Sustainable environmental management in smaller ports
Submitting Institution
Plymouth UniversityUnit of Assessment
Business and Management StudiesSummary Impact Type
EnvironmentalResearch Subject Area(s)
Environmental Sciences: Environmental Science and Management
Engineering: Environmental Engineering
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration
Summary of the impact
Environmental regulations threaten commercial operations in many smaller
ports. This impact case study empowered Falmouth Harbour Commissioners
(FHC) to ensure sustainable anchoring, bunkering and ballast water
exchange operations in Falmouth Bay by redefining environmental management
as a business process and transforming stakeholder management. KTP award
(KTP007098) funded by ESRC, NERC and FHC developed a Port Sustainability
Management System (PSMS) and stakeholder management framework to ensure
systematic collation and analysis of fragmented data, which ensured
sustainable operations and safeguarded commercial revenue streams,
protecting the port. A CUC-ESF studentship award (ESF11200NCO5) is
investigating processes which underpin implementation in Europe's largest
port industry.
Underpinning research
This research has been undertaken by Professor John Dinwoodie, Dr. Sarah
Tuck and Dr. James Benhin of Plymouth University and within the umbrella
of the Marine Institute. Professor John Dinwoodie specialises in maritime
logistics and his research interests span systems in shipping and
logistics, port management and sustainable environmental management,
including Low Carbon Shipping. He has contributed to numerous journal
articles on port management and the maritime logistics of the oil industry
[1]. Sarah Tuck is a specialist in maritime business with interests in
small ports and stakeholder engagement and undertook a PhD (Plymouth
University, 2007) investigating social and economic aspects of the
regional competitiveness of commercial ports and wharves in the South West
of England, using a case study approach. James Benhin is a specialist in
environmental economics who investigated the regional economic impacts of
maritime operations.
Research in marine sustainability has typically featured particular
scientific processes, impacts or models and any available environmental
sustainability initiatives to support port managers have focused on large
ports that possess sufficient resources to employ specialist staff or
engage external consultants. A paucity of research hampers smaller ports.
Further, maritime operations as opposed to port or shipping operations,
have rarely been investigated. Popular methodologies that aim to build
quantitative models concerned with port efficiency or competitiveness
[2,3,4] have limited relevance for smaller ports, and the development and
deployment of qualitative methods, perhaps as case studies [5] to
investigate management processes and stakeholder engagement in smaller
ports has been a neglected field. Perhaps surprisingly, the business
processes of managing maritime operations in ports sustainably had not
been investigated previously. To redress some of these shortcomings our
research initially deployed a case study strategy to investigate the
processes of environmental management in a smaller port in depth. FHC
oversee maritime operations in a very environmentally sensitive setting,
within a business context which incorporates the UK's largest offshore
marine bunkering operation [6]. Falmouth estuary is home to a living maerl
bed of calcified, hardened seaweed. But much of the Estuary also contains
dead maerl habitats where the impacts of routine maritime operations
including anchoring and bunkering have rarely been reported. To date a
business process approach has not been deployed to investigate inputs and
outputs to the processes of sustainable environmental management in ports
at strategic, tactical and operational levels and important issues
concerning stakeholder management and communication have been overlooked.
A Port Sustainability Management System emanated from our research, which
now embeds environmental sustainability issues and management processes
within a broader port management system. Professor John Dinwoodie has
obtained further ESF-CUC research funding with Professor David Gibbs
(Hull) to develop the PSMS further and investigate implementation issues
throughout smaller ports in Devon and Cornwall. This ongoing work is
intended to provide a platform to further refine the model and explore the
process of dissemination both nationally and to other regions in Europe.
References to the research
[1] Dinwoodie, J., Bhatia, R., Daily oil losses in shipping crude oil.
Measuring crude oil loss rates in daily North Sea shipping operations.
2004, Energy Policy. 32 (6), 811-822. ISSN 0301-4215. (ABS**;
impact 3.193)
[2] G.T. Yeo, M.Roe, J. Dinwoodie (2008) Evaluating the Competitiveness
of Container Ports in Korea and China. 2008. Transportation Research A,
48(6), 910-921. ISSN 0965 8564. (ABS***; impact 2.705; ABDC2010 A*)
[3] Yeo, G.T., Song, D.W., Dinwoodie, J., Roe, M. Weighting the
Competitiveness Factors for Container Ports under Conflicting Interests.
2010, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61, 1249 -1257,
ISSN 0160 5682. (ABS***; impact 1.350; ABDC 2010 A)
[4] Yeo, G.T. , Roe, M., Dinwoodie, J. Measuring the competitiveness of
container ports: logisticians' perspectives. 2011. European Journal of
Marketing, 45(3), 455-470. Doi 10.1108/03090561111107276 ISSN 0309
0566. (ABS***; impact 0.965; ABDC2010 A)
[5] Dinwoodie, J. Xu, J. Case studies in logistics: a review and
tentative taxonomy. 2008. International Journal of Logistics Research
and Applications, 11(5), 393-408. ISSN 1367-5567. (ABS**; impact
0.357;ABDC2010 B)
[6] Dinwoodie, J., Tuck S., Knowles, H., Benhin J., Sansom, M.
Sustainable development of maritime operations in ports. 2012. Business
Strategy and the Environment. 21, 111-126 ISSN 1099 0836 DOI:
10.1002/bse.718. (ABS**; impact 1.96; ABDC2010 A)
Details of the impact
FHC oversees maritime operations in Falmouth Bay but in 2008 commercial
activities were threatened by increasingly complex environmental
regulations and fragile stakeholder relations. By ensuring that maritime
operations, which include anchoring and bunkering, are undertaken more
sustainably this research helped to safeguard the commercial revenues that
they generate. The KTP increased the breadth of information available and
the extent of dissemination, as FHC annual reports in 2009 and 2010 added
new sections covering corporate social responsibilities [A] and a
sustainability section was added to the FHC website. The value of
editorial coverage increased from £130k (2008) to £286k (2010) [B]. This
research generated 8 meetings with other UK ports to discuss best
practice, in depth consultations with 9 stakeholders and 70 meetings with
stakeholders. This research created a stakeholder management system and
engaged 2400 visitors at a Maritime Museum exhibition [B, C]. Improved
stakeholder satisfaction led to a £35k multi- stakeholder project managed
by FHC which employed one environmental scientist full time and released
5% of one employee's time previously spent responding to environmental
concerns. The KTP recruited and funded a maritime sustainable developments
officer (MSDO), a role which is now commercially funded and embedded
within FHC [D]. Working with academics and the Harbour Master, the MSDO
developed a Port Sustainability Management System (PSMS) which redefined
environmental management and monitoring in Falmouth Bay as a business
process focused on strategic, tactical and operational processes. This
reformulation clarified understanding and documentation of business
processes generating data relating to what each process involved, who
undertook it, when and why and how long it required. The reformulated
management system empowered FHC to ensure compliance, engage proactively
with legislators and environmental interest groups, and contribute
professionally to good practice and networking [B, E]. In 2008 the
reformulated sustainability management system empowered Falmouth port to
benefit from its location adjacent to the 5' West boundary of a newly
designated Sulphur Emission Control Area (SECA) by ensuring safe,
compliant and sustainable bunkering operations in an environmentally
sensitive area. The number of ships calling to take on bunkers before
entering the English Channel SECA trebled from 2007 to 2008. Research by
MSDO into the environmental impacts of anchoring, bunkering and ballast
water exchange assisted compliance and by pinpointing anchoring locations
using ship Automatic Identification System data, generated new knowledge
and University projects to investigate the location of dead maerl habitats
and the impacts of anchoring [F].
The KTP funded the MSDO to engage in PISCES tidal flow modelling to
combat possible oil spills which was cascaded to colleagues throughout FHC
and GIS training to facilitate monitoring of anchoring locations which was
cascaded to two colleagues [B]. FHC took a lead role in a review of the
SAC management scheme, discharging its responsibilities as a relevant
authority under the habitats regulations. Because of the KTP, sprayings of
quays and steps used less damaging chemicals and the water efficiency of
laundry facilities increased. The KTP spawned trials to gain information
about the scientific impact of re-laying dead maerl beds on the integrity
of the Special Area of Conservation [G].
Monitoring and management of invasive species as part of an early warning
system helped to protect 5 jobs that harvest 60 tonnes of mussels and
oysters locally [B]. Through the KTP FHC became more environmentally
engaged, reducing fuel usage by 24488 liters (2008-2010). The KTP helped
to protect key activities which created 2 new jobs for marine pilots [B]
and to increase annual profit from £61k (pre-KTP|) to £107k (end-KTP).
Evidence of improved societal trust and confidence in FHC's auditable
ability to perform responsibly, openly and accountably was provided when
the Marine Management Organization recently approved works for the
Falmouth Trial dredge application. MSDO undertakes tasks previously
undertaken by the Harbour Master, releasing senior management time
(£17kpa); provides specialist advice and information which reduces
external consultancy fees (£24kpa); substantially increases publicity and
reduced advertising costs (£20kpa) whilst enhancing stakeholder contact
(£60kpa). More constructive relationships with an expanded range of
environmental interest groups include Natural England who volunteered
specialist knowledge in response to proposed legislative changes. MSDO
disseminates specialist environmental awareness training and develops
training materials for harbour users [B]. Work to develop and disseminate
a PSMS to unlock further benefits for ports throughout Devon and Cornwall
is ongoing [H, I] and potentially ports globally could benefit from this
research, which features in a seminal handbook.
Sources to corroborate the impact
[A] See e.g. Harbour Commissioners Annual Report, 2009, p.14,
Chief Executive's Report, available at: http://www.falmouthport.co.uk/commercial/html/documents/
AnnualReport2009_000.pdf. Accessed 15.03.13.
[B Falmouth Harbour Commissioners, KTP007098, Final Report: Results for
the Company Partner.
[C] Comments by Mark Sansom, Harbour Master on winning the ESRC Best
Application of Social Sciences in a KTP, 2012. See National award for
partnership between Falmouth Harbour Commissioners and Plymouth
University, Plymouth Evening Herald. Available at:
http://www.thisisplymouth.co.uk/University-s-partnership-proves-award-winner/story-17626488-detail/story.html.Accessed 19.12.12.
[D] Employment of a full time Marine Sustainable Developments Officer
(p.3) Strategy Document and Business Review Incorporating Report on
Activities for 2011. Published September 2012 Falmouth Harbour
Commissioners. Available at: http://www.falmouthport.co.uk/commercial/html/documents/AnnualReport2011.pdf.
Accessed 15.03.13
[E] The KTP helped FHC to develop
knowledge and expertise to identify potential environmental and
socio-economic impacts to the harbour and the region. See ESRC
researchers winning KTP Awards. Available at: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/impacts-and-findings/features-
casestudies/features/24174/esrc-researchers-winning-ktp-awards.aspx.
Accessed 18.03.13.
[F] On-going projects with Plymouth University students following 2010
projects which assessed the environmental impact of Falmouth anchoring
vessels (FHC, 2012, op. cit.[D], p.27)
[G] Scientific trials to gain information about the scientific impact of
re-laying dead maerl beds on the integrity of the Special Area of
Conservation undertaken with PU Marine Institute (FHC, 2012, op. cit. [D],
p.28).
[H] Developing a Port Sustainability Management System for Smaller Ports
in Cornwall and Devon CUC Research Programme ESF Postgraduate Case study www.cuc.ac.uk Accessed 28.11.12.
[I] PhD project to analyse sustainability systems for the local port
sector. See Falmouth Harbour Commissioners Environmental Policy.
Available at: http://www.falmouthport.co.uk/commercial/html/environmental-policy.php.
Accessed
18.03.13.
[J] Dinwoodie, J., Tuck S., and Knowles, H. (2012) A systems approach to
assessing the environmental impact of maritime operations in smaller
ports. Chapter 14 in: D-W. Song, and P. Panayides "Maritime Logistics:
Contemporary Issues", Emerald, Bingley, UK.