Advancing Safety of Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies: HySAFETY
Submitting InstitutionUniversity of Ulster
Unit of AssessmentArchitecture, Built Environment and Planning
Summary Impact TypeTechnological
Research Subject Area(s)
Engineering: Environmental Engineering, Materials Engineering, Interdisciplinary Engineering
Summary of the impact
The adoption of hydrogen and fuel cell systems provides one solution to fossil fuel depletion,
security of energy supplies and sustainability concerns. However, safety is a key technological
barrier to the hydrogen economy. The technological impact of this case study is the adoption of
research outcomes, from work undertaken by the Hydrogen Safety Engineering and Research
centre (HySAFER), Built Environment Research Institute into international regulations, codes, and
standards (namely Commission Regulation (EU) No.406/2010, and the international
ISO/TR15916), and development of novel safety strategies, guidance, protocols, and engineering
solutions supported by significant external research funding.
Hydrogen safety is a multi-disciplinary research area with numerous knowledge gaps concerning
releases, dispersion, ignitions, fires, deflagrations, detonations, effects on materials, and mitigation
techniques. Research at the University of Ulster, utilising facilities developed under EPSRC/JIF
funding (grant 3a), dates from work into modelling and large eddy simulation (LES) of industrial
scale deflagrations i.e. "explosions". Molkov and Makarov (staff since 1999 and 2000 respectively),
first showed that vented deflagration overpressure is an indirect function of flow turbulence and
combustion instabilities (ref 3.1). They collaborated with Shell (2006) discovering the phenomenon
of coherent deflagrations (ref 3.2), explaining the physical reason for deflagration severity in low
strength equipment and buildings. Partnership with industry (Tamanini/FM Global/USA) and
academia (Dobashi/University of Tokyo/Japan) (grant 3b) provided the limits for vent cover inertia,
ensuring there is no reduction in the effectiveness of deflagration mitigation when venting and
informing EU guidance as outlined in Section 4.
HySAFER (Molkov/Makarov) became a partner in the European Network of Excellence "Safety of
hydrogen as an energy carrier" (2004) (grant 3c) expanding the scope of the group's research to
other physical phenomena underpinning hydrogen safety. A significant number of research grants
followed (Section 3) facilitating outputs and informing guidance and technology development.
Hydrogen can permeate (similar to "seepage") through the walls of a storage vessel. In an
enclosed space such as a garage this permeation and dispersion may result in a flammable
atmosphere unless regulated. Research in HySAFER by Saffers (researcher 2008-2011, lecturer
2011-2012), Makarov and Molkov in 2010 demonstrated the maximum rate of permeation of
hydrogen from an onboard storage tank is sufficiently low, such that there is no flammable mixture
formed, even on the tank surface. Together with partners Volvo (Sweden), CEA (France) and
NSRCD (Greece) a safe permeation rate limit of 6.0 Ncm3 of hydrogen per hour per litre of
container internal volume was established (ref 3.3). This rate limit was adopted into European
Regulation No.406/2010 as outlined in Section 4 (sources 5.1 and 5.2).
The release of hydrogen in the form of a jet is the start of most accidents and is usually followed by
jet fire and/or explosion. The ability to predict the behaviour of unignited and ignited jets (fires) is
fundamental for calculating separation distances. Typically hydrogen releases occur from high
pressure meaning the jet is "under-expanded", thus it is important to understand how an under-
expanded jet behaves. In 2008 Molkov, Makarov and Bragin (researcher/lecturer 2006-2012)
developed an original "under-expanded jet theory" which accounted for flow losses and hydrogen's
non-ideal behaviour at high pressures. This theory enabled conditions at the jet exit to be
calculated. In 2010, Molkov and Saffers validated the similarity law for concentration decay in
under-expanded jets. This meant the similarity law could be used as a means of calculating
separation distances for unignited jets. Hydrogen's buoyancy impacts on separation distances as a
horizontal jet will begin to rise as it loses momentum. Thus separation distances can be
significantly reduced using the correlation for momentum-to-buoyancy-controlled flow transition in
non-reacting/reacting jets. Initial work on jet fires was reflected in the HYPER guidance (grant 3d)
and the novel jet flame length correlation developed by Molkov/Saffers has become the
cornerstone for hydrogen safety engineering (refs 3.3 and 3.4).
Pressure relief devices (PRD) are mandatory for hydrogen onboard storage, they enable a gas
tank to empty in the event of fire, preventing catastrophic failure. HySAFER has developed
innovative designs to reduce the jet length from a PRD as demonstrated by the underpinning work
on under-expanded plane jet behaviour (ref 3.5).
In 2010 Brennan (researcher 2007-2008, lecturer since 2008), Molkov and Makarov discovered the
pressure peaking phenomenon for unignited indoor releases of hydrogen, and drastically changed
the requirements for engineering calculations of ventilation system parameters. The research
demonstrated that a release indoors can lead to overpressures capable of compromising the
integrity of a structure (ref 3.6) and thus pressure peaking phenomenon should be accounted for in
design. In addition, this work and that on PRDs highlighted the need for improved ventilation
systems, PRD design, and increased fire resistance of hydrogen storage tanks (grants 3e, 3f and
References to the research
The quality of the underpinning research is evidenced through the publication of scientific papers in
peer reviewed journals; a number of the key publications by the research group are listed below. A
leading definitive text on Hydrogen Safety Engineering by Molkov in two parts is referred to, as
these volumes incorporate key research findings by the HySAFER group.
3.2 Molkov, V, Makarov D and Puttock, J (2006) The nature and large eddy simulation of
coherent deflagrations in a vented enclosure-atmosphere system, Journal of Loss
Prevention in the Process Industries, 19, (2-3), pp.121-129.
3.3 Molkov, V (2012) Fundamentals of Hydrogen Safety Engineering I, www.bookboon.com,
3.4 Molkov, V (2012) Fundamentals of Hydrogen Safety Engineering II, www.bookboon.com,
3.6 Brennan, S and Molkov, V (2013) Safety assessment of unignited hydrogen discharge from
onboard storage in garages with low levels of natural ventilation, International Journal of
Hydrogen Energy, 38, pp. 8159-8166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.08.036
The research underpinning this case study is the result of extensive funding. Selected grants
awarded to the HySAFER team which have contributed to the impact are listed below; the first
grant (3a) was significant in that it financed the research facility.
3a Boyce, Molkov and Nadjai
Fire safety engineering research facility
01/12/2000 - 30/11/2003
Vented Gaseous Deflagrations in Enclosures with Inertial Vent Covers
16/08/2001 - 15/08/2003
3c Molkov, Makarov and Novozhilov
HySafe: Safety of hydrogen as an energy carrier
CEC - FP6 Sustainable Energy NOE
01/03/2004 - 28/02/2009
3d Molkov, Dahoe and Makarov
HYPER: Installation permitting guidance for hydrogen and fuel cells stationary applications
CEC - FP6 Sustainable Energy STREP
01/11/2006 - 31/01/2009
3e Molkov, Brennan and Makarov
H2FC: Integrating European Infrastructure to support science and development of hydrogen
and fuel cell technologies
CEC FP7 Infrastructure
01/11/2011 to 31/10/2015
3f Molkov, Brennan and Makarov
HyIndoor : Pre-normative research on safe indoor use of fuel cells and hydrogen systems
CEC FP7 Fuel Cell Hydrogen - JU
02/01/2012 to 01/01/2015
3g Molkov and Makarov
Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Supergen Hub
EPSRC - Supergen Hydrogen & Fuel Cell Hub
01/05/2012 to 30/04/2017
Details of the impact
The significance of the underpinning research carried out at HySAFER has been through informing
International Regulations, Codes and Standards and developing guidance documents with a reach
across a range of stakeholders. More specific examples of these are detailed below. The work has
contributed directly to inherently safer technological design.
Research collaboration between HySAFER and Volvo/CEA/NSRCD described in Section 2 has
resulted in justification of the hydrogen permeation rate limit of 6.0 Ncm3/h/L. This significant
published research finding was first presented to the EC and UN ECE in 2009-2010 and was
subsequently adopted into section 126.96.36.199 of the European Regulation on type approval of
hydrogen-powered vehicles (sources 5.1 and 5.2). Likewise, HySAFER's permeation research,
discussed in Section 2, was included in the UN ECE Draft Global Technical Regulation (GTR) for
Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles (source 5.1). The significance of the European Regulation stems from
its EU wide legally binding status and the first to be hydrogen specific. This regulation facilitates
and enables the wider introduction of hydrogen vehicles thereby impacting on the automotive
industry in Europe and having global reach as vehicles must satisfy this European Law. The UN
Global Technical Regulations provide a framework for the global automotive industry, consumers
and their associations.
HySAFER is actively involved in the development and review of standards for ISO/TC 197
Hydrogen Technologies and participates in the International Energy Agency (IEA) Hydrogen
Implementing Agreement (HIA) Task 31 Hydrogen Safety. HySAFER's research, presented to
ISO/TC 197 (source 5.3), on the pressure peaking phenomenon and fire resistance of storage
tanks with a PRD has been incorporated into the recently revised ISO/TR 15916 "Basic
considerations for the safety of hydrogen systems" (sources 5.3 and 5.4). This reference document
is widely used by the hydrogen and fuel cell industry with a global reach. Its significance is in
setting the benchmark for safety of hydrogen systems.
As described in Section 2, HySAFER's expertise originally stemmed from work on deflagrations, in
particular venting of deflagrations and the development of a vent sizing methodology. This vent
sizing methodology and an engineering nomogram to estimate separation distances for high
pressure releases and jet fires has been included in The European Installation Permitting
Guidance for Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Stationary Applications (source 5.5). The significance of this
guidance, developed in 2009 by a European and North American Consortium to address industry
needs, is in providing a compendium of information with a reach across a variety of stakeholders
including use by the hydrogen and fuel cell industry. The document was subsequently adopted by
the Health and Safety Executive for application in the UK (sources 5.5, 5.6 and 5.7).
The European hydrogen industry (New Energy World Industry Grouping, http://www.new-
ig.eu/members) formulates requirements for industry-driven safety research in Europe through the
Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (FCH JU). The international experts group, including
Molkov, published the Reference Report on CFD Gap Analysis
(http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/111111111/15294) based on research
carried out at HySAFER with significance in terms of influencing the European Commission's
funding priorities and specifically the FCH JU Annual Implementation Plan 2012 and related
funding call January, 2012 (source 5.8).
The physical separation distance from hydrogen systems can be comparatively large with practical
and cost implications arising from land values. The significance of safety devices such as PRDs as
part of hydrogen systems is in providing a mechanism to reduce separation distances and hence
cost. Research at Ulster into improved fire resistance of hydrogen storage tanks and PRDs that
reduce flame length by an order of magnitude has led to a patent application (source 5.9). A
discussion document on hydrogen safety devices issued by the UK Health and Safety Executive's
Health and Safety Laboratory (source 5.7) incorporates the PRD work at HySAFER. Industrial gas
company Air Liquide has been using HySAFER's research, specifically vented deflagration
methodology, flame length correlation and the nomogram for pressure peaking to inform their
internal design and industrial guidance (source 5.10).
The significance of research at HySAFER has been its use by industry to improve product design,
enabling the development of inherently safer technologies. In this context, research on releases
and fires has provided the framework for assessing safety distances and developing safer
commercial designs. A key example that illustrates industry relevance was a design study (2011)
for a home refueller for 700 bar hydrogen-powered vehicles. This ITM Power led project for the US
Department of Energy used HySAFER's modelling approach for unignited jets. Furthermore, a
safety strategy developed at HySAFER was adopted by ITM Power with direct impact on their
product development. Specifically the results for hydrogen release within confined spaces were
used to modify their control system and hardware solutions to predict the behaviour of an
unplanned release and the design of a safety case. This facilitated ITM Power's certification and
compliance activities ensuring that the company produces safe, reliable products for the growing
hydrogen economy with a potential reach across different economic sectors (source 5.6).
Sources to corroborate the impact
Electronic copies of all sources including web links can be provided.
5.1 Corroborating statement 1 - Research Engineer, Volvo Group Trucks Technology.
5.2 Commission Regulation (EU) No 406/2010 of 26 April 2010 implementing Regulation (EC)
No 79/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of hydrogen-
powered motor vehicles. Section 188.8.131.52, page 86. http://eur-
5.3 Corroborating statement 2 - President, International Association of Hydrogen Safety.
5.4 ISO/TR 15916. Basic considerations for the safety of hydrogen systems. ISO Technical
Committee 197 Hydrogen Technologies. (184.108.40.206, 4.2.5, 220.127.116.11, 6.3.1, 6.4.2, 7.2.1, 7.5.11,
E.94 reference 13 p 60).
5.5 Installation permitting guidance for hydrogen and fuel cell stationary applications: UK
version, Health and Safety Executive 2009 http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr715.pdf
p33 utilises research from HySAFER's input into the HYPER Installation Permitting
Guidance, which was used as the basis of this UK guidance (http://www.hyperproject.eu/)
5.6 Corroborating statement 3 - Technologist, ITM Power Plc.
5.7 Corroborating contact 4 - Head of Explosion Safety Unit, Health & Safety Laboratory.
5.8 Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking, Annual Implementation Plan 2012, European
Commission, (Section 3.3.5 & page 95) http://www.fch-
5.9 Patent Application WO 2012/143740 A2, International Application Number
PCT/GB2012/050895 "Gas Storage" (International Filing Date 23 April 2012).
5.10 Corroborating statement 5 - R&D Project Coordinator, Air Liquide.