Log in
Newcastle research into practical methods to reduce alcohol-related risk and harm has underpinned national policy, including the Government's Alcohol Strategy and a National Audit Office report. This has shaped public health practice concerning alcohol across England. A UK-specific screening and brief intervention (SBI) programme was developed by Newcastle University for use by GPs and nurses in primary care. This programme, which was designed to reduce alcohol-related problems, has been widely recommended and adopted. An evidence review commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) found that the use of SBI reduces alcohol consumption, mortality, morbidity and alcohol-related injuries. Department of Health figures show that SBI provides an estimated annual healthcare saving of around £100 million.
Empirical evidence generated by UEL research has directly influenced the reform of health financing in two Indian states with total populations of 154 million through changes to provider behaviour, the organisation and use of funds, and treatment verification processes and package rates. The impacts of this work have been commended by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) and the World Bank, and attracted interest from states with similar healthcare schemes. More widely, it has helped policymakers in India and the UK recognise the importance of including high quality comprehensive primary care in India's strategic planning for universal health care, and the benefits to the UK in prioritising primary care collaboration with India.
The Sheffield Alcohol Policy Model (SAPM) has made a major contribution to national and international debate on public policy and services focusing on reducing alcohol misuse in society.
SAPM provides the core evidence underpinning Scottish Government plans to implement minimum unit pricing (MUP) and is cited in the UK Prime Minister's foreword to the 2012 UK Alcohol Strategy. Findings have influenced health policy debate in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, Spain, Switzerland, and the European Commission.
SAPM estimates for the cost-effectiveness of brief intervention programmes in primary care underpin the National Institute for Health & Clinical Excellence guidance on this topic.
Health inequalities are recognised as a critical UK policy issue with life expectancy gaps of up to 28 years between the least and most deprived areas. This case-study demonstrates how Durham University research has led to: (a) changing health service commissioning (with County Durham and Darlington Primary Care Trust [PCT]): (b) influencing NHS funding policy (by generating Parliamentary debate); as well as (c) contributing to the development of the new public health system in England and Wales (as part of the Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England post-2010 [Marmot Review]).
Research by the University of Southampton into maternal and child health in the developing world has contributed significantly to the design of better health policies by governments, international agencies, and non-governmental organisations. The research broke new ground in identifying the urban poor in developing countries as among the groups most at risk of poor maternal and child health. Its findings have informed policy and funding priorities at national and international organisations including the Department for International Development (DFID) and the United Nations; influenced health practitioners in Africa and Asia; and led to better health care outcomes in countries which were the focus of the research.
The ECuity Project was a European Union (EU) funded research network that provided rigorous quantitative evidence on the extent of socioeconomic inequalities in health and health care across countries and over time. The Project pioneered a set of measurement tools to help understand what drives international differences and trends in health inequality. The methods developed within the Project have had a direct impact on the way in which international organisations, such as the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), World Bank (WB) and World Health Organisation (WHO), define and measure health inequality and inequity. The Project provided international agencies and governments with tools to develop and target policies to address inequity and the evidence generated by the Project has extended their understanding of the issue in developed and developing countries, informing and shaping their policy advice.
The Department's impact on health and care has two strands that are mutually enriching: creative interventions in health and social care designed to benefit NHS service users and therapeutic client groups, and the application of innovative arts methodologies to health settings. The research impacts on health professionals, `user' groups and charities by:
This case study details an impact relating to health and welfare in which educational practices regarding the dissemination of responsible drinking messages has been influenced, and on public policy and services where this evidence has stimulated policy debate. Specifically, research led to (i) the withdrawal of the Drinkaware Trust's 5-year flagship campaign, Why let the good times go bad? (WLGTGB), and (ii) a recommendation from an independent review to a) involve academics in future campaign development and evaluation, and b) implement changes to the current campaign based on our findings.
The Department of Health seeks to distribute the NHS budget to local commissioning organisations to achieve equal access for equal need and reduce health inequalities. The formula upon which it bases this distribution must be evidence-based, robust and up-to-date. We summarise four pieces of applied econometric research undertaken at the University of Manchester (UoM) and commissioned by the Department of Health that have developed the methodology for setting budgets fairly and determined the content of the formula in use in England from 2008-date. Adoption of the findings of this research by government has led to a substantial redistribution of NHS funding between areas.
This case study highlights a body of research around health Research Priority Setting (RPS) that assists policy makers in effectively targeting research that has the greatest potential health benefit. Empirical research on RPS led to organizational changes, and new policies within the Cochrane Collaboration along with new training resources and new RPS exercises. A research gap on inequalities in the risk of oral cancer in the English South Asian population led to an evidence synthesis exercise being carried out by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the formulation of a new public health guideline.