Improving packaging machine design and manufacture for a reduced carbon footprint
Submitting Institution
University of BathUnit of Assessment
Aeronautical, Mechanical, Chemical and Manufacturing EngineeringSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Information and Computing Sciences: Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing
Engineering: Manufacturing Engineering, Materials Engineering
Summary of the impact
Packaging is vital for sales and for product protection for all process
industries, with the most widely used world-wide being board and film. For
example, the grocery sector alone represents about 70% of the UK packaging
market, with 10 million tonnes of packaging used each year.
Packaging materials are variable, which poses significant challenges in
packaging machine design. A further challenge has arisen due to
environmental legislation that requires the use of thinner, lighter weight
materials. There is a need to meet these challenges since the size of the
world market for packaging machinery is around €20bn, of which 2% is
associated with the UK. Research at Bath has helped address these
challenges in a number of inter-related areas:
-
Improved performance of an existing business: Research findings
have enabled the creation of new tooling allowing lighter packaging
material and reduced customer carbon footprint giving HayssenSandiacre
incremental revenue in excess of $8M.
-
Improvement/changes in existing practices: Guidelines adopted
and the provision of training has allowed AstraZeneca to report a 16%
improvement in overall equipment effectiveness equating to savings of
£1.1M pa.
-
New business activity: New test equipment, commercially
available since 2008, and associated technical services have provided
Smithers Pira and Hanatek with £200k of specialised test equipment
sales.
Research has been undertaken in collaboration with industrial companies
consisting mainly of SMEs, end users and research associations. Impact has
been gained by embedding the results within the collaborating companies
and by on-going use of the results by research associations.
Underpinning research
Key researchers
Dr C Berry (Research Officer 2001-2006); Dr BJ Hicks (Research Officer
1998-2001, Research Fellow 2001-2006, Senior Research Fellow 2006-2011,
Reader 2011-2013); Dr J Matthews (Research Officer 2001-2010); Mr C
McPherson (Research Officer 2001-2006); Professor AJ Medland (Professor
1995-2009); Professor G Mullineux (Reader 1995-2006, Professor since
2006); Mr G Neale (KT Associate, 2001-2003); and Dr D Sirkett (Research
Officer 2004-2006).
Context
World packaging production for paper and board is estimated at $160bn pa,
while for plastics, including film, it is at $140bn pa (Twede &
Goddard, Packaging Materials). The size of the world market for
packaging machinery is around €20bn of which 2% is associated with the UK
(EUROPAMA website). Companies often design and manufacture this machinery
on an evolutionary basis, so that the reasons for successful operation and
the potential limitations on performance are not well understood.
Key research
There has been extensive interaction with SMEs, end users and research
associations involved with packaging, processing and pharmaceutical
equipment. Interest has focused on the modelling and improvement of the
interaction between machines and the material and products that are
processed. Carton board has distinct non-linear material properties and
behaviour that may vary significantly with moisture content. When folded,
it is liable to delaminate; a fundamental understanding of this process,
[1], is central to the design and set-up of the manufacturing equipment.
Machine design is particularly difficult because the properties of the
processed material vary with ambient temperature and humidity. It is
therefore necessary to understand or, at least, bound their effects [2].
An understanding of the non-linear mechanical properties enabled the Bath
researchers to be the first able to undertake realistic simulation of
machine operation, including the prediction of failure [3]. This was a
major contribution that enabled operating conditions for existing machines
to be established for the avoidance of failure. This in turn informed the
development of improved design procedures [4].
Vertical form-fill-seal (VFFS) machines are used to package products in
film for almost 40% of packaged product worldwide. The key part of this is
the `forming shoulder', which takes the film from a roll, turns it back on
itself to form a tube. When sealed across its width, the tube is formed
into bags and product is then introduced. Although the geometry of the
shoulder needs to be precisely defined to avoid damage to the film, the
requirements have been poorly-understood and the industry has used various
semi-empirical `rules of thumb' to decide the form of a shoulder. The Bath
research identified the five main parameters needed to determine the
shoulder geometry. With this understanding, other forms of shoulder design
are now possible [5]. An approach for designing shoulders for new
applications has been established and incorporated in a software tool,
which allows designers to create usable designs through the use of a
formal methodology. More recent work has succeeded in relating the pull
force needed to take film over a shoulder and in experimental
determination of the factors affecting the sealing of films. The research
has overcome major barriers and led to the use of thinner, lightweight
packaging materials.
The results of the research have been encapsulated into a guide and a
workbook, [6], intended for industrial professionals in the packaging
sector to help them assess and improve their packaging operations. The
research began in 2001 and is still on-going.
References to the research
(* references that best indicate quality)
1*. BJ Hicks, C Berry, G Mullineux, CJ McPherson and AJ Medland. An
energy-based approach for modelling the behaviour of packaging material
during processing, 2004, Proceedings IMechE, Part C, Journal of Mechanical
Engineering Science, 218, 105-118. DOI: 10.1243/095440604322786983
2*. C Berry, BJ Hicks, CJ McPherson, AJ Medland and G Mullineux. Impact
of environmental conditions on the performance of carton board skillets,
2005, Packaging Technology and Science, 18, 225-241. DOI:
10.1243/095440604322786983
3*. DM Sirkett, BJ Hicks, C Berry, G Mullineux and AJ Medland. Simulating
the behaviour of folded cartons during complex packing operations, 2006,
Proceedings IMechE, Part C, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 220,
1797-1811. DOI: 10.1243/0954406jmes109
4. G Neale, G Mullineux, J Matthews and AJ Medland. Case study:
constraint-based improvement of an over-wrapping machine, 2009,
Proceedings IMechE, Part B, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 223,
207-216. DOI: 10.1243/09544054JEM1189
5. CJ McPherson, G Mullineux, C Berry, BJ Hicks and AJ Medland. The
performance envelope of forming shoulders and implications for design and
manufacture, 2004, Proceedings IMechE, Part B, Journal of Engineering
Manufacture, 218, 925-934. DOI: 10.1243/0954405041485993
6. BJ Hicks and J Matthews, Understanding Machine-Material
Interaction: A Practitioner's Guide (ISBN 0-86197-152-3) and An
Illustrated Workbook (ISBN 0-86197-153-1), University of Bath, 2009.
(Can be supplied by HEI on request)
Details of the impact
The context of the Bath research is concisely stated by the Chief
Executive of PPMA [A], prior to the assessment period, who indicates that
the consideration of climate change, packaging waste legislation and
economics leads to the conclusion that the use of thinner packaging
materials is advantageous, particularly if achieved without a significant
reduction in packaging machine performance.
The impact achieved has been in a number of inter-related areas.
Modelling of machine-material interaction: The Bath research has
generated new computer-based models to represent the complex interaction
between machines and materials during processing. This helps to reduce the
volume of packaging and to make use of new lighter and more
environmentally friendly materials. The significance is illustrated on the
website of Smithers Pira [B]:
`The tools and methods created by the research team have enabled the
optimum material properties to be established for particular processes,
the re-engineering of packaging design, the redesign of tooling and
matching of tooling to new and emerging materials, and the determination
of robust machine settings (less sensitive to material variation). It
has been shown that the ability to represent machine-material
interaction enables reasoning about material, machinery and product
within a single approach, and bridges the link between the three key
supply chains: materials, machinery and consumer good manufacturers. The
latter of these is critical for consumer goods manufacturers to meet the
ever-increasing legislative requirements [European packaging and
packaging waste directive 2004/12/EC of 11 February 2004 amending
94/62/EC11, 2004].'
Improved performance of an existing business: The research on the
VFFS process has been undertaken in conjunction with HayssenSandiacre, a
global manufacturer of flexible packaging systems. Its Technology Director
states of the Bath research findings [C]:
`Our customers are continually requiring us to handle thinner,
lighter-weight, recycled and bio-based packaging materials ... to comply
with the new packaging waste legislation ... We believe that this
research has helped us to develop improved techniques for creating
forming set tooling that better enables the creation of
right-first-time-tooling ... and significantly contributes to reducing
our customers carbon footprint. The main business improvement resulting
from successful completion of this research has been our ability to
offer forming set tooling which creates package styles that were
previously difficult or not commercially viable.This work has
significantly contributed to the sales of a large number of machine
systems, with approximate total revenues of $8M.'
The research on forming shoulders has put its design on a much firmer
foundation. This has led to the creation of a design methodology that has
been incorporated into a design tool called FORMIT. As part of the
collaboration, HayssenSandiacre has used the tool to define `non-symmetric
shoulders', which was not previously possible. This has enabled the
company to move to a new business activity with the design and
manufacture of machines, for example, new `quad-pack' designs for
Cadburys. The Technology Director states further [C]:
`We are delighted to have been involved with these projects and the
provision of machinery, equipment, manufacturing capabilities and
engineering time as part of our industrial contribution has been a very
good investment for HayssenSandiacre.'
Improvement/changes in existing practices: The findings relating
to machine-material interaction have been presented as a workbook [6] that
provides a general methodology for understanding machine-material
interaction and the realisation of targeted and sustainable benefits. They
may be practice, process or design led. This publication includes detailed
industrial case studies, worksheets and templates. In particular,
AstraZeneca has successfully used the methodology within the UK to improve
its processes. Early in the assessment period (2008), the
Manufacturing Engineering for UK Operations stated that [D]:
`... the AstraZeneca packaging department at the Macclesfield site has
been working with the University of Bath to introduce their methodology
for understanding Machine-Material Interaction (MMI) and to deliver
training courses for our manufacturing teams in Macclesfield. The
methodology has now been incorporated into our manufacturing operational
excellence programme and along with Reliability Centred Maintenance
(RCM) forms a fundamental component of our programme. Our Operational
Excellence programme has already resulted in a 16% improvement in
Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) for one packaging line. The
significance of this is underlined by the fact that a 1% improvement in
OEE is worth an estimated £70,000 to the business each year.'
New business activity: Based on the research into the deformation
and delamination of carton board, an item of equipment for testing the
crease resistance of carton board was created as a new product, in
conjunction with Smithers Pira (formerly Pira International) and Hanatek.
It is used to assess material properties in order to determine the
settings for good running of packaging machinery. This specialised
equipment is now commercially available (via Rhopoint Instruments) [E] and
is used by Smithers Pira as part of its commercial testing:
`Other developments to come out of this research collaboration with
the University of Bath is a new item of industry specific testing
equipment ... This equipment is now commercially available and in use
worldwide (costing in the region of £10,000 with approximately 20-25
units sold).'
Collaboration with research and trade associations: Where
possible, research is undertaken in collaboration with research and trade
associations, in particular, with Smithers Pira, the Processing and
Packaging Machinery Association (PPMA), and Campden BRI. This
collaboration ensures access to the research outcomes by members of these
associations, thus ensuring that real problems are investigated [F] and
facilitating dissemination of the results of research. PPMA indicates [G]:
`In terms of direct benefit for PPMA members, one of the most
successful research projects has been the `Impact' research project led
by the University of Bath which modelled the behaviour of carton board
and flexible films in packaging machinery.'
This has allowed the offering of new and improved services,
particularly with respect to Smithers Pira, which currently employs around
80 people in the UK and provides testing and consultancy services to the
paper board, printing and packaging industries. It has enabled Smithers
Pira [B] to produce guidelines providing new protocols relating to the
properties, storage and processing of folding cartons. It has provided
this information to its member base of 200 companies worldwide through a
web resource on its website and through presentations at trade conferences
(e.g. IAPRI, International association of packaging research institutes).
The Senior Scientist of Smithers Pira states [F]:
`Experience from the collaboration with the University of Bath has
improved our techniques for investigating complex, challenging problems,
where standard tests are either not available or inappropriate. The
experience gained enables Smithers Pira to `win' a greater proportion of
high-value and value-added customer enquiries which would have
historically been lost or turned away.'
Sources to corroborate the impact
A. PPMA Machinery Update, Issue 1, Volume XVIII, Jan/Feb 2007 (editorial,
page 3, also page 6), www.machineryupdate.co.uk/pdf/mu/MU_2007_January.pdf.
B. https://www.smitherspira.com/testing/research-collaborations.aspx.
C. Corroborative statement from Technology Director, HayssenSandiacre, 13
June 2013.
D. Corroborative statement from Manufacturing Engineer UK Operations,
AstraZeneca, 19 September 2008.
E. http://www.hanatekinstruments.com/Carton-Force-Analyser.html.
F. Corroborative statement from Senior Scientist, Smithers Pira, 27 June
2013.
G. PPMA Technical Services, www.ppma.co.uk/about/pdf/PPMA
Technical Services.pdf.