Log in
Research within the Northern Ireland Barrett's oesophagus Register demonstrated that cancer risk in this disease was substantially lower than previously thought. It identified clinico-pathological characteristics and potential biomarkers that allow Barrett's patients to be stratified into those with higher and lower cancer risk. This research has influenced recommendations from Gastroenterological Associations in the UK and USA and resulted in altered clinical practice nationally and internationally, in which costly routine endoscopic surveillance is now targeted to Barrett's oesophagus patients with the highest cancer risk.
Improvements in therapy have increased the 5-year survival rate for a number of cancers, leading to a new focus on promoting the health and wellbeing of cancer survivors. In the UK alone, over 500,000 people have physical or psychological consequences associated with cancer or its treatment.
Research at the University of Surrey has led to the development of self-management interventions for cancer survivors, demonstrating that active patient involvement leads to significant health and wellbeing benefits. These studies have driven national and international practice policy in the management of the consequences of cancer and its treatment.
There are currently 2 million cancer survivors in the UK. This is predicted to become 6 million by 2050 — by which time more than 50% of the UK population are expected to have experienced a cancer diagnosis. Our research and expertise have been central to the creation of the Department of Health's National Cancer Survivorship Initiative (NCSI), and framing policy more widely to respond to this challenge. It has provided evidence of the wide-ranging impact of the disease following cancer treatment, and has led to new models of cancer aftercare being implemented across the UK and internationally. Our research has linked directly to policy and practice through Professor Jessica Corner's membership of the NCSI Steering Group, as co-chair of the Department of Health's Cancer Patient Experience Advisory Group, and through our partnership with Macmillan Cancer Support.
Thousands of people across the world with a genetic predisposition (HNPCC) to bowel cancer, together with the population at large, have benefited from research on aspirin and dietary fibre undertaken at the University of Bristol since 1993. Clinical trials involving the Bristol group show that the incidence of bowel cancer has fallen in HNPCC patients who take aspirin. Moreover, aspirin use after diagnosis of bowel cancer has reduced colorectal cancer mortality. Furthermore, a high fibre diet also lowers the risk of bowel cancer. These studies led to national public health initiatives (such as the `five-a-day' campaign) that have been instrumental in increasing public awareness of the importance of aspirin and dietary fibre in reducing the risk of bowel cancer, and in establishing international guidelines on dietary advice.
Research in Leeds showed, conclusively for the first time, improved outcomes for cancer patients managed in multidisciplinary specialised cancer care teams. Our research and systemic overview provided the evidence for a new government policy to reconfigure cancer care services into Cancer Networks, Centres and Units. This required radical evidence-based changes including centralisation of many cancer surgical services. A rigorous implementation plan based on research evidence, was initiated under Leeds leadership and sustained in subsequent government policies. It changed clinical guidelines and professional standards, altered practice for all UK cancer patients and contributed to improved cancer survival.
Researchers at the University of Leeds have designed and developed new approaches and technologies for cancer patients to self-assess their symptoms and quality of life. The work focused on electronic methods for collecting patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), developing PROMs for neglected areas of patient care, and running trials of these techniques. These approaches produced sizeable patient benefits including improved symptom control and better quality-of-life. These findings have influenced clinical guidelines in the UK and Canada, NHS policy and the endorsement of PROMs in the Health and Social Care Act (2012). Electronic PROMs systems based on the Leeds research have been implemented locally, nationally and internationally, making measurable improvements to patient welfare and health, such as a reported significant increase in completion of chemotherapy treatment.
Impact: Improved depression care for people with cancer.
Significance: Assessment of emotional distress and evidence-based intervention to manage depression has a direct effect on quality of life of cancer patients. It may also reduce suicide attempts among them.
Beneficiaries: Cancer patients, NHS and healthcare delivery organisations.
Attribution: The work was led by Sharpe (UoE), with UoE Cancer Research Centre colleagues and collaborators in Manchester and London.
Reach: International; this work directly affected NHS practices and clinical guidelines in Europe and North America. It also stimulated international debate and new research into psychological aspects of living with cancer.
The core target in the government's national strategy for cancer control in England is to `save 5,000 lives a year by 2015'. This target was taken directly from research done by LSHTM showing that 10,000 cancer-related deaths per annum would be avoidable if five-year relative survival were as high as the highest levels observed in Europe. Current government strategy is entirely focused around `halving the gap' in avoidable premature cancer deaths identified in this research, which also forms the basis for England's National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative.
ProtecT (Neal, Cambridge; Donovan, Bristol; Hamdy, Oxford), funded by NIHR in 1999, is the largest randomised controlled trial in localised prostate cancer; and compares a deferred conservative approach (Active Monitoring — developed by the Trial PIs) with surgery and radiotherapy. Avoiding "over-treatment" in low risk cancer is important and Active Monitoring (AM) and Surveillance (AS) have now had a major impact on patients and on national health policy through NICE guidance, which recommends such management approaches. The linked bio-repository was critical to characterising the genetic pre-disposition alleles (SNPs) in prostate cancer, which are now being used to identify high risk populations.
Research by our group at the University of Manchester has impacted directly on policy addressing inequities in access to treatment for older women with breast cancer, affecting treatment for 10,060 older breast cancer sufferers in England each year. Our research has led to improvements in pre-operative nutrition and screening for malnutrition for nearly 100,000 patients in Greater Manchester. We have contributed directly to international guidelines on post-treatment follow up for breast cancer and management of cough in lung cancer. We have also contributed to development of national vocational rehabilitation, employer support and benefits advisors for cancer survivors, affecting 700,000 survivors across the UK. Our work has led to implementation of family carer support needs assessment in UK hospice services, to date supporting some 4,500 carers per year with wider roll out imminent.