Log in
Bangor University staff (Neal & Wilkinson) are core members of a collaboration whose research since 2003 has had significant policy relevance and impact in the field of primary care oncology. Impact has been made in three areas:
Colorectal cancer is a common disease, which frequently causes death or morbidity, either because of failure to control the primary tumour or failure to prevent distant metastases. Leeds researchers have devised new treatment approaches using chemotherapy and radiotherapy and tested them in large randomised controlled trials which have led to major changes in clinical practice in the management of rectal cancer and advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC), driving clinical decision-making and improving outcomes for patients. This includes better-evidenced treatment for elderly patients and patient stratification on the basis of molecular biomarkers.
Thousands of people across the world with a genetic predisposition (HNPCC) to bowel cancer, together with the population at large, have benefited from research on aspirin and dietary fibre undertaken at the University of Bristol since 1993. Clinical trials involving the Bristol group show that the incidence of bowel cancer has fallen in HNPCC patients who take aspirin. Moreover, aspirin use after diagnosis of bowel cancer has reduced colorectal cancer mortality. Furthermore, a high fibre diet also lowers the risk of bowel cancer. These studies led to national public health initiatives (such as the `five-a-day' campaign) that have been instrumental in increasing public awareness of the importance of aspirin and dietary fibre in reducing the risk of bowel cancer, and in establishing international guidelines on dietary advice.
There are currently 2 million cancer survivors in the UK. This is predicted to become 6 million by 2050 — by which time more than 50% of the UK population are expected to have experienced a cancer diagnosis. Our research and expertise have been central to the creation of the Department of Health's National Cancer Survivorship Initiative (NCSI), and framing policy more widely to respond to this challenge. It has provided evidence of the wide-ranging impact of the disease following cancer treatment, and has led to new models of cancer aftercare being implemented across the UK and internationally. Our research has linked directly to policy and practice through Professor Jessica Corner's membership of the NCSI Steering Group, as co-chair of the Department of Health's Cancer Patient Experience Advisory Group, and through our partnership with Macmillan Cancer Support.
Researchers at the University of Leeds have designed and developed new approaches and technologies for cancer patients to self-assess their symptoms and quality of life. The work focused on electronic methods for collecting patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), developing PROMs for neglected areas of patient care, and running trials of these techniques. These approaches produced sizeable patient benefits including improved symptom control and better quality-of-life. These findings have influenced clinical guidelines in the UK and Canada, NHS policy and the endorsement of PROMs in the Health and Social Care Act (2012). Electronic PROMs systems based on the Leeds research have been implemented locally, nationally and internationally, making measurable improvements to patient welfare and health, such as a reported significant increase in completion of chemotherapy treatment.
UCL has conducted a series of national lung cancer trials, which have led to wide-scale changes in clinical practice. Two trials compared different platinum based therapies, which led to centres switching from using chemotherapy with cisplatin to carboplatin-based chemotherapy instead. Carboplatin can be given as an outpatient, and has fewer side effects, and has been (and still is) recommended as an alternative to cisplatin in the UK and US.
Research in Leeds showed, conclusively for the first time, improved outcomes for cancer patients managed in multidisciplinary specialised cancer care teams. Our research and systemic overview provided the evidence for a new government policy to reconfigure cancer care services into Cancer Networks, Centres and Units. This required radical evidence-based changes including centralisation of many cancer surgical services. A rigorous implementation plan based on research evidence, was initiated under Leeds leadership and sustained in subsequent government policies. It changed clinical guidelines and professional standards, altered practice for all UK cancer patients and contributed to improved cancer survival.
University of Glasgow research has led to the adoption of first-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer, which has improved patient survival by 11% and has been used to treat 66% of women with ovarian cancer since January 2011 in the West of Scotland Cancer Care Network alone. These therapies are recommended by guidelines for ovarian cancer treatment in the USA, Europe and the UK. The USA guidelines are disseminated to 4.3 million people worldwide and the European guidelines reach 15,000 health professionals. The UK guidelines are used to identify those drugs that are funded by the NHS and used in NHS hospitals.
The core target in the government's national strategy for cancer control in England is to `save 5,000 lives a year by 2015'. This target was taken directly from research done by LSHTM showing that 10,000 cancer-related deaths per annum would be avoidable if five-year relative survival were as high as the highest levels observed in Europe. Current government strategy is entirely focused around `halving the gap' in avoidable premature cancer deaths identified in this research, which also forms the basis for England's National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative.
Impact: Improved depression care for people with cancer.
Significance: Assessment of emotional distress and evidence-based intervention to manage depression has a direct effect on quality of life of cancer patients. It may also reduce suicide attempts among them.
Beneficiaries: Cancer patients, NHS and healthcare delivery organisations.
Attribution: The work was led by Sharpe (UoE), with UoE Cancer Research Centre colleagues and collaborators in Manchester and London.
Reach: International; this work directly affected NHS practices and clinical guidelines in Europe and North America. It also stimulated international debate and new research into psychological aspects of living with cancer.