human capability, with a
budget of £11.6M in 2012/13, coordinated by BAe Systems. The programme
currently represents
225 research contracts awarded to 190 research suppliers across SMEs,
large businesses and
academia. Johnson's advisory work has taken place as part of his 20%
secondment to DSTL [S2].
Johnson was the academic member of the Technical Assessment Panel "helping
to review and
select a bidder for the provision of MoD's future Human Sciences
research" [S3]. He went on to
"shape and influence the governance of the programme through his
engagement in the
Programme Governance Board, working with MoD and the supply chain to
evaluate the successes
and issues with the programme" [S3].
Johnson's research has played a key role in the specification, award and
assessment of the
contracts within the programme. He has established the need to focus on
Humans in Systems from
a broader behavioural and social perspective. For example, he has drawn on
the findings of [4] to
influence the programme in favour of work that treats humans not as
operators but as collaborators
with autonomous systems (AS). His autonomous systems work [5] has been
used to advise DSTL
in the focus of their programme away from one-person:one-AS ways of
working, towards one-person:many-AS
and mixed teams of people:AS. The framework, model and recommendations in
[5] provided a reference point to focus DSTL on issues of command,
reporting and information
sharing between these mixed and one:many teams to achieve greater
awareness and reduce
human cognitive load. [S4] states that Johnson's work and influence have "ensured
that the
confluence of cyber and traditional infrastructure engineering was
considered in a social and
sociotechnical context. This raised the value of the work significantly
as critical infrastructures exist
to provide a service to humans and it is not clear that this would have
been captured by the other
participants."
[S3] states that "Peter has provided valuable input to a the Human
Capability Steering Group,
helping our military stakeholders understand where research may play a
role in solving their
problems, but also by signposting where there is already work available
to support an appropriate
intervention — or where research would not be appropriate. He has helped
to push the thinking of
this community away from their `here and now' perspective to a longer
term view which will
facilitate longer term research programmes with more stable
requirements. He plays a key role in
the assessment and down-selection of technical programmes of work within
the new external
delivery mechanisms, and provides a valuable insight into work ongoing
within academic
Departments MoD would otherwise not be sighted on."
[S1] confirms that "Prof Johnson has been instrumental in supporting
the Influence and
Stabilisation programme at DSTL. This includes providing independent
expert scientific advice to
help challenge suppliers of research to DSTL — including the likes of
QinetiQ. This ensures that the
technical standard of work supplied to the military is rigorous and
robust. [...] This means that
maximum value is achieved from both research council funding (which is
exploited) and for the
military, who can take output from researchers and apply it to real
world problems in defence and
security. Input from Prof Johnson has already been applied to ongoing
military stabilisation
activities overseas — directly supporting HMG objectives."
c) DSTL Distinguished Visiting Scientist
In his DSTL Distinguished Visiting Scientist role Johnson has influenced
DSTL policy towards a
Centre of Excellence in the Social and Behavioural Sciences by helping
establish the need and
defining its relationship to external organisations including academia.
Johnson has also influenced
DSTL's broader engagement with academia, advising DSTL on their activities
with research
councils and their national PhD scheme launched in 2011, and developing
with DSTL staff the
DSTL Visiting Scientist scheme. [S4] thanks Johnson for his work to "create
a more formalised,
rational, visiting scientist scheme."
Sources to corroborate the impact
S1. Statement from Principal Scientist, Cyber and Influence Programme,
DSTL Porton Down.
S2. Secondment — Counter Terrorism, Cyberinfluence, Information
Management and Innovations;
£68153 awarded to P. Johnson from DSTL since January 2012.
S3. Statement from Domain Leader, Human Dimension and Medical Sciences,
DSTL Porton
Down.
S4. Statement from Senior Principal, DSTL Porton Down.