Case Study 1: Robust methodologies for appetite studies – supporting development and marketing of functional foods and anti-obesity products
Submitting Institution
University of LeedsUnit of Assessment
Psychology, Psychiatry and NeuroscienceSummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Clinical Sciences, Nutrition and Dietetics
Summary of the impact
Since 1993 researchers from the University of Leeds (UoL) have devised
robust and standardised experimental methodologies to study human appetite
and food consumption objectively. Companies in the food and pharmaceutical
sectors have used these procedures to develop functional foods and
anti-obesity drugs. The validated methodologies also allowed global
clinical research organisation Covance to establish its Human Appetite
Laboratory to provide product evaluation for US and EU pharmaceutical
companies. Food regulators have also recommended the Leeds approach for
producing evidence to support appetite control claims for functional
foodstuffs.
Underpinning research
In the late 1980's Professor Blundell (Reader, 1982-95;
Professor, Chair of Psychobiology, 1995- present, UoL) developed a
conceptual model to explain how different food groups have psychological
and physiological effects on the body that influence feelings of
`fullness' (satiation) and the period of time since eating, known as
satiety, during which hunger is suppressed. This model, known as the
satiety cascade, helps to explain why some foods weaken satiation and lead
to overconsumption. It also demonstrates how drugs and functional foods
can be used to improve appetite control, and how to measure these effects.
Since 1993, Blundell has headed research at the UoL to elucidate
more detail about the cascade and the mechanisms that control human
eating. He and his team have also carried out studies to identify novel
foods and food additives, which may strengthen satiety and hence help to
control appetite. The research by Blundell and his colleagues has
been funded primarily through grants awarded by the Agriculture and Food
Research Council (AFRC) [i-iii], the Biotechnology and Biological
Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [iv-viii], the European
Commission [ix] and the National Institute of Health [x],
with a view to understanding the fundamental science of satiety and
appetite control as well as to support the food and pharmaceutical
industries [xi] in their development of functional foods and
anti-obesity products.
New mechanisms of action in the satiety cascade
In 1993, an initial study carried out by UoL researchers C.Lawton (Research
Fellow, UoL, 1991- 94; Lecturer, UoL, 2010-present) and Burley (Research
Fellow, UoL, 1988-96; Lecturer, UoL, 2000-present) under the supervision
of Blundell, was one of the first experiments to provide evidence
of the complex mechanisms driving the satiety cascade. The research
indicated that dietary fat had weak effects on satiation and satiety in
obese subjects [1] (155 cites), revealing the potential for a
spiralling deterioration in the health of obese people as they have to
consume relatively more fat before they feel full. Further studies by Blundell
and Macdiarmid (PhD Student, 1992-94; Research Fellow, 1994-96, UoL)
concluded that dietary fat is a risk factor for overconsumption and
affects eating patterns [2] (122 cites).
New methodologies and measures of appetite - development and
validation
The methodologies behind these two studies were remarkable, not just for
their discovery of the role of dietary fat in regulating appetite; they
also demonstrated that researchers could study food consumption and
appetite objectively and quantitatively. Following these early
experiments, Blundell and his team further extended the
methodologies and developed standardised procedures for measuring human
food intake and for objectively identifying the effects of different foods
on satiation and satiety.
In 1997 Blundell and colleagues from the Biopsychology group at
the UoL, along with Joanes from the Department of Statistics (UoL)
developed a new concept in appetite measurement: the satiety quotient (SQ)
[3]. This new parameter stemmed from a number of experiments in
which subjects were presented with food or meals of varying composition;
the researchers measured each subject's motivation to eat immediately
prior to, and periodically after they ate the food. This quotient relates
intake to the rate of return of motivation to eat in the period following
the meal and is a function of the energy consumed- a new relationship,
which is not apparent on separate examination of the amount consumed or
ratings of motivation to eat.
The Leeds group also took existing visual analogue scales for measuring
subjective sensations such as hunger and fullness and adapted them to
create the Electronic Appetite Rating System (EARS), used for handheld
electronic data capture devices which allowed subjects to record their
experiences and appetite reliably and conveniently. The validity of this
experimental approach was evaluated in collaboration with several
independent research groups. The University of Copenhagen led an
evaluation of the visual analogue scales in a project that involved
replication studies to compare the electronic vs. paper scales in Leeds,
Aberdeen and Copenhagen [4] (151 cites).
Several other laboratory procedures first developed by the Leeds team
were also evaluated through collaborations with other appetite research
groups. These studies found the Leeds methodologies for measuring human
food intake and their effects on satiation and satiety were reliable,
valid and robust [5, 6] (76 and 463 cites, respectively). In
parallel to these validation studies, and in order to disseminate the
developed methodologies more widely, Blundell, Hetherington
(Professor, UoL, 2009-present) and Finlayson (Associate Professor,
UoL, 2007- present) co-authored a comprehensive review of appetite
research methodologies in collaboration with colleagues, published as a
chapter on `Measuring Food Intake, Hunger, and Satiation in the
Laboratory' in the 'Handbook of Assessment Methods for Eating Behaviors
and weight related problems' (Alison, D.B., & Baskin, L.S. (Eds.)
(2009). Handbook of Assessment Methods for Eating Behaviors and weight
related problems (pp. 283-325). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Publications).
References to the research
[1] Lawton*, C.L., Burley*, V.J., Wales*, J.K., & Blundell*,
J.E. (1993). Dietary fat and appetite control in obese subjects:
weak effects on satiation and satiety. International Journal of
Obesity, 17, 409-416. pmid: 8395476
This research demonstrates the importance of the distinction between
satiation and satiety in the assessment of nutrients on appetite
control.
[2] Blundell*, J.E., & Macdiarmid*, J.I. (1997). Fat as a risk
factor for overconsumption: satiation, satiety, and patterns of eating. Journal
of American Dietetic Association, 97, S63-S69. doi:
10.1016/S0002-8223(97)00733-5
This paper shows how satiation and satiety, as features of the eating
pattern, embody risks for overconsumption and weight gain.
[3] Green*, S.M., Delargy*, H.J., Joanes*, D., & Blundell*,
J.E. (1997). A Satiety Quotient: A Formulation to Assess the
Satiating Effect of Food. Appetite, 29(3), 291-304. doi:
10.1006/appe.1997.0096
This paper describes a procedure for quantifying the capacity of a food
to modulate the strength of satiety.
[4] Stubbs, R.J., Hughes, D.A., Johnstone, A.M., ... Stratton,
R.J., Delargy*, H.J., King*, N.A., & Blundell*, J.E. (2000).
The use of visual analogue scales to assess motivation to eat in human
subjects: a review of their reliability and validity with an evaluation of
new hand-held computerized systems for temporal tracking of appetite
ratings. British Journal of Nutrition, 84, 405-415. doi:
10.1017/S0007114500001719
This paper demonstrates how electronic data capture of motivational
ratings allows easier personal quantification of the effects of food on
satiety.
[5] Blundell*, J.E., de Graaf, C., Hulshof, T., Jebb, S.,
Livingstone, B., Lluch, A., ... & Westerterp, M. (2010). Appetite
Control: methodological aspects of the evaluation of foods. Obesity
Reviews, 11, 251-270. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00714.x
This paper describes, along with other techniques, the status of the
Leeds objective procedures for quantifying the effects of foods on
satiation and satiety.
[6] Flint, A., Raben, A., Blundell*, J.E., & Astrup,
A. (2000). Reproducibility, power and validity of visual analogue scales
in assessment of appetite sensations in single meal studies. International
Journal of Obesity, 24, 38-48. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801083
This paper confirms the scientific capacity of the Leeds measures for
assessing the impact of foods on satiety under controlled laboratory
conditions.
Key funding and grants
[i] AFRC FG24/544. (1994-1997). Investigation of the Effect of
Dietary fat on the Satiation Power of Food and Food Selection in Man. Blundell*,
J.E. £79,950.
[ii] AFRC F00248. (1996-1999). An Investigation of High fat
Consumers: Personal, Social and Physiological Characteristics. Blundell*,
J.E., & Cade*, J. £134, 510.
[iii] AFRC D02501. (1997-2000). The Effect of Exercise and Diet
Composition on the Pattern of Appetite and Energy balance in Man. Blundell*,
J.E., & Stubbs, R.J. £184,753.
[iv] BBSRC BBS/B/05079. (2004-2007). Individual Variability and
Characterisation of Compensatory Responses to exercise Interventions. Blundell*,
J.E., & King*, N. £293,045.
[v] BBSRC (DRINC) BB/G005524/1. (2009 -2012). Drivers of eating
behaviour during chronic overconsumption. Blundell*, J.E., & Finlayson*,
G. £675,694
[vi] BBSRC BB/G530141/1. (2009-2013). Hedonic responsivity in
individuals susceptible and resistant to weight gain. PhD studentship
linked to [v]. Blundell*, J.E., & Finlayson*, G.
£178,827.
[vii] BBSRC BB/H004971/1. (2009-2012). Increased Propionate
Production in The Colon Is Associated With Reduced Appetite, Body Weight
And Improved Insulin Sensitivity. Frost, G., & Blundell*, J.E.
£673,268.
[viii] BBSRC BB/I022325/1. (2011-2014). Emulsion structure: a
novel mechanism of delivering fatty acids to regulate gut function and
satiety. Wilde, P., & Blundell*, J.E. £830,893.
[ix] European Commission: Partner in Projects funded in Framework
5 (Response to High Fat Diet in Europe), Framework 6 (DIOGENES) and
Framework 7. Ongoing: FP7-KBBE-2011-5. (2011- 2015). SATIN. Satiety
control through food structures made by novel processing. Co-PI: Blundell*,
J.E. €5,992,880.
[x] NIH/NIDDK [R01 DK081714-01A2]. (2011-2016). Portion size
effects on body weight: free living setting (with Univ Minnesota). French,
S., & Blundell*, J.E. $2,688,410.
[xi] Received industrial support for satiety projects from
National Starch & Chemical Ltd, Roche, Unilever, Danisco, Du-Pont,
Sanofi-Aventis, Barilla, VINNOVA (Swedish Government Research Agency) and
Covance CRC.
Note: All UoA4 researchers in bold; *research conducted by
academics at the UoL.
Details of the impact
In its efforts to elucidate the detailed mechanisms of action behind the
satiety cascade concept, Blundell's research group has developed
laboratory procedures and methodologies which have since been adopted by
industry and recommended by European and North American regulatory
authorities as a standard approach to food consumption and human appetite
studies. The methodologies have been used in studies to support the
development of anti-obesity drugs and functional foods for appetite
control.
Setting standards of evidence for food and health regulators
In 2012 the Food Directorate of Health Canada made extensive reference to
the Leeds Methodology (pages 3, 5, 6,10,11,13,14) in its guidelines and
recommendations on the scientific assessment of functional foods for
satiety. These guidelines set out how companies must validate any claims
they make regarding the effects of novel foods [A]. This Leeds
research has also informed the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in
setting standards for evaluating the food companies claims for foods to
exert effects on appetite, through Blundell's position as a
consultant to the EFSA NDA panel (2008 -10) [B].
Product development - functional foods and anti-obesity products
Appetite suppression is a major focus for anti-obesity drugs developed by
the pharmaceutical industry and for appetite-controlling functional foods
developed by the food industry. The global pharmaceutical corporation
Merck adopted Leeds' methodologies to evaluate two novel obesity drugs,
the MC4 R agonist and CB1R inverse agonist. The trials showed that MC4R
agonists lacked the potency required for further development, but the
appetite action of CB1R was related to brain activity [C].
The concepts of the satiety cascade and Leeds' approach to appetite
control studies are embedded within the functional food R&D of large
consumer food companies such as Danone and Kraft Foods. Companies have
produced a booklet developed from satiety cascade methodology, which
provides educational background on the value of controlling appetite as a
public health strategy [D]. The satiety cascade forms the major
principle underlying a pan-European project called SATIN. This project
involves nine industrial partners (five SMEs) who have applied the satiety
cascade and used Leeds' experimental methodologies for innovative
functional food product development for appetite control (http://www.satin-satiety.eu/workpackage-4)
[E]. The project has identified six candidate products that the
partners are taking through to further development.
Commercial development and growth
In 2004 the Covance Clinical Research Centre, established its Human
Appetite Laboratory (HAL) for the measurement of food behaviour and the
use of instruments for the quantitative assessment of hunger and
motivation to eat [F]. The working practices and procedures of
this facility are based on the satiety assessment methodologies developed
by the Leeds research team, specifically the work by Blundell in
collaboration with Covance to adapt the methodologies into standard
procedures for clinical evaluations of appetite control [G]. The
HAL studies for US and EU companies represent Proof of Concept (POC) and
First in Man (FIM) - the results of which determine whether the drug
proceeds to Phases 2 and 3 [G].
Sources to corroborate the impact
[A] Guidance Document. Scientific requirements for satiety health
claims on food. (2012). Food Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch,
Health Canada (pp. 3,5,6,10,11,13,14). Corroboration for the impact of Blundell's
work on this document can be obtained from a Scientific Evaluator at
Health Canada.
[B] Evidence of Blundell's participation as a consultant
for the EFSA DNA (Diet Nutrition and Allergies) Panel 2008 onwards
(26.5.2011).
[C] Corroboration on the application of Leeds methodologies by
Merck for the evaluation of novel drugs (MC4 R agonist and CB1R Inverse
agonist) for the treatment of obesity:
Krishna, R., ... Blundell, J.E., Bray, G.A., Fujioka, K.,
Heymsfield, S.B., Wagner, J.A., & Herman, G.A. (2009). Potent and
Selective Agonism of the Melanocortin Receptor 4 With MK-0493 Does Not
Induce Weight Loss in Obese Human Subjects: Energy Intake Predicts Lack of
Weight Loss Efficacy. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 86(6),
659-666. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.167
Addy, C., ... Blundell, J.E. Hargreaves, R.J., Wagner, J.,
Gottesdiener, K., Amatruda, J.M., & Heymsfield, S.B. (2008). The
Acyclic CB1R Inverse Agonist Taranabant Mediates Weight Loss by Increasing
Energy Expenditure and Decreasing Caloric Intake. Cell Metabolism, 7,
68-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.11.012
[D] Kraft Foods Europe document (brochure, 2010) uses Satiety
Cascade methodology. Further corroboration for the impact of Blundell's
work on this document and its implications for scientific assessment of
satiety potential of foods can be obtained from the Nutrition Research
Manager at Kraft Foods.
[E] The Satiety Cascade is the formative principle in this
pan-European project (2012-16) under the call KBBE.2011.2.3-04: Satiety
Control through Food Structures made by Novel Processing: The SATIN
(SATiety INnovation) Project (http://www.satin-satiety.eu).
Impact on industrial enterprise (http://www.satin-satiety.eu/workpackage-4)
can be obtained from the SATIN coordinating and dissemination partner.
[F] Methodology used in establishment of the HAL by Covance
Clinical Research Centre for the assessment of anti-obesity drugs in
clinical development. At least four compounds have been evaluated using
the methodology.
[G] Corroboration for the impact of Blundell's research on
work conducted at the HAL and impact on commercial development and growth
can be obtained from the Scientific Director of Covance.