Lone-parent families: work, welfare and well-being
Submitting Institution
University of BathUnit of Assessment
Social Work and Social PolicySummary Impact Type
EconomicResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration, Sociology
Summary of the impact
There are over two million lone-parent families in the UK, including one
in three children. Since the late 1990s, the key policy targets have
included raising employment rates and reducing in-work poverty.
Researchers at the University of Bath have engaged in innovative and
influential research on lone parenthood over many years. Our work has been
instrumental in the development and evaluation of policies intended to
help lone parents move into, and remain in, work. Specifically, our
research has influenced the design and delivery of the New Deal for Lone
Parents, Tax Credits, and policies to improve lone parent job retention.
These policies have a direct and ongoing impact on the social and economic
circumstances, and quality of life, of the families.
Underpinning research
[Numbers in square brackets refer to references in Section 3].
While our work in this area dates back to the 1980s the focus is on
research carried out since 1993 (in the REF impact period). Jane Millar
(Bath throughout), Susan Harkness (Bath since 2007) and Tess Ridge (Bath
since 2000) carried out the research. It also included joint projects with
colleagues who have now left Bath, in particular Karen Rowlingson (Bath,
1999 - 2006) and Martin Evans (Bath, 2002 - 2007), and others on specific
projects. Paul Gregg joined us in 2011, having already worked with Susan
Harkness at Bath, and this further consolidates this body of research. Our
work has been at the forefront of UK research into lone parenthood, work
and welfare, with significant grants (including from ESRC, JRF, and DWP)
and a substantial body of publications.
For many years lone-parent families in the UK have had low employment
rates and a high risk of poverty. Since the mid to late 1990s the focus of
UK policy has been to promote `work as welfare', with specific targets to
increase lone-parent employment and to reduce in-work poverty. Our
research in the REF impact period has explored both these topics in depth
and made a distinctive contribution to knowledge and policy development.
We have shown that the majority of lone mothers are highly motivated to
work and in general employment leads to better quality of life for both
mothers and children, including evidence of improvements in the mental
health of lone mothers, and improved self-esteem and other outcomes for
adolescents in lone-parent families [3.1]. However, our research has also
found that high rates of job exit among lone parents were a key factor in
limiting the ability of the Labour government to increase employment
rates. Our work showed that improving job retention rates, to levels
similar to those of other workers, would boost employment sufficiently to
meet the 70% lone parent employment target [3.2]. Our research following
lone mothers and children over time highlighted the role of the whole
family, including the children, in maintaining employment and underlined
the difficulty of `making work pay' in practice, with low pay and tax
credits often insufficient to establish income security [3.3].
Research at Bath has included also evaluation of specific government
policies. We were part of the team, with NatCen Social Research
(independent research contractor), that evaluated the New Deal for Lone
Parents (NDLP) prototype scheme and national programmes [3.4]. This
research highlighted the importance of the personal advisers providing
tailored and individual support. It also showed that the scheme worked
best for lone parents closest to the labour market, and least well for
those with multiple work disadvantages. These conclusions are reinforced
by our international comparative policy analysis of welfare-to-work policy
[3.5]. Finally, our work has shown the importance of wage supplements to
boost low wages and take working lone parents out of poverty. Our
cross-national study of tax credits was the only research to examine this
policy area design and delivery in detail and to provide evidence on the
trade-offs between simplicity, responsiveness to income change, and
administrative burden [3.6].
References to the research
3.1 Gregg, P., Harkness, S. and Smith, S., (2009). `Welfare reform and
lone parents in the UK'. The Economic Journal, 2009, volume 119
(535), F38-F65 DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02226.x
3.3 Millar, J. and Ridge, T., (2009) Relationships of care: working lone
mothers, their children and employment sustainability. Journal of
Social Policy, 38 (1), pp. 103-121. (Based on research funded by
ESRC and DWP between 2001 and 2008, Millar and Ridge both Bath based.)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047279408002572
3.4 Evans, M., Eyre J., Sarre S. and Millar J. (2003) New Deal for
Lone Parents: second synthesis report of the national evaluation,
London: Department for Work and Pensions (Based on research funded by DWP
between 2002 and 2003, all researchers based at Bath.) URL:
http://www.dwp.gov.uk/jad/2003/163_rep.pdf
3.5 Millar, J. and Rowlingson, K., eds. (2001). Lone Parents,
Employment and Social Policy: Cross-National Comparisons. Bristol:
The Policy Press. (Based on research funded by DSS 2000, Millar and
Rowlingson both at Bath.) (Can be supplied by HEI on request)
3.6 Whiteford, P., Mendelson M., and Millar J. (2003) Timing it
right? Tax Credits and responding to income changes, York: Joseph
Rowntree Foundation. (Based on research funded by the Joseph
Rowntree Foundation in 2003, with the Bath contribution by Millar.)
http://www.jrf.org.uk/system/files/1859351107.pdf
Details of the impact
[Numbers in square brackets refer to evidence in Section 5].
The impact refers to policy and practice aimed at helping lone parents
move into, and remain in, paid work. We have achieved impact by making our
research available in accessible and timely ways. The beneficiaries
include the policy community and the UK's two million lone-parent
families. In relation to the REF guidance (REF 01.2012, Main Panel C) we
identify three main types of impact.
1. `Influencing policy and practice leading to improved take-up or use
of services'. Our evaluation of the New Deal for Lone Parents and
our cross-national research on welfare to work programmes for lone
parents provided evidence that informed government decisions to extend
employment advice and support to more groups of lone parents, to deliver
that support through Personal Advisers, to provide `better-off'
calculations, and to introduce measures (such as benefits run-ons) to
ease the transition to work. Such measures were introduced into the New
Deal programme, following the evaluation, and hence were central to how
the New Deal operated. Millar was a special advisor to the House of
Commons Select Committee on employment targets, resulting in a 2007
report [reference 5.1] which led to measures to strengthen job retention
in the operation of the New Deal [5.2] implemented from 2008. Our
research thus had a direct impact on the delivery of the New Deal to a
substantial number of lone-parent families: between 2008 and 2011,
official DWP statistics [5.3] show that a total of about 440,000 lone
parents took up a place on the New Deal for Lone Parents programme.
2. `Policy debate has been stimulated or informed by research evidence
which may have led to the confirmation of policy, change in policy
direction, implementation or withdrawal of policy'. Our research
on lone-parent employment was used extensively by the Labour government
as confirmation of welfare-to-work policy for lone parents. This came
about through regular presentations to DWP (for example, Millar on
employment sustainability in 2008, Harkness on lone-parent employment
and mental health in 2009). Harkness' work is referenced in eight
government White Papers, including most recently in respect of universal
credit in 2012 [5.7].
Our cross-national research on tax credits is a specific example of
impact on policy implementation. Millar proposed and organised a seminar
funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation and held at HM Treasury in 2002
with participants from across government and NGOs. The work was cited in
the HM Treasury paper [5.4] and influenced the design of the tax credits
that were implemented from 2003 onwards, with substantial revisions to
reporting requirements and the level of disregard in 2005/2006, these
making the scheme operate more in line with our original proposals. Lord
Best (former Director of JRF) stated in his testimonial for our Queen's
Anniversary Prize entry (see below): this work `significantly informed
and influenced the measures .... The system of tax credits proved a very
important part of the reduction by some 600,000 in the number of
children living in poverty... The University of Bath can justifiably
take some credit for the raising of living standards for these
households.' [5.5]. In each year from 2007-08 to 2011-12 official
HMRC statistics [5.6] show about 1.2 million employed lone parents
have received tax credits, making a considerable difference to their
incomes and living standards.
3. `Influencing the work of NGOs or commercial organisations'. We
have worked closely with a range of NGOs, including key groups such as
Child Poverty Action Group, One Parent Families, One Parent Families
Scotland, Single Parent Action Network, Gingerbread and Gingerbread NI,
Women's Budget Group, the Smith Institute, and the Resolution
Foundation. Our research has helped NGOs to develop their responses to
government policy, to articulate policy alternatives, and to provide
advice and support on sustainable employment to lone parents. For
example, Kate Green, MP and formerly Chief Executive of One-Parent
Families, confirms that our research on `the new deal for lone
parents, the impact of tax credits, and children's attitudes to their
parents' employment have all helped me with my campaigning and
lobbying work, enabling me to point to evidence of the impact of
government policies and to suggest areas for policy improvement'
[5.8]. Sue Cohen, Director of the Single Parent Action Network, notes a
contribution to `SPAN's Participatory One Parent Proofing (POPP)
tool-kit. Jane Millar was a member of the Advisory Group and wrote the
Forward for this tool-kit which has now been accepted by the
Department of Work and Pensions as a model of good practice in
providing single parents with practical stepping stones into
sustainable employment' [5.9].
The deep and sustained impact of our research in informing policy debates
was recognised in 2011 by the award to Bath of the Queen's Anniversary
Prize for Further and Higher Education, awarded for `influential research
into child poverty and support for vulnerable people' [5.10].
Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1 House of Commons Select Committee on Work and Pensions (2006/07),
Third Report: The Government's Employment Strategy, HC 63-I,
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmselect/cmworpen/63/63i.pdf
5.2 House of Commons Select Committee on Work and Pensions (2006/07), First
Special Report: The Government's Employment Strategy: Government
Response to the Committee's Third Report of Session 2006-07, HC 492
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmselect/cmworpen/492/492.pdf
5.3 DWP Tabulation tool:
http://83.244.183.180/new_deals/ndlp/live/tabtool.html, Starters
(individuals), Caseload (starts), timeseries (start year), gender, NONE.
5.4 HM Treasury (2002) The Modernisation of Britain's Tax and Benefit
System number 10, The Child and Working Tax Credits, London: HM
Treasury
http://www.hmtreasury.gov.uk/d/new_tax_credits.pdf
5.5 Testimonial: Lord Best, OBE. House of Lords
5.6 HMRC Child and Working Tax Credit Statistics Finalised Awards, 2013
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/statistics/fin-main-stats/cwtc-awards.pdf
, Table 1.2.
5.7 Department for Work and Pensions (2010) Universal Credit: welfare
that works
http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/universal-credit-full-document.pdf.
5.8 Testimonial: Kate Green MP and formerly CEO One-Parent Families
5.9 Testimonial: Sue Cohen, formerly Chief Executive, Single Parent
Action Network (SPAN), Bristol.
5.10 Queen's Anniversary Prize (2011) for Higher and Further Education:
the University of Bath for `influential research into child poverty and
support for vulnerable people':
www.royalanniversarytrust.org.uk/
& www.bath.ac.uk/sps/about/queens-award/.