Log in
Unique research at the University of Manchester highlights the shortcomings of public accountability and the high cost, to the public purse, of PPPs and the Private Finance Initiative (PFI) using critical financial analysis. Lead researchers have been invited to engage in dialogue with national audit regulators, give evidence to parliamentary committees and contribute to policy debate through international roundtables. The work has been used to challenge government policy and has significantly influenced the national and international public debate about the costs, affordability and value for money of PPPs. The UK government has now renegotiated existing PFI projects to achieve cost savings, and we have given evidence by invitation to international committees concerned with public accountability and policy development.
University of Glasgow research, undertaken in collaboration with the Universities of Exeter and Oxford, directly influenced the Government decision to create the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). The Conservative Party cited the research as part of the rationale for the creation of such a fiscal body in its policy paper in 2008; the research was subsequently presented to the Strategy Unit of the Cabinet Office, No.'s 10 and 11 Downing Street and the Institute of Government throughout 2008 and 2009. The proposal was implemented by the coalition government in 2010, with the research team then using the findings to advise a Treasury Select Committee as well as the Bank of England on the appropriate remit, expectations and functions of the newly-created OBR.
Sheila Ellwood (at Bristol from 2006) examined how managerial freedoms created through the trend to decentralise public service organisations need to be tempered through `better' accounting. Her research has led to her appointment as a non executive director (2000-2005) and a Treasury Panel member (2009-11). The research impacts on both national policy and local financial management. Her impact is seen in the financial reporting policy in local public bodies; the policy on auditing local public bodies and in the costing/ pricing of healthcare. Her work has been used in UK parliamentary committees and incorporated into government accounting manuals. International recognition includes dissemination of her work by the Chinese Treasury.
This case study focuses on the impact of research studies and their influence on International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) carried out by Manchester Business School (MBS). International accounting harmonisation is currently the most topical issue debated in the accountancy world. These studies have attracted the attention of practitioners, e.g. Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA), and policy makers, e.g. the UK Accounting Standards Board (ASB). The research has informed the policy debate of whether IFRS should be mandated further, and been taken up in the negotiating position of several key bodies. It has been used to justify the continued application of IFRS among UK quoted companies.
University of Glasgow research into public sector governance has influenced planning and investment in major transport and infrastructure projects. Transport Scotland's Strategic Transport Projects Review was the first nationwide, multi-modal, evidence based review of Scotland's transport system; as a member of the Board, Professor Iain Docherty contributed to its recommendations, adopted by the Scottish Government in December 2008. His research also shaped the Commission for Integrated Transport's negotiations with the Westminster Government on the White Paper which underpinned the Planning Bill 2008 and subsequent Planning Act 2009; informed the Cabinet Office's 2009 Urban Transport strategy and recommendations; and influenced 2012 investment planning discussions by Edinburgh City Council.
In the wake of the Enron Scandal in 2002, the global landscape of auditing practices radically changed, significantly transforming the UK regulatory system. University of Glasgow research into the high-level financial reporting interactions between UK companies and external auditors has influenced public debate in the House of Lords and prompted several recommendations of the Select Committee on Economic Affairs. It has also contributed to an ongoing Competition Commission investigation into the market concentration of audit companies, and shaped the working practices at Deloitte, one of the Big Four international audit firms, influencing the industry at a global level.
A body of research carried out at Sheffield Hallam University has led to significant changes in the accounting requirements for charities in England and Wales. Two sets of impact are presented: (A) simplified audit requirements for smaller charities from 2008/09 through enhancement of an alternative regime of `independent examination' (IE), and (B) Government acceptance in 2012/13 of the case for further simplifications in charity regulation. Over the period 2009-13 at least £15 million of charity resources has been released from mandatory audits for charities to spend on work with beneficiaries. Further benefits to the sector will follow from the latest developments.
Research conducted by John Turnpenny shaped the recommendations of the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee (EAC). In 2010, the EAC addressed the need to embed sustainable development across government policy-making. This followed the closure of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (RCEP) and the end of funding for the Sustainable Development Commission (SDC). The EAC determined to change how it engaged with experts, while reaffirming and expanding its role in the overall scrutiny of government sustainability policy. Turnpenny's findings formed the basis of two of the thirteen headline recommendations in the EAC's 2011 report Embedding Sustainable Development Across Government. In addition his suggestions helped influence significant changes in the way that the EAC operates, and contributed to its wider impact among other policy actors.
Impact: Improved awareness and development of professional practice related to the financial accounting of carbon, including: its addition to the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB) work programme and its designation by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) as a priority research project (both during 2012).
Significance and reach: The CDSB is a consortium of eight business/environmental organisations (including the World Economic Forum and the World Resources Institute). The IASB is the independent standard-setting body of the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation.
Underpinned by: Research into corporate carbon accounting practices, undertaken at the University of Edinburgh (2008 onwards).
The findings of Prof. Warwick Funnell and Prof. Robert Jupe have stimulated international policy debates on government accountability and the provision of public services. By challenging conventional free market wisdom, their analysis of the limits to effective privatisation have been used by stakeholders concerned by the direction of public sector reform, including government representatives, professionals and political pressure groups. They achieved this through accessible publications and close partnerships with these stakeholders that provide a platform for associated discussion events, seminars and media commentary.