Bayesian calibration and verification of vibratory measuring devices
Submitting Institution
University of KentUnit of Assessment
Mathematical SciencesSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Mathematical Sciences: Statistics
Economics: Applied Economics
Summary of the impact
This impact case study is based on a Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP)
between the School
of Mathematics, Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Kent and KROHNE Ltd, a world
leading manufacturer of industrial measuring instruments. These precision
instruments (typically
flow meters and density meters) need to be calibrated accurately before
being used and this is an
expensive and time-consuming process.
The purpose of the KTP was to use Bayesian methodology developed by Kent
statisticians to
establish a novel calibration procedure that improves on the
existing procedure by incorporating
historical records from calibration of previous instruments of the same
type. This reduces
substantially the number of test runs needed to calibrate a new instrument
and will increase
capacity by up to 50%.
The impact of the KTP, which was graded as `Outstanding', has been to
change the knowledge
and capability of the Company, so that they can improve the
performance of their manufacturing
process by implementing this novel calibration method. This has been
achieved by adapting the
underpinning Kent research to the specific context of the calibration
problem, by running many
calibrations to demonstrate the effectiveness of the method in practice,
and by supporting the
implementation of the new calibration method within the Company's core
software.
Moreover, the project has changed the Company's thinking on
fundamental science, particularly
industrial mathematics. The value of historical data, and the usefulness
of Bayesian methods, is
now widely appreciated and training for staff in Bayesian Statistics is
being introduced. Thus the
project has not only changed the protocols of the Company, it has also
changed their practice.
Underpinning research
The research in Bayesian methodology that underpins this impact case
study was conducted at
Kent by Griffin (2000-2004 and 2007-present), Kalli (PhD
student, 2004-2007), Walker (2004-2013) and X Wang
(2007-present).
Precision measuring instruments require careful calibration. For KROHNE
Ltd, the current
calibration procedures, which are a crucial step for the Company's
production line, are time-consuming and costly. However, large amounts of
historical data are available that can potentially
be exploited to improve the efficiency of the calibration process. For
example, for one class of
meters, over 800 instruments have already been calibrated, but before the
KTP project, these data
were not utilised in the calibration of new meters.
The existing calibration procedure used multiple regression, based on 30
test runs under varying
temperature and pressure conditions. The regression model is a
second-order model with five
parameters to be estimated. Bayesian methods provide a natural framework
for incorporating
historical data through introduction of a prior distribution and the basic
aim of the KTP was to
develop a Bayesian regression model for calibration.
The evidence from the historical data is that the distribution of the
parameter estimates is non-normal and exhibits multimodality and skewness.
This implies that a flexible family of distributions
is required to model the population distribution of the meter parameters.
A natural choice in a
Bayesian setting is the mixture of Dirichlet process model, where we mix a
multivariate normal
distribution for the five parameters with a Dirichlet process random
distribution function. The Kent
researchers, X Wang and Walker, therefore proposed an
infinite mixture model with weights
attached to a set of multivariate normal distributions for the calibration
process.
In this industrial application, the computational time for model fitting
needs to be kept to a
minimum. This led the Kent team to propose the use of simple geometric
weights. References
[3.1 - 3.3] provide the supporting theory for geometric weights.
This choice of weights allows fast
computation time due to the identifiability of the model. With more exotic
weight structures, such as
a stick-breaking prior for the weights, the model is unidentifiable and
much of the computing time
is due to the Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm visiting different parts
of the model space which
produce the same density.
With geometric weights it is necessary to use slice sampling ideas for
dealing with the infinite
nature of the model, this effectively provides a random truncation of the
number of mixture
components, often at a small value; this computational technique was also
developed at Kent, see
references [3.4] and [3.5].
Because the new calibration procedure incorporates information from
previous calibration of
instruments of the same type, the number of test runs that are needed to
calibrate a new meter can
be reduced. The KTP Associate, overseen by X Wang and Walker,
has run many tests using the
proposed algorithm on data sets provided by KROHNE Ltd and the results
have proved to be
excellent. By applying the Bayesian pooling approach we have managed to
replicate the ordinary
least squares estimates of parameters for each meter using only 18
readings per meter rather than
the 30 that are used in the existing multiple regression approach.
A further benefit of the Bayesian approach is improved robustness of the
calibration procedure.
Although the multiple regression approach works well in general, it is
susceptible to occasional
anomalies in the calibration data. This may result in the need to
recalibrate the meter. Because the
Bayesian approach `borrows strength' from the historical data, data
anomalies are less influential
and this reduces the likelihood that a meter will have to be recalibrated.
Finally, the new statistical model has also highlighted an unanticipated
feature which is that one of
the secondary sensing devices thought to be important for calibration,
namely strain gauge, is
actually not required for at least two of the meter types [5.2, 5.3];
the elimination of this secondary
device from each instrument directly reduces manufacturing cost.
A document giving full details of the proposed Bayesian procedure has
been produced for the
Company by the KTP Associate.
The link with KROHNE Ltd was initiated in earlier collaborative research
work on mass flow
measurement involving X Wang at Kent that resulted in a patent [3.6].
References to the research
[3.1] Fuentes-Garcia, R., Mena, R.H. and Walker, S.G.
(2009). A nonparametric dependent
process for Bayesian regression. Statistics and Probability Letters,
79, 1112-1119.
doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2009.01.005
[3.2] Fuentes-Garcia, R., Mena, R.H. and Walker, S.G.
(2010). A new Bayesian nonparametric
mixture model. Communications in Statistics, 39, 669-682.
doi: 10.1080/03610910903580963
[3.3] Mena, R.H., Ruggiero, M. and Walker, S.G. (2011).
Geometric stick-breaking processes for
continuous-time Bayesian nonparametric modeling. Journal of
Statistical Planning and
Inference, 141, 3217-3230. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2011.04.008
[3.4] Walker, S.G. (2007). Sampling the Dirichlet mixture model
with slices. Communications in
Statistics, 36, 45-54. doi: 10.1080/03610910601096262
[3.5] Kalli, M., Griffin, J.E. and Walker, S.G.
(2011). Slice sampling mixture models. Statistics
and Computing, 21, 93-105. doi: 10.1007/s11222-009-9150-y
[3.6] Wang, X. and Hussain, Y. (2010). Method to improve mass flow
measurement based on
statistical analysis of signals. This patent application was filed on
January 28, 2010 in
Germany (Patent DE102010006224A1), and subsequently in the USA, (Patent
US2011/0184667A1).
(References marked with a star best indicate the quality of the
underpinning research.)
Details of the impact
The current economic climate has emphasised the importance of resource
efficiency, which
presents a challenge for manufacturing companies. The KTP project has
developed a novel
calibration procedure, based on Kent research, that exploits historical
data that were already held
by the Company. The benefits of the new procedure are fourfold: (i) around
50% more meters can
be calibrated in a given period of time than with the previous method,
leading to increased profits
and more rapid fulfilment of orders; (ii) there are separate environmental
benefits, resulting from
less usage of energy; (iii) for some types of meter, certain secondary
measurements have been
found to be unnecessary and can be eliminated; (iv) the calibration is
more robust, reducing the
number of instruments that need to undergo costly and time-consuming
recalibration [5.1, item 6].
All these are confirmed by the Research and Development Manager of KROHNE
Ltd, who
declares that the "new procedure based on your statistical theory
reduces the overall time and also
improves robustness" and that it "will not only benefit the
Company with thousands of instruments
produced more efficiently but also benefit our local economy and
environment since less energy
will be used in the production" [5.6]. These benefits will
be substantial: for example the Company
anticipates that gross profits will have risen by around £250,000 per
annum by 2015 [5.1, item 10].
The collaboration with KROHNE Ltd built on initial links with the Company
that were established by
X Wang. Support for building this into a more formal collaboration,
funded through a Knowledge
Transfer Partnership (KTP) in 2011, was provided by the Kent Innovation
and Enterprise unit.
At this stage, the primary impact has been to change the knowledge
and capability of staff
within the Company with regard to the use of historical data and
specialised Bayesian
methodology, so that they themselves can incorporate this more
efficient calibration method into
their manufacturing process. Previously, such methods were unknown to
staff at KROHNE Ltd.
The impact has been achieved through the KTP by adapting the Bayesian
regression techniques
developed at Kent to the specifics of the calibration problem, by running
many calibrations to
demonstrate the effectiveness of the method in practice, and by supporting
the implementation of
the new calibration method within the Company's core software. The
adoption of the new
production procedure based on the statistical developed by Kent
statisticians is confirmed by the
Research and Development Manager of KROHNE Ltd, who declares that "this
new procedure has
been tested by our software engineers and it is being implemented in our
core software" [5.6].
The Company has been extremely positive about the benefits of the KTP
throughout the project
(e.g. [5.2, 5.3, 5.5, 5.6]) and the project has received
consistently high ratings. The Company itself
rated the project as "high" (the top grade) in terms of "improved
efficiency or productivity" [5.1, item
13] and commented that "The KTP exceeded our
expectations in finding a very effective
mathematical model to meet the Company's need." [5.1, item 18].
The project was awarded the
highest grade of "Outstanding" by the KTP Grading Panel for its
achievement [5.7]; only around
10% of projects nationally receive this rating.
The Company's commitment to the project is evidenced by the fact that
they have a software
engineer working full time on the implementation. This requires a full
understanding of the
Bayesian methodology and the Company employed the KTP Associate for an
additional five
months beyond the lifetime of the KTP project to facilitate this. Part of
the delivery of this
knowledge transfer has been the provision of a comprehensive document
detailing the statistical
methods used, and associated training of the software engineers by the KTP
Associate.
A secondary impact of the KTP has been to change the culture of
KROHNE Ltd, with regard to
the value of fundamental science, particularly industrial mathematics [5.1
item 12]. The Company
now recognises the value of historical data and sees the potential for
exploiting such data
elsewhere in the Company to "improve manufacturing operation and
product quality" [5.1, item 7].
It is also starting to address other issues in relation to historical
data, such as the question of
whether it is best to use all available data, or whether there may be
benefits in discarding some of
the oldest data.
The research undertaken by the University of Kent, with the KTP
Associate, has been presented to
a cross-section of staff at a seminar hosted by KROHNE Ltd [5.4, 5.5].
Bayesian methods were
completely new to the Company, but they have been quick to realise their
potential and describe
the KTP as "significant to the Company's operation for enhancing its
competitiveness of precision
instrumentation manufacturing" [5.1, item 4]. The Company's
2013 plan includes dissemination of
Bayesian statistical principles to Research & Development personnel
and training of calibration
operators. Thus the impact on the Company was broad as it affected
personnel involved in
research and development, implementation through software development and
practical
calibration. The KTP Associate has also been involved in regular
discussions with KROHNE
Germany.
A further example of the increased awareness of the value of statistical
methods within
KROHNE Ltd is that a second software engineer is working full time on the
implementation of
another new statistically based procedure into the Company's software; the
KTP Associate also
contributed to development of this procedure.
Summary: Whilst there are various approaches to Bayesian
regression, the methods used here to
address the calibration problem successfully are firmly based in the
nonparametric approach of the
underpinning Kent research outlined in Section 2, which offers great
flexibility in the choice of prior
distribution; the need for this flexibility was apparent from the
historical data. The impact on the
Company has been to provide a new calibration procedure that utilises
historical data. The new
procedure reduces waste, lowers manufacturing costs and delivers more
reliable products that
require less re-calibration, and will lead to large increases in profits.
The KTP has provided the
knowledge and capability that the Company is now using to implement the
procedure into its
manufacturing software.
To conclude, this very successful KTP project has changed the practices
and protocols of the KTP
partner through transfer of knowledge and capability. The Company
anticipates a gross profit
increase of a quarter of a million pounds per annum in three years' time
as a direct consequence of
this KTP project [5.1, item 10]. This acknowledges the
significance of this project which has
already affected many departments of the Company.
Sources to corroborate the impact
[5.1] KTP Final Report, 6th February 2013. This provides details
of the aims and objectives of the
project and assessment of performance and impact by both the industrial
partner and the
academic partner.
[5.2] Report LMC3 from the Technical Director, KROHNE Ltd, 2nd
November 2011 detailing
progress and noting the seminar given by the KTP Associate. (See Contact
4.)
[5.3] Report LMC4 from the Technical Director, KROHNE Ltd, 29th
February 2012, detailing
progress and highlighting the "great benefits" of the approach being
developed to the
calibration procedures. (See Contact 4.)
[5.4] Email from the Research and Metrology Manager, KROHNE Ltd,
7th October 2011,
announcing a forthcoming seminar by the KTP Associate.
[5.5] Email from the Research and Development Manager, KROHNE Ltd,
26th October 2011,
highlighting the progress of the project and in particular the success of
the seminar given by
the KTP Associate. (See Contact 3.)
[5.6] Letter from the Research and Development Manager, KROHNE
Ltd, 23rd July 2013,
explaining that the new calibration procedure "will not only benefit
the Company with
thousands of instruments produced more efficiently but also benefit our
local economy and
environment since less energy will be used in the production." (See
Contact 3.)
[5.7] Certificate of excellence, (highest grade of "Outstanding"),
KTP Grading Panel.