CHEM01 - Natural organic emissions and summertime UK air quality
Submitting Institution
University of YorkUnit of Assessment
ChemistrySummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Chemical Sciences: Other Chemical Sciences
Engineering: Environmental Engineering, Interdisciplinary Engineering
Summary of the impact
Research performed at York during 2003-6 revealed the unexpectedly high
level of organic emissions by trees in the UK during the hottest periods,
catalysing the formation of smog. This research on causes of summertime
air pollution informed UK government policy reports in 2008/9. It also
resulted in on-going changes in modelling of biogenic emissions by DEFRA
(Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs), embedding the
knowledge into all future government policy evaluations of air pollution.
The Met Office and others have now improved their air quality forecasts
provided to the public by adding the effect of natural emissions. The
beneficiaries of the York research include government and those people at
health risk from low air quality. The impact spans public policy,
environmental policy and health.
Underpinning research
Ozone in the troposphere is an air pollutant and a greenhouse gas.
Moreover, it has been known for 40 years that the action of light on
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the atmosphere generates ozone at
ground level, resulting in "photochemical smog". It is a challenge to
determine how much ozone will form at a given time, since each VOC has a
different ozone-forming potential. We need therefore to know what types of
VOCs are present in air, and in what quantities. In 2003, NERC supported a
major experimental project1 led by Lewis (also including
Carpenter, Hamilton and Lee from York) to take state-of-the-art
measurement into the field in the UK to establish which organic compounds
were drivers of ozone formation. Other contributing universities were
Leeds, UEA, Manchester, Bristol and Imperial. The York team led the
consortium and made the measurements of organic emissions, while the other
universities provided supporting data. York led the data analysis.
Observations of all major VOC classes and other compounds were made
during summer 2003 as part of a large collaborative field experiment
during the most significant heat-wave for more than a decade. Ozone in SE
England exceeded 240 03bcg m-3 on some days, levels reminiscent
of the 1970s and early 1980s before the widespread use of catalytic
converters in vehicles. This was a highly unexpected level of air
pollution since European policy on emissions targets had been assumed to
have mitigated against very high ozone episodes. Using data from this
field study, the York group published papers in which they determined that
during the hottest periods, organic emissions (especially isoprene) from
plants rose dramatically leading to a natural contribution to the overall
atmospheric VOC loading, in turn Ozone levels during 2003 heat wave
generating additional smog which was not accounted for in predictive
forecasting models.2,3 This was an unexpected finding since the
UK was considered to have negligible isoprene emissions from its plant
stock. These publications highlighted for the first time the potential
direct impacts of a warmer climate on air quality in the UK and consequent
impacts on quality of life. The research models demonstrated the
inadequacy of accounting procedures for emissions used by UK government
since their methods did not include these natural organic emissions in a
representative way.
Key researchers
Alistair C. Lewis: Started 01/05/03 as Reader. Chair since 01/10/06
Lucy J. Carpenter: Started 01/09/2000 as Lecturer A, Chair since 01/10/09
James D. Lee: Started: 01/09/03 as Research Fellow Grade II, Promotion to
Grade 8 01/10/11
Jacqueline F. Hamilton: Started 20/08/03 as Post-doc. Appointment to
Lecturer from 01/02/08
References to the research
This research exceeds the quality threshold as is evident from journal
quality, number of citations (data from Scopus, November 2013) and
recognition in Lewis's Leverhulme Prize and RSC John Jeyes Award.4
Research funding to determine atmospheric chemistry of organic
compounds in the UK.
1. NERC consortium project 2002-2006, part of the Polluted Troposphere
Research Programme: Tropospheric Organic Chemistry Experiment (TORCH),
NER/2002/00498. Principal Investigator A.C Lewis (at University of York),
with 15 co-investigators from five UK HEIs. Total grant £975K.
Peer-reviewed papers with research outcomes used later as evidence for
policy change:
2. J. D. Lee, A. C Lewis, P. S. Monks, M. Jacob, J.
F. Hamilton, L. J. Carpenter, et al. "Ozone
Photochemistry And Elevated Isoprene During The U.K. Heat Wave Of August
2003". Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 7598-7613. DOI:
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.057. 43 citations.
3. S. Utembe, M. E. Jenkin, A. C. Lewis, J. R. Hopkins and J.
F. Hamilton. "Modelling The Ambient Distribution of Organic
Compounds During The August 2003 Ozone Episode In The Southern U.K". Faraday
Discuss. 2005, 130, 311-326. DOI: 10.1039/b417403h. 29
citations. Other evidence of quality: Awards to A.C. Lewis
4. Philip Leverhulme prize in `Ocean, Earth and Atmospheric
Science' (2004) - citation: "Alastair Lewis has used his talent for
chemical analysis to open a new area of atmospheric chemistry, devising
innovative techniques to measure complex hydrocarbon volatiles both in the
unpolluted atmosphere and in urban air. ... They can play an important
role in the chemistry of the atmosphere and are involved in the generation
of ozone, which is a potential health hazard when it occurs in the lower
atmosphere at high concentration. His measurements have helped to show
that recent exceptional summer temperatures in the UK have been
accompanied by large emissions of carbon volatiles from vegetation,
resulting in high ozone levels across the country."
RSC John Jeyes Award 2012 citation: "For his significant contributions to
our understanding of the atmospheric chemistry, transport and impacts of
organic compounds, enabled by his development of novel methods of chemical
analysis".
Details of the impact
The research directly resulted in changes in UK government policy and
improved forecasts of air quality made available to the public. In the UK,
air pollutants reduce lifespan on average by 8-14 months, and by up to 9
years for the most vulnerable groupings, inducing respiratory and
pulmonary diseases that affect disproportionately the elderly and
children. Health costs are estimated to be £10.7 billion per annum5
and are comparable to those of alcohol and drug misuse. Vulnerable people
are advised to consult air quality forecasts, as illustrated by the Met
Office and Asthma Society:6 "If you find pollution triggers
your asthma, keep well informed about air quality. Ozone can be a
problem for some people. Levels are likely to be higher on hot summer
days." Air pollution also causes ecological damage and reduces crop
yields. The connection between heat-waves and air pollution and their
impacts on the population reached wide attention during summer 2003, a
period that led to several thousand additional deaths throughout Europe
attributable to ozone and fine particulates.7 The event
catalysed public debate on the effects of air pollution, the possible
impacts of a warmer climate and the effectiveness of Government policy for
pollution control. In response, DEFRA collaborated with the York team to
improve their capability for prediction of air quality. This collaboration
began in 2003 and continues, most recently during the heat-wave of July
2013.
The government has benefited from clear scientific evidence for the
causes of continuing peak summertime ozone pollution, and an enhanced
appreciation of the limitations of EU control policies in periods of high
temperatures. The inclusion of biogenic species in predictive models has
provided government with an improved capability to forecast air quality in
the short term,8 and provided advice to the public (for example
through DEFRA and Met Office air quality forecasts). It has also improved
estimates of future changes in air pollution of natural origin and those
arising through policy change. There is now a better appreciation of the
balance between the effects of natural and man-made emissions on air
quality. Since controlling anthropogenic emissions is a costly activity,
the benefits of improved prediction are felt in both health and financial
domains.
Section 2 presented the finding from York that biogenic volatile organic
compounds are released in large quantities from vegetation in the UK on
hot summer days, promoting rapid photochemical formation of ozone. The
natural emissions offset some of the benefits from policies to reduce man-
made VOCs from sources such as combustion and solvent usage. York
scientists calculated the impacts of biogenics on air quality using their
unique measurements and supporting data from other HEIs.
The research data collected by York were shared within months with the
evidence team at DEFRA, the Government department responsible for ensuring
UK compliance with European legislation, and specifically the air quality
Directive 2008/50/EC. At the same time there was substantial media
reporting and debate about the research.9 Peer-reviewed
publications from York followed in 2005 and 2006.2,3 These
academic publications were then used by DEFRA as a key part of the
evidence base that guided the terms of reference for two Government
reports. It is through these reports published in 2008 and 2009, and
on-going policy recommendations and practice changes, that the impacts of
the research in this assessment period are seen.
The first DEFRA expert report on the impacts of climate change on air
pollution appeared in 200810 and a second reporting on ozone in
the UK appeared in 2009.11 In addition, DEFRA called an expert
meeting in 2009.12 Both reports made substantial reference to
the original underpinning research, highlighting the impacts that this new
understanding of natural emissions may have on air quality, and how
climate change may exacerbate this process." The drought conditions
accompanying the episode (summer 2003) decreased deposition of ozone to
vegetation, while the high temperatures led to increased emissions of
isoprene, a highly reactive volatile organic compound that is emitted
from vegetation, and is an ozone precursor. Both of these effects
further contributed to the high ozone concentrations." 10
Both Government reports made reference to the need to improve the
representation of biogenic species in UK emissions models in the light of
the York research. In 2010, DEFRA tendered for an update of the reporting
of natural VOC emissions for the UK, and the models used for national
policy development continue to be updated to include this source. This key
change to represent natural VOC emissions in the models used by Government
for future scenario testing has embedded the original research in all
future policy formulations. Specific direct consequences are: (a) DEFRA
contracted the consultancy Ricardo-AEA (http://www.ricardo-aea.com)
to include natural emissions in future air quality predictions, work that
is on-going; (b) the Met Office is including natural emissions in the
models used for their air-quality forecasts for the public (http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/guide/weather/air-quality).
Activities supporting DEFRA air-quality evidence and policy requirements
continue to the present. Lewis is a current member of the Government
Expert Committee, the Air Quality Expert Group. DEFRA continues to support
a range of air pollution and emissions research projects at York Chemistry
with Lewis, Lee and Hamilton. In 2012, DEFRA and York created a new
permanent staff position split between Whitehall and York to accelerate
the translation of NERC air quality science outcomes into government
departments (Dr Sarah Moller).
Quotations: Dr Tim Murrells, Technical Director, National Atmospheric
Emissions Inventory, Ricardo-AEA (05/04/13) "The research project
TORCH, led by Prof. Lewis at University of York, provided a very
detailed chemical analysis of processes occurring in the UK during very
high temperature conditions. The research, and later DEFRA expert
publications, highlighted that natural organic emissions of isoprene
could elevate UK ozone during very warm weather. In response, there is
now a programme of work, commissioned by DEFRA and led by Ricardo-AEA,
to provide recommendations on approaches for estimating biogenic
emissions inventories and their use in models to support air pollution
prediction and forecasting. Ricardo-AEA includes biogenic inventories in
its Ozone Source Receptor Model which is used to predict future ozone
concentrations in the UK and to inform DEFRA's policies on ozone air
quality by predicting the impacts of future changes in precursor
emissions. Ricardo-AEA also uses this information in models used for
DEFRA's daily forecasts and public alert systems on air pollution for
the protection of human health."13
Dr Chris Jones, Head, Earth System and Mitigation Science, Met Office
Hadley Centre (22/04/13): "In part due to NERC-funded TORCH campaign,
the Met Office has developed global and regional chemistry climate
models which include detailed process-based representations of the
dependence of isoprene emissions on temperature and light levels. This
emissions scheme will shortly be included in our air quality forecast
model which provides daily forecasts of ozone and other pollutants for
the UK and has been demonstrated to improve the ability of the model to
represent ozone levels during period of elevated pollution. The work
carried out during the TORCH campaign both improved our understanding of
the role of isoprene in European and UK ozone episodes and also provided
a driver to ensure that these processes are fully considered by Air
Quality models for the UK. The campaign was therefore a very valuable
contribution to improving our understanding of air pollution and in
furthering our ability to model future air pollution events."13
Stephen Elderkin, Deputy Director Analysis and Evidence, DEFRA (1/10/13).
"Summer 2003 resulted in a period of poor air quality with impacts on
health across Southern England and in many other parts of Europe.
Understanding the causes of poor air quality events such as this is of
great importance to Defra. The NERC TORCH project has been a
particularly useful scientific resource in understanding the detailed
chemistry occurring during very high temperature conditions in the
UK.....The improvements to model chemistry resulting from the findings
of the TORCH campaign on the significance of natural organic emissions
have led to an improved ability to forecast high ozone events and
therefore provide appropriate guidance and warnings to the public. It
has also led to an improvement in our ability to project future
concentrations of ozone reducing uncertainty in evidence to support
decisions on the scale and nature of measures required to tackle air
pollution." 13
Sources to corroborate the impact
- www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmenvaud/229/22906.htm#a11
-
www.asthma.org.uk/knowledge-bank-pollutants
www.metoffice.gov.uk/guide/weather/air-quality#Air-quality-index
- J. R. Stedman et al. "The predicted number of air pollution
related deaths in the UK during the August 2003 heatwave." Atmos.
Env. 2004, 38, 1087. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.11.011
- N. H. Savage et al. "Air quality modelling using the Met
Office Unified Model (AQUM OS24-26): model description and initial
evaluation", Geosci. Model Dev., 2013, 6, 353. DOI:
10.5194/gmd-6-353-2013
-
. References to public debate (not exhaustive) prior to Government
reports and prior to 2008 The Observer. 9/5/04. Front-page story
`Summer heat to spark killer fog of ozone'. The Daily Telegraph.
10/5/04. Page 3 "Heatwave Britain — when trees turn toxic". BBC 1 TV
News (1pm, 10pm).10/05/04. `Summer ozone'
- Government reports and meetings referencing research (within REF
impact period).
http://archive.defra.gov.uk/environment/quality/air/airquality/publications/airqual-matechange/documents/summary.pdf
. DEFRA, — `Air Quality and Climate Change — A UK
perspective', Published 2008, ISBN 0-85521-172-5 See for example
Section 3 in executive summary (page 3), or chapter 4 on VOCs. (pages
102-150) DEFRA, — Air Quality and Climate Change policymakers'
summary', see pages 18-20, Air Quality and Climate Change'
-
http://archive.defra.gov.uk/environment/quality/air/airquality/publications/airqual-climatechange/documents/contents-execsumm.pdf
DEFRA, —`Ozone in the United Kingdom'. Published 2009. ISBN
978-0-85521-184-4. See for example DEFRA recommendations relating to
reporting of biogenic VOCs in Annex 1 and Annex 2. Policy recommendation
specifically associated with biogenic VOCs with reference to this
research, also in Executive Summary.
- DEFRA, — Expert meeting to consider biogenic emissions and air
quality, 2009, see http://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/reports/cat11/0903231041_Ozone_in_the_United_Kingdom_-_Agenda.pdf
, and then subsequent links to presentations including from
National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory on updating biogenic inventory.
-
Confirmatory Letters: from AEA-Ricardo, Met Office and DEFRA
are available from University of York.