Improving the way consumer credit risk is assessed
Submitting Institution
University of SouthamptonUnit of Assessment
Business and Management StudiesSummary Impact Type
EconomicResearch Subject Area(s)
Mathematical Sciences: Statistics
Economics: Applied Economics
Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services: Banking, Finance and Investment
Summary of the impact
Credit scoring, the process of estimating the risk of lending to
consumers, has traditionally estimated the likelihood of default over a
fixed period, usually 12 months. Research carried out at Southampton's
School of Management has led to a gradual shift by many financial
institutions in the UK and elsewhere towards an alternative method that
estimates default over any period. This approach provides accurate risk
estimates over any time period. It also allows for the inclusion in the
"scorecard" of economic conditions and the lending rates charged —
features whose absence from previous scorecards was identified as
contributing to the sub-prime mortgage crisis.
Underpinning research
Sir David Cox developed the proportional hazards approach to survival
analysis in the mid-1970s to model problems of mortality. It estimates
when an event will occur and how much more likely it is to occur as a
function of an individual's characteristics. Apart from one non-academic
paper, the concept's potential benefits in the context of consumer credit
remained overlooked for more than two decades.
In 1999 Professor Lyn Thomas, then at the University of Edinburgh,
suggested a proportional hazards model could be as effective as the
standard approaches — principally logistic regression — in modelling
credit defaults. Thomas continued his research in this field after moving
to Southampton in 2000 (Professor of Management Science, Centre for Risk
Research, Southampton Management School, 2000-present) and produced a
series of papers, the most important being Survival Analysis Methods for
Personal Loan Data (2002) [3.2] and PHAB Scores: Proportional Hazards
Analysis Behavioural Scores (2001) [3.1]. The former solved various
technical issues and identified the appropriate statistical tests,
allowing scorecard builders to know their scorecard was robust and valid.
The latter extended the idea to behavioural scoring — the way of assessing
the risk of existing borrowers rather than just new borrowers. This work
was enhanced by the arrival at Southampton in 2004 of Dr Christophe Mues
(Senior Lecturer, Centre for Risk Research, Southampton Management School,
2004-present), who would go on to apply the same approach to collection
scoring — when and how likely events occur that determine how much of a
defaulted debt will subsequently be recovered [3.5]. Dr Bart Baesens
(Lecturer, Centre for Risk Research, Southampton Management School,
2004-present) extended the approach by incorporating non-linear
data-mining techniques [3.6].
In 2006 an ESRC grant [3.7] to develop the Quantitative Financial Risk
Management Centre allowed the Southampton research team to show how the
survival analysis approach to credit scoring enabled changes in both the
economic environment and the interest rate on the loan to be incorporated
into the scorecard. Banks were anxious to incorporate such changes, as the
failure to do so had been one of the weaknesses highlighted by the
sub-prime mortgage crisis that began in 2007.
Having economic conditions in individual loans' risk assessments made it
possible to build models of the default risk of portfolios of consumer
loans by allowing the correlations between the default risks of different
loans to come from the common economic conditions. In addition, in work
beginning in 2007, the competing risk approach in survival analysis
enabled the modelling of portfolios of loans with both default and churn
[3.3] [3.4].
The work has led to important advances in modelling credit defaults.
Firstly, all the data can be used in building scorecards, thus eliminating
the time-consuming process of filtering out information that would offer
insufficient history to construct a fixed-period scorecard. Secondly,
competing risk ideas can be used to build scorecards not just for default
but also for attrition and early repayment — the other occurrences that
might affect a bank's profits. Thirdly, expanding the survival analysis
method to incorporate economic conditions facilitates building default
risk models for portfolios of consumer loans.
References to the research
Publications
3.1 Thomas LC, Stepanova, M (2001): PHAB Scores: Proportional Hazards
Analysis Behavioural scores, Journal of the Operational Research
Society, 52, 1007-1016
3.2 Thomas, LC, and Stepanova, M (2002): Survival Analysis Methods for
Personal Loan Data, Operations Research, 50, 277-289
3.3 Malik, M, and Thomas, LC (2010): Modelling Credit Risk of Portfolios
of Consumer Loans, Journal of the Operational Research Society,
61, 411-420
3.4 McDonald, R, Matuszyk, A, and Thomas, LC (2010): Application of
Survival Analysis to Cash Flow Modelling for Mortgage Products, OR
Insight, 23(1), 1-14
3.5 Tong, ENC, Mues, C, and Thomas LC (2012): Mixture Cure Models in
Credit Scoring: If and When Borrowers Default, European Journal of
Operational Research, 218, 132-139 (doi:10.106/j.ejor.2011.10.007)
3.6 Baesens, B, Van Gestel, T, Stepanova, M, Van den Poel, D, and
Vanthienen, J (2005): Neural Network Survival Analysis for Personal Loan
Data, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(9),
1089-1098
Grants
3.7 EPSRC grant (2006-2010): Quantitative Financial Risk Management
Centre, to Hand (Imperial), Thomas (Southampton) and Crook (Edinburgh) -
£560,000 (£170,000 to Southampton)
Details of the impact
Recent economic events have underlined the enormous importance of risk
management. Logistic regression, involving estimating the likelihood of a
customer defaulting within a set period, was long the dominant method of
building credit scorecards. In what has been described as a "sea-change"
in modelling, Southampton's research has been fundamental in driving the
development and adoption of a more flexible approach.
The broad impact of this work can be split into two phases. The first saw
recognition among lenders that survival analysis can lead to a scorecard
that is as good as — if not better than — logistic regression in terms of
identifying loans that are more likely to default. The second phase
heightened awareness that this approach allowed scorecards to include
factors such as economic conditions and loan interest rates — the absence
of which was a critical weakness of scorecards used in the run-up to the
sub-prime mortgage crisis. The approach also allowed estimation of the
default risk of portfolios of consumer loans.
Workshops and conferences have been key to disseminating the advantages
of these new methods. Since 2008 Thomas, Mues and Baesens have presented
their research at an average of 30 events a year. Held both in the UK and
abroad, these have included the University of Edinburgh's Credit Scoring
and Credit Control Conferences, — the 2013 one, attracted more than 450
practitioners [5.1]; conferences organised by industry specialists such as
SAS, the OR Society and Infoline; and workshops for individual
institutions such as GE Capital, Lloyds, RBS and the Coventry Building
Society.
Banks, industry experts and other practitioners are now acknowledging the
major advantages of the survival analysis approach. For example, referring
to Thomas's presentation at a March 2008 "master class" for risk modellers
at HBOS [5.2], Alan Forrest, who at the time was HBOS's Manager of Group
Credit Analytics, described the "experience and insight" provided by
Southampton's work as "crucial to the training of the HBOS modellers".
Forrest, now Manager of Model Review and Research for RBS Risk Management,
said: "At the time survival analysis was a growing technique in HBOS.
[Southampton's] academic papers were fundamental texts and motivators...
and the 2008 Master Class cemented HBOS's acceptance of survival analysis
as a modelling and retail risk management technique." [5.3] Similarly
Richard Norgate, Director of Customer Analytics and Decisions at the
Lloyds Banking Group acknowledged the Southampton group "played an
instrumental part in changing the industry in the use of survival analysis
to model credit risk" [5.4]
The ability to expand the survival analysis method to incorporate
economic conditions and loan interest rates allows the building of default
risk models which can be stress tested. This is fundamental to the Basel
Accord regulations introduced in 2008. This aspect of the research,
together with the School's work on estimating Loss Given Default, has
become the basis for a new series of conference appearances and workshops,
held in more than 30 countries and including presentations to regulators
such as the Financial Services Authority and the Department for Business,
Innovation and Skills.
One such event led to the research team using survival analysis to build
a pricing model for the Coventry Building Society's mortgage portfolio.
The Coventry is among Britain's top-10 mortgage lenders. In 2008
Southampton's model was applied to a portfolio of 115,000 mortgages with a
total value of £12bn, and the concepts it introduced are still used in the
Coventry's modelling today [5.5].
Other financial organisations have introduced these ideas as a result of
summer projects undertaken by Southampton MSc students in Management
Science and Finance under the supervision of the research team. Each year
around 10 of these projects are in the credit-scoring area, with several
involving the development of models based on the proportional hazard
approach. Lloyds and HSBC have been among the organisations to implement
related methods with Lloyds saying "they helped them make real steps
forward in new project ideas which we would struggle to make otherwise".
There have also been numerous email enquiries and several visits from
financial analysts concerning the technical details of building scorecards
in this way. During 2012-13 these included organisations in the USA
(Toyota Financial Services, WW Grainger, Citi and JPMorgan), Canada,
Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Hong Kong, China, Australia, South Korea, South
Africa, Germany, Spain, Hungary and Lithuania [5.6]. These demonstrate the
research's ongoing impact on financial organisations worldwide.
Dr Joseph L Breeden, CEO of leading industry specialist Prescient Models
LLC, has remarked that the work of Thomas, Mues and Baesens has been
pivotal to "a sea-change in modelling", observing: "Loan-level forecasting
techniques... are a great advance over standard logistic regression. The
research being conducted by the Southampton team is critical to exploring
the applicability and limitations of these methods so that we can educate
lenders about where they work best and where further advances are required
for success" [5.7].
Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1 Presentation to Credit Scoring and Credit Control Conference,
University of Edinburgh, March 2011 http://www.business-school.ed.ac.uk/crc/conferences/conference-archive?a=46022
5.2 Survival Analysis Master Class for HBOS, Halifax, March 2008
5.3 Statement from Manager, Model Review and Research, RBS Risk
Management
5.4 Statement from Group Analytics and Modelling Director, Lloyds Banking
Group
5.5 Statement from Head of Risk Models, Coventry Building Society
5.6 Email correspondence from financial institutions in countries
mentioned above
5.7 Statement from CEO, Prescient Models LLC