Monitoring and Evaluation of Sport-for-Development
Submitting Institution
University of StirlingUnit of Assessment
Sport and Exercise Sciences, Leisure and TourismSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Studies In Human Society: Human Geography
Summary of the impact
As a consequence of research carried out at the University of Stirling as
set out in this case study, monitoring and evaluation of sport for
development programmes has been enhanced:
- Organisations (NGOs/charities) in Africa and India have developed more
systematic programmes for the monitoring and evaluation of their work;
- Project workers have acquired the knowledge and skills to be able to
use quantitative and qualitative research techniques to design, collect,
analyse and report evaluation findings;
- Monitoring and evaluation has become an integral component of
sport-for-development work in the organisations that participated in the
research;
- UK funding and sponsoring organisations have adapted approaches to
supporting sport-for-development programmes and overseas organisations
to include monitoring and evaluation.
Underpinning research
The research set out below was commissioned by a partnership consisting
of International Development though Sport (IDS), Comic Relief and UK
Sport. The aim of the research was to assess what contribution sport makes
to the personal development and well being of disadvantaged children and
young people.
Eight overseas organisations were involved in the study: six in Africa
(EMIMA, Tanzania; KCCC; Uganda; The Kids League, Uganda; SCORE, South
Africa; Don Bosco, Liberia; and YMCA Senegal, Senegal) and two in India
(Magic Bus and Praajak Railway Children). All of the projects used sport
and other activities as tools for the personal development of children and
young people. The organisations worked with different groups of children
and young people in different contexts with the main areas being: (i)
personal development (self-efficacy and self-esteem); (ii) gender equality
and women's empowerment; (iii) HIV and AIDS; and (iv) peer leader
development.
This research was designed to build the capacity of these organisations
to be able to undertake their own monitoring and evaluation and to be able
to move away from having an external agency undertake evaluation on their
behalf. The research provided a framework for the participating
organisations to design their own monitoring and evaluation projects and
provided the appropriate advice, support and training to develop the
knowledge and skills necessary for staff to become proficient in
undertaking monitoring and evaluation. Training workshops were delivered
and included the following:
- Using logic models in programme design and monitoring and evaluation;
- Questionnaire design and administration;
- SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) — Data file design,
data entry and data processing;
- SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) — Statistical
analysis and chart building (Excel);
- Interviewing techniques;
- Interpreting and reporting evaluation findings.
As part of the training and support provided by this research, each
organisation was provided with copies of the Sport-in-Development: A
Monitoring and Evaluation Manual (Coalter 2006). This tool provided
a foundation on which each organisation built their own monitoring and
evaluation project.
Further on-going support was provided by way of telephone and email
exchanges between the organisations and the evaluation team. Detailed
comments on questionnaire design and content, on processing data using
SPSS and reporting was provided to the nominated monitoring and evaluation
project workers. In addition, visits were made to the project where advice
and support was provided on-site, which was tailored to meet the needs of
the organisation.
The University of Stirling Research Team
- Professor Fred Coalter, Chair of Sports Policy, School of Sport,
University of Stirling — Fred was the Principal Investigator for the
evaluation and was responsible for all phases of the evaluation (now
retired).
- John Taylor, Research Fellow, School of Sport, University of Stirling
— John supported the research organisations' design and analysis stages
of their evaluations, provided training in the use of SPSS and
contributed the content and production final report.
References to the research
Coalter, F. (2010) `Sport for development: going beyond the boundary',
Sport in Society, 13(9), 1374-1391.
Grant awarded to: Professor Fred Coalter
Title: Comic Relief/UK Sport joint venture
Sponsor: International Development through Sport (IDS) / UK Sport / Comic
Relief
Period of grant: 01/12/2006-01/12/2009
Value of grant: £51,000
Details of the impact
The research impacted on the work of the African and Indian organisations
delivering sports-for-development projects and the work of the funding and
sponsoring bodies in the UK (IDS, Comic Relief and UK Sport).
African and Indian organisations
The study provided the organisations under investigation with a
monitoring and evaluation framework and associated tools that strengthened
their programmes of activity. This framework is set out in Coalter (2006)
and is available for download via the sportanddev.org website, which is an
international repository for work in this field. By adopting more robust
systems of monitoring and evaluation, for which they received training and
support, the organisations became more capable of assessing the quality
and impact of their work. It also led to the strengthening of the design
of their programmes, and the setting of appropriate outcomes. It has also
led to improvement in other areas as noted by IDS/UK Sport and Comic
Relief as they explained that "although challenging for some of the
partners, others have taken the monitoring and evaluation skills
acquired through the process into other areas of their work."
The research allowed project workers to assess the impact of their work
on children and young people more thoroughly, which enabled them to amend
or adjust their programmes to further improve their outcomes.
Subsequently, several of the organisations involved in the research have
appointed workers with responsibility for monitoring and evaluating of
programmes.
Some of the organisations have continued to develop monitoring and
evaluation programmes. For example, Magic Bus continues to expand its
monitoring and evaluation function and is currently supporting others in
the sector through further training opportunities based on the training
the organisation received through this project. In December 2011 it
delivered a three day workshop in `M&E and Project Cycle Management of
S4D Programmes', designed to help delegates to understand and prepare
M&E frameworks, enhance programme design and management and understand
logic models.
Funding and Sponsoring Bodies in the UK
The research resulted in changes in the way that IDS supports partners
and how it approaches research. In its summary document about the study,
IDS stated:
"IDS has refined its strategy towards developing and initiating research
projects and continues to aspire to be an all round `better partner'.
The impact study findings have alerted us to the importance of
re-evaluating traditional assumptions about the nature and extent of
expected impacts and the definition and measurement of success. We will
support our partners to evaluate their interventions focusing on accurate
beneficiary targeting, better understanding participant needs and the
wider context." (IDS, 2010, p23)
This was re-iterated by the International Programme Manager, IDS/UK Sport
when she said that "For IDS and UK Sport, it has informed our advice
to partners on programme design and our programme strategy going
forward."
This was further emphasised by IDS/UK Sport and Comic Relief as they
explained that: "As a result of this project, our own understanding of
the role of sport has progressed immensely. It has informed our own
programmes and will continue to do so in the future."
The study has also helped raise Comic Relief's awareness of the
importance of monitoring and evaluation:
"We acknowledge the need to support organisations to take the time to
develop and fully understand their theory of change to allow for better
setting and monitoring of outcomes for children and young people. We will
assess the relevance of the `deficit model' across other programme areas
and continue to challenge organisations in their assumptions about the
groups they are working with and the issues they are addressing through
their programmes We will support further learning and exchange between the
sport for development and wider development sectors, so that organisations
can learn from each other's good practice and understanding about how
change is brought about." (IDS, 2010, p24)
The Sport for Change Manager for Comic Relief also explained how the
research "has helped guide the design of our Sport for Change strategy
and the assessment of proposals."
Sources to corroborate the impact
Written statements to corroborate the impact which are quoted from in the
case study have been provided by the Sport for Change Manager at Comic
Relief and the International Programme Manager for IDS/UK Sport. Contact
details have been provided with the REF submission.
See also http://www.uksport.gov.uk/pages/research-and-publications/