Log in
This programme of research has, through producing national guidance and improving understanding of professional behaviour, enabled delivery of evidence based practice by dental practitioners in primary care. Its impacts include:
The use of fluoride in preventive dentistry was previously fraught with controversy despite numerous primary studies. A series of Cochrane systematic reviews by Queen Mary's Marinho et al greatly reduced uncertainty in this field and has been used extensively in the UK (eg Department of Health, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) and internationally (eg World Health Organization) since 2002 as strong evidence to support clinical and public health decisions on preventive use of fluorides. The research provided a knowledge framework that enabled decision-makers worldwide to significantly reduce variations in practice and policy, and also reduce burden of dental caries (tooth decay). The research has prompted new, more relevant trials and important advances in systematic review methodology (new statistical approaches for meta-analysis).
Anxiety before dental procedures is common in children, and is usually managed by conscious sedation of the patient. Previously, nitrous oxide inhalation was the only method widely used in primary care, so patients who could not be thus sedated were referred for general anaesthesia. In 2010, NICE published the first national guideline on medical sedation, which states that administration of midazolam should be considered alongside the standard technique of nitrous oxide inhalation for sedation of children. That recommendation is based on robust evidence, the majority of which came from a series of randomised controlled clinical trials carried out by researchers at Newcastle University. Midazolam is now deployed as a second-line sedation option across the UK.
Life-threatening bacterial endocarditis occurs on previously damaged cardiac valves. Established dental practice has been to administer antibiotics to patients who are at risk. This practice has been linked with increased antibiotic resistance, which represents one of the greatest threats to public health.
Researchers at the University of Manchester (UoM) evaluated the evidence for this practice by undertaking a high quality systematic review (initially published 2004). The review has informed multiple international guidelines. Publication of the NICE guideline led to a fall in the unnecessary prescription of antibiotics from 10,727 to 2,292 per month, an approximate annual saving of £174,580.
Research carried out at Newcastle University in the mid-1990s showed that the dental health profile of older people was changing rapidly: the number of people with no natural teeth was falling and a cohort of people with complex restoration needs had emerged as an important patient group. Those trends were confirmed by analysis of the 1998 Adult Dental Health Survey data, with further changes shown in children in 2003. It became clear to policymakers that substantial reform of NHS dental services in England would be required if the projected future needs of the population were to be met. The 2009 Steele review of NHS dentistry analysed the problems with the existing dental contract, from which a set of recommendations for public policy reform were put forward, which have now been adopted into a prototype NHS dental contract which is currently being piloted.
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare but life-threatening disorder that may arise as a consequence of bacteraemia following invasive procedures such as those of dentistry. Research at the UCL Eastman Dental Institute has detailed the dental causes, prevalence and character of bacteraemia following dental procedures and demonstrated that everyday oral health activities are more likely to be a cause of bacteraemia than invasive dentistry. The research outcomes informed 2008 NICE guidelines that recommended that antibiotic prophylaxis solely to prevent IE should not be given to people at risk of IE undergoing dental and non-dental procedures. This has since caused a 78.6% fall in related antibiotic prescribing, a cost-saving of approximately £4m to the NHS in England and will reduce the threats of fatal anaphylaxis and antibiotic resistance.
"One in 10 adults in Wales has no natural teeth" (BBC News), "Cost puts off some going to the dentist" (BBC News) and "Overall improvement masks dental health concerns", (British Dental Association, Press Release). These are examples of the sensational headlines which accompanied the publication of the findings of the 2009 Adult Dental Health Survey (ADHS). Researchers at Birmingham's Dental School were key members of the research consortium that carried out both the ADHS as well as the 2003 Child Dental Health Survey (CDHS). The findings from these surveys demonstrated an overall improvement in the nation's oral health but also highlighted areas of inequality. The Government regards these surveys as being of vital importance in providing gold-standard information about the nation's oral health and uses the findings to inform oral health policy in the areas of workforce planning, the provision of, and access to, dental services. The impact of these internationally-leading studies is reflected in Government policy documents and in public debates about the future provision of dentistry.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 60% to 90% of school children are affected by tooth decay in industrialised countries 1,2. At low levels, fluoride can reduce tooth decay, but high levels can damage developing tooth enamel in young children. Our research has informed the revised WHO guidelines for monitoring community tooth decay prevention programmes and the UK National Fluoridated Milk Advisory Group's recommendation to increase the amount of fluoride added to school milk. The WHO guidelines are accepted and implemented internationally representing a substantial spread of influence. The recommendation to increase the amount of fluoride in school milk UK-wide is significant, as it will further control and reduce dental caries, especially in deprived areas with non-fluoridated water supply. In addition, we have established better measures of babies' and children's actual and ideal fluoride intake, including better techniques to determine the fluoride content of foods, a protocol for monitoring fluoride intake through urinary excretion, and experimentally-based models to monitor community preventive programmes.
The IOE's Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating (EPPI) Centre has helped UK and overseas governments to make better-informed decisions on education, public health and health education, social welfare and international development, through the use of systematic reviews. The internationally-respected research team has done this by developing and improving methods and tools that produce a broader range of high quality, reliable studies better able to answer policy-makers' questions. EPPI trains civil servants to formulate effective research questions, supports NICE and WHO in ensuring the validity of their guidelines, and works with governments across the EU to build capacity in evidence-informed policy and practice in education.